logo
The beauty and challenge of elections in Canada's frigid north

The beauty and challenge of elections in Canada's frigid north

Yahoo27-04-2025

Nunavut is Canada's largest federal district. The entire territory - all 1.8 million sq km (695,000 sq miles) and its 40,000 people - will be represented by one person in parliament.
"Nunavut is at least three times the size of France. If it was its own country, it would be the 13th largest behind Greenland," Kathy Kettler, the campaign manager for local Liberal candidate Kilikvak Kabloona, told the BBC.
Located in the Arctic, where average temperatures in the capital city Iqaluit are below freezing for eight months of the year, it is so vast and inaccessible that the only way to travel between its 25 communities is by air.
"Yesterday, in 24 hours, we travelled 1,700 km (1,050 miles) by air and campaigned in Pangnirtung, Iqaluit, Rankin Inlet, and Arviat," said Ms Kettler.
"There are not very many people who understand the reality of the north," Ms Kettler said, describing the challenges of running a campaign where so much is different from southern Canada.
She recalled knocking on doors earlier this month as she campaigned for her candidate in -24C (-11F) temperatures.
She said it's rare in northern communities for people to knock before entering someone's home. Instead, the tight-knit culture permits visitors to simply "walk in and say hello" - almost unthinkable in other parts of the country.
As an Inuk from northern Quebec, she said it "feels weird" even for her to knock and wait for a response.
In Nunavut, one of Canada's three northern territories, the majority-Inuit population speak Inuktitut.
Ms Kettler said one of the biggest expenses was translating campaign signs and hiring an interpreter for Kabloona, the candidate.
Election issues for northerners too are unique.
"The national campaign is really focused on Arctic security and sovereignty, whereas our campaign here is focused on food security and people being able to survive," Ms Kettler said.
Food can be prohibitively expensive and there are infrastructure challenges to accessing clean water for a number of Indigenous and northern communities.
She was boiling water to drink while campaigning in Arviat, she said, and described being unable to rely on calling voters as she canvasses because a phone plan is the first thing they sacrifice to afford food.
The seat is currently held by the New Democratic Party (NDP), with incumbent Lori Idlout running for re-election.
James Arreak is the Conservative candidate.
Jean-Claude Nguyen, the returning officer in Nunavut, is responsible for conducting the election in the district.
He described how difficult it is to ensure ballots and voter lists get to every community - including to workers at remote gold mines.
"[Elections Canada] sent a team from our Ottawa headquarters via Edmonton and Yellowknife to the mine where they work, gave them sufficient time to vote, and then they brought the ballots back," he said.
Mr Nguyen also spoke about security considerations.
Once polls close, the ballots are counted at the polling station and then stored safely either with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), or a local hamlet - a small community that provides municipal services to its residents.
The ballot boxes are then flown to Iqaluit, and then to Ottawa.
Mr Nguyen recalled how in the 2019 election, a ballot box arrived with a big hole.
"When we asked the charter flight company what happened, they said it was eaten by a raven," he said laughing.
"That's part of the reality here in the territories, you have wild animals eating the ballot boxes."
No ballots were damaged by the bird.
Beyond all the challenges, Kathy Kettler said she is most drawn to the spirit of the people.
"The generosity, love, and care that people have for each other in every community shines through," she said.
"That's what keeps me going, and it's what makes campaigning across Nunavut so meaningful."
'We have more in common with America than the rest of Canada'
Patriotism surges in Quebec as Trump rattles Canada
A month without clean water in Canada's north

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review
People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review

This week the government will set out how much it is going to spend over the next four years on the public services that millions of people use every day. That includes the NHS, schools and public transport as well as welfare benefits, armed forces, energy projects and a whole range of other government spending. We asked a handful of readers, who had contacted the BBC via Your Voice, Your BBC News, what they would like to see in Wednesday's announcement. Lewis Eager, 26, works two shifts a week in the on-demand delivery service for a supermarket in Southend-on-Sea, earning £850 a month. He lives with his parents who he pays £120 a month. He would like the Spending Review to include a plan to help young people like him find well-paid, full-time jobs. Lewis completed a business administration apprenticeship and an Open University degree, but says he cannot find full-time work. He estimates he has applied for more than 4,000 jobs without success. "Getting knocked down all the time is horrible." Even entry-level jobs seem to require experience, he says. He sees a "looming crisis" among young people unable to get on the jobs ladder, and would like to see more money go into adult education. "I live with my parents which I have nothing against, but I thought I would have achieved more by now," he says. Resheka Senior, 39, is a nursery nurse and her husband Marcus, 49, a school caretaker. Between them they take home more than £50,000 a year. But the couple say they are still struggling, particularly while Resheka is on maternity leave. When she goes back to work, Resheka says she won't be much better off because she will have to pay for childcare before and after school for her five-year-old and all day for the younger children, aged two and nine-months. They have debts that they are shuffling between credit cards and no prospect of moving out of their two-bedroom council flat in Woolwich, London. "I don't want to stay at home. I've been working since I was 15 years old," says Resheka. But she would like to see more support for couples who are "making an honest living". She wants the government to pay for free breakfast and afterschool clubs or more free childcare on top of the 30 hours a week currently provided. "It's not as if I'm saying I want benefits," she says. "We're putting back into the economy. We just need some help." Ollie Vass works for a nutritional supplement company, where he earns £31,000. His girlfriend Grace Sangster also 19 is on an apprenticeship scheme earning £40,000. They each started saving from the age of 13, earning money mowing lawns and working in restaurants. In April, with the help of a small inheritance and their Lifetime ISAs, the couple completed on a £360,000 two-bedroomed terraced house near Slough. Ollie and Grace would like to see more support for young people starting out, especially first-time buyers, and more apprenticeships. They also think the tax-free allowance, which has been frozen since 2021 should rise so that people on low wages can keep more of their earnings. Ollie also wants to see cheaper rail fares: "At the moment it's too expensive to use." Leah Daniel, 23, and her partner are entitled to £800 a month in Universal Credit and the council pays £900 a month rent for the flat in Birmingham they share with their two-year old daughter. But currently around £100 a month is being deducted from their Universal Credit to pay for advances they took while homeless for a short time. Leah says they run out of money every month and have to borrow from friends and family, sometimes having to skip meals to make sure their daughter is fed. If the government decides to cut the welfare budget in the Spending Review, that would be "absolutely heartless", she says. "It's one thing to make sure the country's growing and we aren't wasting money and people aren't taking advantage of the system. "It's another thing if you aren't giving more support to help people out of poverty and help them look for work," she says. Above all she and her partner want stable jobs so they can "build up their lives". "So many times we haven't eaten and we're worried about tomorrow," she says. "I just want this situation to change." As a GP and practice partner earning £96,000 a year, Dr Kirsty Rogerson says she is aware she is well-off. She and her husband, a hospital consultant, own their own house, and are putting some money aside to support their sons through university. But she sees plenty of people in her surgery in Sheffield who aren't so fortunate and face what she thinks are impossible choices. If she could choose one thing for the government to take action on it would be to subsidise fresh fruit and vegetables and make processed food more expensive. "What [the government] shouldn't be doing is just tackling it at the other end with weight loss drugs," she says. "That's going to bankrupt the NHS." She would also like to see more money spent on public services. "As a mother, I'd rather pay more tax and know my children were being well educated and there's a good healthcare system," says Dr Kirsty Rogerson. The same goes for the police. "I'd rather go to bed each night knowing those things were there," she says. Sylvia Cook, 72, used to sell accounting software, then published books about Greece, before she retired. Living on a pension of £20,000 means being careful with her outgoings, so she welcomes the government's u-turn on winter fuel payments as "a good decision, if a little late". The extra £200 "obviously eases things", she says. But in general she thinks that rather than increasing spending, the government should look at where it can save money. "You can spend a lot of money and achieve nothing," she says. Instead she suggests changes to the tax system, efficiency savings across government and cutting perks for MPs and civil servants. "There are so many inefficient things they haven't got the common sense to sort out." The health service is a case in point she says. "Throwing more money at the NHS doesn't necessarily help if they don't sort that out," she says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store