logo
Trump has abandoned his own peace plan

Trump has abandoned his own peace plan

Telegraph19-05-2025
First a caveat: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were on the phone for two hours.
Even allowing for the delay caused by translation between English and Russian, that is a lengthy call. And we do not know what else was said beyond the statements put out by the Kremlin and the White House.
Nonetheless, the respective readouts are revealing. Mr Trump's focus on trade illustrates two things.
First, he still does not seem to understand what Putin calls 'the root causes of the conflict' – or does not care about them.
The Russian leader is driven by the goal of righting 'Lenin's mistake' of allowing Ukraine to exist, of addressing what he considers a fundamental challenge to Russia's existence as a great power, of restoring the old empire and Russia's place as one of the leading poles of power on the planet.
Volodymyr Zelensky and Ukraine are driven by self-preservation.
There remains an enormous gulf between those positions. Neither is the sort of thing you abandon on the offer of a trade deal.
But Mr Trump's objective has always seemed to be less about peace in Ukraine, than normalising America's ties with Russia.
Read with that in mind, his enthusiasm about the 'UNLIMITED' potential of 'TRADE' with Russia once peace comes makes more sense.
That is consistent with much of his previous rhetoric, so it should be taken seriously.
It suggests Mr Trump is impatient to ditch wartime sanctions on Russia sooner rather than later.
That in turn implies the White House will push for a quick deal rather than a good deal, and that Russia will be able to rebuild its economic and thus military power more quickly than previously thought. Bad news for Ukraine and Europe.
There is little here to suggest peace really is imminent, however.
For while Putin agreed with Mr Trump that 'we are generally on the right track' for peace, he makes clear there are several stations to go through to get there.
He spoke after the call not of imminent peace, but 'a memorandum on a possible future peace accord' including 'the principles of settlement, the timing of a possible peace agreement'.
And of course, he said 'the main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis'.
Talks have resumed. The two sides met in Istanbul last week for the first time since 2022. But they could go on for a very long time.
In the meantime, the fighting will continue, and troops on the ground will use force to make the diplomatic delegations 'take into account new realities' – another bit of Russian diplomatese, best translated as might makes right.
Maybe the war will end this year. But don't hold your breath.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine
This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The UK is preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a reassurance force if a peace deal is reached with Russia. A meeting of the "coalition of the willing", co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, saw over 30 international leaders discuss further sanctions on Russia and security guarantees for Ukraine. Donald Trump has indicated the US is willing to provide security assistance, such as air support, but will not commit ground troops to Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky has welcomed the promise of security guarantees as a major step forward, expecting them to be formalised soon. Donald Trump stated he has spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to plan a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky, followed by a three-way meeting including Trump. UK preparing to send troops to Ukraine as part of 'reassurance force' if peace deal is struck

Trump team will soon decide what's ‘anti-American' when granting citizenship
Trump team will soon decide what's ‘anti-American' when granting citizenship

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump team will soon decide what's ‘anti-American' when granting citizenship

President Donald Trump's administration is now screening for what it considers 'anti-American activity' when deciding whether immigrants can legally live and work in the United States. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced on Tuesday that 'anti-American' activity — including social media posts and any perceived ideological affiliations — will be considered an 'overwhelmingly negative factor' when deciding whether immigrants can stay in the country legally. But it will be largely up to officers' discretion to decide what 'anti-American' means, relying on a 60-year-old immigration law that prohibits alleged communists or people who support 'totalitarian' governments from entering the country. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser said in a statement Tuesday. 'Immigration benefits — including to live and work in the United States — remain a privilege, not a right." The agency's policy manual was updated Tuesday to note that immigration authorities can deny citizenship, work permits, green cards and other lawful status to anyone it deems to have supported 'anti-American ideologies' or 'anti-American activities.' The agency's review of social media profiles will also screen for 'anti-American activity,' USCIS announced. The manual notes that the definition of 'anti-American' relies on language in a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which doesn't mention 'anti-American' and largely focuses on communism. That 1952 law was drafted at the height of red-scare hysteria, Senator Joseph McCarthy's anti-communist crusade, and investigations under the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which investigated alleged disloyalty and subversive activities, including perceived communist sympathies. The guidance comes just days after the Trump administration expanded a 'good moral character' test for citizenship, with officers instructed to perform more than a 'cursory mechanical review focused on the absence of wrongdoing.' Immigration authorities must now consider 'a holistic assessment of an alien's behavior, adherence to societal norms, and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character.' The Trump administration's latest maneuvers join an expansive anti-immigration agenda defined by mass arrests, stripping legal status for tens of thousands of people, restricting who can enter the country — and who can be considered a citizen. The president is seeking to unilaterally redefine birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment while closing all points of entry for asylum seekers and cutting off legal protections for more than one million immigrants — radically expanding the pool of 'undocumented' people now vulnerable for arrest and removal. USCIS guidance announced on Tuesday also instructs authorities to screen whether applicants promote what they consider 'antisemitic terrorism and antisemitic terrorist organizations' and 'antisemitic ideologies.' The new screening measures follow similar guidance from USCIS and other agencies as the Trump administration targets campus dissent against Israel's war in Gaza, which officials broadly characterized as antisemitic. In May, USCIS announced the agency was 'immediately' reviewing immigrants' social media accounts for what it considers 'antisemitic activity' that could be used as evidence to deny them legal status in the United States. 'This will immediately affect aliens applying for lawful permanent resident status, foreign students and aliens affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemitic activity,' according to the agency. The following month, the State Department restarted interviews for student visa applicants and directed embassies and consulates to 'conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants. Those applicants' social media privacy settings must also be 'public' to be reviewed by immigration authorities, according to State Department orders. Diplomats were ordered to review social media profiles for 'any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.' They also were instructed to decide if applicants displayed any 'advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to U.S. national security' and 'support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence.'

DC residents question troops' focus on low-crime areas amid Trump takeover
DC residents question troops' focus on low-crime areas amid Trump takeover

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

DC residents question troops' focus on low-crime areas amid Trump takeover

As Donald Trump's federal takeover of Washington DC's police entered its second week, and six states vowed to send hundreds of additional national guard troops to assist the administration, residents questioned why federal agents seem to be largely patrolling high-profile but low-crime parts of the nation's capital. The Washington Post has tracked where federal forces are patrolling the city, finding that few interactions have been witnessed in the parts of the city with the highest rates of crime. The White House rejected that claim on Tuesday, saying that 'nearly half of non-immigration related arrests have happened in the most crime-hit areas in DC', but before Tuesday, the White House had been releasing data showing many of their arrests were of undocumented immigrants, and few federal agents have been spotted addressing or responding to violent crime. Instead, Washingtonians have seen officers from the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and other offices standing around prominent tourist sites and nightlife corridors, responding to minor disturbances and creating disturbances of their own. Over the weekend, several military vehicles were seen outside Union Station, positioned next to where passengers find their ride share vehicles. The Department of Defense posted a photo of a tan Humvee outside the train station on X on Saturday and said: 'This We'll Defend.' Federal agents and vehicles have also been spotted across the National Mall, including the Lincoln Memorial, where violent crime is virtually nonexistent. Visible confrontations between federal officers and protesters have also occurred along 14th Street, a popular nightlife destination. Amanda Moore, a Washington-based writer and researcher, wrote on X early on Saturday morning that she witnessed '15 federal agents call an ambulance for a very, very drunk and sick girl' in Dupont Circle, another center of nightlife. Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute thinktank, joked on X, referring to the 'department of government efficiency': 'I was wrong about Doge. The federal government is efficient now.' In the Mount Pleasant neighborhood, which is home to a large Hispanic population, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) shared a video on Sunday of at least seven agents taking down a banner supporting immigrant neighbors from a public park. 'Mount Pleasant melts Ice,' the banner read. After removing it, a masked agent says: 'Mine. We're taking America back baby.' According to a local reporter and a neighbor's surveillance camera footage, the agents left a dildo in its place. The banner was quickly replaced. Trump has tried to depict the nation's capital as a city rife with violent crime, but violent crime is at a 30-year low after a spike in 2023. The president has stated, without evidence, that crime data is manipulated and rates are worse than they appear. Washingtonians have noted how quiet nightlife felt during the first weekend of the federal takeover, although August is typically a slower period in the capital with Congress on recess. On a busy stretch of the heavily Hispanic Columbia Heights neighborhood where street vendors typically sell anything from fruits to clothing, the streets have been empty. Democrats in Congress last week introduced a joint resolution to end what they described as 'egregious attacks on DC home rule' and the city secured a small legal victory late last week when the White House agreed to leave the Metropolitan police department (MPD) under the control of its chief, Pamela Smith.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store