Sean 'Diddy' Combs seeks release on $50-million bond ahead of sentencing
The motion follows a split verdict in his sex crimes trial: Combs was found not guilty on the most serious charges (sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy) but was convicted of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution under the Mann Act.
In the filing, defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo argues that Combs has endured an unusually harsh detention since his arrest in September 2024, claiming Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn has dangerous conditions, including lockdowns, violence and fights within his housing unit.
He says that defendants convicted of similar offences are normally released before sentencing, and emphasises that Combs did not profit financially from the acts in question. "Sean Combs should not be in jail for this conduct," Agnifilo wrote. "In fact, he may be the only person currently in a United States jail for being any sort of john."
Previously, US District Judge Arun Subramanian denied bail immediately after the verdict, citing trial evidence of Combs's violent behaviour toward former partners and concerns about public safety and witness tampering.
Combs is 55 years old and the founder of Bad Boy Records. Prosecutors alleged he coerced two former girlfriends into multi-day, drug-fuelled sexual performances involving male escorts, using threats and influence tied to his business empire. Combs has maintained the encounters were consensual.
The two convictions he received each carry a statutory maximum of ten years. Prosecutors say sentencing guidelines call for a term between 51 and 63 months, while the defence has proposed a sentence more in line with federal guidelines, about 21 to 27 months or time served.
Defence counsel propose exceptional circumstances for Combs's release, namely nearly ten months in MDC since late 2024 amid reported violence and unsanitary issues. They contend his safety is at risk and cite precedent where courts have withheld incarceration pending sentencing in similar cases. The Bureau of Prisons has acknowledged ongoing problems at MDC and said it is making intensive efforts to improve conditions.
Legal experts say Judge Subramanian will weigh these arguments against concerns over Combs's history of violence, possible risk of flight and respect for the judicial process, all of which were cited in earlier bail denials.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
State seems to be suggesting even people of means should apply for legal aid, barrister for Diarmuid Phelan tells court
The State appears to have suggested that even people of means should make legal aid applications, which a barrister for law professor Diarmuid Phelan has argued is 'entirely contrary' to the spirit of the scheme. A judge will give her ruling in September as to whether the State should pay the 'enormous' legal costs for Mr Phelan following a trial that ended last January. Mr Phelan was acquitted by a Central Criminal Court jury of murdering a trespasser on his farm. The costs issue was raised on Thursday evening, on the last day of the Trinity term, before Ms Justice Siobhan Lankford. Law lecturer Mr Phelan, who has assets valued in the millions, instructed two senior and two junior counsel at his trial and did not receive legal aid. He also called expert witnesses who gave evidence following the close of the prosecution case. READ MORE Mr Phelan (56) went on trial in October 2024 after he pleaded not guilty to murdering Keith 'Bono' Conlon (36), a father of four, at Hazelgrove Farm, Kiltalown Lane, Tallaght, Dublin 24 on February 24th, 2022. Mr Phelan is a barrister, law lecturer and farmer who owns Hazelgrove, formerly a golf course. Opening the application on Thursday evening, Sean Guerin SC, who was one of two senior counsel representing Mr Phelan at his trial, told Ms Justice Lankford that the starting point - and also expressly the most important consideration - in awarding costs was the verdict. Counsel submitted Mr Phelan was entitled to his costs and the onus was really on the prosecution to show why he shouldn't succeed in the application. Mr Guerin said one of the prosecution's submissions was that Mr Phelan had the option of applying for legal aid but had chosen not to do so. The barrister said the State appeared to be suggesting that even people of resources should make a legal aid application, which he suggested was a complete misunderstanding of what the scheme was. Opposing the application, John Byrne SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), argued there was no presumption in favour of costs and one cannot simply say they had been acquitted so were entitled to their costs. He said a more complex and nuanced inquiry was required by the trial judge. Ms Justice Lankford asked both parties to articulate their views if she decided to award Mr Phelan his costs but confined it to legal aid costs. She noted there was quite a wide discretion in case law, where 50 per cent of costs had been awarded to applicants. Mr Guerin told the judge there was no warrant for doing so as those weren't the costs his client had incurred. He said legal aid was not a guide or a measure as to what are the appropriate costs in a case. Mr Byrne said the discretion seemed to be very wide and awarding legal aid costs was not something the court couldn't do, provided it set out the basis for it. Ms Justice Lankford said she hoped to deliver the court's judgement in September.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs asks judge to throw out guilty verdicts or grant a new trial
'This conviction stands alone, but it shouldn't stand at all,' the Wednesday filing said. Combs's lawyers argue that his two felony convictions were a unique misapplication of the federal Mann Act, which bars interstate commerce related to prostitution. 'To our knowledge, Mr Combs is the only person ever convicted of violating the statute for conduct anything like this,' a Wednesday filing from Combs's legal team said. Combs, 55, was convicted in a New York federal court of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, for sexual encounters. While he was acquitted of more serious charges, he could still get up to a decade in prison at his sentencing, which is set for October 3. His lawyers argued that none of the elements normally used for Mann Act convictions, including profiting from sex work or coercion, were present here. 'It is undisputed that he had no commercial motive and that all involved were adults,' the filing said. 'The men chose to travel and engage in the activity voluntarily. The verdict confirms the women were not vulnerable or exploited or trafficked or sexually assaulted.' The lawyers said that Combs, 'at most, paid to engage in voyeurism as part of a 'swingers' lifestyle' and argued that 'does not constitute 'prostitution' under a properly limited definition of the statutory term'. Combs was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, charges that could have put one of hip-hop's celebrated figures in prison for life. The new motion asks Judge Arun Subramanian to vacate the jury's verdict, or to order a new trial whose evidence is limited to matters related to the Mann Act counts, because of 'severe spill over prejudice from reams of inflammatory evidence' related to the more serious counts. ADVERTISEMENT Prosecutors insisted during the eight-week trial that Combs had coerced, threatened and sometimes viciously forced two ex-girlfriends to have sex with male sex workers to satisfy his sexual urges. They cited multiple acts of violence he carried out against them as proof that they had no say. A day earlier, Combs's team asked the judge to free him on a 50 million dollar bond while he awaits sentencing in October after a jury found him not guilty of the most serious federal charges he faced earlier this month. His lawyer argued that conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn are dangerous, noting that others convicted of similar prostitution-related offences were typically released before sentencing. Subramanian previously denied a request that Combs be released on bail while he awaits sentencing, citing a now-infamous video of Combs beating a former girlfriend and photographs showing injuries to another ex-girlfriend. The judge has not yet ruled on either of this week's motions.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs asks judge to throw out guilty verdicts or grant a new trial
Sean Diddy Combs has asked a judge to throw out his guilty verdicts on prostitution-related counts or grant him a new trial, saying such convictions are without precedent. 'This conviction stands alone, but it shouldn't stand at all,' the Wednesday filing said. Sean 'Diddy' Combs (Elizabeth Williams via AP) Combs's lawyers argue that his two felony convictions were a unique misapplication of the federal Mann Act, which bars interstate commerce related to prostitution. 'To our knowledge, Mr Combs is the only person ever convicted of violating the statute for conduct anything like this,' a Wednesday filing from Combs's legal team said. Combs, 55, was convicted in a New York federal court of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, for sexual encounters. While he was acquitted of more serious charges, he could still get up to a decade in prison at his sentencing, which is set for October 3. His lawyers argued that none of the elements normally used for Mann Act convictions, including profiting from sex work or coercion, were present here. 'It is undisputed that he had no commercial motive and that all involved were adults,' the filing said. 'The men chose to travel and engage in the activity voluntarily. The verdict confirms the women were not vulnerable or exploited or trafficked or sexually assaulted.' Sean Diddy Combs (Ian West/PA) The lawyers said that Combs, 'at most, paid to engage in voyeurism as part of a 'swingers' lifestyle' and argued that 'does not constitute 'prostitution' under a properly limited definition of the statutory term'. Combs was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, charges that could have put one of hip-hop's celebrated figures in prison for life. The new motion asks Judge Arun Subramanian to vacate the jury's verdict, or to order a new trial whose evidence is limited to matters related to the Mann Act counts, because of 'severe spill over prejudice from reams of inflammatory evidence' related to the more serious counts. Prosecutors insisted during the eight-week trial that Combs had coerced, threatened and sometimes viciously forced two ex-girlfriends to have sex with male sex workers to satisfy his sexual urges. They cited multiple acts of violence he carried out against them as proof that they had no say. A day earlier, Combs's team asked the judge to free him on a 50 million dollar bond while he awaits sentencing in October after a jury found him not guilty of the most serious federal charges he faced earlier this month. His lawyer argued that conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn are dangerous, noting that others convicted of similar prostitution-related offences were typically released before sentencing. Subramanian previously denied a request that Combs be released on bail while he awaits sentencing, citing a now-infamous video of Combs beating a former girlfriend and photographs showing injuries to another ex-girlfriend. The judge has not yet ruled on either of this week's motions.
