Indian parents face uncertainty over US citizenship for newborns
The wait for temporary US visas for soon-to-be-born babies of expectant Indian moms has just gotten longer, immigration lawyers told ET.
The challenge to the Presidential executive order on birthright citizenship is still awaiting a decision in the Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS).
Trump's executive order puts the US citizenship of unborn children of foreign nationals including Indians on temporary visa in limbo. This has caused much anxiety among the expecting Indian parents as they throng immigration attorney offices to seek further counsel. While some are even considering shifting to those states that do not recognize the Trump order as of now, an attorney, who did not wish to be identified, told ET."The scenario for Indian nationals on temporary visas expecting children in the US is quite uncertain. Depending on the jurisdiction, children born in the US may or may not automatically acquire citizenship," said Sukanya Raman, country head, Davies and Associates. "This is complicating decisions around childbirth and long-term residency planning."
(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) According to experts, about 1.5 lakh newborns annually could be denied US citizenship if the order comes into effect.
Many foreign nationals have in the past used the US' birthright citizenship path to gain legal entry for their offsprings. This has given way to "birth tourism" which refers to the practice where foreign nationals travel to the United States on visitor visas with the primary intention of giving birth. This ensures their children automatically acquire US citizenship under the 14th Amendment.This trend has been particularly common among women from countries like Russia, China, and Nigeria, said experts. "Recently, a growing number of Indian nationals have also pursued this route," said an attorney.The SCOTUS deliberations, which started on May 15, primarily focused on the scope of nationwide injunctions rather than the constitutionality of executive order itself, said experts.
Despite being a smaller share, Indian families could be deeply impacted by changes to birthright citizenship laws, given the large number of Indian nationals on temporary visas, say experts. "Our firm has been receiving a continuous flow of inquiries from Indian nationals ever since Executive Order 14160 was announced," said attorney Prachi Shah who runs her eponymous firm. Expecting parents on H-1B, H-4, F-1 and OPT visas are queueing up at the immigration lawyers' offices. There is widespread anxiety in the Indian diaspora, said lawyers."The executive order is quite egregious," said Rajiv Khanna, managing attorney, Immigration.com."For some parents, it's devastating because to have a child in the US after decades of living here and not have them be a US citizen is ridiculous," he said.It usually takes 10-15 years for people to get a green card in the US for people who are here legally."The outcome of the hearing is not clear as to what is going to happen," said Khanna."The US Census doesn't collect statistics on the legal status of parents, but roughly 21-25% of babies have at least one foreign citizen parent," said Jath Shao, principal attorney, Shao Law Firm."The Trump administration's strategy seems to be arguing technicalities and wanting to impose their changes and make all the individual states and plaintiffs fight it," said Shao.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
R&D? Rarely
Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Iran warns it will target US bases if conflict erupts over nuke talks
If nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with the United States, Iran will strike American bases in the region, Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday, days ahead of a planned sixth round of Iran-US nuclear talks."Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us ... all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries," Nasirzadeh said during a weekly press President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened Iran with bombing if it does not reach a new nuclear deal. The next round of talks is due this week, with Trump saying negotiations would be held on Thursday while Tehran says they will take place on Sunday in is expected to hand a counter-proposal to a previous US offer for a nuclear deal it rejected, with Trump saying on Tuesday that Iran was becoming "much more aggressive" in nuclear and Washington have clashed on the issue on uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, which Western powers say is a potential pathway to the development of nuclear weapons. Iran holds that its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes."As we resume talks on Sunday, it is clear that an agreement that can ensure the continued peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program is within reach — and could be achieved rapidly," Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in a post on X on sticking point in the talks has been Iran's missile programme. Ballistic missiles form an important part of Iran's said that Tehran recently tested a missile with a two-ton warhead and does not accept Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had said in February that Iran should further develop its military, including its missiles.
India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Very nice: Donald Trump responds to Musk's public apology after ugly feud
US President Donald Trump responded Wednesday to Elon Musk's public apology after a bitter social media spat between the two former allies. Musk admitted that his recent criticism of Trump had gone "too far," hoping that tensions between him and the president might ease after a week of sharp personal commented on the apology during a brief phone interview with the New York Post on Wednesday morning. Despite the harsh words, Trump said that he has "no hard feelings."advertisementTrump said, "I thought it was very nice that he did that." He also said he doesn't "blame" Musk for the blow-up that started with the latter's criticisms of the Big Beautiful Bill. However, he maintained that he was "a little disappointed," reported The Post. Elon Musk, a former Trump aide, unleashed a series of posts about Trump last week. The feud began when Musk lashed out at Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Trump responded by downplaying Musk's role in his political success. In response, Musk claimed that Trump's 2024 election victory was largely due to his support. He went on to allege that the president had a role in blocking the release of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, based on Trump's past connections with APOLOGISES AFTER HARSH CRITICISM OF TRUMPadvertisementHowever, Musk later deleted some of these posts and apologised, stating, "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." According to the New York Times, the apology came after Musk spoke privately with Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles on Friday. The talks aimed to find a way to calm tensions between the two men, who had been engaged over a social media some reports claimed Musk personally reached out to Trump on Monday. Trump acknowledged the apology but did not make clear if he was ready to restore their previous in the feud, Trump had called Musk "crazy" and threatened to reconsider federal contracts with Musk's companies. He also accused Musk of suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and being upset over losing his government position and the removal of electric vehicle tax incentives from the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act."When asked about the possibility of repairing their relationship, Trump told Miranda Devine's "Pod Force One" podcast, "I guess I could, but we have to straighten out the country." He added, "My sole function now is getting this country back to a level higher than it's ever been. And I think we can do that."Tune InMust Watch
