Angus Taylor suggests Labor ‘fickle' on AUKUS
Mr Taylor was asked on Wednesday to respond to comments made by Jerry Hendrix – the man heading a US ship building blitz in line with Donald Trump's mission to 'restore America's maritime dominance'.
Mr Hendrix, a retired US Navy captain, has been vocal in his concerns about Australia's commitment to AUKUS, saying last year 'the Australians have been noticeably fickle', as reported overnight by the Sydney Morning Herald.
In a separate criticism, he said the 'challenge for AUKUS' is two-fold.
'First there will be a question of whether the Australian government will sustain their commitment across the coming years and change of (governments),' Mr Hendrix posted on social media.
'Second will be whether the US will actually be willing to give up Virginia class boats.'
Speaking to Sky News, Mr Taylor said the 'opposition's position on AUKUS is not fickle at all'.
'It is complete and utter commitment to what is an incredibly important initiative, both tranche one and tranche two – the nuclear submarines as well as the associated technology,' he said.
Pressed on the criticism, he repeated his defence but suggested it was a fair shot at the Albanese government.
'The opposition's not fickle, that's for sure,' he said.
'I worry that the government – I think it's not just me worried, I think every expert looking at this is making these comments – they're deeply worried that we're not on our way to having the defence force we need in such an uncertain time.
'We've got authoritarian regimes around the world flexing their muscles.'
Mr Taylor was also asked about the Netherlands' defence chief warning Australia should lift its military spending in response to the build up in China.
General Onno Eichelsheim was in Australia for Talisman Sabre – annual war games hosted by the Australian Defence Force.
He said the country should 'get ready for something that you hope will never happen', drawing parallels between Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific.
'You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, then take that seriously,' General Eichelsheim told the ABC.
'And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen.
'If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it.'
However, he said percentage of GDP was not the most important measure.
Responding to the remarks, Mr Taylor said Australia 'definitely' needed to boost defence spending.
'We need to spend that money better,' he said.
'And (the Coalition has) made a commitment already to get to 3 per cent at least and that is exactly what the government should be doing.'
Labor has committed billions in extra defence funding over the next decade, which will push it to about 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2034.
But Anthony Albanese and his government have firmly rejected the US' call to boost it to 3.5 per cent, adding to friction with Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
Negative gearing reform is back on the agenda, but younger voters now hold the power
It's time to put the 2019 election to bed, along with the messages we pretend were sent from voters from that disastrous campaign for Labor. It has been six years since Labor leader Bill Shorten took what were quite radical proposals to the voting public, including negative gearing reforms. Since that election, Australia has changed profoundly. We have endured a global pandemic with consequences we are only beginning to realise, and an acute housing crisis that has changed us. We have seen the biggest change to the demographics of the dominant voting bloc, with millennials and Gen Z now being the largest voting group in Australia, outnumbering boomers. By the next election, that shift will be even more profound. Voters younger than their mid-40s are consistently telling pollsters they believe the system is stacked against them. They have made it crystal clear they are hungry for change. The treasurer's productivity roundtable has now morphed into something much broader than simply delivering productivity reforms, and this is both worrying and exciting some stakeholders. Some in business circles believe it is increasingly being used to push for higher taxes. Those who want the tax conversation say it's about more effective taxes. Even fairer taxes. Remember fairness? Senior government sources strongly contest that this is an excuse to raise taxes. They say they are keen to cut taxes too, but need to pay for it somehow. That can't be from spending cuts alone. A reconfiguration of that tax system is the only answer. The Australian Council of Trade Unions yesterday declared they will use the productivity platform to call for bold reform to negative gearing and the capital gains tax at the government's productivity roundtable this month, proposing that the tax breaks be limited to one investment property. Sally McManus, the union's secretary, told Insiders the current arrangements should continue for five years, but after that date, "we've got to bite the bullet". "Otherwise, we're just saying 'too bad, young people, you're not going to be able to ever own a home,'" she said. "Since 2019, the problem has just gotten worse. It's going to continue to get worse unless the government is brave enough to do something about it." When it was in opposition, Labor took negative gearing reforms to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections, at which they were defeated. But they were defeated for a myriad of reasons. Their tax policies were only part of the story of that defeat. The ACTU's manifesto for reform will be resisted by some quarters, but their proposals achieve one important thing. They have restarted a conversation that Australians have said they want their leaders to be having. The tax burden is not being shared fairly, and governments that continue to ignore this reality risk losing the trust of younger voters who are hungry for reform. At the same time, the Productivity Commission has called for a 20 per cent tax rate on profits for companies with revenue of up to $1 billion. The commission also called for a new 5 per cent tax on net cashflow rather than profits, which could see some large companies pay a higher rate but would provide immediate tax relief for smaller companies seeking to build their capital. Already, this is being fiercely resisted by the big end of town. But it's time to involve a wider range of Australians from across the tax scale to have an input on what is fair and what is just. Perhaps the proposal won't work — who knows — but we should ventilate big and radical ideas, and we should applaud the Productivity Commission for thinking radically and creatively. Returning to the negative gearing conversation, you'll recall this was a scare campaign Peter Dutton unsuccessfully tried to inject into the May campaign. At the time, it forced Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers to deny that Labor was preparing to make changes to negative gearing. The issue re-emerged during the leaders' debate on the ABC, when Mr Albanese said he had not commissioned Treasury modelling on the potential economic impact of changes to the policy. His response prompted Opposition Leader Peter Dutton to laugh and accuse him of lying. Reports first emerged last year that the federal Treasury had investigated a potential overhaul of the tax concessions awarded to property owners. "It certainly wasn't commissioned by us to do so," the PM said when asked during the second debate about the Treasury modelling. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers had publicly stated back in September that he had asked Treasury for "advice" about the subject, leading Dutton to claim in the debate that Albanese had a "problem with the truth". Chalmers then tried to draw a difference between that advice and "modelling". "I've said on a number of occasions now that I sought a view," the treasurer said. "Now that's different to commissioning modelling. The prime minister was asked about commissioning modelling. I sought a view." Chalmers said it was "normal practice" to seek advice on such a matter and that the Treasury's view was a change to negative gearing "wouldn't get the sort of improvement that we desperately need to see in our economy when it comes to supply". One thing is clear: the treasurer wants this debate. Whether the PM would be willing to champion this change is another matter. We do, however, have one precedent worth remembering. The PM was deeply resistant to changing the stage 3 tax cuts until the case had been made with the public, and then suddenly, he was into it. I suspect the same thing would occur on some of the bigger reform ideas. Kos Samaras, director at the political consultancy firm Redbridge, said there are profound generational shifts between the 2019 and 2025 elections. In 2019, Millennials and Gen Z made up just 26 per cent of the electoral roll, whilst Baby Boomers and older Australians still held sway, culturally and politically. But that was the last election where the latter group's decades-long dominance would be felt. "By May 2025, Millennials and Gen Z accounted for 42 per cent of enrolled voters, a generational bloc shaped by vastly different life experiences," he tells this column. "This is the first cohort since the Great Depression to believe their quality of life is worse than that of their parents. "They've come of age amid a housing crisis, climate anxiety, a global pandemic, inflation shocks, and broken career promises. "At the next federal election, this generational tide will become even more pronounced. "Millennials and Gen Z will be the most dominant voting bloc in the country, while Baby Boomers and older Australians will comprise just 27 per cent of the roll. "Hence, the ACTU-proposed negative gearing changes will resonate with younger Australians, and it would be a brave politician to ignore such a proposal." Over to you. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Emissions reduction 'central' to boosting productivity
An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals. An answer to Australia's languishing productivity lies in its response to the threat of climate change, an independent government advisory body has found. Adapting to growing climate-related risks while also reducing emissions and transitioning to clean energy will enable higher productivity growth and living standards, according to an interim report by the Productivity Commission. The findings come as Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares to convene a roundtable in search of a solution to the nation's lagging productivity. "Australia's net zero transformation is well under way," commissioner Barry Sterland said. "Getting the rest of the way at the lowest possible cost is central to our productivity challenge." By minimising the costs of reducing emissions through careful policy design, resources would be freed up for more productive activities, the interim report found. It recommended ensuring incentives to invest in technology that can achieve reductions. The Renewable Energy Target and the Capacity Investment Scheme, for example, will not support new investment in renewables after 2030, which means new market-based incentives should be implemented to eventually replace them. The report also recommends incentivising heavy vehicle operators to reduce emissions. Long-overdue reforms to Australia's main environment law would also better protect the natural world by introducing national standards and improving regional planning, while speeding up approvals for infrastructure to make energy cheaper. Though Australia has already set targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions 43 per cent by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the interim report found Australia will face significant climate-related risks regardless of emissions reductions. This means adapting to climate change is integral to growing productivity. The government has been urged to boost resilience to climate perils, which would lower the cost of disaster recovery and help maintain quality of life while Australia grapples with the impacts of climate change. Australians' homes in particular must become better adapted to climate risks, prompting the Productivity Commission to call for a housing resilience rating system and resources to help households, builders and insurers more easily identify upgrades. Dr Chalmers' roundtable will convene later in August and some invited to attend have already called for similar reforms. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry in July urged the government to overhaul the nation's environment laws or risk Australia missing its most important economic goals.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Australia commits to more food, medical aid for Gaza
Australia has pledged an extra $20 million in humanitarian assistance for women and children in war-torn Gaza after more than 100,000 turned out in protest across the country to spotlight suffering in the besieged enclave. The funding will go to organisations able to deliver desperately needed food, medical supplies and other lifesaving support, the federal government said in a statement on Sunday. The new package of support includes $6 million for the United Nations World Food Programme for the provision and distribution of food supplies and $5 million for UNICEF for nutritional support for children at risk of starvation. The International Committee of the Red Cross will also receive $5 million to help those in Gaza meet essential needs, including access to health care. An additional $2 million for relief support with the UK will be donated through an existing partnership arrangement, while $2 million will go to the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization to provide medical supplies to support the operation of field hospitals in Gaza. Australia has so far committed $130 million in humanitarian assistance to help civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since October 7, 2023. But the Albanese government has been criticised for not doing enough in addressing what the UN has described as worsening famine conditions in Gaza. About 90,000 people turned the Sydney Harbour Bridge into a sea of Palestinian flags on Sunday while tens of thousands more met at similar protests in Melbourne and Adelaide. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia has "consistently been part of the international call on Israel to allow a full and immediate resumption of aid to Gaza". "The suffering and starvation of civilians in Gaza must end," she said. "Australia will continue to work with the international community to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the release of hostages and a two-state solution - the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples." Mr Albanese is standing firm against increasing pressure to recognise a Palestinian state after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom would do so unless Israel moved to secure a ceasefire and increase humanitarian aid into Gaza. The UK move comes after France became the first G7 country to say it would recognise Palestine ahead of a UN meeting in September. Mr Albanese said while the world was horrified at Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in thousands of deaths and some 200 people being taken hostage, the subsequent war had cost too many innocent lives. Gaza's health ministry says 60,000 people have been killed during Israel's subsequent counteroffensive. Israel has restricted food and medical supplies from entering Gaza, where it controls all entry points, to put pressure on Hamas. International pressure is mounting on the nation state to let in more humanitarian aid, as deaths attributed to malnutrition rise. Israel denies there is starvation in the besieged strip despite international human rights groups branding Israel's offensive in Gaza a genocide and attributing deaths to starvation.
