Man faces jail in US for shipping 850 turtles in socks to Hong Kong
The turtles have unique markings on their shells, and are seen as a status symbol in China where they are often kept as pets. US authorities estimated that Lin's seized turtles had a combined market value of $1.4m (£1m). He was caught when the animals were intercepted by law enforcement during one border inspection.Both species, which were smuggled in large quantities in the 1990s, are protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Trade of the turtles can only be authorised with export permits or re-export certificates.The eastern box turtle is also deemed vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.Besides the turtles, Lin also exported 11 other parcels filled with reptiles, including venomous snakes, according to the Justice Department.Lin, who is set to be sentenced on 23 December, faces up to five years in prison.In March, another Chinese national was sentenced to 30 months in prison for smuggling more than 2,000 eastern box turtles. The amphibians were also wrapped in socks and packed in boxes, which were labelled as containing almonds and chocolate cookies. US authorities estimated at the time that each turtle could have been sold for $2,000 (£1,500).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
15 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Chinese nationals who smuggled €10.4 million of cannabis into NI jailed
Two Chinese nationals who smuggled cannabis worth €10.4 million (£9 million) into Northern Ireland, hidden in wooden floorin,g have been jailed. Yudong Ouyang, 32, and Gary Hon, 26, living in Manchester, were cultivating large crops of cannabis in the city and using HGVs to transport it by ferry to Northern Ireland, where they knew they could charge a 'premium price', the National Crime Agency (NCA) said. Advertisement The pair were using encrypted messaging platforms between June 2019 and February 2020, where they organised hiding the drugs in large pallets of wooden flooring. The pair were sentenced at Manchester Crown Court (Anthony Devlin/PA) The NCA said inner pallets of flooring were hollowed out to create a void where they could hide the drugs before organising shipping to Northern Ireland using a legitimate agent who was unaware of the criminal activity. NCA investigators found there were up to 38 deliveries made by the group from Manchester to Belfast in the nine-month period. Ouyang and Hon sent messages in Mandarin, and translations showed that the contents discussed the cannabis trade, warehouse rentals and travel to Northern Ireland. Advertisement Other messages discussed how to hide the drugs and how they could secrete money when they returned to England. One message stated: 'I put the d(drug) money on me, not in the car, so the sniffing dog could not get the smell'. The NCA said phone evidence also showed Ouyang regularly sent photos of cannabis, cannabis farms, or selfies of him at the farms to the gang. His fingerprints and an invoice in his name were found at a cannabis farm raided as part of the operation. Advertisement Officers pieced together messages and phone calls with CCTV movements that showed how the group were in touch with each other before attending storage units to move pallets. Despite attempting to appear as a legitimate business, NCA investigators found that pallets were occasionally shipped back from Northern Ireland to Manchester and other locations in England, where it is believed the hollow void could be used again for a further export. The standard weight of a pallet of the type used by Ouyang and Hon was 1,000 kilograms. Evidence showed declarations made by the group always weighed the pallet at 1,200 kilograms, though it is believed 50 kilograms of cannabis was moved in each delivery. Advertisement Contact details on invoices from the legitimate storage businesses were also linked back to the men. Hon was arrested by NCA officers in February 2022. Ouyang was arrested in December 2023. Ouyang and Hon appeared at Manchester Crown Court, where Ouyang pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply class B drugs in January 2024 and Hon pleaded guilty to the same offence on June 25th, 2025. They were sentenced at the same court on Monday. Advertisement Hon received a prison sentence of three years and one month, and Ouyang received three years and six months' imprisonment. Barry Vinall, NCA operations manager, said: 'Ouyang and Hon were key players in this large-scale cannabis supply operation, producing up to £9 million in profit and working closely with a wider group. 'They attempted to make their operations appear legitimate but investigators unravelled their vast communications and movements showing they would often transport pallets back across to England so they could be reused for further importations. 'This organised crime group targeted Northern Ireland as their market where they knew their drugs would attract a premium price. 'Gangs like those run by Ouyang and Hon fuel an industry that sees people transported to the UK to work illegally in cannabis farms and taking action against those involved in these crimes is a priority for the NCA.' Two other men, Luis Ieong and Ming Liang He, were convicted in Northern Ireland after being arrested in Belfast in January 2020. They were stopped by PSNI officers while driving a vehicle carrying almost 11 kilograms of cannabis, and CCTV showed they had been at a storage unit in Belfast where boxes of flooring with the internal cavity were kept. A further 35.5 kilograms of cannabis was found at the unit alongside £70,000 (€81,000) in cash. They were sentenced to 13 months' imprisonment each in December 2020.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Watchmaker Swatch pulls 'slanted eye' advert after campaign sparked uproar in China
Swiss watch giant Swatch has been forced to pull an advert and issue an apology after a promotional image was accused of racism and triggered furious calls for a boycott in China. The campaign featured an Asian male model tugging at the corners of his eyes, a gesture widely slammed online as a racist depiction. Social media users in China branded the image offensive and demanded action against the brand. On Saturday, the company said it had 'taken note' of the backlash in posts on Instagram and the Chinese platform Weibo, writing that it had scrapped the campaign worldwide. 'We sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused,' Swatch said. But the statement did little to calm anger - many users continued to urge shoppers to shun Swatch Group labels, which include luxury names such as Blancpain, Longines and Tissot. One Weibo commentator with more than a million followers accused the firm of 'racism against Chinese' and even called for regulators to punish the brand. Others accused Swatch of deliberate discrimination. One user wrote: 'The brand's image has collapsed. (Swatch) thinks they can just apologise and salvage everything? It's not that simple.' On X, many critics mentioned the company's official account and demanded an explanation. China is one of Swatch's biggest markets, but like other Western luxury houses the company has faced slowing demand. In July it reported sales had fallen 11.2 per cent in the first half of the year, blaming the drop 'exclusively' on weak consumer appetite in China. Last year, it was embroiled in a heated row with the Malaysian government when the countries seized several of its watches claiming it incorporated LGBTQ elements. A court finally ruled that the confiscated good should be returned. The latest scandal is the latest in a string of controversies over foreign advertising campaigns in the country. Dolce & Gabbana was forced to apologise in 2018 after releasing videos that showed a Chinese woman struggling to eat Italian food with chopsticks. The model in that photograph later said the controversy nearly ruined her career. And in 2023, Dior drew fury with an image of a model pulling at her eye in a similar gesture to the one now dropped by Swatch. Two years before that, a Chinese photographer apologised for being 'ignorant' after a picture she shot for the French label came under fire.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ending Isolation review – a takedown of solitary confinement by incarcerated co-authors
Terry Kupers can't sleep. The veteran psychiatrist, author and solitary confinement expert, 81 and still working on multiple projects, is particularly troubled by the brutal spate of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) raids rocking communities around the US. 'My father came from Russia, so I'm an immigrant's son,' he said. 'I can't live with these raids. I need to do something about it.' Recently, 'doing something' has meant putting the finishing touches on a new book, Ending Isolation: The Case Against Solitary Confinement, which Kupers co-authored with three others. Out on 4 September from Pluto Press, the book is an exhaustingly researched takedown of solitary confinement: the practice of isolating an incarcerated person for hours, days, weeks or even years in a cell all their own. It's a practice long decried by experts including Kupers, but despite their repeated warnings, researchers and advocates generally agree that anywhere between 75,000 and 80,000 people are locked in solitary confinement in the US on any given day. The true number could be much higher, and as the book points out, 'there is no evidence that solitary confinement actually reduces violence. Instead, there are research findings that point strongly to the opposite conclusion, that solitary confinement worsens the problem of violence, both within prisons and in the public.' Considering this, Ending Isolation is a vital, systematic dismantling of every possible argument one could use to justify solitary confinement. The book covers everything from the history of solitary, the disturbing overlaps between sexual assault and isolation practices, and a deep dive into who gets 'sent to the hole' (spoiler alert: it can be any prisoner at any time for the vaguest reasons that more than often defy logic.) The chapters feature narratives from people who have lived through tortuous isolation, which makes for a mentally fraying read that feels, at times, like you're peeking behind a curtain in a room where you're not meant to be. 'Most people who go to solitary confinement are broken by the experience,' Kupers said in an interview with the Guardian. 'They have what I've termed the decimation of life skills. They become unlearned in terms of how to relate to others, and in terms of the prison environment, they then get into more trouble when they get out of segregation.' Kupers' insights are based on decades of interviews with people who have experienced solitary confinement in America's prisons. His latest book offers the in-depth psychiatric research Kupers has previously delivered in five other books and hundreds of articles – only this time he's joined by three co-authors, including two people who are currently incarcerated. Chris Blackwell, an award-winning journalist currently serving a decades-long sentence in Washington, kicks off the book with an engaging prologue recounting how he endured his first stint in solitary confinement at the age of 12. The experience 'solidified my distrust for authority figures forever and drove me into a deep hate for 'the system''. He has now spent most of his life as part of that system. By age 18, he'd been arrested more than 20 times. After killing a man during a drug-related robbery ('an act I would never be able to repair', he writes) Blackwell received the 45-year sentence he is currently serving. More solitary confinement awaited, too. 'Nothing is worse than becoming a target in prison,' he writes in the prologue. 'I refused to comply with what I felt was a constant abuse of power, and guards refused to allow me to rebel without punishment for my actions.' Even after years in isolation, Blackwell says he is still struggling to understand the impact those experiences had on him. But he knows the good he offers – his writing, his advocacy – is in spite of solitary confinement. Kupers says Blackwell is representative of a large proportion of prisoners: 'He didn't have murder in his mind,' but he committed a terrible crime that will haunt him – and others – for the rest of their lives. When they started working together on this book, Kupers realized that if circumstances were different, he and Blackwell would have been close friends. He admires his intellect, the grassroots organization Blackwell helped co-found from behind bars, and the harrowing essays and incarceration accounts Blackwell has published in the Appeal, the New York Times, the Washington Post and many other outlets. 'He happens to be behind bars and therefore his life is very limited and restricted,' Kupers said. 'But it's amazing what he's done given those limits.' It was Blackwell who recruited Kupers to co-author the book alongside himself and Deborah Zalesne, a law professor at the City University of New York. Together, Blackwell and Zalesne had the personal testimonies and legal foundation covered; they needed Kupers to add the mental health angle. He does so convincingly, detailing how solitary confinement, especially when it's prolonged, can cause severe anxiety, panic, sleep problems, psychotic behavior and severe post-traumatic stress disorder. Many people 'sent to the hole' develop a compulsion for self-harm, and Kupers says this shouldn't surprise anyone. 'Prolonged solitary confinement is torture,' he writes. These repeated insights, while necessary, aren't the main draw of the book. Rather, it's the contributions of people such as Kwaneta Harris, Ending Isolation's fourth and final co-author. Harris is an incarcerated writer whose work has helped shed light on the crisis of sexual assault in prisons. 'I used to think there was a timeline for when people lost their minds in solitary confinement. Six months, two years, maybe five. I was wrong. The descent into madness doesn't follow a schedule. Even now, back in medium-security, I wake up some mornings thinking I'm still in that cell,' she writes. Those passages, coupled with reams of research, leave no doubt that solitary confinement constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The question, then, is if the practice will ever end. 'There's a split in correctional authorities,' Kupers said. 'Probably around half think that solitary confinement is a very bad idea.' In Donald Trump's second term, Kupers is concerned about the advent of places like Alligator Alcatraz. 'This book is representative of this finding that ending solitary confinement is strategically extremely important in the context of what Ice is doing, for instance, and the emergence of a police state,' Kupers said. 'If we required that people who are behind bars are entitled to the civil and human rights, which they are by law entitled to, if we gave them those rights, including due process, that would massively change what's going on right now.' Kupers adds: 'If we continue to treat people like monsters, that is exactly what they will become.' Ending Isolation: The Case Against Solitary Confinement comes out on 4 September from Pluto Press. The book's release date coincides with the launch of a nationwide bus tour hosted by Unlock the Box.
