logo
Michigan joins over 20 states in suing USDA over access to SNAP food stamp recipient records

Michigan joins over 20 states in suing USDA over access to SNAP food stamp recipient records

CBS Newsa day ago
Michigan is among nearly two dozen states that are suing the federal government over a pending rule that seeks extensive access to the personal records of food stamp recipients.
A total of 22 states have signed onto the suit, which was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
"USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data," said the statement from Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's office.
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, is the modern version of what was once called food stamps. The program is meant for lower-income people who complete an application and meet a series of eligibility requirements. While the SNAP program is federally funded, it has long been administered by the states, and the records of recipients are generally handled at that level.
Michigan currently directs about $254 million in SNAP benefits a month through the Michigan Bridge Card network.
Eligible recipients can use their individual or household allocations via the electronic benefits card toward purchasing food at most supermarkets and other participating retailers. Fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy products can be purchased with SNAP benefits. Paper products and cleaning supplies are among the ineligible grocery items.
In May, the USDA issued a notice that it will require states and territories to share records of SNAP benefits and allotments with the federal government.
While those instructions are on hold, according to the USDA, they do ask for personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers and other records about applicants and recipients.
The USA is also seeking information "sufficient to calculate the total dollar value" of SNAP benefits that participants received on and after Jan. 1, 2020.
"For years, this program has been on autopilot, with no USDA insight into real-time data. The Department is focused on appropriate and lawful participation in SNAP, and today's request is one of many steps to ensure SNAP is preserved for only those eligible," USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in her announcement.
The lawsuit said the federal government has never previously asked for such detailed records on SNAP recipients. Quality control checks normally ask for sample data, and both inspections and audits would seek a limited range of information specifically allowed by law.
"SNAP applicants provide their private information on the understanding, backed by long-standing state and federal laws, that their information will not be used for unrelated purposes," Nessel's office said. "USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cotton Falling on Tuesday Trade
Cotton Falling on Tuesday Trade

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cotton Falling on Tuesday Trade

Cotton futures are down 38 to 63 points in the nearby contracts so far on Tuesday's midday. Crude oil futures are $1.00/barrel higher. The US dollar index is continuing the rally, up $0.340 to $98.735. Weekly Crop Progress data indicated 80% of the US cotton crop was squaring as of July 27, with 44% setting bolls. Condition ratings were back down 2% to 55% gd/ex, with the Brugler500 index down 2 points to 345. TX ratings were steady at 334, with GA slipping 3 points. More News from Barchart Coffee Prices Sharply Higher on Weather and Tariff Concerns in Brazil Corn Bulls Are Bending, Not Breaking: What to Watch in Grain Futures This Week Adverse Brazilian Weather and Tariff Concerns Boost Coffee Prices Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! The Seam showed sales of 1,489 bales on Monday, with an average price of 61.20 cents/lb. The Cotlook A Index was down 50 points at 78.70 cents on July 28. ICE cotton stocks were steady on 7/28, with the certified stocks level at 21,617 bales. USDA's Adjusted World Price (AWP) was up 23 points last week at 54.95 cents/lb. It is good through this Thursday. Oct 25 Cotton is at 67.02, down 38 points, Dec 25 Cotton is at 67.71, down 63 points, Mar 26 Cotton is at 69.13, down 63 points On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Bessent calls Trump baby accounts 'backdoor for privatizing Social Security'
Bessent calls Trump baby accounts 'backdoor for privatizing Social Security'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent calls Trump baby accounts 'backdoor for privatizing Social Security'

By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday likened new savings accounts in a bill President Donald Trump this month signed into law to "a backdoor for privatizing Social Security," speaking at an event sponsored by Breitbart. The accounts, which were part of Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, are meant to encourage new parents by offering a one-time $1,000 government contribution. According to the White House, the accounts will track a stock index and allow for additional private contributions of up to $5,000 per year. Bessent said some details, including distribution dates and what funds could be accessed for, still needed to be worked out. "But in a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security," Bessent said. "Like, Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out that - to the extent that if all of a sudden these accounts grow, and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement - then that's a game changer too." The Social Security administration did not immediately comment. Social Security was launched in the 1930s as a federally administered system of social insurance and as a retirement program for U.S. citizens and some non-citizens. The program is due to run short of funds to pay full benefits in 2033, its annual trustees' report said in June. U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee which oversees the agency, expressed concern over Bessent's remarks and accused the Trump administration of wanting to privatize Social Security. The Trump administration has not indicated a move towards doing so. In a post on X on Wednesday afternoon, Bessent said the "Trump Baby Accounts" will supplement Social Security's guaranteed payments. He said the Trump administration is committed to protecting Social Security. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Dave Ramsey Says 'Almost Every Time It Makes Sense To Take It Early' —Tells 61-Year-Old To Claim Social Security At 62 And Invest 'Every Dollar'
Dave Ramsey Says 'Almost Every Time It Makes Sense To Take It Early' —Tells 61-Year-Old To Claim Social Security At 62 And Invest 'Every Dollar'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dave Ramsey Says 'Almost Every Time It Makes Sense To Take It Early' —Tells 61-Year-Old To Claim Social Security At 62 And Invest 'Every Dollar'

When Tracy from Billings, Montana called into "The Ramsey Show," he was looking for advice. What he got was a full-blown Social Security takedown. "I'm 61 years old, and I keep getting these letters from Social Security wanting to know what I want to do," he said. "I'm still working, I'm on Baby Step 7, I am married — and I don't know when is the best time to take advantage of that fantastic program." Ramsey, catching the sarcasm, smirked: "I sense sarcasm, Tracy." Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Tracy clarified that he didn't actually need the money. His plan? Take Social Security early and invest 100% of the checks. But he hesitated after realizing he'd receive a reduced amount before full retirement age. "You don't [get the full amount]," Ramsey confirmed. "The later you start—whether it's 62 all the way up to 70—every year you would get more." But then Ramsey delivered the part he'd been waiting to say: "If you run the numbers out... almost every time you can run the numbers on it by taking every dollar from 62 to 66 that you get and put it in a good investment. The investment returns will give you greater than the difference for the rest of your life — almost every time. So it usually makes sense to take it early if you're going to do what you're going to do, which is invest." Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Ramsey reinforced his mathematical case, now set against a backdrop where the full retirement age has shifted to 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later. "You can get a better rate of return than they will pay you by waiting," he said. He even brought up the estate factor, adding, "When you die, that money that's in that mutual fund is part of your estate. When you die with Social Security? Nothing. That's what you get." Then he let loose. "You will discover it's about a negative 4% rate of return in your life," Ramsey said. "Only the government can figure out a way to talk everyone into having something removed from their check that they make a negative 4% on — and everybody fights to keep it in place." The rant escalated fast. "I've been paying into it for almost 40 years. You could keep all that — I'll still come out ahead in the next 20 years not putting money in the stupid thing," he said. "Just putting that amount of money — the amount of money you robbed from me in my check — into a mutual fund."And finally: "Your program's so freakin' awesome, you can just keep it." So should you take Social Security early or wait for a bigger check at 70? It's a hotly debated question. Some experts, like Suze Orman, encourage healthy adults to delay as long as possible. Ramsey takes the numbers-first approach: if you're still working and willing to invest every dollar, it "usually makes sense to take it early." There's no one-size-fits-all answer. It depends on your health, financial habits, retirement timeline — and who you ask. But in Ramsey's math, the earlier check plus a smart investment beats the bigger check later — almost every time. Read Next: Can you guess how many retire with a $5,000,000 nest egg? . Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Dave Ramsey Says 'Almost Every Time It Makes Sense To Take It Early' —Tells 61-Year-Old To Claim Social Security At 62 And Invest 'Every Dollar' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store