
Here's How Investing $300 Per Month Can Create $50,000 in Annual Dividends
Being able to live off dividend income in your retirement years can be a great goal to aim for. And by investing in the stock market, growing your portfolio, and investing in dividend-paying stocks, that can be possible.
But just how does that all work? Below, I'll outline a strategy that can help you build up a strong portfolio balance over time through monthly investments of $300, and then, how that can eventually be transformed into a portfolio that's generating around $50,000 per year in dividends for you.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Investing in a growth-focused fund can build up a strong portfolio balance in the long term
To achieve the best returns over the long run, you'll likely want to have a position in top growth stocks. While they can be volatile, especially in the short term, over a long period of time, you should benefit from their growth and rising valuations. It can, however, be hard to pick the right growth stocks and determine the right mix of them.
In order to get around this, you can simply invest in the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ). The exchange-traded fund (ETF) will give you exposure to the top 100 non-financial stocks on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. There's no worry about having to change your portfolio composition over the years and determining which stocks to buy and sell. All that is taken care of for you through this ETF, which does the work for you.
Over the past decade, the QQQ ETF has easily beaten the S&P 500, and is a great example of why it can be an ideal investment option when pursuing long-term growth.
Data by YCharts.
Historically, the S&P 500 has averaged an annual total return of close to 10%. It's possible that slower annual returns may be on the horizon, given how strong the market has been in recent years. But for the Invesco QQQ Trust, which has performed much better than the market, a 10% total annual return would be a slowdown, and thus, may be a realistic percentage to use when forecasting its future performance.
If you were to invest $300 per month into the fund, and it ended up averaging a 10% annual total return (compounded), then after 35 years, your portfolio balance could climb to a value of over $1.1 million.
Once you have a high enough balance, dividend stocks can do the rest
With $1.1 million, you would need to put that money into investments that yield a little more than 4.5% to generate dividend income of $50,000 per year. If your balance is not at such a high level, then you would need to target a higher yield for that to be possible, and that can result in taking on a bit too much risk. After building up your portfolio to such a large amount, it'll be important to balance both dividend income along with capital preservation; you don't want all that work of growing your portfolio to go to waste by gambling it on a risky dividend.
In 35-plus years, there will be new income-generating investments to consider, but one example today of an ETF that could bring in a lot of income is the iShares International Select Dividend ETF (NYSEMKT: IDV), which yields 5.3% and gives you exposure to international companies from all over the world. This or a similar type of investment could help provide you with a sufficiently high yield to produce $50,000 in annual dividends on a $1.1 million balance, while keeping your risk relatively low.
Another thing you can do to try to minimize your risk is to spread your total investment across multiple ETFs. As long as you're averaging around 4.5%, then the end result can still be the same: $50,000 in dividends per year.
Investing regularly into stocks is a good move for the long run
Regardless of what the outlook may be for the stock market this year, or for the next few years, routinely investing in it can still be an effective way of building up your wealth over the long haul.
Timing the market is a risky strategy that can result in you missing out on gains. By simply making it a routine to invest in a fund like the Invesco QQQ Trust each month, you don't need to worry about external factors -- simply trust the process. There may be anxiety and poor returns in any one year, but the long-term trajectory is still likely to be a very strong and positive one.
Should you invest $1,000 in Invesco QQQ Trust right now?
Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Nasdaq. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada, China, Mexico, Japan and EU urge Trump not to impose new airplane tariffs
Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of US$75 billion for the U.S. industry. The documents made public by the U.S. Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union. 'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field,' it added. Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10 per cent on nearly all airplane and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, U.S. planemaker Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts. Opinion: Carney was right to not retaliate against Trump's latest tariffs 'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported US$1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took U.S. exports of aircraft worth roughly US$12 billion, while exporting about $8 billion of aircraft to the U.S. In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'Current U.S. tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100 per cent domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing U.S. content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88 per cent domestically-sourced content.' The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that U.S. aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilize, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
U.S. Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds
President Donald Trump walks down the stairs of Air Force One upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez) WASHINGTON — A U.S. federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. 'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai in an emailed statement Tuesday. 'The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court.' The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. The Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called it an 'unfortunate decision.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, represents five American small businesses pushing against the tariffs. He noted that the court did go out of its way to indicate this is not a ruling on the merits, and ordered an expedited schedule for consideration of the case. 'We have a strong case, and I remain guardedly optimistic that the appellate court will ultimately see that the president's claim of virtually unlimited power to impose tariffs is blatantly illegal — which is what every court to have considered the issue so far has concluded,' Somin said in an email to The Canadian Press. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included the five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for... constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025 Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Analyst Outlook for American Financial Markets
Market Outlook (About (STA Research): Is a Canadian investment research company, consisting of Financial Professionals specializing in advanced stock research and analysis). Analysts have mixed expectations for the U.S. stock market for the remainder of 2025, reflecting a balance between cautious optimism and concerns over valuation and geopolitical risks and macro economic pressures. Bullish Outlook Several major financial institutions maintain a positive view for the remainder of 2025: Bank of America projects the S&P 500 to reach 6,666 by year-end, driven by anticipated earnings growth and potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. JPMorgan forecasts a 9% upside, targeting 6,500, supported by AI-driven investments and favorable global economic policies. Morgan Stanley sets a base case of 6,500, with a bull case of 7,400, contingent on continued economic momentum and policy support. . Cautious Outlook Conversely, some analysts express caution due to high valuations and potential economic headwinds: PIMCO warns that the equity risk premium is at historic lows, indicating that stocks may be overvalued relative to bonds, which could lead to market corrections. BCA Research anticipates a bearish phase in the first half of 2025, citing weakening consumer spending and potential recession risks. Sector-Specific Insights Analysts also provide guidance on sector performance: Small-cap stocks are expected to outperform in the second quarter, benefiting from attractive valuations and potential Federal Reserve rate cuts. Defensive sectors such as utilities and consumer staples are viewed favorably, offering stability amid market volatility. Technology and AI-related investments remain strong, with continued enthusiasm for advancements driving market interest. Top 5 Analyst Stock Picks For Q3 & Q4 1. Amazon (AMZN) Amazon's diverse revenue streams, including AWS, advertising, and logistics, position it for sustained growth. Analysts anticipate a reacceleration in AWS and potential growth in advertising, grocery, logistics, and Project Kuiper 2. Meta Platforms (META) Meta's investment in AI-powered applications, such as Llama 4, and its strong advertising recovery contribute to its growth prospects. The company has approximately 1 billion monthly active users for Meta AI. 3. Microsoft (MSFT) Microsoft's strategic partnerships and investments in AI, including collaborations with Fivetran and Fastino, enhance its growth prospects. The company's focus on AI-driven solutions positions it well for future gains. 4. Nvidia (NVDA) Nvidia is a leader in AI hardware, providing GPUs that power AI computing. The company's strong performance in 2024 and continued leadership in the industry contribute to its growth potential. 5. Salesforce (CRM) Salesforce's position as the #1 platform for integrated CRM services, coupled with its focus on AI-driven solutions, supports its growth prospects. The company's strong financials and market position make it a top pick for the upcoming quarters. Outlook The consensus among analysts for financial markets is a cautiously optimistic outlook for the near term and the remainder of 2025. While some anticipate market gains, others advise vigilance due to high valuations and economic uncertainties, and macro headwinds. Investors are encouraged to focus on sectors with strong fundamentals and consider a diversified approach to navigate potential market fluctuations.