logo
Gable-fronted Victorian on 1.3 acres once home to world's first female stockbroker

Gable-fronted Victorian on 1.3 acres once home to world's first female stockbroker

Asking price: €2.95m
Agent: Sherry FitzGerald (01) 2894386
​'Sell in May and go away' has long been the seasonal steer from the stock trading floors. The mantra among portfolio managers and dealers in equities points to summer as the historically weak period for the market.
Not so for the property market though, with the early year sales season pushing on resolutely to the end of June and into July.
New to market, for example, is Trentham: a six-bedroom Victorian detached property on 1.3 acres which was, for a time, the family home of Oonah Keogh, the world's first female stockbroker.
The legendary Keogh's trailblazing legacy long ran under the radar, until her story was uncovered in Herstory: Ireland's Epic Women, a six-part documentary aired by RTÉ in 2020.
Oonah joined the Irish Stock Market as a licensed trader on the floor in 1925, making her the world's first female trader. She was living at Trentham when she achieved this – her family owned the house between 1915 and 1930.
Having studied art at London's Metropolitan School following a secondary education in Dublin's Alexandra College, and a period spent travelling, Keogh applied to be a member of the Dublin Stock Exchange, having been taught the mechanics of market trading by her father.
At the time, there was nothing in the constitution of the relatively new Irish Free State (which purported to guarantee equal rights for women) to bar her on gender grounds. However, she met with some resistance.
As Oonah possessed the requisite wealth, education and references (including one from a government minister), a seemingly reluctant stock exchange voted to accept her after considerable debate, and she remained a member for 14 years.
ADVERTISEMENT
It would be another 42 years until Muriel Siebert began trading on the New York Stock Exchange in 1967, becoming the world's second licensed female stockbroker.
Though she may have been treated as a professional equal under the constitution, socially it was a different story for Oonah Keogh.
'One of the disadvantages in those days was that women did not socialise with men in lounges of pubs,' she said in a 1971 interview. 'When the men retired to Jurys to relax after transacting business, I could not accompany them… And even when I went to the races with my father, it was the same. He would go to the bar for a drink, I would have to slip off for afternoon tea.'
Keogh also turned her hand to property development. After marrying ex-pat Russian architect and designer Bayan Giltsoff in 1933, the couple settled in England and went into building mock-Tudor houses, before moving back to Kilquade in Co Wicklow in the late 1940s, where they developed the distinctive housing scheme that became known as 'The Russian Village'.
These days, Trentham belongs to Mary Cummins and her businessman husband Paul, who have been there since 1991. The mostly granite built, gable-fronted house has almost 5,000 sq ft of living accommodation.
The couple were attracted by the regal frontage and the sheer amount of space inside.
Trentham was constructed by John Bentley of the Bentley brothers, one of the original ­developers of the Foxrock suburb.
'We redid the kitchen,' Cummins says. 'We re-plastered walls and put in new bathrooms, and we refurbished all the windows.
'We didn't carry out any big structural changes, but we did knock a wall from the kitchen to lead into the garden because there were pantries and what have you there.'
The improvements the Cumminses made to the house were supervised by architects Paul Brazil and Gillian Murphy.
As a result of the renovation, Cummins says the kitchen space is particularly suited to entertaining. 'The back of the house comes into its own in summer, while those at the front of the house have a cosiness about them in the winter.'
Some of her most treasured memories will be her and her husband's 40th birthday parties there, as well as daughter Ali's communion and 21st. 'Ali and her friends all loved to come back here on St Stephen's Day after the race meeting at Leopardstown,' Cummins says.
The facade of several gables of varying scale has a storm porch with a notable stained-glass panelled entrance.
On the ground floor is a guest ­bathroom, drawing room, dining room, back hallway, living room, conservatory and kitchen/ breakfast room. The main living rooms all have 12ft ceilings.
The conservatory has French doors connecting to a patio out back, as does the kitchen.
In the back garden is what they call the 'third garden', a sort of secret garden that was formerly the site of an outdoor swimming pool which now has a pond, rockery and patio area.
The former pool house now accommodates a toilet, wash hand basin and storage.
Upstairs, the master bedroom suite runs from the back to the front of the house, with a dressing room and an en suite kitted out in marble, with a Villeroy & Boch bath.
There are three other bedrooms on this floor, with a fifth, en suite bedroom on the second floor. There is also a floored attic space with under-eaves storage, a detached garage and several sheds.
The family have already secured alternative accommodation in the neighbourhood. 'I will definitely miss the space,' says Cummins.
Sherry FitzGerald will take stock of an offer of €2.95m for this home with history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky warns oil price surge could help Russia's war effort in Ukraine
Zelensky warns oil price surge could help Russia's war effort in Ukraine

Irish Examiner

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Zelensky warns oil price surge could help Russia's war effort in Ukraine

A sharp rise in global oil prices after Israeli strikes on Iran will benefit Russia and bolster its military capabilities in the war in Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky has said. The Ukrainian president told journalists in Kyiv that the surge in oil prices threatens Ukraine's position on the battlefield, especially because western allies have not enforced effective price caps on Russian oil exports. 'The strikes led to a sharp increase in the price of oil, which is negative for us,' Mr Zelensky said. 'The Russians are getting stronger due to greater income from oil exports.' Global oil prices rose as much as 7% after Israel and Iran exchanged attacks over the past 48 hours, raising concerns that further escalation could disrupt oil exports from the Middle East. We would like aid to Ukraine not to decrease because of this. Last time, this was a factor that slowed down aid to Ukraine. Mr Zelensky said he planned to raise the issue in a conversation with US President Donald Trump. 'In the near future, I will be in contact with the American side, I think with the president, and we will raise this issue,' he said. He also expressed concern that US military aid could be diverted away from Ukraine towards Israel during renewed tensions in the Middle East. 'We would like aid to Ukraine not to decrease because of this,' he said. 'Last time, this was a factor that slowed down aid to Ukraine.' Ukraine's military needs have been sidelined by the US in favour of supporting Israel, Mr Zelensky said, citing a shipment of 20,000 interceptor missiles, designed to counter Iran-made Shahed drones, which had been intended for Ukraine but were redirected to Israel. 'And for us it was a blow,' he said. 'When you face 300 to 400 drones a day, most are shot down or go off course, but some get through. We were counting on those missiles.' An air defence system, Barak-8, promised to Ukraine by Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu was sent to the US for repairs but never delivered to Ukraine, he added. The Ukrainian president conceded that momentum for the Coalition of the Willing, a group of 31 countries which have pledged to strengthen support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, has slowed because of US ambivalence over providing a backstop. 'This situation has shown that Europe has not yet decided for itself that it will be with Ukraine completely if America is not there,' he said. The offer of a foreign troop 'reassurance force' pledged by the coalition is still on the table 'but they need a backstop, as they say, from America' Mr Zelensky said. 'This means that suddenly, if something happens, America will be with them and with Ukraine.' The Ukrainian president also said the presence of foreign contingents in Ukraine would act as a security guarantee and allow Kyiv to make territorial compromises, which is the first time he has articulated a link between the reassurance force and concessions Kyiv is willing to make in negotiations with Russia. 'It is simply that their presence gives us the opportunity to compromise, when we can say that today our state does not have the strength to take our territories within the borders of 1991,' he said. But Europe and Ukraine are still waiting on strong signals from Mr Trump. Without major US sanctions against Russia, 'I will tell you frankly, it will be very difficult for us', Mr Zelensky said, adding that it would then fall on Europe to step up military aid to Ukraine. In other developments, Russia repatriated more bodies of fallen soldiers in line with an agreement reached during peace talks in Istanbul between Russian and Ukrainian delegations, Russian officials said on Saturday, cited by Russian state media. The officials said Ukraine did not return any bodies to Russia on Saturday. Ukraine's Co-ordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War confirmed in a statement that Russia had returned 1,200 bodies. The first round of the staggered exchanges took place on Monday. The agreement to exchange prisoners of war and the bodies of soldiers was the only tangible outcome of the talks in Istanbul on June 2. Continuing a renewed battlefield push along eastern and north-eastern parts of the 600-mile front line, the Russian Defence Ministry claimed on Saturday that its troops had captured another village in the Donetsk region, Zelenyi Kut. Russia launched 58 drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight into Saturday, according to the Ukrainian air force, which said its air defences destroyed 23 drones while another 20 were jammed. Russia's Defence Ministry said it shot down 66 Ukrainian drones overnight.

EU and US sanctions on Russia: Timing is everything ahead of G7 summit
EU and US sanctions on Russia: Timing is everything ahead of G7 summit

RTÉ News​

time10 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

EU and US sanctions on Russia: Timing is everything ahead of G7 summit

As G7 leaders converge on Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies this weekend, the prospect of decisively tougher sanctions on Russia will loom large. The Ukraine War is reaching another inflection point: Vladimir Putin has intensified missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities and there are fears a Russian ground offensive is imminent. While President Trump has been publicly frustrated with Mr Putin's relentless attacks on civilian targets, he keeps deferring a tougher response. Over the next 10 days, a key NATO summit in The Hague, and a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels, will further clarify Mr Trump's intentions when it comes to Ukraine and the broader issue of European security. Supporters of Ukraine, therefore, are banking on harsher sanctions to convince Russia to move towards the 30-day ceasefire to which Ukraine has in principle already agreed. There is also a growing consensus that Russia's economy, despite weathering the sanctions better than expected, could be more vulnerable than the regime is claiming. This week the European Commission tabled its 18th sanctions package, aimed at stopping the flow of refined Russian crude oil into Europe, while simultaneously pushing to lower the oil price cap agreed by the G7. In July, the Commission will also propose a complete phase out of Russian fossil fuels, especially LNG. In tandem, two US senators Lindsay Graham (Rep) and Richard Blumenthal (Dem) have been promoting a bill which would, in the words of its authors, put "bone-crushing" pressure on Russia by hitting countries which continue to buy its oil with 500% tariffs. Both gambits face formidable challenges. The cap on the price Russia can sell its seaborne crude oil was set at $60 per barrel by a joint decision of the G7 and EU member states in December 2022. The idea was to ensure that the global south did not suffer from a complete ban (which would also have pushed up prices and therefore the Kremlin's revenues), whereas a cap would keep the oil flowing but with less benefit to Russia. 'Shadow fleet' The price cap was policed through the west's virtual monopoly on maritime insurance. To circumvent the cap, Russia began buying end-of-life vessels, effectively creating a parallel shipping network with dubious insurance - what became known as the "shadow fleet". The EU and G7 then sanctioned individual ships: the US hit 200 vessels, the EU 154 and the UK 177. As a result, ports became increasingly unwilling to let these oil tankers dock while flag states like Panama and Honduras were de-registering them (on Wednesday the EU added an additional 77 shadow fleet vessels to the sanctions list). Experts suggest Russia, which still gets one third of its export revenues from crude oil, is still finding ways to circumvent the price cap. However, the EU believes it has significantly reduced oil revenues. India, Turkey and China - the biggest buyers of Russian oil - have been pressuring Moscow to sell its crude below the price cap, officials say. Now, the EU wants to push the price cap lower. Notwithstanding the spike in prices following Israel's attack against Iran, the traded price of crude this year has fallen to around $65 a barrel, rendering the $60 cap ineffective. This week European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen proposed lowering it to $45. This was deliberately timed ahead of the G7 summit: Europe cannot do this alone. The Commission believes that most G7 partners are on board, but not yet the Trump administration. Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is sceptical and reportedly insisted that a reference to a lower price cap be dropped from the final communiqué of last month's G7 finance ministers meeting in Banff, Alberta. While EU officials say the work to convince President Trump will continue, it may be that the six other G7 countries go it alone, given that the UK and EU between them cover most of the elements (ie, identifying the shadow fleet and maritime insurance). Sources admit, however, that the decision-making process within the Trump administration is "difficult to predict". Brussels is also proposing a ban on any EU operator engaging in transactions, either directly or indirectly, via the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, and also wants to curb the amount of Russian crude making its way into member states through the back door because it has been refined and relabelled elsewhere. Officials admit there are conflicting figures as to how much relabelled Russian crude - mostly refined in India and Turkey - is entering Europe. India and Turkey imported 1.7 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first quarter of 2025, according to LSEG data; EU member states imported more than 350,000 barrels from both countries in the same period. EU officials say the burden of proof would be switched to the exporting countries to show that the refined oil is not originally Russian, but that could be tricky. "The [European] Commission implementing such a ban would be difficult, given that refiners blend different types of crude oil," writes Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy with ING. "Determining the origin of the crude oil becomes challenging." The Kremlin is publicly unperturbed. "Naturally, Russia has not been living under restrictions for just a day," spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said this week. "We have long operated under such conditions, which we continue to regard as unlawful. Russia has gained valuable and substantial experience that allows us to minimize the adverse effects of such measures." The Commission has also proposed cutting off a further 22 Russian banks from the Swift international payments system and converting the partial ban on financial institutions to a full ban. The 18th sanctions package could be agreed by the end of the month, with the usual caveat of potential objections by Hungary and Slovakia. Robert Fico, Slovakia's pro-Russian prime minister, has warned he would not support the package - which requires unanimity - unless the Commission provides a solution to the problems caused by a full phase out of Russia fuel. In reality, it has been the contradictory response by the Trump administration to the Ukraine War that has pushed the EU into launching what could be its toughest sanctions package yet. In Kyiv, on 10 May, the leaders of Ukraine, Britain, France, Germany and Poland had called on Russia - on the assumption they had the backing of the Trump administration - to agree to an immediate 30-day ceasefire or face massive sanctions. Instead, the US President enthusiastically backed a call by Vladimir Putin to start talks in Istanbul the following week (with no commitment to a ceasefire). Mr Putin refused to attend the talks, which were conducted by a low-level Russian delegation, and has since intensified air attacks while continuing to insist on his maximalist war aims. Moscow appears convinced that military gains and the demoralisation of the Ukrainian population are a better bet than ceasefires. "The aim of the [18th sanctions] package is to increase pressure on Russia and to make it agree to negotiate with sincere intentions," says Svitlana Taran, an analyst with the European Policy Centre (EPC). "At the moment Russia is engaging in negotiations, but without any real intention to actually negotiate. Russia still thinks that it can win. Moscow is confident they still have more potential to sustain a war of attrition against Ukraine than Ukraine does." In the absence of tougher action from the White House, US senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal are currently pushing a bill through the Senate which would - if approved by President Trump - allow for tariffs of 500% on countries which are continuing to buy Russian crude oil, gas, uranium and other exports. The bill currently has 82 sponsors on both sides of the aisle with Graham - regarded as a weathervane on Republican sentiment towards Ukraine - and Blumenthal hopeful it can be adopted before the 4 July recess. Supporters of the bill complain that Mr Putin has been stringing the US president along and has no incentive to get to the negotiating table in the absence of tougher measures. 'Making astronomically high tariffs the center of US policy toward Russia's war is misguided' But the Sanctioning Russia Act (SRA2025) is not without its critics. President Trump would have to determine every 90 days that Mr Putin is refusing to negotiate a peace agreement at which point sanctions would be mandatory. These would be on President Putin himself, on Russian oligarchs and on banks and other financial institutions. But the most eye-catching element is the 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian crude oil. Since China is among the biggest purchasers, this would upend the current negotiations between Washington and Beijing on averting a damaging trade war. "Making astronomically high tariffs the center of US policy toward Russia's war is misguided: a threat that will never be carried out lacks real coercive power," argues Stephen Sestanovich of the Council on Foreign Relations. "And a bill that stops all trade with the United States' most important commercial partners is precisely that kind of threat." The authors of the bill insist it is designed precisely to focus minds and to convince Mr Putin that he cannot maintain his war effort for another two or three years. "Russia is in a very perilous state already economically, because 40 percent of its economy is devoted to war production or compensation for soldiers," Senator Blumenthal said during a recent visit to Kyiv. "It's only real source of revenue is oil and gas and other similar energy products, of which 70 percent is sold to India and China together." While Lindsey Graham stresses he has worked closely with the White House in formulating the bill, President Trump has been urging him to water down key aspects and has made his distaste for some of the elements clear. EU officials, while supportive of the need for tougher US pressure on Moscow, are aware of this. "I'm not convinced that the bill will be what gets adopted, even if Trump decides to put sanctions on Putin," says a senior EU source. "These bills in the Senate are notoriously aspirational until the White House gets at them and says: this is what's actually realistic. [Senator] Graham won't do anything without Trump's approval." Russian economy 'clearly heading toward zero growth' Yet, there is a growing body of opinion that this is precisely the time to hit the Russian economy. On paper, Moscow has weathered the sanctions well since 2022. While the economy contracted by 2.1% in 2022, there was economic growth in the following two years as Russia switched to a military economy, deepened trade links with China and India, availed of windfall fossil fuel profits and used its accumulated reserves as a buffer against the sharp decline in exports. This allowed Mr Putin to pour huge resources into military spending. Between 2011 and 2021 the defense budget averaged $53 billion per year. In 2022 it rose to $79 billion and $94 billion in 2023. Last year, defence spending soared to $140 billion, while this year it will eat up 32.2% of the federal budget. Such spending has allowed the Kremlin to mute popular unease about the war by boosting military salaries and social benefits, while buying off business elites. Pouring money into the military industrial complex has generated its own economic growth. However, there are strong indications that this formula is running out of road. Up to a million able-bodied Russians are thought to have left the country either in protest or to avoid being drafted, and while up to half have returned the civilian economy is deemed dangerously starved of labour. That has forced companies to boost salaries so they can compete with military pay, which in turn has fueled inflation. To cut inflation from its current rate of 10.2%, the Russian central bank has raised interest rates to over 20%. In March, President Putin called on his government not to strangle growth in its fight against inflation, while Alexander Shokhin, president of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, warned Russia was "clearly heading…toward zero growth." A report this week by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CISS) concludes that Russia has reached the limit of massive state spending on the military sector, with the side-effects of prolonged sanctions, soaring inflation and interest rates starting to bite. "Russia's current account remains the country's most glaring economic vulnerability," the report says. "A dramatic drop in export revenues, a surge in capital flight, or a further increase in the country's import costs, if timed fortuitously, could push Russia in the direction of a balance of payments crisis." 'Good-cop-bad-cop' tactics The growing frustration in Washington at the Kremlin's unrelenting assault on civilians appears to have prompted a change in heart. While the Biden administration steered clear of tough sanctions against Russia's energy sector until the very end of his tenure, and those countries filling Mr Putin's war coffers by buying its crude oil paid no penalty, there is today a change in mood. It is true that European countries which continue to rely on Russian oil could be caught up in the US tariffs. Lindsey Graham insists there will be exemptions for countries that have supported Ukraine's defence. A much tougher bipartisan response from Congress could provide President Trump with a 'good-cop-bad-cop' tactic to be used on Mr Putin, notwithstanding his tendency to cut the Russian president a very generous amount of slack. Brussels would prefer to act in tandem with Washington. However, observers point to Europe's complete oil embargo on Iran in 2009, and how it pushed the country to negotiate the 2015 nuclear deal, as an argument for going it alone. "Just as the EU oil embargo on Iran helped spur action in Washington a decade and a half ago, major new EU sanctions on Russia could do the same today," writes Edward Fishman, a former Obama administration official in Foreign Affairs. "Instead of waiting around for Mr Trump, Brussels should advance new penalties on Russia's energy sector. Even unilateral EU measures would tighten the screws on Moscow - and could prompt Washington to follow suit."

New EU tariffs on Russian fertiliser confirmed to begin on July 1
New EU tariffs on Russian fertiliser confirmed to begin on July 1

Agriland

time21 hours ago

  • Agriland

New EU tariffs on Russian fertiliser confirmed to begin on July 1

New tariffs imposed by the EU on fertilisers coming from Russia and its geopolitical ally Belarus will come into effect on or before July 1, it has been confirmed. The confirmation comes after the Council of the EU (council of ministers) adopted the proposal from the European Commission for increased tariffs, following the European Parliament's decision to adopt the proposal last month. The adoption by the council means the proposal has cleared all its legislative hurdles, and therefore the tariffs will come into force no later than the first day of next month. According to the council, the aim is to reduce EU dependence on those imports as well as to reduce Russian export revenues, thereby limiting its ability to finance its war effort in Ukraine. The council said that the implementation of these tariffs will be closely monitored to ensure that the EU fertiliser industry and farmers are protected. The tariff increases on fertilisers will take place gradually, over a transition period of three years. Once the legislation enters into force, EU tariffs will apply to all agricultural products from Russia, as other agricultural goods are already subject to customs duties. The new tariffs will apply to goods that made up around 15% of all agricultural imports from Russia in 2023. In the case of fertilisers, the new tariffs will apply to certain nitrogen-based products. According to the council, the new tariffs will help reduce the EU's dependence on Russia and Belarus, and will boost diversification and domestic production, while also allowing for the diversification of supply, ensuring a stable fertiliser supply and maintaining affordability for EU farmers. However, the new regulation has been adopted despite the concerns of EU farmers over the impact it will have on the availability and price of fertiliser. Copa Cogeca, the body representing EU farm organisations and agricultural co-operatives, previously said: 'Farming communities understand and support the overall objective pursued by the EU institutions. 'However, the complete lack of consideration for alternative sourcing, the absence of an impact assessment, and the lack of clarity on market implications, remain deeply problematic,' Copa added. 'While recognising broader foreign policy goals, we must emphasise the serious economic and operational consequences this proposal represents for the EU agricultural sector,' the group said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store