Sen. Lindsey Graham gets a 2026 challenge from Democrat Annie Andrews, who ran against Nancy Mace
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — Dr. Annie Andrews, the South Carolina Democrat who unsuccessfully challenged Rep. Nancy Mace in 2022, says she's running against Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham in 2026, challenging the four-term incumbent in part due to what she characterized as his waffling positions over the course of his political career.
'He's changed his position on nearly every issue over that time and that's because, in my view, he doesn't stand for anything or believe in anything other than what it takes to get reelected,' Andrews, a pediatrician in Charleston, told The Associated Press before a campaign rollout Thursday.
In her launch video, Andrews says it's 'embarrassing' to see how politicians like Graham — at the moment one of President Donald Trump's top Senate allies — have swung from criticizing Trump to working to gain his favor. The video features archival video of Graham bemoaning critics who called Trump a 'kook' and then, a year earlier, using the same term to describe his former GOP primary foe in the 2016 presidential contest.
Andrews also levies criticism at Graham for voting to confirm Trump's Cabinet picks and for his relationship with Elon Musk, describing 'an unelected billionaire … taking a chainsaw to Social Security, Medicare and veterans' healthcare.' She calls Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 'a guy who can't even organize a text thread,' a reference to the recent Signal chat scandal in which war plans were discussed.
No Democrat has won a U.S. Senate seat in South Carolina in decades, and Republicans in recent history typically take statewide seats by double-digit margins. When he last ran in 2020, Graham defeated his Democratic opponent, Jaime Harrison, by a 10 percentage point margin.
That contest turned into South Carolina's most expensive ever, with both candidates posting record fundraising that surpassed $200 million total and continued to grow in the race's closing days. Harrison, who went on to chair the Democratic National Committee, became the first U.S. Senate candidate to amass a war chest of more than $100 million over the course of the race.
Andrews was the Democratic nominee who unsuccessfully sought to unseat Mace in 2022, losing to the Republican by 14 percentage points. South Carolina's 1st District, which spans the state's southern coast, is the only one to have flipped from red to blue in decades, when Joe Cunningham won it for Democrats for a single term in the 2018 election. Mace won it in 2020 and has been reelected twice, although in 2026 she is eyeing a race for governor.
In the years since her House run, Andrews stepped away from her practice at the Medical University of South Carolina and founded a political organization focused on issues related to children, including climate change, gun violence and childhood poverty. According to federal filings, an affiliated political action committee, Their Future PAC, gave $7,000 to a handful of candidates in the 2024 cycle and had about $5,000 on hand at the end of 2024.
Asked about Democrats' lackluster statewide record in the state, Andrews said she felt Harrison's effort was 'hamstrung' by necessary precautions in place during the pandemic. Now, she said, voters feel strained under the effects of the Trump administration's 'chaotic' policies.
'Lindsey Graham has had 22 years to make things better for folks here in South Carolina, and I think you'd be hard-pressed to find many voters who could articulate in what way Lindsey has made their life better,' Andrews said.
Graham, seeking his fifth Senate term, kicked off his reelection campaign in February, announcing that Gov. Henry McMaster and Sen. Tim Scott would chair his effort. Scott, the state's junior senator, is serving as chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the chamber's campaign arm.
At least one Republican has announced a primary challenge to Graham.
___
Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Moving from throne speech to results
Opinion The usual 'speech from the drone' became a true speech from the throne this past week. Gone were the long, lofty flights of rhetoric and open-ended ambition that peppered Liberal throne speeches of the past. This one, like its progenitor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, was more sober and serious, with a speech shorn of the ornamental ellipses favoured by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau. It was delivered as well from a real Canadian throne, made from Canadian black walnut and donated English walnut from a forest behind Windsor Castle. And it was read by King Charles, the only person in the Senate chamber that day who can honestly lay claim to the phrase, 'to the throne, born.' Pageantry aside, there was little new in the actual speech that had not been telegraphed by Carney in the days following his election. That's no bad thing. Adrian Wyld / The Canadian Press King Charles delivers the speech from the throne in the Senate in Ottawa on May 27. In fact, it was all contained in the single two-page mandate letter (shorter than this column!) he wrote to his cabinet colleagues the week before. It contained seven priorities that the whole government would focus on, beginning with 'establishing a new economic and security relationship with the United States,' 'building one Canadian economy,' and 'bringing down costs for Canadians' leading the list. These became the first three sections of the throne speech. For now, the new prime minister is sticking to the electoral winning knitting from the campaign that won his party an unprecedented fourth term. Ambition was not absent though in the throne speech. But it was the ambition of fortitude and resilience in the face of external economic threats that Carney put before Canadians, not the ambition of hope and dreams propagated by his predecessor. 'We must be clear-eyed', the King intoned on the prime minister's behalf, 'the world is a more dangerous and uncertain place than at any point since the Second World War.' The new prime minister is engaged in a radical act of political revisionism. The very next day in the House of Commons, he labelled his team as 'Canada's new government,' a phrase not actively heard in Ottawa since Stephen Harper branded itself as such in 2006. No one should be surprised. That is simply the latest apotheosis of a branded makeover of the Liberal government he has embarked upon. The symbolism of the King coming to Canada to read the throne speech, its stylistic shift in tone and tenor, and a tight, focused agenda as its content, all reinforce the impression and momentum of what are deliberate 'points of departure.' To chart a new course, to set a new agenda, or strike in a new direction, all requires a starting point. A point of departure, you might say. Carney's magic so far is to ignore what came before and concentrate attention on what's to come. Shakespeare wrote 'what's past is prologue' in The Tempest. For Carney, it isn't even past. It's as if it never was. This is a political juggling feat of no mean skill. Our new prime minister defied political gravity and political convention by showing he is a politician of better-than-average skills. So, it might just work. What Carney has most going for him is that the country wants it to work. Fatigued from past Liberal virtue-signalling, wary of Donald Trump's America, and more than a little attracted to the Conservative policy offerings of the campaign, the prime minister has real running room to set his new points of departure. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. Setting and achieving are two very different things. Ten years of overpromising and underdelivering by Justin Trudeau makes for a skeptical electorate. Still, they suspended enough of that skepticism to give him a chance. Carney's real challenge isn't what he's saying or how he's saying it. It is whether the federal government as an institution can be corralled and focused to do his bidding. A public story making the rounds in Ottawa is that the new prime minister sent a deputy minister packing from an inadequate briefing session, telling him to return when he knew his file. Truth be told, our federal bureaucracy is not fit for Carney's purpose. He wants to move fast to get things done. Save for the once-in-a-lifetime pandemic experience, this is not standard operating procedure for official Ottawa. It needs to be more nimble, more horizontal in thinking and acting across government, less consumed by process, and relentless in focusing on delivery and results. Canada's operating environment outside Ottawa hasn't changed. The same political barriers to action remain, from premiers to Indigenous leaders and communities, to advocacy groups, to industry, to … the list goes on. Mr. Carney does not control that. What he does control is the operating environment inside Ottawa. Changing Ottawa from the inside out will be seen as the single most important reason for whether throne speech poetry gets translated into governing prose. Now that would be a true point of departure. David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet secretary in the Manitoba government.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Renewed marketing, product development keys to improved pork sales: report
Opinion Canadian pork producers are likely to chew slowly as they digest a report released this week by one of the largest agricultural creditors in the U.S. While the paper by CoBank focuses on U.S. pork production and consumption trends, the North American hog and pork industries are highly integrated. Whatever happens in this report's wake, if anything, will spill across the border to influence the Canadian sector. Nearly one-quarter of the pigs born in Canada are sent to the U.S. for feeding and slaughter. Sixty per cent of those live hog exports are weanlings sent to U.S. feeding operations. Canada also exported US$1.7 billion in pork products to the U.S. in 2024, while importing US$850 million back. JOHN LOCHER / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Pigs eat from a trough at the Las Vegas Livestock farming operation in Nevada CoBank says the U.S. industry's continued reliance on export sales to places like Mexico, China, South Korea and Canada for nearly a quarter of its production is becoming too risky because of 'new trade policies' creating more volatility in global trade. Even without U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs in the mix, trade with China has fallen sharply since record sales in 2020. That country's domestic production rebounded faster than expected following a devastating outbreak of African swine fever in 2018. Sales to China in 2024 were less than a quarter of the kilograms sold five years ago. Bacon has achieved a cult-like following and sausage products have gained appeal, which has doubled the market prices for the pork bellies and trimmings used to make them. However, the 'muscle cuts,' such as pork loins and hams, are often discounted because they aren't as convenient and consumers often don't know how to cook them. 'Sluggish exports could mean more pork loins in domestic markets, and U.S. consumers have difficulty cooking 'the perfect pork chop,'' the report says. Exports of so-called 'variety meats,' such as livers, hearts, kidneys, tongues, stomachs, snouts, ears, feet and tails, were worth $1.3 billion in 2024, but they aren't popular menu items in North America. 'Any trade barriers in place for countries that purchase variety meats could cause implications for the U.S. pork sector because those products have extremely limited demand in the U.S.,' CoBank says. The industry has launched campaigns focused on convincing consumers they need more pork on their forks, something the Canadian sector has been working on, too. Even though Canadian pork consumption is much lower, at about 16 kg per capita, recent marketing efforts have achieved increases of just under 15 per cent. CoBank warns increasing U.S. consumption, which has remained static at about 22 kg per capita since the 1970s, will be challenging because the parts of the animal the industry currently exports are such a hard to sell to American consumers. 'If the U.S. consumer is to reimagine pork, the pork industry may need to make drastic changes, including recalibrating the genetic hog makeup and showcasing different cuts at retail and through food service.' CoBank cites Kansas State University research that names taste as the primary driver for protein purchases. When it comes to animal protein, the flavour is in the fat. Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. That's a problem for a sector that heeded the low-fat messaging of yesteryear and shifted genetic focus in selecting breeding stock towards lean carcass weights, rapid growth and feeding efficiency. CoBank says the industry needs to rethink that strategy if it wants to convince consumers to eat more pork. It also must put more effort into marketing and new product development focused on eating quality and convenience. 'The lean hog formulation that was adopted by the broad bulk of U.S. producers more than two decades ago has largely influenced the pork that U.S. consumers are offered today,' the report says. 'This has left something to be desired when comparing pork chops to beef steaks, often with an overcooked chop delivering a bad experience.' CoBank is signalling a shift in market direction that has obvious implications for the Canadian sector. When it's time to make a change, the consolidated and vertically integrated industry will be able to pivot relatively quickly. However, with all the moving parts to this equation, now is not the time. Laura Rance is executive editor, production content lead for Glacier FarmMedia. She can be reached at lrance@ Laura RanceColumnist Laura Rance is editorial director at Farm Business Communications. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Poland holds a pivotal presidential runoff influenced by Trump, the far right and the war in Ukraine
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Poland is set to hold a presidential runoff election on Sunday between two candidates offering starkly different visions for the country's future. The winner will succeed President Andrzej Duda, a conservative who is finishing his second and final term. The outcome will determine whether Poland embraces a nationalist populist trajectory or pivots more fully toward liberal, pro-European policies. An exit poll by Ipsos will be released when polls close on Sunday at 9 p.m. local time, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Final results are expected Monday. Whoever wins can be expected to either help or hinder the agenda of the centrist government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk thanks to the presidential power to veto laws. An unpredictable vote at a time of tensions The vote comes amid heightened regional tensions driven by Russia's war in neighboring Ukraine, security concerns across Europe and internal debates about the rule of law. It follows a first round on May 18, in which Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski won more than 31% of the vote and Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian, earned nearly 30%. Eleven other candidates were eliminated. Opinion polls show the two men running neck and neck. Other factors add to the unpredictability. Nawrocki did much better in the first round than surveys had predicted, indicating that his strength was underestimated. On the other hand, large numbers of Poles abroad have registered to vote in the second round, which could help Trzaskowski. The candidates Nawrocki is a 42-year-old historian who was tapped as by the national conservative Law and Justice party despite a lack of political experience or party membership. But this is seen as acting in his favor, as the party, which governed for 2015-2023, seeks to refresh its image before a parliamentary election in 2027. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic Polish values. They believe U.S. President Donald Trump's support for him will strengthen Poland's ties with the United States and make the country safer. Trzaskowski, 53, is Warsaw's mayor and a close ally of Tusk. A deputy leader of Civic Platform, a pro-European Union party, he has been prominent in national politics for years. This is his second presidential bid after narrowly losing to Duda in 2020. Supporters credit him with modernizing Warsaw through infrastructure, public transit expansion and cultural investments. He is widely seen as pragmatic and focused on strengthening ties with other European nations. A global ideological war Nawrocki recently received a boost from Trump and other U.S. conservatives, who see the Polish election as part of a global battle between liberal and populist right-wing forces. His campaign has echoed themes popular on the American right, including skepticism toward EU bureaucracy and emphasis on Christian identity. His supporters feel that Trzaskowski, with his pro-EU views, would hand over control of key Polish issues to Paris and Berlin. Nawrocki also has been endorsed by the Trump administration and conservative Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Many European centrists are rooting for Trzaskowski, seeing in him someone who would defend democracy as it faces pressure from authoritarian forces across the globe. He has received the support of new centrist Romanian President Nicusor Dan — who recently defeated a far-right nationalist. Nawrocki's scandals Nawrocki has faced a number of scandals over the past months, but it's not clear that they are hurting him. In fact, they might have the opposite effect. Many right-wing voters don't believe the allegations and accuse the media of using its power to hurt him, creating what appears to be a rallying effect around him. Nawrocki himself has acknowledged that he took part in an organized brawl including football hooligans in 2009. A former boxer, he said he has taken part in various forms of 'noble male battle' in his life. Polish media have also reported on his connections to gangsters and the world of prostitution. Tusk accused Law and Justice party leader Jarosław Kaczynski of tapping Nawrocki despite questions about his past. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'You knew about everything, Jarosław. About the connections with the gangsters, about 'fixing girls,'' Tusk wrote on X. 'The entire responsibility for this catastrophe falls on you!' The key issues at stake 1. Security and war in Ukraine: With Russia's war in Ukraine in its fourth year, Polish voters are acutely attuned to issues of regional security. Both candidates support continued backing for Ukraine, but to different degrees. Nawrocki believes that Ukraine should never join NATO, while Trzaskowski believes Ukraine should be allowed to join one day when the current war is over. 2. Rule of law and democracy: Trzaskowski has pledged to support the restoration of judicial independence and repair relations with the EU, which viewed changes by Law and Justice as anti-democratic. Tusk has tried to change some legislation, but has faced resistance from the the outgoing president, Duda. Nawrocki, while less outspoken than his party patrons, is seen as likely to preserve Law and Justice's changes that politicized the courts. 3. Women's rights: Abortion remains a divisive issue in Poland, especially after a near-total ban was imposed under Law and Justice. Trzaskowski supports loosening restrictions and has backed proposals to legalize abortion up to 12 weeks. Nawrocki opposes any liberalization and has campaigned as a defender of traditional conservative values.
