ASX Penny Stocks Spotlight Australian Strategic Materials And 2 More Hidden Gems
As the Australian market experiences a gradual downward trend, largely influenced by profit-taking and international tensions, investors are seeking opportunities that can withstand volatility. Penny stocks, though often considered niche investments, still hold potential for growth particularly in smaller or newer companies. When these stocks are backed by solid financial health and fundamentals, they can present underappreciated opportunities for returns without excessive risk.
Name
Share Price
Market Cap
Financial Health Rating
EZZ Life Science Holdings (ASX:EZZ)
A$1.50
A$70.76M
★★★★★★
GTN (ASX:GTN)
A$0.65
A$124.05M
★★★★★★
IVE Group (ASX:IGL)
A$2.57
A$396.25M
★★★★★☆
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (ASX:SXE)
A$1.67
A$441.56M
★★★★★★
Tasmea (ASX:TEA)
A$3.08
A$725.72M
★★★★★☆
Regal Partners (ASX:RPL)
A$2.25
A$756.37M
★★★★★★
Accent Group (ASX:AX1)
A$1.845
A$1.11B
★★★★☆☆
Lindsay Australia (ASX:LAU)
A$0.71
A$225.19M
★★★★☆☆
Bisalloy Steel Group (ASX:BIS)
A$3.37
A$159.91M
★★★★★★
CTI Logistics (ASX:CLX)
A$1.815
A$146.19M
★★★★☆☆
Click here to see the full list of 1,001 stocks from our ASX Penny Stocks screener.
Let's review some notable picks from our screened stocks.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆
Overview: Australian Strategic Materials Ltd is an integrated producer of critical metals for advanced and clean technologies in Australia, with a market cap of A$116.96 million.
Operations: The company's revenue is primarily derived from its operations in Korea, generating A$0.91 million, and the Dubbo Project, contributing A$1.12 million.
Market Cap: A$116.96M
Australian Strategic Materials Ltd is pre-revenue, with limited sales of A$1.13 million reported for the half year ending December 2024, and a net loss of A$13.96 million. Despite its unprofitability, ASM has reduced its debt to equity ratio significantly over five years from 319.6% to 8.6%, indicating improved financial management. The company has more cash than total debt and short-term assets exceeding both short- and long-term liabilities, suggesting a stable financial position despite high volatility in share price and less than one year of cash runway based on current free cash flow trends.
Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in Australian Strategic Materials' financial health report.
Review our historical performance report to gain insights into Australian Strategic Materials' track record.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆
Overview: Horizon Oil Limited, with a market cap of A$292.55 million, is involved in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties across China, New Zealand, and Australia.
Operations: The company's revenue segments include $60.53 million from exploration and development activities in China and $34.26 million from similar operations in New Zealand.
Market Cap: A$292.55M
Horizon Oil Limited, with a market cap of A$292.55 million, has demonstrated financial resilience despite recent challenges. The company maintains more cash than its total debt, and its interest payments are well-covered by EBIT at 60.8 times coverage. However, Horizon's dividend yield of 15.3% is not supported by earnings or free cash flow, raising sustainability concerns. Profit margins have decreased to 14.1% from last year's 30.3%, and the company experienced negative earnings growth over the past year (-67%). Recent board changes include appointing Catherine Costello as an independent non-executive director to strengthen governance and strategic oversight.
Click here and access our complete financial health analysis report to understand the dynamics of Horizon Oil.
Explore historical data to track Horizon Oil's performance over time in our past results report.
Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★
Overview: SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited operates in the construction, fitout, and refurbishment of commercial properties across Australia with a market cap of A$287.93 million.
Operations: The company's revenue is primarily derived from its heavy construction segment, which generated A$902.63 million.
Market Cap: A$287.93M
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited, with a market cap of A$287.93 million, has shown robust financial performance in the construction sector. Despite an unstable dividend track record, its earnings have grown significantly by 34.9% over the past year, surpassing both industry averages and its 5-year growth rate of 9.3% per annum. The company is debt-free and efficiently manages liabilities with short-term assets of A$209.5 million exceeding both short-term and long-term obligations. SHAPE's Return on Equity stands at an impressive 54.2%, indicating high-quality earnings and effective use of equity capital, although management tenure data remains insufficient for assessment.
Jump into the full analysis health report here for a deeper understanding of SHAPE Australia.
Explore SHAPE Australia's analyst forecasts in our growth report.
Click here to access our complete index of 1,001 ASX Penny Stocks.
Ready To Venture Into Other Investment Styles? Outshine the giants: these 25 early-stage AI stocks could fund your retirement.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include ASX:ASM ASX:HZN and ASX:SHA.
This article was originally published by Simply Wall St.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Markel Group the New Berkshire Hathaway Now That Warren Buffett Is Retiring?
Markel Group uses an investment approach similar to Berkshire Hathaway's. Markel Group is dramatically smaller than Berkshire Hathaway. With Warren Buffett retiring, investors may want to take a second look at this Berkshire wannabe. 10 stocks we like better than Markel Group › Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) is one of the most successful companies in modern history. Its CEO, Warren Buffett, is a Wall Street legend who has been given the nickname "the Oracle of Omaha." If you are an investor, it's highly likely that you know all about Buffett and the company he runs. But do you know about Markel Group (NYSE: MKL)? Because of its large insurance operations, Berkshire Hathaway usually gets placed in the finance sector. That's not a bad classification for the company, but it doesn't do justice to the business at all. That's because Berkshire Hathaway is actually a widely diversified conglomerate. The collection of businesses under the Berkshire Hathaway umbrella ranges from auto sales to retail to specialty parts manufacturing. And it has a whole lot in between -- its list of subsidiaries includes over 180 companies. Even the insurance operations are used in a slightly different manner than they are at most other insurers. The float, which arises because insurance premiums get paid up front while claims get paid in the future, is used to buy stocks like Coca-Cola, American Express, and Chevron. The diversity in the list of stock investments is just as wide as the diversity in Berkshire Hathaway's owned businesses. Investors buying Berkshire Hathaway are really investing alongside Warren Buffett. But at the end of 2025, Buffett is retiring from the $1 trillion market cap company he basically created via his unique investment approach. His hand-picked successor, Greg Abel, will likely continue to use a similar approach to that of his mentor Buffett, buying well-run companies while they are attractively priced and then holding on for the long term to benefit from the business' growth over time. But there's no question that Berkshire Hathaway won't be exactly the same in the future as it has been in the past. Markel Group, with a market cap of around $25 billion, is a much smaller business than Berkshire Hathaway. But it doesn't pull any punches when it describes its business, making frequent references to Berkshire Hathaway. It also uses the same exact model, of an insurance company that directly owns companies and invests in publicly traded stocks (including Home Depot, Visa, and Deere). Interestingly, the stock performance of Markel Group hasn't been as strong as that of Berkshire Hathaway or the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) since the 2020 bear market. But Markel's management has been working to shake things up so it can get back to its historical performance, which was actually better than that of Berkshire Hathaway for many years. This is where the really interesting comparison comes up. Berkshire Hathaway is at the start of a management shake-up. Markel Group is nearer the end of such a shake-up. Berkshire Hathaway's new leader is taking over a company so large that it requires very large changes to affect performance. Markel Group is still small enough that improving the business won't require massive changes. In some ways, and from a big-picture perspective, it sounds like Markel Group is in a better position as a business right now. The world will never see another Warren Buffett because he is a unique individual. But his broad investment approach can be roughly mimicked. Mimicking Buffett is basically what Wall Street wants Greg Abel's job to be when he takes over as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at the end of 2025. Only he's going to have to do it within the confines of a gigantic company, which means it will be a massive task. Markel Group has been mimicking Buffett for years. While the company seemingly lost its way to some extent over the last five years, it is working to get back on track. Given the relatively small size of the business, that shouldn't be nearly as large a job as what Greg Abel is dealing with. If you like Berkshire Hathaway, now could be a good time to start looking at Markel Group, where imitation has long been a high form of flattery to Warren Buffett. Before you buy stock in Markel Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Markel Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, Chevron, Deere & Company, Home Depot, Markel Group, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Markel Group the New Berkshire Hathaway Now That Warren Buffett Is Retiring? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major Coles move to take on Chemist Warehouse, Bunnings, Amazon after $400 million loss: 'Stood still'
Coles is beefing up one particular section of its supermarket empire to take on rivals that aren't Woolworths or Aldi. Chemist Warehouse, Bunnings and Amazon have been soaking up the health, beauty and household categories while the grocery giants fight it out on food and other essentials. Coles lost an estimated $400 million to these other rivals in this sector, and it is making some changes to get a bigger piece of that pie. Leanne White has been appointed the supermarket's new general manager for health and home, and she revealed Coles' recent "step change". 'We have all been working with a real supermarket lens on how to execute our offer and potentially have not lifted our eyes enough on the broader market set,' she said. Coles, Woolworths shelves reveal devastating reality for coffee lovers: 'From $49 to $62' Centrelink payment change happening next week: 'Will increase' ATO capital gains tax warning as Aussies caught doing the wrong thing: 'Focus area' 'We have also lost sight of the importance of health and home. The reality is we have stood still … we really, really need to lift our eyes.' The health, beauty and household category is a large sector to tackle. It includes items like makeup, supplements, cleaning products, and everything in between. Bunnings and even The Reject Shop became unlikely sellers of household goods like laundry detergent and dishwashing liquid, with their prices often decently lower than Coles and Woolworths. Meanwhile, there has been no shortage of articles raving about beauty items that have been selling out left, right, and centre at Chemist Warehouse, which has massively expanded its beauty and fragrance Chinese marketplace Temu has also carved out a space in the household sector by selling items for a fraction of the price of Coles and Woolworths. You can pick up an electric toothbrush from one of the big supermarkets for $25 to $50, depending on whether it's on special. But on Temu, they sell for just over $10. Coles wants to hop on this bandwagon and has reportedly asked suppliers in the health, beauty and household categories to give the supermarket an inside look at their promotional campaigns up to a year in advance. White told The Australian that having a much longer view of how these products would be sold to the big players would hopefully give her a "significant opportunity" to grow in this sector. 'By moving towards a 9 to 12 month planning timeline, we create better opportunities for Coles, our suppliers, and ultimately, for our customers," she said. "Many of our suppliers are already adopting this best-practice approach, with this enhanced planning allowing us to be agile to customer trends.' These non-supermarket players have raked in roughly $100 million per year over the last four years from the new trio sector, according to analysis produced by Coles. Woolworths chief Amanda Bardwell admitted earlier this year that it too was facing "increased levels of competition" from the likes of Bunnings, Amazon, and Chemist Warehouse, as Aussies "increasingly" shop at multiple retailers to get the best price. But Coles believes it could claw back as much as $1 billion in annual sales if it's able to stamp a bigger imprint in the health, beauty, and household categories.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elliott Calls for Further Action to Enhance Corporate Value and Strengthen Corporate Governance Ahead of Sumitomo Realty's 2025 Annual General Meeting
Elliott plans to vote against members of Sumitomo Realty's senior management at the 2025 AGM absent further corporate-governance and value-enhancement initiatives LONDON, June 8, 2025 /CNW/ -- Elliott Investment Management, L.P. and Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited ("Elliott"), which advise funds that together have a more than 3% ownership stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo Realty" or the "Company"), making it one of the Company's largest shareholders, today released an open letter to the Company's shareholders. In the letter, Elliott encouraged fellow shareholders to actively engage with Sumitomo Realty's management ahead of the upcoming 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ("AGM") and to hold the Company accountable for not addressing its long-standing valuation discount and weak corporate governance. The letter outlines four key areas of concern – poor shareholder returns, excessive cross shareholdings, declining capital efficiency and subpar governance – and urges the Company to implement tangible reforms. These include increasing its shareholder payout, reducing cross shareholdings, issuing a credible return target and enhancing governance. Elliott also emphasized that without meaningful progress from Sumitomo Realty, it intends to vote against the reappointment of senior management at the upcoming AGM. The full text of the letter can be read at and is included below: Dear Fellow Sumitomo Realty Shareholders, Elliott Investment Management, L.P. and Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited ("Elliott," or "we") advise funds that together have a more than 3% ownership stake in Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. ("Sumitomo Realty", or the "Company"), which makes us one of the Company's largest shareholders. For months, we have engaged in private discussions with Sumitomo Realty management to express our conviction in the value-creation opportunity at the Company and to outline tangible actions to realize this potential. With the 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders ("AGM") approaching, we are now making our views public because these issues are critical to the Company's future success, and we want our fellow shareholders to be able to assess the same views we have presented to the Company ahead of the 2025 AGM. We believe the 2025 AGM marks a critical juncture for evaluating management's performance over the past two years. We are encouraging investors to actively engage with Sumitomo Realty management ahead of the 2025 AGM and to use their voting rights to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the Company's current strategy. We highlight recent opinions from ISS and Glass Lewis, who both recommended a vote against the reappointment of Sumitomo Realty's Chairman, due to the Company's high levels of cross shareholdings and lack of board independence. Sumitomo Realty is one of Japan's leading real estate developers, with a dominant position in Tokyo office real estate, an attractive business mix and a high-quality portfolio of assets. Our substantial investment reflects our conviction, based on months of thorough diligence, in Sumitomo Realty's strengths. However, despite these advantages, Sumitomo Realty trades at just half of the post-tax market value of its real estate ("PNAV"),1 making it the most undervalued real estate developer in Japan. Sumitomo Realty also trades at a depressed multiple of earnings, despite its stable, high-quality core office leasing business. Sumitomo Realty's persistent stock underperformance and valuation discount are not coincidental. The Company is an outlier in several areas: it holds a large portfolio of cross shareholdings, it has a unique policy of not selling property assets or managing REIT assets, and its board and governance structure rank near the bottom of all TOPIX 100 companies on several metrics2. In our view, these self-imposed problems and others we highlight below are responsible for the Company's significant undervaluation. We see a clear opportunity for Sumitomo Realty to close its discount to fair value by taking steps to resolve these issues. The upside potential is significant: Applying a peer-average PNAV multiple – a conservative approach given Sumitomo Realty's superior asset quality – would imply a share price of just under ¥8,000, over 40% higher than the current level. See Chart 1 – PNAV and Price Target Bridge. The Case for Change The market's negative sentiment toward Sumitomo Realty reflects deep shareholder concerns with the Company's performance. In 2024, Elliott commissioned a third-party shareholder perception study to better understand investor views on the Japanese real estate developer sector, including Sumitomo Realty and its large-cap peers. This study surveyed large and mostly long-term institutional investors, both in Japan and abroad, on topics including the Company's strategy, its shareholder-return policy and its cross-shareholding policy. The study's findings – as well as sell-side analyst ratings, expert commentary and AGM voting results – show consistently poor investor sentiment toward Sumitomo Realty and highlight meaningful opportunities for improvement. See Chart 2 – Shareholder Survey. Evidence of shareholder dissatisfaction is also clearly visible in the AGM approval rate for Sumitomo Realty's Board. Approval rates have steadily declined since 2017, with the Chairman's approval rating falling from 95% to a record-low 77% by 2023 – the lowest among peers. See Chart 3 – AGM Approval Rating. Publicly available proxy voting data shows that many of Sumitomo Realty's largest investors have already voted against management at previous AGMs. Their concerns center on Sumitomo Realty's excessive cross shareholdings and its antiquated board structure. With proxy voting guidelines from asset managers growing more stringent since the Board last stood for election in 2023, and with independent proxy advisory firms recently making recommendations to vote against the reappointment of Sumitomo Realty's Chairman at the 2025 AGM, it appears that continued inaction could lead to Sumitomo Realty's Board facing even broader disapproval from major asset managers this year. Diagnosing the Key Issues Four core issues underlie Sumitomo Realty's deep undervaluation and poor investor sentiment: Weak shareholder returns: Sumitomo Realty's dividend payout was just 17% of net income in the last fiscal year – half the peer group average. Larger peers have moved more aggressively on shareholder returns, with one key peer expecting its shareholder payout to exceed 80% of net income this fiscal year. Even with Sumitomo Realty's recently outlined plans to increase its shareholder payout, the pace of increase is too slow: we estimate it could take almost a decade to achieve the Company's target dividend payout ratio of 35%. Excessive cross shareholdings: At 26% of net assets as of March 31, 2025, Sumitomo Realty's cross shareholdings far exceed those of its peers as well as the maximum levels set by independent proxy advisory firms and key Japanese asset managers. The Company's high level of cross shareholdings was a major cause of shareholder disapproval at the 2023 AGM and will likely be a decisive issue again in 2025. Declining capital efficiency: Sumitomo Realty is the only company in its peer group that does not have a Return on Equity ("ROE") target, nor any clear strategy for maintaining or improving its ROE, such as by selling mature assets into a REIT structure. As a result, the Company's ROE has declined for six consecutive years and is forecast to continue Chart 4 – ROE. Poor corporate governance and board structure: Sumitomo Realty ranks near the bottom of the TOPIX 100 on corporate-governance metrics. A global company with the size and stature of Sumitomo Realty should aspire to market-leading governance standards. While the Company has recently outlined plans to gradually improve its governance, progress on these reforms can and should be accelerated. See Chart 5 – Corporate Governance Comparison. Setting the Right Course These issues are largely self-imposed and can be addressed quickly and decisively by management. Specifically, we believe that the Company should take the following steps: Shareholder return: Immediately increase its shareholder payout ratio to 50% or more, a level that is in-line with its peers, via a higher dividend payout and larger and more regular share repurchases; Cross shareholding: Decrease its cross-shareholdings portfolio, which we believe is worth more than ¥500 billion on a post-tax basis, to below 10% of net assets (based on current market value) by the end of its current medium-term management plan ("MTMP") period; ROE target: Set a ROE target of at least 10% and outline clear plans to achieve this target, such as by shifting capital from mature projects to growth projects. For instance, the Company could unlock ¥500 billion of capital by transferring rental apartment assets into a REIT structure; and Governance: Strengthen governance by adding independent directors and establishing a nomination and remuneration committee. The time to implement a more ambitious policy to unwind cross shareholdings is now. Several large holders of Sumitomo Realty shares – including Taisei Corp, Obayashi, Shimizu and Kajima, which collectively own more than ¥160 billion worth – have announced plans to aggressively sell their cross shareholdings. Sumitomo Realty reciprocally owns more than ¥60 billion worth of shares in these four construction companies. This dynamic presents a compelling opportunity for Sumitomo Realty: It can unlock significant capital by selling shares in these four firms and use the proceeds to repurchase a portion of the Sumitomo Realty shares they currently hold. Such a transaction would reduce cross shareholdings and deploy capital back into the Company's own shares at extremely attractive levels. While cross shareholdings have historically been seen as promoting business relationships across Japanese companies, they are now viewed as a poor use of capital and an enabler of corporate leadership entrenchment. Sumitomo Realty and its key cross shareholders are meant to adhere to the Corporate Governance Code, which requires Japanese companies to scrutinize the purpose and benefits of cross shareholdings, particularly those held for business relationships, which are increasingly viewed as inappropriate. We believe the Company should act decisively and expeditiously to unwind its cross-shareholdings portfolio. See Chart 6 – Key Corporate Cross Shareholding. The steps we have outlined would not only raise management's standing at the 2025 AGM, but also improve Sumitomo Realty's valuation. In the Japanese real estate developer sector, there is a clear relationship between valuation (PNAV), capital efficiency (ROE) and shareholder returns. We are confident that taking the steps above – particularly on improving shareholder payout and capital efficiency – will unlock significant value for Sumitomo Realty shareholders and increase management's credibility with shareholders ahead of the 2025 AGM. See Chart 7 – ROE and Shareholder Returns Explain Valuation. Companies that have proactively embraced Japan's ongoing corporate reforms – by unwinding cross shareholdings, improving capital efficiency, increasing shareholder returns and strengthening governance – have been rewarded with higher valuations and greater shareholder support. Examples from the general construction, non-life insurance, and real estate developer sectors show how such reforms can successfully unlock value and transform investor perception at previously underperforming companies. Conclusion We appreciate that in recent months, Sumitomo Realty management has taken several initial steps in the right direction – some of which are aligned with our recommendations. However, progress has been insufficient and too slow. The market reacted negatively to the uninspiring MTMP released in late March, which failed to address core issues. Many of our suggestions remain ignored. The 2025 AGM is a critical opportunity for shareholders to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with Sumitomo Realty's current strategy. Management's approval rating is the clearest and most effective way for shareholders to catalyse change. Despite the modest shareholder-friendly actions taken to date, there remains deep skepticism, including from Elliott, about management's genuine commitment to ambitiously and decisively address the Company's key issues. As such, absent further value- and governance-enhancing measures from Sumitomo Realty, Elliott plans to vote against the reappointment of senior management at the 2025 AGM. We urge all shareholders to carefully consider their voting decisions and engage with Sumitomo Realty management in the lead up to the AGM. Your vote can shape the Company's future. We are hopeful management will be attentive to shareholder viewpoints and will take decisive steps to raise Sumitomo Realty's corporate value and enhance its governance. Sincerely, Aaron TaiPortfolio Manager Elliott Investment Management, L.P. About ElliottElliott Investment Management L.P. (together with its affiliates, "Elliott") manages approximately $72.7 billion in assets as of December 31, 2024. Founded in 1977, it is one of the oldest funds under continuous management. The Elliott funds' investors include pension plans, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, funds-of-funds, high net worth individuals and families, and employees of the firm. Elliott Advisors (UK) Limited is an affiliate of Elliott Investment Management L.P. Media Contacts: LondonAlice BestElliott Advisors (UK) LimitedT: +44 203 009 1715abest@ TokyoBrett WallbuttonAshton ConsultingT: +81 (0) 3 DISCLAIMER THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY ELLIOTT ADVISORS (UK) LIMITED ("EAUK"), WHICH IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM'S FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY ("FCA") AND ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT L.P. ("EIMLP"). NOTHING WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT PROMOTES, OR IS INTENDED TO PROMOTE, AND MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED AS PROMOTING, ANY FUNDS ADVISED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY EAUK AND EIMLP (THE "ELLIOTT FUNDS"). THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR DISCUSSION AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN REPRESENT THE OPINIONS OF EAUK, EIMLP AND THEIR AFFILIATES (COLLECTIVELY, "ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT") AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE OR MODIFY ANY OF ITS OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN AT ANY TIME AND FOR ANY REASON AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION TO CORRECT, UPDATE OR REVISE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR TO OTHERWISE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO SUMITOMO REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. (THE "COMPANY"), INCLUDING PUBLIC FILINGS AND DISCLOSURES MADE BY THE COMPANY AND OTHER SOURCES, AS WELL AS ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S ANALYSIS OF SUCH PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT HAS RELIED UPON AND ASSUMED, WITHOUT INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION, THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF ALL DATA AND INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM PUBLIC SOURCES, AND NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY IS MADE THAT ANY SUCH DATA OR INFORMATION IS ACCURATE. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RECOGNISES THAT THERE MAY BE CONFIDENTIAL OR OTHERWISE NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPANY THAT COULD ALTER THE OPINIONS OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT WERE SUCH INFORMATION KNOWN. THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO THE 92ND ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY (THE "AGM"). NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SEEKS ANY FORM OF AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING FROM ANY RECIPIENT OF THIS DOCUMENT ABOUT VOTING IN RELATION TO ANY MATTER AT THE AGM OR THE EXERCISING OF SHAREHOLDERS' RIGHTS. YOU SHALL RETAIN AND EXERCISE DISCRETION TO VOTE IN ANY MANNER OR NOT TO VOTE AS DETERMINED BY YOU IN YOUR SOLE DISCRETION. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR OUR SOLICITATION OF YOUR PROXY IN CONNECTION WITH ANY MATTER AT THE AGM. NO REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY OR UNDERTAKING, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IS GIVEN AND NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY OR DUTY OF CARE IS OR WILL BE ACCEPTED BY ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT OR ANY OF ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR ADVISORS (EACH AN "ELLIOTT PERSON") CONCERNING: (I) THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS CONTENTS, INCLUDING WHETHER THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE ACCURATE, FAIR, COMPLETE OR CURRENT; (II) THE PROVISION OF ANY FURTHER INFORMATION, WHETHER BY WAY OF UPDATE TO THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR OTHERWISE TO THE RECIPIENT AFTER THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT; OR (III) THAT ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S INVESTMENT PROCESSES OR INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL OR ARE LIKELY TO BE ACHIEVED OR SUCCESSFUL OR THAT ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S INVESTMENTS WILL MAKE ANY PROFIT OR WILL NOT SUSTAIN LOSSES. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, NONE OF THE ELLIOTT PERSONS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSSES, WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCLUDING LOSS OF PROFITS, DAMAGES, COSTS, CLAIMS OR EXPENSES RELATING TO OR ARISING FROM THE RECIPIENT'S OR ANY PERSON'S RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT FOR THE HISTORICAL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS INCLUDED IN THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS PREPARED WITH RESPECT TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMPANY'S ANTICIPATED OPERATING PERFORMANCE, THE VALUE OF THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES, DEBT OR ANY RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE BASED UPON OR RELATE TO THE VALUE OF SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY (COLLECTIVELY, "COMPANY SECURITIES"), GENERAL ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS AND OTHER FUTURE EVENTS. YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ARE INHERENTLY UNCERTAIN AND SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC, COMPETITIVE, AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES AND CONTINGENCIES AND HAVE BEEN INCLUDED SOLELY FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN DUE TO REASONS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE FORESEEABLE. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE COMPANY SECURITIES WILL TRADE AT THE PRICES THAT MAY BE IMPLIED HEREIN, AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY ESTIMATE, PROJECTION OR ASSUMPTION HEREIN IS, OR WILL BE PROVEN, CORRECT. THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE (A) AN OFFER OR INVITATION TO BUY OR SELL, OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY OR SELL OR TO OTHERWISE ENGAGE IN ANY INVESTMENT BUSINESS OR PROVIDE OR RECEIVE ANY INVESTMENT SERVICES IN RESPECT OF, ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT AND NO LEGAL RELATIONS SHALL BE CREATED BY ITS ISSUE, (B) A "FINANCIAL PROMOTION" FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 OF THE U.K. (AS AMENDED), (C) "INVESTMENT ADVICE" AS DEFINED BY THE FCA'S HANDBOOK OF RULES AND GUIDANCE ("FCA HANDBOOK"), (D) "INVESTMENT RESEARCH" AS DEFINED BY THE FCA HANDBOOK, (E) AN "INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION" AS DEFINED BY REGULATION (EU) 596/2014 AND BY REGULATION (EU) NO. 596/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF U.K. DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 3 OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 ("EUWA 2018") INCLUDING AS AMENDED BY REGULATIONS ISSUED UNDER SECTION 8 OF EUWA 2018, (F) ANY ACTION CONSTITUTING "INVESTMENT ADVISORY BUSINESS" AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 28, PARAGRAPH 3, ITEM 1 OF THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND EXCHANGE LAW OF JAPAN (THE "FIEL"), (G) ANY ACTION CONSTITUTING "INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT BUSINESS" AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 28, PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE FIEL, OR (H) FINANCIAL PROMOTION, INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AN INDUCEMENT OR ENCOURAGEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY PRODUCT, OFFERING OR INVESTMENT. NO INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A RECOMMENDATION BY ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO FORM THE BASIS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION OR AS SUGGESTING AN INVESTMENT STRATEGY. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT (AND MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE) LEGAL, TAX, INVESTMENT, FINANCIAL OR OTHER ADVICE. EACH RECIPIENT SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN LEGAL COUNSEL AND TAX AND FINANCIAL ADVISERS AS TO LEGAL AND OTHER MATTERS CONCERNING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE ALL-INCLUSIVE OR TO CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT MAY BE RELEVANT TO AN EVALUATION OF THE COMPANY, COMPANY SECURITIES OR THE MATTERS DESCRIBED HEREIN. NO AGREEMENT, COMMITMENT, UNDERSTANDING OR OTHER LEGAL RELATIONSHIP EXISTS OR MAY BE DEEMED TO EXIST BETWEEN OR AMONG ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT AND ANY OTHER PERSON BY VIRTUE OF FURNISHING THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT IS NOT ACTING FOR OR ON BEHALF OF, AND IS NOT PROVIDING ANY ADVICE OR SERVICE TO, ANY RECIPIENT OF THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE TO ANY PERSON FOR PROVIDING ADVICE IN RELATION TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS DOCUMENT. BEFORE DETERMINING ON ANY COURSE OF ACTION, ANY RECIPIENT SHOULD CONSIDER ANY ASSOCIATED RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES AND CONSULT WITH ITS OWN INDEPENDENT ADVISORS AS IT DEEMS NECESSARY. THE ELLIOTT FUNDS MAY HAVE A DIRECT OR INDIRECT INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT THEREFORE HAS A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE PROFITABILITY OF THE ELLIOTT FUNDS' POSITIONS IN THE COMPANY. ACCORDINGLY, ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT MAY HAVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS IMPARTIAL. NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE TAKEN AS ANY INDICATION OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S CURRENT OR FUTURE TRADING OR VOTING INTENTIONS WHICH MAY CHANGE AT ANY TIME. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE ITS VOTING INTENTION AT ANY TIME NOTWITHSTANDING ANY STATEMENTS IN THIS DOCUMENT. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT INTENDS TO REVIEW ITS INVESTMENTS IN THE COMPANY ON A CONTINUING BASIS AND DEPENDING UPON VARIOUS FACTORS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL POSITION AND STRATEGIC DIRECTION, THE OUTCOME OF ANY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE COMPANY, OVERALL MARKET CONDITIONS, OTHER INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT, AND THE AVAILABILITY OF COMPANY SECURITIES AT PRICES THAT WOULD MAKE THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF COMPANY SECURITIES DESIRABLE, ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT MAY FROM TIME TO TIME (IN THE OPEN MARKET OR IN PRIVATE TRANSACTIONS, INCLUDING SINCE THE INCEPTION OF ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT'S POSITION) BUY, SELL, COVER, HEDGE OR OTHERWISE CHANGE THE FORM OR SUBSTANCE OF ANY OF ITS INVESTMENTS (INCLUDING COMPANY SECURITIES) TO ANY DEGREE IN ANY MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION TO NOTIFY OTHERS OF ANY SUCH CHANGES. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT ALSO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO ITS INVESTMENTS IN THE COMPANY AS IT MAY DEEM APPROPRIATE. ELLIOTT MANAGEMENT HAS NOT SOUGHT OR OBTAINED CONSENT FROM ANY THIRD PARTY TO USE ANY STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. ANY SUCH STATEMENTS OR INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS INDICATING THE SUPPORT OF SUCH THIRD PARTY FOR THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN. ALL TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES USED HEREIN ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. 1 Defined by dividing share price by book value per share adjusted for the post-tax difference between market value of leasing properties and the book value of leasing properties as disclosed in Sumitomo Realty's yuho. 2 Sumitomo Realty ranks at the bottom of the TOPIX 100 on its ISS Governance Score, director independence ratio and its usage of independent board committees (e.g. nomination, remuneration and audit committees). View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Elliott Investment Management L.P. View original content to download multimedia:
