
Live facial recognition to be expanded across the UK with more police forces using the technology
The government says this technology will be introduced to catch 'high-harm' offenders, with new rules set to be drawn up this autumn to ensure 'safeguards and oversight," while balancing public and experts' views on how this tech should be used.
The technology is already in use in some areas of the country but Wednesday's announcement will see a further ten vans equipped with cameras rolled out across seven police forces, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire, over the coming weeks.
Currently, the rules say LFR can only be used to check against a police watchlist of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions, such as sex offenders.
Police compiled this list before a deployment of LFR technology and say it is intelligence-led and targeted to the specific area in which they are working.
Signs are positioned to alert the public that LFR is being used, and the cameras scan the faces of every individual who walks by.
These scans are compared against the criminal watchlist and if there's no match, are automatically deleted.
When the technology thinks a person matches someone on the list, it alerts a team of officers, showing them a comparison of the photos in order for them to decide whether to stop them.
The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said they would be focused on identifying sex offenders or 'people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find.'
Addressing specific concerns over its accuracy and use, the Home Office added: 'The algorithm being used in the vans has been independently tested and will only be operated in specific circumstances and with robust oversight.'
Privacy campaigners have previously voiced concerns about a potential lack of regulation and transparency over the expansion of the technology.
There have also been concerns raised over racial bias in the system and the accuracy with which it operated under certain conditions.
The technology was tested by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) who looked at whether the algorithm had any racial bias.
The NPL concluded that the threshold, which can be set by police forces, at which the machine alerts officers to a match does include a racial bias at certain low levels of confidence.
Above a certain level however, their research showed no racial bias was present.
Police forces insist the technology is now never operated below this level of confidence in a match and all data on deployments, including the threshold at which the technology was operating that day, is publicly available online.
Forces already deploying live facial recognition have used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions.
Lindsey Chiswick, National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) lead for facial recognition, said it had already been used 'to great success, locating thousands of wanted offenders, or others breaching their bail conditions.
She added: 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward."
South Wales Police, who have been using the technology for some years and are co-ordinating this national rollout said they understood the public's concerns.
They highlighted however that in their own force, the use of LFR had "never resulted in a wrongful arrest" and there had "been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved.'
As well as concerns of bias, campaign group Big Brother Watch are worried about what the wider rollout of this technology means for privacy.
Interim Director, Rebecca Vincent told ITV News the timing of this rollout was concerning.
"We don't yet have any legislation or framework to govern the use of this. The Home Secrtary has said that's coming, but why the rush to get more vans on the street when we don't yet have that oversight and accountability."
She added: "Sometimes critics of groups like ours say 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear.'
"That's not quite right - we have the presumption of innocence in this country.
"What live facial recognition does is reverse that. It treats us as a nation of suspects until proven otherwise."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Harehills community hub to build trust with police
Money seized from criminals has been used to create a community hub in part of Fusion 8 Community Hub on Bexley Road, Harehills, will offer a variety of support to people living in the area and also offer a neutral space for residents to speak to police about any Yorkshire Police said it formed part of the force's CommUnity Harehills project. If focuses on the work of the police and partners through the Home Office's Clear, Hold and Build strategy, which was rolled out to police forces across England in involves a sustained campaign of action to target serious and organised crime in a specific area to ensure lasting improvements. The hub is part of the Build phase, which focuses on long-term community development and crime prevention by addressing root causes and fostering local Richard Neeves from the East Leeds Neighbourhood Policing Team said they had carried out a campaign of action to dismantle and disrupt organised crime in the Harehills area since March 2023."We continue to work closely with our partner agencies to disrupt criminality, whilst also engaging and empowering the local community to help build lasting improvements."By creating a space for people to talk to officers and get practical, everyday support we hope to continue building our relationship with the local community." 'Build trust' The hub has largely been funded by cash from the ARIS fund, which takes assets seized from criminals and distributes it to police addition to providing a safe and neutral space for residents to speak with their local police officers, it will also serve as a food and hygiene bank and school uniform with Places for People (PfP), the UK's leading social enterprise who provided the commercial unit, local PCSOs and PfP staff have volunteered their time to help transform the building into a welcoming space which will be open three days a week for two hours at a of places impact at Places for People, Marcus Hulme, said the hub was "a testament to what can be achieved when communities, public services, and partners come together"."It's about creating a space that meets real needs and helps build trust and resilience in the community."Fusion 8 reflects our mission to invest in places and partnerships that empower people, and we're proud to be part of something that will make a lasting difference in Harehills." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Illegal immigrant who taunted Brits on TikTok fled Germany for ‘soft touch' Britain after travelling from Afghanistan
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) AN illegal migrant who taunted Brits on TikTok from his taxpayer-funded hotel room fled Germany for 'soft-touch' Britain. The Sun told yesterday how he racked up a million views by boasting of crossing the Channel by dinghy, saying: 'Tell your friends to come.' Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 The TikTok asylum seeker smirking on dinghy to the UK on Saturday 9 The illegal migrant shared social posts wearing a balaclava 9 He is also seen in photos from his travels to France He posted a step-by-step guide to reaching the UK before hosting a Q&A in the Afghan dialect Pashto. Today we can reveal he swapped stays in Germany and France — two safe countries — to reach 'soft-touch' Britain, one of 434 boat arrivals on Saturday. The man, using the online handle Alexandra420, was moved to a hotel near Heathrow from where he shared eight clips encouraged others to make the journey. It also emerged that months before coming here, he warned Afghan asylum seekers they could be sent home from Germany. READ MORE ON ILLEGAL MIGRANTS STOP THE BOASTS Migrant LIVE STREAMS step by step channel crossing & boasts from hotel Following our investigation, TikTok has taken down his account for promoting people-smuggling. Last night Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp blasted: 'This illegal immigrant had multiple opportunities to claim asylum in other European countries before choosing to come here. 'The Home Office and police should be urgently investigating this man for encouraging others to enter the UK illegally and producing a step-by-step guide showing them how to cross. 'Facilitating illegal immigration is a criminal offence. Enough is enough. "Everyone crossing the Channel illegally by small boat must be removed either to their home country or a safe third country. The Labour government need to get a grip of this crisis.' Mr Philp called for the return of the Rwanda deportation scheme, proposed by the Tories under Boris Johnson and dropped by Sir Keir Starmer on Day One of his premiership. Small boat migrants given taxpayer-funded days out including dinghy trips & £1 Prem tickets as farcical perks exposed Since then, 50,716 migrants have entered on a small boat — including 445 on Tuesday. Removals to Afghanistan have been paused since the Taliban seized control in 2021. It meant the TikTok influencer knew when entering the UK that he would likely not be deported. 9 He poses for a picture at Berlin's Altes Museum 9 Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp says 'enough is enough' Credit: PA He is believed to have stayed in Germany for a substantial time. But he decided to seek better benefits in Britain after posting about a plan by far-right party Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) to deport all illegal migrants. It would have seen the mass return of asylum seekers had the party won February's elections. The current German government is also exploring deporting failed asylum seekers to nations other than their home country. Everyone crossing the Channel illegally by small boat must be removed either to their home country or a safe third country Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp Mocking taxpayers The influencer posted a video of AfD firebrand leader Alice Weidel, in which she claimed: 'The Afghans are a nation that grew up in a war-torn environment. 'We know this fact and we do not deny it. But it does not matter to me where they came from or what conditions they grew up in. 'When they reach Germany, they must respect the laws, customs and culture of this country. young people who appear in German streets in military uniforms…they are clearly from the battlefield, not from the borders of Europe. 'I say this as a warning, not a threat. Learn the civil attitude. Otherwise, perhaps where you came from is more suitable for you.' The asylum seeker wrote of the video: 'Listen to this woman's speech, and indeed, she has spoken what she means. 'This law will be applied to Afghans at the earliest opportunity.' In shared social posts he poses in front of Berlin's Altes Museum, and in a keffiyeh headdress. In another he showed off the city's Alexanderplatz. In a third he sits in front of a bridge in a blue t-shirt, jeans and trainers. He captioned the photo with a location pin emoji, the French flag, and wrote: 'France'. Another photo shows him at an unidentified train station platform wearing a black puffer jacket with cream cargo trousers. We can also reveal he changed his TikTok bio after entering the UK to include a British flag — mocking taxpayers stumping up billions to put up 32,000 people in around 210 migrant hotels. In his 45-minute Q&A session, livestreamed on TikTok on Tuesday, he told his 70,000 followers: 'Finally, I left Germany. Then they moved me into France.' Later, he attempted to make a sarcastic joke by claiming he had not come from Germany — despite admitting it multiple times. A follower asked: 'Brother, have you been to Berlin or not?' The man replied: 'Yes – oh, no, no, I haven't been there, brother. I've never been to Berlin.' He then laughed for several seconds before adding: 'And I've never lived in Germany. Not for one second.' 9 The illegal migrant posted a step-by-step guide to crossing the Channel on a small boat Credit: Tiktok 9 He showed TikTok fans his view from the window of his asylum hotel Credit: Tiktok 9 He also took part in a live Q&A with his followers Appearing to admit he had been rejected for asylum in mainland Europe, he went on: 'What should I do in a country that rejects me? 'I didn't get acceptance, I got nothing. I'm crazy to live there?' Referring to Britain's generous perks, he said: 'There's nothing there. Only here.' Later, in the livestream, he admitted: 'Everything in the story is about acceptance. 'There is no need for my attention there (in Germany) anymore. 'I came from a faraway place, aboard a ship.' Finally, I left Germany. Then they moved me into France After arriving in Dover, he was taken to the processing centre at Manston, Kent, and given standard-issue clothes, some of which he appears to wear in the video. He was then transferred to the Crowne Plaza near Heathrow. The hotel is a stopover for many asylum seekers before switch to more permanent accomodation. Yesterday more migrants came and went from the hotel, which is contracted by the Home Office after previosuly operating as a four-star stopover for holidaymakers and businesspeople. A TikTok spokeswoman said yesterday: 'We take a zero-tolerance approach to content promoting human smuggling, this account has been banned and we remove the vast majority of content before it is even reported. 'Through industry-leading search interventions and close collaboration with the UK National Crime Agency, we work to identify and disrupt organised immigration crime online, adapting our efforts to meet evolving threats.' A Home Office spokeswoman said: 'It is our longstanding policy not to comment on operational matters or individual cases.' 9 The man, using the online handle Alexandra420, was moved to the Crowne Plaza hotel near Heathrow Credit: Dan Charity BBC edit for 'xenophobia' THE BBC was yesterday forced to apologise after a Radio 4 programme branded fears about illegal migrants as 'xenophobic'. A guest singled out Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick for saying he did not want his children 'sharing a neighbourhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally.' On Thought for the Day, Dr Krish Kandiah said: 'These words echo a fear — fear of the stranger. The technical name is xenophobia.' Jenrick slammed the comments and the BBC edited the show. It said: 'While its reflection on fear in society from a faith perspective is broadly in line with expectations of the programme, some of the language it used went beyond that and we apologise.'


The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Plans for UK police to reveal suspects' ethnicity a recipe for ‘dog-whistle politics', say campaigners
Plans to disclose the ethnicity and immigration status of criminal suspects in the UK have been condemned by race campaigners for setting a dangerous precedent for 'dog-whistle politics', which will make 'Black and brown communities more vulnerable'. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, has welcomed new police guidelines released on Wednesday which encourage forces to release the race and nationality of those charged in high-profile cases. It is meant to combat misinformation on social media, which spread last summer after the murder of three schoolgirls in Southport. False information about the killer's nationality, religion and asylum status fuelled widespread unrest throughout the country. But race campaigners believe the move may encourage focus on the racial background of suspects, and will lead to further rightwing conspiracy theories when information is not released to the public. Enny Choudhury, the co-head of legal at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: 'Releasing the ethnicity of everyone suspected of serious crimes will … simply fuel mistrust, deepen divisions, and make Black and brown communities more vulnerable to prejudice and harm. 'Some point to cases like Southport, where rumours were quashed by releasing specific information. But building a blanket policy around this is dangerous. It turns race into a variable in policing and public debate– when we know the vast majority of serious crimes, including sexual offences, are committed by white men. 'The role of the justice system should be to unite communities in pursuit of justice, not to single people out because of their ethnicity.' Peter Herbert, from the Society of Black Lawyers, questioned the role of the police around issues of ethnicity and nationality when forces still face allegations of institutional racism. He said: 'The disclosure of ethnicity in particular is especially sensitive. People have never committed crimes on the basis of their ethnicity or nationality, and therefore the whole premise about releasing this information in certain cases sets a dangerous precedent. 'One only has to remember the misinformation the surrounded the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes to understand the police themselves are often guilty of putting out misinformation which exacerbates public concern and fear. 'Conspiracy theorists are rarely satisfied by official announcements and therefore tagging ethnicity and nationality, even in a limited amount of cases, opens a dangerous door to widespread xenophobia and racism, enabling the criminal justice system to be used for dog-whistle politics.' The guidance, which comes into immediate effect, was developed by the National Police Chiefs' Council in recognition of 'public concerns', and to ensure police processes were 'fit for purpose in an age of rapid information spread'. It comes after authorities were accused by Reform UK of hiding the identities and immigration status of two men, reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Warwickshire. In May, when a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool FC's winning of the Premier League title, Merseyside police disclosed that the man arrested was white and British, in order to quash rumours of a terrorist attack in the public interest. Decisions on releasing such information will remain with police forces, with wider legal and ethical considerations also taken into account, the NPCC said. Verifying a suspect's immigration status will be up to the Home Office, not the police. Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said the government will want police to release these details in 'most cases'. She told the BBC that disinformation was a 'bigger problem for society' and said that the government was working with social media providers to tackle the issue. The former Metropolitan police chief superintendent Dal Babu has warned of the 'unintended consequences' of the new guidance, which he said could lead to more online speculation in cases where these details are not released. 'The danger is there will be an expectation for police to release information on every single occasion,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.