UN says 14 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2024
In their annual estimate of global
vaccine coverage
, released Tuesday, the
World Health Organization
and
UNICEF
said about 89 per cent of children under one year old got a first dose of the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine in 2024, the same as in 2023. About 85 per cent completed the three-dose series, up from 84 per cent in 2023.
Officials acknowledged, however, that the collapse of international aid this year will make it more difficult to reduce the number of unprotected children. In January, US President Trump withdrew the country from the WHO, froze nearly all humanitarian aid and later moved to close the US AID Agency. And last month, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said it was pulling the billions of dollars the US had previously pledged to the vaccines alliance Gavi, saying the group had "ignored the science".
Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has previously raised questions the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine - which has proven to be safe and effective after years of study and real-world use. Vaccines prevent 3.5 million to 5 million deaths a year, according to UN estimates.
"Drastic cuts in aid, coupled with misinformation about the safety of vaccines, threaten to unwind decades of progress," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
UN experts said that access to vaccines remained "deeply unequal" and that conflict and humanitarian crises quickly unraveled progress; Sudan had the lowest reported coverage against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough. The data showed that nine countries accounted for 52 per cent of all children who missed out on immunisations entirely: Nigeria, India, Sudan, Congo, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Angola.
WHO and UNICEF said that coverage against measles rose slightly, with 76 per cent of children worldwide receiving both vaccine doses. But experts say measles vaccine rates need to reach 95 per cent to prevent outbreaks of the extremely contagious disease. WHO noted that 60 countries reported big measles outbreaks last year.
The US is now having its worst
measles outbreak
in more than three decades, while the disease has also surged across Europe, with 1,25,000 cases in 2024 - twice as many as the previous year, according to WHO.
Last week, British authorities reported a child died of measles in a Liverpool hospital. Health officials said that despite years of efforts to raise awareness, only about 84 per cent of children in the UK are protected.
"It is hugely concerning, but not at all surprising, that we are continuing to see outbreaks of measles," said Helen Bradford, a professor of children's health at University College London. "The only way to stop measles spreading is with vaccination," she said in a statement. "It is never too late to be vaccinated - even as an adult."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UnitedHealth Group stock down after Wolf Research lowers its price target to $330 from $363
Five days after Wolfe Research gave the UnitedHealth Group stock an "Outperform" rating, the research organization tapered down its stock price target to $330 from the initial amount of $363. Goldman Sachs sees UnitedHealth as one of its top healthcare stock picks, according to the report by Insider Monkey. Company facing billing and profit troubles They did this because the company is dealing with medical billing problems right now. Wolfe Research also revised the 2025 earnings estimate to $18 — showing a more cautious or conservative view, as stated by the reports. ALSO READ: Prince Harry ready to make amends and make peace — Kate supports it, but William says 'Not So Fast' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now The reason is that UnitedHealth is under pressure in Medicaid and health insurance exchanges. The firm thinks Optum Health and Medicare Advantage, two parts of UnitedHealth, are facing big drops in earnings, as stated by Insider Monkey report. Right now, Medicare Advantage is only giving UnitedHealth 1% profit margins, which is much lower than what they normally earn. UnitedHealth is supposed to give a new update about its 2025 earnings soon and explain how it will handle these billing issues, according to the reports. Experts say some AI stocks may be better Insider Monkey says UnitedHealth still has potential, but some AI stocks might be better options right now. They say some AI stocks are more undervalued, could grow faster, and have less risk — especially with Trump-era tariffs and onshoring trends helping them, according to the report by Insider Monkey. Live Events ALSO READ: Putin gets grim warning: Russia's population crisis could wipe out 11 million workers by 2030 FAQs Q1. Why did Wolfe Research lower UnitedHealth's stock price target? Wolfe Research cut the price target to $330 because UnitedHealth is facing medical billing issues and lower profits in key areas like Medicare Advantage and Medicaid. Q2. Is UnitedHealth still a good investment after the price cut? Experts like Insider Monkey say it still has potential, but some AI stocks may offer better short-term growth and lower risk.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
India accounts for 6.4% of global zero-dose children in 2024: UN
ANI India cuts zero-dose children by 43 per cent as South Asia hits record-high children immunization in 2024 India constituted 6.4 per cent of the global population of children who did not receive a single dose of any vaccine in 2024, according to a United Nations report. The new national immunisation coverage data released on Monday by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF also highlighted that "India accounted for 49.2% of zero-dose children in South Asia", as per statistics from the Regional Office for South Asia (ROSA). The term "zero-dose children" refers to those who have not received any routine immunisations, including the first dose of the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine. This metric is a critical indicator of access to immunisation services and overall healthcare infrastructure. The report said India accounted for "6.4% of zero-dose children globally". Every year, WHO and UNICEF release global and national routine immunisation coverage estimates (WUENIC). Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, analyses what the 2024 WUENIC data says about the state of immunisation in the 57 low- and lower-middle-income countries it supports. Gavi said nearly half (4.9 million) of all the 10.2 million zero-dose children in lower-income countries live in five populous nations - Nigeria, DR Congo, India, Pakistan, and Ethiopia. It pointed out that coverage with the first dose of the DTP vaccine (DTP1) is an important measure that helps the world understand how many zero-dose children still don't have access to life-saving vaccines. DTP1 coverage stood at 87 per cent in 2024 - nearly recovered from a four percentage point decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic. "This means there are half a million fewer zero-dose children in lower-income countries in 2024, thanks mainly to targeted efforts in populous countries like India, DR Congo, and Ethiopia," Gavi said. The report said in 2024, 89 per cent of infants globally -- about 115 million -- received at least one dose of DTP vaccine, and 85 per cent -- roughly 109 million -- completed all three doses. Compared to 2023, around 171,000 more children received at least one vaccine, and one million more completed the full three-dose DTP series. While the gains are modest, they signal continued progress by countries working to protect children, even amid growing challenges, the report said. Still, nearly 20 million infants missed at least one dose of DTP-containing vaccine last year, including 14.3 million "zero-dose" children who never received a single dose of any vaccine. That's four million more than the 2024 target needed to stay on track with Immunisation Agenda 2030 goals and 1.4 million more than in 2019, the baseline year for measuring progress, the report said. "Vaccines save lives, allowing individuals, families, communities, economies, and nations to flourish," said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. "It's encouraging to see a continued increase in the number of children being vaccinated, although we still have a lot of work to do. Drastic cuts in aid, coupled with misinformation about the safety of vaccines, threaten to unwind decades of progress," he said. The report noted that children often remain un- or under-vaccinated due to a combination of factors, such as limited access to immunisation services, disrupted supply, conflict and instability, or misinformation about vaccines. Data from 195 countries show that 131 countries have consistently reached at least 90% of children with the first dose of DTP vaccine since 2019, but there has been no significant movement in expanding this group. Among the countries that reached less than 90% in 2019, only 17 managed to increase their coverage rates in the past five years. Meanwhile, in 47 countries, progress is stalling or worsening. This includes 22 countries that achieved and surpassed the 90% target in 2019 but have since declined. The data shows conflict and humanitarian crises can quickly erode vaccination progress. A quarter of the world's infants live in just 26 countries affected by fragility, conflict, or humanitarian crises, yet they make up half of all unvaccinated children globally. Concerningly, in half of these countries, the number of unvaccinated children has expanded rapidly from 3.6 million in 2019 to 5.4 million in 2024, underscoring the need for humanitarian responses to include immunisation, the report said Immunisation coverage in the 57 low-income countries supported by Gavi has improved in the past year, reducing the number of un- and under-vaccinated children by roughly 650,000. At the same time, signs of slippage are emerging in upper-middle- and high-income countries that have previously maintained at least 90% coverage. Even small declines in immunisation coverage can dramatically raise the risk of disease outbreaks and place additional strain on already overstretched health systems. "The good news is that we have managed to reach more children with life-saving vaccines. But millions of children remain without protection against preventable diseases, and that should worry us all," said UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell. "We must act now with determination to overcome barriers like shrinking health budgets, fragile health systems, along with misinformation and access constraints because of conflicts. No child should die from a disease we know how to prevent," she said.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Health data cover up? 100+ US government datasets quietly altered without warning
Over 100 US government health datasets were quietly altered earlier this year, and most of those changes were made without public notice, leaving major transparency and trust issues about official data, as per a report. A recent study in The Lancet went deep into 232 datasets from major organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, according to Psypost. The study, "Data manipulation within the US Federal Government," was authored by Janet Freilich and Aaron S. Kesselheim, as reported by Psypost. What they discovered was that almost half of the datasets had had wording adjustments that were not mentioned anywhere in the formal change logs, as per the report. The most frequent edit was replacing the term "gender" with "sex," as reported by Psypost. ALSO READ: Epstein files stay sealed — Republicans block move to force Trump admin to reveal details To find this out, the researchers compared existing datasets to older versions held online, as per the report. In most instances, despite the dataset appearing to have been recently updated, the change logs indicated nothing had been changed, according to Psypost. For instance, a Veterans Affairs document monitoring veteran medical care changed "Gender" to "Sex" in its headers and titles, but its change log doggedly reported, "No changes have been archived yet," as reported by Psypost. It is important to know because these datasets are the foundation of millions of public health studies on everything from mental illness to chronic disease and health disparities, according to the report. When words like "gender" and "sex" are incorrectly interchanged without definition, it is nearly impossible to tell whether changes in the data indicate true changes in the population or merely a quiet rewrite behind the scenes, as per the Psypost report. ALSO READ: Trump's tariff threat could trigger recession as August 1 deadline looms, and he might not blink this time This is not merely a statistical concern, as gender and sex are not the same thing: gender is social identity, and sex is biological categorisation, according to the report. A large number of transgender and non-binary individuals have identities that differ from the sex at birth, as reported by Psypost. Thus, if suddenly one dataset starts remapping "gender" to "sex" without explaining why it was altered, researchers cannot interpret results properly, according to the report. That confusion might compel public health officials to make decisions based on false information, as per Psypost. The timing of the edits is also significant because the edits primarily occurred between January and March of 2025, shortly following a White House directive that called on federal agencies to drop language linked to what it referred to as "gender ideology," as reported by Psypost. Although there is no official confirmation about the dataset edits being carried out in response to the White House's directive, but the pattern indicates a coordinated effort, according to Psypost. The researchers indicate that this lack of transparency jeopardises both scientific integrity and public trust, as per the report. They call for more robust systems for tracking and justifying all changes to data so that everyone, from policymakers to ordinary citizens, can clearly see what's been changed and why, according to Psypost. They also propose that independent groups and researchers maintain their own versions of datasets and compare them with archives on a regular basis, as per the the difference between 'gender' and 'sex' in data?'Sex' usually refers to biology (male or female), while 'gender' includes social identity (like non-binary or transgender). Swapping them without clarification can distort results. Did the government admit to making these changes? No federal agency has publicly confirmed the edits or explained the reason behind them.
