New Delhi draws ‘red lines' in US trade talks
Agriculture and dairy are 'very big red lines' when it comes to trade negotiations with the US, Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman told the Financial Express on Monday. The US and India are engaged in trade negotiations and racing to meet a July 9 deadline set by President Donald Trump, after which reciprocal tariffs will be imposed if an agreement is not reached.
'Agriculture and dairy have been among very big red lines, where a high degree of caution has been exercised,' Sitharaman told the newspaper. 'There's no way we could do anything that would weaken our agriculture, our farmers' positions.'
Sitharaman expressed enthusiasm for a 'big and beautiful' trade deal between India and the US – a reference to Trump's language describing the desired agreement. However, she also indicated that India could seek better market access and consider reciprocal market openings.
In the interview, India's finance minister explained that issues such as environmental regulations, sustainability, carbon taxes, government procurement, gender, and labor issues are increasingly being included in trade talks, although they were not traditionally part of such discussions. She added that India is carefully evaluating its position in each of these areas, considering its status as an emerging market with its own specific requirements.
In May, New Delhi said that it had proposed deep cuts in import tariffs on various goods, in an effort to reach a preliminary trade agreement with the US. This excluded agricultural products, such as grains and dairy items, according to Financial Times. New Delhi wants to secure a deal with Washington by July 9, when the US has threatened to impose a 26% reciprocal tariff on all Indian goods.
The US introduced an additional tariff on Indian products effective April 2, but it was suspended for a 90-day period. A standard 10% US tariff on certain of the country's goods.
Trump has called India the 'tariff king.' In February, India announced a reduction in customs duties on some items, including luxury cars and solar cells, in what was seen as an effort to address US trade concerns. New Delhi believes a successful trade agreement with Washington could 'flip current headwinds into tailwinds,' the Indian Finance Ministry's Monthly Economic Review said in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Canada scraps tax on tech giants in bid to revive US trade talks
Canada has shelved its plan to slap a digital services tax (DST) on tech companies in a bid to get trade talks with the US back on track, reversing course just as the measure was due to kick in. The 3% tax, passed into law last year by the government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, was set to take effect on Monday and would have been applied retroactively to 2022-2024 profits. It would have primarily targeted US companies like Amazon, Google and Meta, costing them an estimated $3 billion. 'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025 timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement on Sunday. 'Canada's new government will always be guided by the overall contribution of any possible agreement to the best interests of Canadian workers and businesses,' he added. Canada is engaged in complex negotiations on a new economic and security partnership with the the DST will allow the negotiations to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians.🔗 Carney and Trump agreed to resume trade talks when they met earlier this month at the G7 summit, where the prime minister said they had agreed to finalizing a new economic agreement within 30 days. Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne wrote on X late on Sunday that dropping the levy would allow Ottawa 'to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians.' On Friday, US President Donald Trump had denounced the tax hike as a 'direct and blatant attack on our country' and threatened to terminate all trade negotiations that had been ongoing between the North American neighbors for months. He also vowed to impose new tariffs on Canadian goods within a week. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick welcomed the reversal, saying the tax 'would have been a deal breaker for any trade deal with America.' Tensions between the two countries have been mounting since February, when Trump imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian goods shortly after taking office. Ottawa responded with reciprocal duties, though Trump later suspended the measure, saying he was open to country-specific deals that benefit US businesses. Trump has long accused Canada of exploiting US trade and on several occasions suggested it should become America's 51st state. This fueled the ambitions of the country's Liberal Party and Carney's election campaign. Shortly before taking office as prime minister, he described Trump's tariffs as 'unjustified' and stated that 'Canada will win' the trade war with the US. On March 14, the day he was sworn in, he vowed that the country 'will never, ever, in any way, shape, or form, be part of the United States.' Canada is the US's second-largest trading partner after Mexico, and the top buyer of US exports. According to the US Census Bureau, it imported $349 billion in American goods last year and exported $412 billion to the US.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Intel suggests US strikes on Iran caused limited damage
US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were far less destructive than expected, according to intercepted communications between senior Iranian officials published by the Washington Post. The strikes in question were part of a coordinated American-Israeli military campaign launched earlier this month. On June 13, the IDF began bombing Iranian targets, claiming that Tehran was close to being able to build nuclear weapons. The US joined the operation on June 22, targeting several Iranian nuclear facilities, including the underground Fordow site, which was struck using 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs. US President Donald Trump has claimed that the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. CIA Director John Ratcliffe told lawmakers last week that several key sites had been completely destroyed and would take years to rebuild. However, according to the intercepted conversations described to the Post by four sources familiar with the intelligence, Iranian officials have been speculating as to why the strikes did not cause greater damage. The Trump administration has not denied the existence of the intercepted calls, but officials have flatly rejected their significance. 'The notion that unnamed Iranian officials know what happened under hundreds of feet of rubble is nonsense,' said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, calling the report 'shameful' and accusing WaPo of 'helping people commit felonies by publishing out-of-context leaks.' Last week, several American media outlets also reported on leaked classified intelligence assessments that suggested the US strikes only caused moderate damage to the facilities, despite the use of bunker buster bombs. Trump has since called for the prosecution of those who leaked the information. In a CBS interview published on Sunday, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi also claimed that there are still 400kg worth of enriched uranium that remain unaccounted for after the US-Israeli strikes. 'We don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told CBS, noting that some of it could have been destroyed and some could have been moved. He also pointed out that while Iran's facilities suffered 'a very serious level of damage,' Tehran could still restart its uranium enrichment operations 'in a matter of months.' He noted that the knowledge possessed by Iran cannot be 'disinvented.' Tehran has repeatedly denied that it has plans to produce a nuclear weapon and has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, stressing that it wants to reserve the right to enrich uranium for civilian use.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump's son hints at White House run
Eric Trump, one of US President Donald Trump's three sons, has hinted at the possibility of himself or a family member running for his father's office in the 2028 elections. Since 2017, Eric and his older brother, Donald Trump Jr., have co-headed the Trump Organization; their father transferred its management to them to avoid conflicts of interest during his first term in office. Eric oversees Trump Hotels, a world-wide chain of luxury hotels and resorts. In an interview with the Financial Times last Friday, when asked if a Trump family member would run in the next election, Eric responded rhetorically, 'Who knows?' He added that 'there's more people than just me' among the Trumps who could become a presidential candidate. Trump Jr. said he was 'wholly unimpressed by half the politicians I see,' and suggested that he could do politics 'very effectively.' He also emphasized that the family 'had not profited from politics,' citing their need to 'defend themselves' against federal and state authorities' allegations of business and political ties to Russia and claims that the Kremlin has used them to exert influence on US elections. In 2016, Trump Jr. served as the main fundraiser for his father's presidential campaign. He also argued against the results of the 2020 elections, accusing the Democrats of fraud and posting videos and photos of alleged illegal ballot changes on social media. During Donald Trump's first term, his daughter Ivanka served as director of the Office of Economic Initiatives and Entrepreneurship, while Eric's wife, Lara Trump, was co-chair of the Republican National Committee. In May, Donald Trump Jr. also did not rule out his own presidential campaign.
