logo
Aboard Marine One, a Phone Call and the Decision to Strike Iran

Aboard Marine One, a Phone Call and the Decision to Strike Iran

Hindustan Times4 hours ago

As he barreled toward a nearby airport on Marine One, before flying to Washington, Trump received a call from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. It was time to make a final decision: move forward with U.S. strikes on Iran or abort the mission. The president, who had grown convinced that diplomacy alone wouldn't prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, gave Hegseth the greenlight, according to people familiar with the matter.
Hours later, B-2 bombers targeted nuclear sites in Iran, the culmination of a frenetic week of behind-the-scenes deliberations marked by covert plans to keep the operation secret.
Trump and his advisers have said the strikes were a targeted campaign to impede Tehran's nuclear ambitions. But the move threatens to drag the U.S. into a broader conflagration in the Middle East, potentially further dividing Trump's political coalition.
Ultimately, Trump saw the operation as a way to assert U.S. dominance. 'Our country is hot as a pistol,' Trump told The Wall Street Journal in a brief interview on Sunday. 'Six months ago, our country was cold as ice. It was dead,' he said, calling the strikes 'a great victory for our country.'
Trump had been under pressure for weeks from his advisers and opposing wings of his MAGA coalition. Hawks, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, were pushing the president to take military action, while some well-known conservatives, such as Tucker Carlson and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.), warned that hitting Iran was a mistake.
The hawks ultimately won out, as diplomatic efforts sputtered. Steve Witkoff, an influential Trump adviser who had long held out hope for a nuclear deal with Tehran, told the president that the Iranians were stringing the White House along. Israeli officials, meanwhile, argued that the air superiority they had established over Iran made an operation a much lower risk, administration officials said.
Graham, in an interview, said he told Trump that authorizing strikes in Iran would give the U.S. an opportunity to repair damage done to America's reputation abroad after the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan. 'You'll be a new sheriff in town, and this will reset our relationship with the rest of the world,' Graham said he told the president. Trump arrives at the White House on Saturday.
Trump spent much of Sunday tracking news coverage of the strikes. His aides gave him a compilation of positive statements from supporters on social media, according to administration officials. He also stewed about Rep. Thomas Massie's criticism of the strikes, discussing with advisers a primary challenge against the Kentucky Republican who called the U.S. attack on Iran unconstitutional.
Democrats have called the Iran strikes unlawful, arguing that Trump should have sought a War Powers Resolution from Congress before approving the military action. And they have alluded to the faulty intelligence that was a basis for the Iraq war, saying the administration failed to offer a detailed rationale for the timing of the strikes.
'We saw no evidence that Iran had made the decision to build a bomb or was actually affirmatively building the mechanism, which takes time,' said Sen. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) on CNN's 'State of the Union.' 'So in the absence of that, you don't order a strike like this.'
Trump's decision to launch U.S. strikes came after mounting frustration over the pace of negotiations with Iran, according to administration officials. The president and Witkoff, his Middle East envoy, were bullish that they could reach a nuclear deal with Iran. But in recent months, Witkoff and Trump soured on the talks as Iran continued to move ahead with its plans to build a nuclear weapon. In late May, Trump told advisers that he was convinced the Iranians were 'tapping them along,' according to a person who heard his comments.
The president was leaning heavily toward moving forward with U.S. strikes by the time White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday that Trump would make a final decision over the next two weeks. Trump, frustrated by reports that he was preparing to authorize strikes, instructed Leavitt to announce the two-week timeline in part because he believed it would help obscure his plans, administration officials said.
As the U.S. moved closer to an attack, Trump and his team were in regular touch with Israeli officials. He also repeatedly asked his advisers to lay out what, if anything, could go wrong with the attack, according to the officials.
On Saturday, Trump's aides gathered secretly in the Situation Room, where they went over attack plans and reviewed maps of the region. Another set of B-2 planes flew from the U.S., in a ruse meant to throw off Iranian officials. Administration officials think the timing of the strikes caught Iran off guard.
The backlash from Trump's political base has so far been muted, despite private misgivings from prominent supporters of the president. But some Republicans warned voter frustration could spread if the U.S. gets drawn into a sustained conflict in the region.
'If the base feels betrayed, then they'll be more apathetic during the midterms, and it will be his own undoing,' Massie said in an interview. Greene, the Georgia lawmaker, wrote on X, following the strikes: 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war.' She added in her post, 'this is not our fight.'
Trump and his advisers continued to make their case publicly and privately on Sunday. In phone calls, Trump told supporters his actions align with his America First views and said he has been consistent in his goal of Iran not getting a nuclear weapon, a senior administration official said.
Trump has said in recent days that he has no intention of overthrowing Iran's regime. But he appeared to signal on Sunday that he is open to that outcome. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' he wrote on Truth Social. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, center, at a news conference at the Pentagon on Sunday.
Responding to concerns that the U.S. was entering another war abroad, Vice President JD Vance said Americans were understandably 'exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East.'
'But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives,' he told NBC News. 'So this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing.'
Vance, however, acknowledged that further military action in Iran is possible. 'If they decide they are going to attack our troops, if they decide they are going to continue to try to build a nuclear weapon, then we are going to respond to that with overwhelming force,' he said.
Iran's foreign minister on Sunday played down chances of further diplomacy, saying 'they have proved that they are not men of diplomacy and that they only understand the language of threat and force.'
As a candidate in 2016, Trump was a frequent critic of the second Iraq war, which was launched by Republican President George W. Bush. During the 2024 presidential campaign, he blamed Joe Biden for allowing wars in Ukraine and Gaza to continue. In his Milwaukee convention speech, Trump said he could 'stop wars with just a telephone call.'
But foreign-policy matters have already consumed much of his early months in office, as lawmakers debate his legislative priorities and some in his base are frustrated with the slow pace of deportations, a key campaign promise. Trump tried on Sunday to shift the focus back to his legislative agenda, saying in a social-media post: 'Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done.'
Other top administration officials, including Vance and Hegseth, are also veterans whose experience in the war on terrorism made them skeptical of America's security role abroad. In a 2023 opinion column in The Wall Street Journal, Vance argued Trump's best foreign policy was 'not starting any wars.'
Write to Tarini Parti at tarini.parti@wsj.com, Josh Dawsey at Joshua.Dawsey@WSJ.com, Siobhan Hughes at Siobhan.hughes@wsj.com and Alex Leary at alex.leary@wsj.com Aboard Marine One, a Phone Call and the Decision to Strike Iran

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistani politicians, activists call on govt to review Trump's nomination for Nobel peace prize
Pakistani politicians, activists call on govt to review Trump's nomination for Nobel peace prize

Hindustan Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pakistani politicians, activists call on govt to review Trump's nomination for Nobel peace prize

Several Pakistani politicians and notable figures have asked the government to reconsider its decision to recommend President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize after the US bombed Iran's three nuclear sites. Pakistan said it would support US President Donald Trump's nomination for a Nobel peace prize(AP) The government, in a surprise move on Friday, announced that it would nominate Trump for the prestigious award due to his peacemaking efforts during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. A letter of recommendation, signed by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, has already been sent to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Norway. But the decision came under scrutiny after the US bombed Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, joining Israel to dent Tehran's nuclear programme. Also Read: Pakistan condemns US strike on Iran day after nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize The Dawn newspaper reported that some leading politicians demanded the government review its decision in light of the latest development. Veteran politician Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who heads the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), demanded that the government rescind its decision. 'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel Prize should be withdrawn,' Fazl told workers at a party meeting in Murree on Sunday. He said that Trump's recent meeting and lunch with Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir 'pleased Pakistani rulers so much' that they recommended nominating the US president for the Nobel Prize. "Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace?' Fazl questioned. 'With the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on America's hands, how can he claim to be a proponent of peace?' Trump had campaigned for office as a 'peacemaker' who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, but both conflicts are still raging five months into his presidency. Former senator Mushahid Hussain wrote on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has willfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!' He said Trump had been 'trapped by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli war lobby, committing the" biggest blunder of his presidency'. 'Trump will now end up presiding over the decline of America!' Trump 'engaged in deception and betrayed his own promise not to start new wars', Mushahid said in another post, strongly condemning the US attacks on Iran. Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan wrote 'reconsider' on his X account, highlighting the 'US attack on Iran and continuous US support of Israeli killings in Gaza'. In a separate post, the Opposition PTI condemned the 'unprovoked' US strikes and voiced 'total support' for Iran's sovereignty. Raoof Hasan, head of PTI's political think-tank, said the government's decision was now a 'cause of unmitigated shame and embarrassment for those who were instrumental in making the choice'. 'That's why it is said that legitimacy can neither be bought nor gifted,' said Hasan, as he took a jibe at the government. He also denounced the US' 'total disregard for international covenants' through attacks on Iran. Former senator Afrasiab Khattak said, 'The sycophancy adopted by the Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy.' 'It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites,' the veteran politician noted. Jamaat-i-Islami chief Naeemur Rehman has said the decision 'undermines our national dignity and grace'. Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, termed the move 'unfortunate' and said it did not reflect the public's views. Senior journalist Mariana Baabar, in a post on X, said that 'today Pakistan does not look too good either', sharing the government's post announcing its intention to nominate Trump for the Nobel. Author and activist Fatima Bhutto asked: 'Will Pakistan withdraw its nomination for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize?'

‘Bullseye': Donald Trump claims US strikes inflicted ‘monumental damage' to Iran's nuclear facilities
‘Bullseye': Donald Trump claims US strikes inflicted ‘monumental damage' to Iran's nuclear facilities

Indian Express

time32 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Bullseye': Donald Trump claims US strikes inflicted ‘monumental damage' to Iran's nuclear facilities

United States President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) claimed that the overnight military strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure delivered a severe blow to Tehran. Taking to his Truth Social handle, Trump asserted that Iran's key nuclear sites suffered 'monumental damage', citing the satellite images. He further affirmed that 'obliteration' was the 'accurate term' for the devastation caused by US airstrikes. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote in a post. Iran says 'no signs of contamination' at nuclear sites Trump's remarks come as Iran downplayed the US attacks, saying that there were no signs of contamination at its key nuclear sites — Isfahan, Fordow and Natanz. Iranian state media also quoted the country's National Nuclear Safety System Centre, which said that its radiation detectors recorded no radioactive release after the strikes. 'There is no danger to the residents living around the aforementioned sites,' the statement said. It further stated that the residents living in the vicinity of the nuclear sites hit by the US were not in danger. Experts suggest that Iran, anticipating a US strike, might have relocated its stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium from Fordow, potentially hiding it in undisclosed locations, especially the ones not known to Israel and the US. 'I don't think you can with great confidence do anything but set back their nuclear program by maybe a few years. There's almost certainly facilities that we don't know about,' Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey told Reuters. The US, on Saturday (June 21), carried out 'Operation Midnight Hammer' against Iran, targeting its three key nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. Trump said that the attack's objective was the 'destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. '

Gold Price Prediction: War tensions push yellow metal down by Rs 1,900 from peak. Turbulence ahead?
Gold Price Prediction: War tensions push yellow metal down by Rs 1,900 from peak. Turbulence ahead?

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Gold Price Prediction: War tensions push yellow metal down by Rs 1,900 from peak. Turbulence ahead?

Amid geopolitical tensions and a war scenario, Gold August futures contracts at MCX opened flat at Rs 99,175/10 grams, which is up merely by Rs 66 or 0.07%. However, the prices of the yellow metal have slipped by Rs 1,900 from their all-time high of Rs 1,01,078/10 gm. However, silver July futures showed strength, opening higher by Rs 503 or 0.47% at Rs 1,06,727/kg. Internationally, gold and silver prices hovered near $3,360 and $36 per ounce, respectively, on Monday, remaining volatile as tensions escalated in the Middle East after the U.S. joined Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. President Trump warned of further military action if Iran resists peace, intensifying fears and boosting demand for safe-haven assets. On Friday, gold and silver settled on a weaker note in the domestic market while settling on a mixed note in the international markets. Gold August futures contract settled at Rs 99,109 per 10 grams with a loss of 0.22%, and silver July futures contract settled at Rs 1,06,224 per kilogram with a loss of 1.09%. Gold and silver showed very high price volatility and slipped from their highs amid the hawkish policy stance of the U.S. Fed. The U.S. Fed maintained a status quo on interest rates and also downgraded growth outlooks. They also show concerns about higher inflation due to U.S. trade tariffs. Gold and silver also plunged after the U.S. President said that it will take two weeks to decide whether to intervene in the Israel-Iran war or not. However, the US stroke on Iran's three main nuclear facilities over the weekend. This comes at a fragile moment for the global economy. The dollar index is also facing resistance at higher levels and supporting prices of gold and silver. Today, the US Dollar Index, DXY, was hovering near the 99.01 mark, gaining 0.31 or 0.31%. 'We expect gold and silver prices to remain volatile this week amid volatility in the dollar index and geo-political tensions and Chairman's testify but gold prices could hold its support level of $3,280 per troy ounce and silver prices could also hold $34.40 per troy ounce levels on a weekly closing basis,' said Manoj Kumar Jain of Prithvifinmart Commodity Research. 'Investors now turn to upcoming U.S. economic data and speeches from Federal Reserve officials, including a two-day congressional testimony by Chair Jerome Powell, to gauge the Fed's response amid rising risks from tariffs and conflict,' believes Rahul Kalantri, VP Commodities at Mehta Equities. How to trade gold? Manoj Kumar Jain suggested the following ranges for gold and silver on MCX: Gold has support at Rs 98,660-98,280 and resistance at Rs 99,400-99,850 Silver has support at Rs 1,05,400-1,04,650 and resistance at Rs 1,07,000-1,07,800 Jain suggests buying silver around Rs 95,500 with a stop loss of Rs 95,000 for a target of Rs 96,650. Gold rates in physical markets Gold Price today in Delhi Standard gold (22 carat) prices in Delhi stand at Rs 57,216/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,968/8 grams. Gold Price today in Mumbai Standard gold (22 carat) prices in Mumbai stand at Rs 57,576/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 61,416/8 grams. Gold Price today in Chennai Standard gold (22 carat) prices in Chennai stand at Rs 56,936/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,744/8 grams. Also read: Why stock market is falling today? Key factors behind 900-point Sensex crash, Nifty below 24,850 Gold Price today in Hyderabad Standard gold (22 carat) prices in Hyderabad stand at Rs 56,880/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,576/8 grams. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store