Ni-Vanuatu youth celebrate landmark ICJ ruling as a new era for climate change justice
Aui'a Vaimaila Leatinu'u
, PMN
Save the Children Vanuatu NextGen Youth Ambassadors and youth climate activists demonstrating ahead of the historic International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change.
Photo:
Save the Children
A youth climate advocate from Vanuatu says the United Nations' court ruling on countries' climate responsibility has given new hope to young people across the Pacific.
The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) advisory opinion found that countries have binding legal obligations under international law to prevent climate harm and protect human rights. While the opinion is not legally enforceable, it carries substantial political and legal weight for states and communities seeking accountability.
Speaking to Khalia Strong on Pacific Mornings, 16-year-old Ni-Vanuatu *Vepaiamele welcomes the ICJ verdict. Vepaiamele was part of the Vanuatu delegation that attended The Hague last December.
"It is an amazing advisory opinion because it completely clarifies what states need to be doing in regards to the climate crisis. We know that the climate crisis isn't just an environmental crisis, it's also a human rights crisis and affects children's rights. So I'm sure that it will pave the way for justice for everyone around the world," she says.
For Vepaiamele, the struggle against climate change is personal. Growing up in Vanuatu, she has witnessed the impacts of climate change firsthand, including schools and clinics being put out of commission, forcing children to learn in tents.
"We see the effects of climate change in our nation and economy, from things that have happened even years ago. Cyclones that have happened two years ago or10 years ago. We still see the effects lingering to this day."
Vepaiamele writing poetry at her home in Port Vila, Vanuatu.
Photo:
Save the Children
This ruling follows years of advocacy led by youth in the Pacific, especially students from Vanuatu, supported by their government. Minister for Climate Change Ralph Regenvanu says the court's unanimous ruling confirms what vulnerable states have long argued.
"These aren't aspirational ideas as some would have it. It's important now as the world goes forward that we make sure our actions align with what was decided. Today's ruling will also inspire new cases where victims around the world, in a legal sense, realise that they can claim their rights and seek accountability," Regenvanu says.
The Vanuatu government plans to present the ruling to the UN General Assembly in order to push for global implementation. "The implementation of this decision, we hope, will set a new status quo and provide the structural changes needed to give our current and future generations hope for a healthy planet and a sustainable future," he says.
Save the Children's Polly Banks
Photo:
PMN
Polly Banks, the country director for Save the Children in Vanuatu, sees the ruling as a "huge win for human rights" and believes it will add moral pressure on governments. Although the advisory opinion is not legally binding, Banks remains "thrilled at this outcome".
"It's expected that the advisory opinion will influence future climate litigation, environmental negotiations or climate change negotiations, and national policy frameworks," she says. "Leading environmental lawyers have described the advisory opinion as a potential guiding star in terms of climate action. So we see this as an absolute landmark moment for climate change."
Vepaiamele expresses her pride in the achievements of the youth and emphasises the moment's importance for justice and future generations. "It's amazing what the students have achieved and also our government and governments that have supported this," she says.
"It will pave the way for climate justice for communities and people all around the world. I'm so proud and happy with this outcome. I hope that everyone else is listening and will take climate change seriously."
-This article was first published by
PMN
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government's repeal of 2018 oil and gas exploration ban passes final reading
Climate Minister Simon Watts. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government's repeal of the 2018 oil and gas exploration ban has just passed its final reading in Parliament. The legislation had been set down for Tuesday night, but was delayed after a last-minute amendment to change the rules around liability for the cleanup of decommissioned oil and gas fields. The Climate Minister, Simon Watts, stood in for Resources Minister Shane Jones - saying the ban has pushed power prices up. "The ban sent a chilling message to the investment community, halting the very exploration that underpins our energy security, and leading directly to the supply constraints and price volatility that we see today." Labour's Megan Woods said the repeal of the ban was a "very potent symbol of the shambles that this government is when it comes to energy policy," and that Prime Minister Christopher Luxon "is leading a government that is so far out of touch with ordinary New Zealanders and more intent at doing the bidding of multinational oil and gas companies". The bill passed 68 votes to 54, with all coalition parties in support and the opposition parties opposed. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Offshore Oil & Gas Exploration Ban Set To Be Overturned
The 2018 ban on offshore oil and gas exploration is facing a repeal, with part of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill due for its third reading in Parliament today. A last-minute amendment passed on Tuesday means the Resources Minister and the Finance Minister would decide who pays for decommissioning of oil and gas fields. In the last Budget, the government set aside $200 million over four years for co-investment into new gas fields. The International Court of Justice said in last week's non-binding opinion that countries could be held legally responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions. The Science Media Centre asked experts to comment. Dr Nathan John Cooper, Associate Professor of Law, University of Waikato, comments: 'Current debate in New Zealand's Parliament on the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill should bear in mind last week's ICJ Advisory Opinion on State Responsibility for climate change. 'Hon Shane Jones, Minister for Resources should be mindful that States have obligations under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and that States are subject to legal consequences connected to these obligations where they have caused climate harm. 'Moreover, States are responsible for climate harm caused by actors under their jurisdiction or control. This ICJ advice should induce caution when reconsidering the onerous obligations of oil and gas companies operating in New Zealand.' Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts of interest. Dr Jen Purdie, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, comments: 'The government's Crown Minerals Amendment Bill proposes re-opening New Zealand's territorial waters to oil and gas exploration. 'This flies in the face of projections that global demand for oil will peak soon. The International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted demand for oil will peak before 2030. A 2023 report by Shell projects fossil fuel use dropping rapidly in coming decades, while BP thinks oil demand for combustion has already peaked. Many large organisations think peak oil demand will happen this decade or the 2030s. But the progression from prospecting new oil and gas wells to exploration and mining can take decades. This new bill therefore just doesn't add up. 'The IEA has stated we don't need any new fossil fuel exploration or development, with enough projects already in existence or planned to meet global energy demand forecasts to 2050. New research agrees, saying governments around the world should stop issuing new oil, gas and coal licences.' Weakening clean-up laws 'The government is also proposing weakening the law that requires oil and gas permit holders to pay for the decommissioning and clean-up of wells. This law was passed in 2021 in response to taxpayers having to pick up a NZ$400 million bill for decommissioning the Tui oil field after the financial collapse of the oil company. 'Weakening these laws re-opens the prospect of taxpayers paying for clean-up. The government may be weakening these laws to attract drilling interest, as many oil interests, including BP, project declining investment in new oil and gas infrastructure globally in coming decades, and the IEA's World Energy Investment report notes an ongoing hesitancy about oil and gas investment comes partly from concerns about downward long-term demand projections.' Natural gas 'New Zealand does not import natural gas, but our gas fields have been yielding less than forecast for some years. Increased maintenance drilling or limited new expansion of current gas fields for the next decade will help smooth the energy transition, alongside other measures to firm up intermittent renewable electricity.' Invest in the energy transition 'New Zealand should be moving away from oil drilling and instead invest in the energy transition, including decarbonisation of industrial heat, subsidising low-emitting vehicles (and charging high emitters), better public transport and bike lanes, increased EV charging infrastructure, and 'urban mining' (recycling) of batteries and other technology currently filling rubbish dumps.' Fossil fuels MUST stay in the ground 'We've known for some time that remaining fossil fuels must stay in the ground to meet the Paris Agreement goal of keeping the world below 2°C above pre-industrial temperatures, and to enable us to continue to have a liveable planet.' Conflict of interest statement: 'I do occasional consulting work for various organisations in the energy industry.'
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
'From moral duty to legal obligation': Pacific church leader hails ICJ climate ruling
Save the Children Vanuatu NextGen Youth Ambassadors and youth climate activists demonstrating ahead of the historic International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change. Photo: Save the Children The leader of the Pacific Conference of Churches (PCC) says a landmark climate ruling from the world's top court is a significant win, but much more work is needed. The International Court of Justice (IJC) found last wekk that countries can be held legally responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions. The advisory opinion also said failing to protect people from the effects of climate change could potentially violate international law. PCC secretary-general Reverend James Bhagwan spoke to Pacific Waves about the decision, alongside Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono. Tuiono is the Green's Pacific People's spokesperson. Bhagwan said the decision was a much-needed win for the region and climate advocates. "This really is about shifting things from a moral duty to a legal obligation," he said. "This is a really important step forward, considering that COP (Conference of Parties) after COP we fail to get the words that we need in statements; we fail to get real movement on climate financing [and] real action on mitigation." The ICJ's opinion delivered in the Hague on 24 July was the culmination of six years of advocacy and diplomatic manoeuvring which started with a group of Pacific university students in 2019. Vanuatu led the charge at an international level and was backed by other Pacific nations. Bhagwan urged advocates across the Pacific to use the ruling to advance the climate ambitions of their own countries and governments. "There is a lot of opportunities for us to work on the issues of so-called sustainable development, which are not really sustainable. "I think this is the challenge that we need to start pressuring all of our countries to pay attention to the advisory opinion and prepare ourselves for how we can actually make use of the opinion in a legal way as well," he said. Tuiono said the ruling did not bode well for the New Zealand government's track record on climate change. He said Aotearoa needed to listen to its fellow Pacific nations to truly address climate change. "New Zealand is part of the Pacific. We are part of a family of Pacific nations," he said. "In order for us to truly recognise that, [we have to] actually listen to the voices - particularly these young people - who have taken this all the way to the ICJ and have gotten the highest recognition." Tuiono said the decision added weight to the work of climate advocates across different industries and areas. He believed it could provide a framework for pushing for change. "I think that…it has enormous moral weight and has enormous legal weight…because it actually gives us guidelines, it gives us guard rails in… how we should be approaching things. "And I think states will be paying attention in terms of what their obligations [and] what their responsibilities are."
