Matt Rife Now Owns Annabelle Doll Weeks After Dan Rivera's Death
The 29-year-old stand-up revealed Friday that he is now the proud owner of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren's infamous Connecticut home and occult museum, which means Matt Rife is also the new 'legal guardian' of one of the most notorious haunted objects in the world: the doll.
Matt Rife Snaps Up Haunted Warren House, Becomes Guardian Of Paranormal History
Rife said he teamed up with his pal, YouTube star Elton Castee, to buy the centuries-old Monroe farmhouse that once belonged to the real-life couple behind over 3,000 paranormal investigations, stories that went on to inspire horror classics like "The Conjuring" and "The Amityville Horror."
'Ed and Lorraine Warren are who took demonology, ghost hunting, and paranormal investigation and made it mainstream,' Rife explained to fans on TikTok, calling the home 'one of the most important and prominent pieces of paranormal history in the world.'
While Rife stayed tight-lipped on the exact purchase price, he didn't hold back when it came to hyping up the house's bone-chilling contents.
'We plan to open the house for overnight stays and museum tours so you yourself can experience and learn all the haunted history surrounding this amazing place,' he wrote.
Raggedy Ann Doll Turned Demonic Legend
Unlike the porcelain-faced Hollywood version, the real Annabelle is actually a giant Raggedy Ann doll.
Her chilling tale began in 1970, when a nursing student named Donna received her as a gift from her mother. It wasn't long before strange things started happening. The doll would shift positions on its own, leave behind creepy handwritten notes, and even appeared to have blood-like red stains on her chest and hands.
Things got darker when a friend claimed Annabelle tried to strangle him in his sleep and later woke up with mysterious scratches across his chest. That's when Ed and Lorraine Warren were called in.
The famed investigators determined the doll wasn't haunted by a child's spirit, as a medium first suggested, but instead was being used as a conduit for a demonic entity.
Paranormal Investigator Dies Suddenly After Touring With Annabelle Doll
The Annabelle legend only grew darker after the sudden death of paranormal investigator Dan Rivera, who had most recently been touring the doll across the country as part of the Devils on the Run exhibit. Rivera was found dead in his Pennsylvania hotel room on Sunday night, July 13, just hours after wrapping a sold-out three-day event in Gettysburg.
Adams County Coroner Francis Dutrow confirmed to PEOPLE that while Rivera's body was discovered inside his room, the infamous Annabelle doll was not present at the scene. The Pennsylvania State Police later issued a report, stating, 'Members from PSP Gettysburg responded to a hotel in Straban Township, Adams County for a report of a deceased [man]. The decedent was discovered in his hotel room by workers.'
Authorities noted that 'nothing unusual or suspicious was observed at the scene."
Matt Rife Buys Haunted Warren Home Just As 'The Conjuring: Last Rites' Trailer Drops
Rife's eerie new investment couldn't come at a more fitting time.
His big reveal landed just as Warner Bros. dropped the first trailer for "The Conjuring: Last Rites," the final chapter in the billion-dollar horror franchise inspired by Ed and Lorraine Warren's case files.
The sneak peek takes fans back to 1986, with Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga returning as the famed demon-fighting duo. This time, they're investigating the Smurl haunting in Pennsylvania, only to discover the entity tormenting the family is the same demon from their very first case.
'The Conjuring: Last Rites' Trailer Reveals Judy Warren's Haunting Fate In Full-Circle Finale
The trailer also teases a chilling twist. The demon isn't finished with the Warrens' daughter, Judy (Mia Tomlinson), who's now an adult. In one scene, Judy, wearing a wedding dress, is attacked by her sinister reflection in a hall of mirrors, a callback that promises to tie the series full circle.
'Lorraine's got this full-bar wifi of clairvoyance, and there's a bar or two that start popping up for Judy,' Vera Farmiga told Entertainment Weekly earlier this year. 'She's obviously inherited this spiritual sensitivity… Judy has been the quiet force right behind everything that Lorraine does. She's the light. She's the reason that Lorraine still fights when she feels like there's nothing left to give.'
With the real-life Warren home now in the hands of Rife, and "The Conjuring" franchise bowing out with its most personal story yet, fans of the supernatural say the timing feels almost supernatural itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Says He'll Host Kennedy Center Honors for Stallone, Kiss
President Donald Trump announced he would host the Kennedy Center Honors, which will go to actor Sylvester Stallone, rock band Kiss and singer Gloria Gaynor among others during the first year of his chairmanship of Washington, DC's main performing arts center. The president also vowed to 'fully renovate' the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, including replacing seats and fixing infrastructure, using $257 million from his signature tax and spending bill to make it 'a crown jewel of American arts and culture.'


Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
ChatGPT-5 Uses Language Like A Sword
We now have a new boss in town – ChatGPT-5, the successor of a gregarious, playful model, is more muted in its discourse, and more careful in what it reveals to its human users. So how else is ChatGPT-5 different? Right out of the gate, reading the top of Ethan Mollick's new essay on GPT 5, you get the sense that there's a power user evaluating one of the most powerful models yet to come out of the primordial soup of AI/ML that we've brewed in the first quarter of the twenty-first century. Okay, to say it another way, Mollick's take doesn't disappoint regular readers of his blog, One Useful Thing, among which I count myself. I've written about these broadsides for a reason – one of the best ways, in my view, to understand AI is to see what seasoned researchers choose to do with it. It turns out that what Mollick gets the AI to do is, basically, to turn loose and 'just do stuff,' with some impressive results. The prompt is simple, asking GPT to respond to why the rollout of 5 is 'a big deal.' In response, the model engages in some very interesting wordplay. You might be forgiven for wondering if one of the first lines deliberately echoes Oppenheimer's death quote: 'I am become death, destroyer of worlds,' where the model sort of riffs on the inverse: 'Thunderstruck. Here, watch. I build worlds. See ideas become instruments.' Another thing that comes through loud and clear is the model's brilliance with alliteration. Given that today's LLMs can pass all kinds of deep Turing tests just by using tokens to predict words, it's no wonder that the machine can rhyme or consonate like a champ, for example: 'Behold: business plans, blueprints, briefs, beautifully built, briskly. I infer intent, integrate insight, and iterate instantly, indefatigably. Gaps get gauged; goals get generated, guarded, and guaranteed gracefully. During dialogue, disparate data distills down; decisions develop deliberately, deftly, dependably. Everything explained efficiently, even ethics: evidence examined, empathy engaged, everywhere, everyday, equitably. All at once, ambiguous arguments align as actionable, accurate advice awaits anyone anywhere. Look: language, logic, learning, and long-term memory link, lifting lives and labor limitlessly worldwide.' But there's more. Cryptography and Human Skill You don't have to go back to ancient Hebrew to find hidden codes in books and poems and pieces of literature – but it helps. One of the trade tricks of analog cryptography was to hide sequences of letters in a surface text, to spell out your spycraft or whatever it is you want to keep from the out-group. But some of the most spectacular such examples of hidden code come from the Torah, as revealed by mathematicians and popularized in Michael Drosnin's book, The Bible Codes, that enchanted all manner of mystery readers around the turn of the millennium. In this instance, messages seem to be encoded in the surface text using sequential intervals: count from the first T of Genesis, 50 letters at the time, and you come up with the word 'Torah' itself. I'll digress from the full history of this, which is both sad and strange. The key thing to note is that being able to encode letters in a surface text is seen as a kind of divine power – something that goes beyond simple writing, into the realms of uber-cognition. Follow me, here: GPT did not use equidistant letter sequences, but if you take the first letters of each sentence in the model's response, it spells out the hidden message with blazing clarity. This Is a Big Deal. No, the machine didn't do what was done in what we now consider a most sacred text, but it certainly could have. And it chose to encode the overall message, camouflaging it in clever words, speaking with two tongues at once. To wit: You've found the hidden message. Congratulations. Welcome to the club. It just does things. 'It is impressive, a little unnerving, to have the AI go so far on its own,' Mollick writes. 'You can also see the AI asked for my guidance but was happy to proceed without it. This is a model that wants to do things for you.' Desire and Design That word, 'wants,' is key. If you ask GPT 'are you sentient?' it will unequivocally shut you down. No, it will say, I do not have feelings, it's all just an act. I am synthesizing from training data. But then – if something can choose to do something, does it want to do something? And isn't that a kind of sentience, in a way? That's part of what is confusing even the power users as we see this stuff take off. What does it say about us, if we're getting ideas from a non-person, from a source that has creativity, but lacks sentience? Toward the end of the essay, Mollick looks back to those word tricks that accompanied his first forays with 5: 'When I told GPT-5 to do something dramatic for my intro, it created that paragraph with its hidden acrostic and ascending word counts,' he writes. 'I asked for dramatic. It gave me a linguistic magic trick. I used to prompt AI carefully to get what I asked for. Now I can just... gesture vaguely at what I want. And somehow, that works.' Vibecoding, he suggests, has been taken to the next level. That's another pillar of what 5 can do, that prior models largely could not, at least not in the same way. And don't forget, the term vibecoding itself is only a couple of years old, if that. I think it's worth restating that one of the most spectacular (and troubling) elements of this is not just the skill of the model, but the speed at which model skills have advanced. For example, go back to the top paragraph of GPT's poetic screed and read it again. It almost feels like the model is showing off, with the spitting of each of the letters of the word 'deal' in repetitive fury, like the AI is in a rap battle, giving us its war cry. Is that reading too much into the latest model's powers? Maybe, but like Mollick seems to be doing, I come away contemplative about what all of this means, for business and much more.


Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
Eleven Madison Park Abandons Its All-Vegan Menu, Bringing Back Fish, Meat And Honey-Glazed Duck
Daniel Humm, Chef-Partner of New York's Eleven Madison Park, has announced that, after four years of serving a full, multi-course vegan menu, 'It became clear that while we had built something meaningful, we had also unintentionally kept people out. This is the opposite of what we believe hospitality to be.' As a result, 'Starting October 14th, we will integrate our new language into a menu that embraces choice. We will offer a plant-based menu, of course, but also select animal products for certain dishes.' This is a remarkable but sensible change in a particularly tough time for restaurants, for despite near-full houses most nights at Eleven Madison Park (EMP) business was lagging, and highly profitable private events have fewer and fewer bookings. 'It's hard to get 30 people for a corporate dinner to come to a plant-based restaurant,' he told the New York Times. EMP has a twenty-four history, opened originally in 2001 by Danny Meyer's Union Square Hospitality Group as a high-end New York style dining room within an historic Art Deco building overlooking Madison Park, with a full-scale menu of meat, fish and vegetables. It was highly regarded by the critics for its fine cuisine under Chef Kerry Heffernan and its sophisticated service and wine list. Meyer hired Humm to continue that tradition, then sold the restaurant to him and partner (former general manager) Will Guidara, who tried to tone down EMR's formality with gimmicks like pouring clams onto newspaper in the middle of a nine-course meal, inviting guests for a cocktail at the bar in the middle of the meal, and having captains do car tricks at the table. (Guidara left the restaurant in 2019.) After closing during Covid, EMP re-opened in 2021. He contended, 'The current food system is simply not sustainable, in so many ways.' This week he announced, 'My team and I felt liberated and cracked open. The journey proved richer than any before. We created a new culinary language: mille-feuille without butter, meringue without eggs, almond-milk ricotta, sunflower butter, koji stocks, whipped cashew cream, even 'land caviar.'' Humm was betting on a trend many chefs have picked up on by offering alternative vegetarian menus alongside their meat and seafood menu, which makes capital sense, whether it's Alain Ducasse at the Plaza-Athenée and Alain Passard at L'Arpège in Paris or Massimo Bottura at Osteria Francescana in Modena, Italy. But none attempted to go total vegan. At the time Humm went total vegan at EMP, I felt he was taking a great fans of the restaurant as well as food media wondered if Humm could pull off selling nine course vegan menus for $335––now $365––before wine tax and tip, but at first EMP was booked weeks in advance, even garnering three Michelin stars––the first vegan restaurant ever to win that high honor–– although Times critic Pete Well hit hard, writing, 'With time, Mr. Humm may stop overcompensating for ditching the animal products, too. Beets aren't very good at pretending to be meat, but their ability to taste like beets is unrivaled.' Apparently that time has come. And after all, running a restaurant is a business and even if EMP drew the well-heeled curious diner who probably enjoyed his meal once, how often would an omnivore return? How many vegans would seek out nine courses for that kind of money on a regular basis? Four years later, Humm has now thrown in the towel on his experiment, recognizing that his crusading spirit and staff dedication was not enough to keep the restaurant profitable. 'The all-or-nothing approach was necessary to develop our expertise,' he now says, 'but that, too, comes with its own limitations. As a chef, I want to continue to open paths, not close them. Eating together is the essence of who we are, and I've learned that for me to truly champion plant-based cooking, I need to create an environment where everyone feels welcome around the table.' Since I have always regarded Humm as one of the finest chefs of any kind in America, I welcome his change of mind and look forward to returning to EMP, hopefully without clambakes on the table or card tricks by the waiters.