&w=3840&q=100)
Lok Sabha sees Question Hour proceed smoothly after 6 days of disruption
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Lok Sabha on Tuesday witnessed smooth functioning of the Question Hour for the first time since the beginning of the Monsoon session on July 21.
The House has been witnessing repeated disruptions over the Opposition's demand for a debate on electoral roll revision in Bihar and Operation Sindoor. While the debate on Operation Sindoor commenced in the House on Monday, the Opposition disrupted the first half of the day demanding an assurance from the government that a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar will be held after that.
Speaker Om Birla has been insisting that members should participate in the Question Hour as issues related to key ministries are taken up and the government is held accountable.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
House adjourned for 10 mins amid protests over coal-handling cess
Speaker Ramesh Tawadkar adjourned the House for 10 minutes on Friday after opposition MLAs rushed to the well in protest of state govt's failure to collect green cess on coal-handling from Jindal and Adani. The legislators vehemently declared that they did not want coal in Goa. Opposition leader Yuri Alemao alleged that the two companies handled double the amount of coal than the permissible limit, and that govt had failed to recover around Rs 4,000 crore from them. He also said that coal imports increased after the cessation of ore mining in 2012, and that even though everyone objected to coal-handling at the Mormugao port during subsequent public hearings, the activity was still recommended for environmental clearance (EC). Alemao further said that the Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB) had reduced coal-handling at the port by 25% based on a letter by former chief minister Manohar Parrikar, but it was reversed following Parrikar's death. He told the House that the environment department had written a letter calling for a decrease in coal-handling at the Mormugao port and that this letter was put in the public domain at a public hearing. He asked whether the letter was ultimately sent to New Delhi to be included in the coastal zone management plan. While chief minster Pramod Sawant said it was, Alemao claimed it was never sent. 'My charge is that the EC was illegally granted as state govt hid the letter and did not send it to Centre,' the opposition leader said. Sawant responded that all the documents placed at the public hearing were sent to Delhi. Alemao also accused govt of allowing illegalities at the Mormugao port pertaining to coal-handling, but Sawant insisted that govt was not allowing any illegalities there and that coal was handled according to the limit. Environment minister Aleixo Sequeira said the import and export of coal are monitored by the GSPCB, and agreed with the figures pointed out by Alemao. Sequeira said that the GSPCB had not given any permission to increase coal-handling at Mormugao port as there is no bypass road for its transportation. He promised that in the next assembly session, he would provide the correct coal-handling figures. Alemao pointed out that Sawant claimed coal was handled as per the EC limit, but that the environment minister contradicted the chief minister. 'Jindal and Adani are handling double the amount of coal compared to the EC limit,' Alemao said. 'Jindal has not paid green cess since 2013, which amounts to Rs 3,000-4,000 crore, and it needs to be recovered. When will it be recovered?' Sawant replied that govt had recovered green cess on coal-handling. His response didn't sit well with the opposition, prompting them to rush to the well of the House.>
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Simply making false claims': BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra slams Rahul Gandhi over ECI vote theft claim
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Manan Kumar Mishra on Friday hit out at Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi , over his statement accusing the Election Commission of India (ECI) of vote theft , stating that if the Congress MP have such evidence, then he must submit it to the Supreme Court . Mishra further slammed Rahul Gandhi, stating that he is making false claims without any proof. "If he truly has any evidence, he should present the proof in the Supreme Court of India and the Election Commission. He should also present it to the public. As it stands, he is simply making false claims; he has no proof," Mishra told ANI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Earlier in the day, Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, criticised the ECI, accusing the poll body of being complicit in "vote theft" to benefit the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Gandhi claimed his party has "open-and-shut proof" of the alleged electoral malpractice , which he likened to an "atom bomb" that will expose the ECI's involvement when revealed. Live Events Talking to reporters on the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, the Congress said, "Votes are being stolen. We have open-and-shut proof that the Election Commission is involved in this vote theft. And I'm not saying this lightly, I'm speaking with 100% proof. And when we release it (proof), the entire country will come to know that the Election Commission is enabling vote theft. And who are they doing it for? They're doing it for the BJP." Gandhi said that the findings of an investigation by the Congress amount to nothing short of an "atom bomb," with implications severe enough to shake the very foundations of the ECI. "We had suspicion of voter theft, and we got into its granularity. Since the Election Commision was not helpful in the investigation, we did our own. It took six months, and the things we found are an 'Atom Bomb' and when this atom bomb explodes, you won't see the Election Commission in the country," he added. Gandhi warned that the findings are explosive and will have severe implications for the ECI, and warned ECI officials involved in the alleged malpractice that they will face consequences, even if they are retired. He described their actions as "no less than treason". "Most importantly, whoever in the Elections Commission is involved in this exercise, right from top to bottom, we will not spare you. You are working against India, and this is no less than treason. Wherever you are, even if you are retired, we will find you," said the Lok Sabha LoP. In response to the allegation, the Election Commission of India rejected the opposition claims of vote theft ahead of the Bihar elections , calling them baseless and irresponsible. The EC said its officials should continue working fairly and transparently, without being affected by daily threats or false statements. As per the statement from ECI, "Election Commission ignores such baseless allegations being made on a daily basis and despite threats being given daily, asks all election officials to ignore such irresponsible statements while working impartially and transparently."The Election Commission of India has also responded to Congress leader and Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, saying he ignored official messages sent on June 12 and never raised any concerns through proper channels. Terming his recent accusations and threats as "wild" and "deplorable. "As per the statement of ECI, "1. ECI sends a mail to him on 12 June 2025. He does not come. 2. ECI sends him a letter on 12 June 2025, but he does not respond. 3. He has never sent any letter to ECI on any issue, whatsoever 4. It is very strange that he is making wild allegations and has now even started threatening EC and its staff. Deplorable ! 5. ECI ignores all such irresponsible statements and asks all its staff to continue working impartially and transparently."
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Bihar SIR: Key takeaways from draft electoral roll after ECI's revision
New Delhi : The Election Commission of India (ECI) released the draft electoral roll for Bihar after its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) on Friday. The draft electoral roll, according to HT's calculations on data sourced from ECI, has 72.4 million electors. This number is the same as what was released by ECI on July 27 (no detailed break-up was given then) and 4.9 million or 6.3% less than the number of electors in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the latest period for which we have elector count for the state. A painter paints a wall to create awareness among voters ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections 2025 at the state election department premises, in Patna on Friday.(ANI) To be sure, an ECI press release issued on Friday says that there can still be additions and deletions to this draft roll and the final count before the assembly elections could vary. Moreover, ECI's own status report on the exercise published on August 1 made these comparisons with respect to the draft roll published on June 24, when there were 78.9 million electors in the state. However, since this number was not disaggregated beyond district level, HT has used the 2024 Lok Sabha numbers for the analysis of the numbers released on Friday to do an assembly constituency (AC) level analysis. Here is what the numbers suggest. There is a wide variation in AC-wise change in number of electors Bihar has 243 ACs across 38 districts. The AC with the highest deletion between the 2024 elector count and the SIR draft roll is Gopalganj which has seen 62,269 or 18% of its electors deleted. The AC with the lowest deletion is Dhaka in Purvi Champaran district, which has seen just 2,083 or 0.63% of its electors deleted. At the district-level, Gopalganj has seen the highest deletion while Sheikhpura has seen the lowest deletion in percentage terms. In absolute terms, it is Patna and Sheikhpura which have seen the highest and lowest number of deletions. Absolute changes in the number of electors is misleading because it can be higher for a district with more electors. Patna district has the highest number of electors in the state. To be sure, a lot of districts show a large variation in change in voter count across ACs. (See map) If one were to classify Bihar's 243 ACs into 203 General, 38 Scheduled Caste (SC) reserved and two Scheduled Tribe (ST) reserve ACs, the aggregate deletion in these groups is 6.4%, 5.9% and 5%. Is the change in voter count a result of deletion of migrant voters? Bihar SIR(HT ) The ECI press release attributes 2.2 million deletions to deaths, 3.6 million deletions to permanently shifted/absent and another 0.7 million voters to already enrolled (elsewhere). One proxy which can be used to answer whether migration out of the state is the largest driver of change in elector counts across ACs is to check for a correlation between 2024 voter turnout and deletion in number of voters at the AC level. This is based on the premise that ACs with a larger share of migrant but absentee voters would have had lower turnouts in the past. A basic correlation check does not support this theory as the correlation between share of voters deleted and AC-wise turnout is very weak. Chart 1(HT) (See Chart 1) Are deletions a function of alliance-wise performance in 2020 elections? One of the theories doing the rounds has been that the SIR could lead to large scale deletion of Opposition voters in the state. A comparison of AC-wise deletions with alliance-wise victories in 2020 elections shows that this is unlikely to be true. The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) won 125 out of the 243 ACs in the state. The total voter deletion in these ACs is 6.4% which is somewhat more than the overall deletion of 6.1% in the 115 ACs won by the Mahagathbandhan (MGB) in 2020. One could use the 2024 results for this analysis too but the MGB or INDIA alliance won only 68 ACs in 2024. The NDA had also won a larger number of ACs in the ACs with the top 25% and top 50% of deletions, while the MGB had won a greater share of ACs in the ACs with the bottom 50% of deletions between 2024 and the SIR draft roll. To be sure, these comparisons should be read with caution, because it is impossible to connect the voters who have been deleted from the rolls to which party they would have voted for, if they voted at all (more on this later). Chart 2(HT) (See Chart 2) What about deletions in Muslim dominated ACs? This is a more difficult question to answer because electoral rolls do not mention religion of voters and we do not even have religious break-ups of electors at the AC level. If one were to rank district-wise Muslim population from the 2011 census, then Kishanganj, which has the highest share of Muslim population in Bihar has seen the second highest deletion of voters between 2024 and the SIR draft roll. However, other districts with a large share of Muslim population do not figure in the list of districts with highest deletions. For example, Katihar and Araria, which have the second and third highest share of Muslims, have the sixth and tenth lowest deletions as a share of their respective 2024 Lok Sabha elector count. Chart 3A(HT) Another way to check whether deletions are higher in Muslim dominated ACs is to check the deletion in ACs which either had a Muslim winner or runner-up candidate. Of the 19 ACs won by Muslim candidates in 2020 assembly elections, 7 figure in the top 25% districts with voter deletions while 4 figure in the bottom 25% by number of deletions. The break-up is 11 and 8 in the top and bottom 50% by share of voters deleted. For 22 ACs where Muslim candidates were runners-up (and a Muslim did not win), the average share of voters deleted is 6.3% and varies from 13.6% to 0.63%. Chart 3B(HT) (See Chart 3A and 3B) Have seats with close contests seen more deletions? One could argue that these are the ACs which could be most sensitive to changes in electoral rolls. Once again, there is no correlation between victory margin in 2020 and the share of voters deleted between 2024 and SIR draft roll. Chart 4(HT) (See Chart 4) Theoretically, the SIR could have no impact on actual polling in Bihar This is an extremely counter-intuitive but eminently plausible scenario. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, voter turnout across ACs in Bihar ranged from 38.1% to 68.7%. In all of these ACs, the electors in the draft SIR roll are more than the number of people who cast their vote in 2024. If, and we do not know this for sure, the only voters who have been deleted are either deceased or not present in the state (and therefore did not vote in the last election) then one could very well have a situation where the absolute voter turnout is still close or even higher than the 2024 number and what we get is an increase in voter turnout; this number will be have to increase from 56% in 2024 (Bihar had the lowest voter turnout among all states and UTs in the country in the election) to 59.8% in 2025 for the absolute voter count to remain the same.
