Awaiting sex crimes trials, billionaire Frank Stronach in Austria for a TV appearance
On June 5, Canadian billionaire Frank Stronach was doing what has preoccupied him for years: hawking his economic ideas in front of the camera.
But this was not one of his regular speeches at his Aurora, Ont., restaurant or at some Canadian business gala. The 92-year-old, who is to stand trial in Toronto and Newmarket, Ont., next year for more than a dozen alleged sex crimes, gave his economic stump speech an ocean away, in Austria, on a current affairs news program.
Stronach, who had to surrender his passport to the courts when he was arrested in June 2024, has been in the country of his birth for three weeks, CBC News has learned.
Court documents obtained by CBC News show that Stronach's bail conditions were quietly altered on May 21, granting him the return of his passport and ability to travel from May 24 to June 14.
The section of the document set aside to provide reasons why a bail condition should be changed contains only a single sentence with no further explanation: "To allow Mr. Stronach to travel to Austria."
The change to Stronach's bail conditions, which were requested by his Toronto lawyer, Leora Shemesh, was approved by assistant Crown attorney Jelena Vlacic. The alteration did not require a hearing before a judge, because the Crown did not object.
Vlacic confirmed in an interview that she consented to the change.
"I'm not in a position to sort of make any comments," she said when asked why she agreed.
Not unusual to grant passport request: lawyer
Although Stronach was required to surrender his passport last year, his bail conditions do not mention any other restrictions on travel, a common feature, said Ottawa criminal lawyer Michael Spratt.
"Bail is not intended to be punitive," he told CBC News in a Friday interview. "An accused person is presumed innocent."
Spratt said the primary reason a court orders the surrender of a passport is to prevent an accused person from fleeing the country. While someone of Stronach's wealth has the means to leave, Spratt said that is not the only consideration at hand.
"If someone, say, suddenly moved a lot of assets into that country, or bought a home there, or bought a one-way ticket to a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty, the Crown might take a much harder look at that," said Spratt, who is not part of the Stronach case.
If those sorts of conditions don't exist, the Crown is likely to grant the return of a passport, he said.
Spratt said in a case like Stronach's, where a high-profile person is facing multiple criminal charges, the release of a passport will raise some eyebrows. But it is not unusual for such a request to be granted.
Shemesh, in an emailed statement to CBC News, said the paperwork was a "formality."
"He is presumed innocent. He has no criminal record. He maintains his innocence and enjoys the same freedoms we all do."
'A disappointing double standard for wealthy'
Stronach is a well-known political and business figure in Austria. Aside from the fame and wealth he garnered from leading the Ontario-based auto-parts giant Magna for decades, he once ran his own political party in Austria. Called Team Stronach, the party had limited electoral success in 2013 but was a thing of the past by 2014.
He surrendered his passport at the courthouse in Brampton, Ont., on June 7, 2024. Stronach, 91 at the time, was arrested and charged with sexual assault, rape and forcible confinement in cases involving 10 women dating back decades.
By October 2024, his charge sheet ballooned to 18 criminal counts.
Stronach has denied all of the charges against him, calling the allegations made by the women "lies."
He now faces two trials. Twelve of the charges against him will be heard in a Toronto courtroom starting on Nov. 16, 2026. The remaining charges will be tried in York Region, with a jury trial scheduled to begin on June 1, 2026.
CBC News reached out to several of the women who allege Stronach assaulted them. They declined to comment or could not be reached on Friday.
"I'm baffled by Frank Stronach's presence in Austria. It was reported that he had surrendered his passport," said Jane Boon, a former Magna intern who says she had a sexual encounter with Stronach in 1986, when she was 19 and he was 54.
Last year, Boon spoke to Fifth Estate reporter Mark Kelley about her uncomfortable sexual experience with Stronach, which is not part of any of the criminal cases the former auto-parts magnate is facing.
"It was a horrible abuse of power," she told Kelley.
"This extravagant trip suggests a disappointing double standard for wealthy defendants of serious crimes," she said Friday of Stronach's recent trip to Austria.
However, Spratt said it is not uncommon for passports to be returned to people facing a criminal trial. Sometimes it is for a medical or family emergency, he said, and other times for something as simple as a vacation.
Requests to change bail are also common in high-profile cases, including sex crime trials.
In January 2014, then-CBC Radio host Jian Ghomeshi faced seven sexual assault charges, for which he was later acquitted. He, too, had to surrender his passport, and his bail conditions required him to live with his mother. The Crown later agreed to modify his bail, which included the return of his passport.
But former fashion mogul Peter Nygard, currently serving 11 years in prison after being found guilty of four counts of sexual assault, was denied changes to his bail in 2024 because a judge said he presented a flight risk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
As Canada wildfires choke U.S. with smoke, Republicans demand action. But not on climate change
The Statue of Liberty is visible through haze due to Canadian wildfire smoke during sunset Aug. 5, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura) The sternly worded statements and letters are filled with indignation and outrage: Republican U.S. lawmakers say Canada has done too little to contain wildfires and smoke that have fouled the air in several states this summer. 'Instead of enjoying family vacations at Michigan's beautiful lakes and campgrounds, for the third summer in a row, Michiganders are forced to breathe hazardous air as a result of Canada's failure to prevent and control wildfires,' read a statement last week from the state's GOP congressional delegation, echoing similar missives from Republicans in Iowa, New York, North Dakota, Minnesota and Wisconsin. They've demanded more forest thinning, prescribed burns and other measures to prevent fires from starting. They've warned the smoke is hurting relations between the countries and suggested the U.S. could make it an issue in tariff talks. But what they haven't done is acknowledge the role of climate change — a glaring and shortsighted omission, according to climate scientists. It also ignores the outsized U.S. contribution to heat-trapping gases from burning fossil fuels like coal and gas that cause more intense heat waves and droughts, which in turn set the stage for more destructive wildfires, scientists say. 'If anything, Canada should be blaming the U.S. for their increased fires,' said Jennifer Francis, a climate scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. On Tuesday, the Canadian government announced almost $46 million in funding for wildfire prevention and risk assessment research projects. But Corey Hogan, parliamentary secretary to the federal energy and natural resources minister, said international cooperation is needed. 'There's no people that want to do more about wildfires than Canadians,' Hogan said. 'But I think this also underlines the international challenges that are brought on by climate change ... we need to globally tackle this problem.' The country has 'been fighting wildfires in this country at unprecedented rates since 2023,' when Canada saw its largest wildfire on record, said Ken McMullen, president of the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs. This year's first fire started in April, one of the earliest on record, and 2025 is now the second-worst year. As of Thursday, more than 700 wildfires were burning across the country, two-thirds of them out of control, with more than 28,000 square miles (72,520 square kilometres) burned in 4,400 wildfires so far this year, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. That's almost five times the surface area that's burned so far in the U.S. this year. Most wildfires are started by people, sometimes on purpose but mostly by mistake, though McMullen said lightning is the culprit in many of Canada's fires, especially in remote areas. McMullen said he has no interest in debating the role of climate change, but data show that something has changed. Sloughs and basins have dried up and water that once lapped at people's back doors in Canada's lake communities now is often hundreds of feet away. 'People can make up their own mind as to why that is,' he said. 'But something clearly has changed.' Denying climate change U.S. President Donald Trump has called climate change a hoax — a belief echoed by many in the GOP — and his administration has worked to dismantle and defund federal climate science and data collection, with little to no pushback from Republicans in Congress. He's proposed to revoke the scientific finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare — the central basis for U.S. climate change action. He's declared a national energy emergency to expedite fossil fuel development, canceled grants for renewable energy projects and ordered the U.S. to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, aimed at limiting long-term global warming to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels. The Associated Press reached out to more than half a dozen Republicans who criticized Canada but none returned phone calls or emails. Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine said the wildfires are jeopardizing health and air quality in her state, too, but faulted Republicans for failing to meet the crisis head on — beginning by acknowledging climate change. 'Rather than accept this reality and work together to find proactive, common-sense solutions for preventing and mitigating these fires, Republicans are burying their heads in the sand,' she said. Wisconsin Rep. Gwen Moore, a Democrat, criticized her Republican colleagues' letter to Canada's U.S. ambassador, saying those 'who are in denial about climate change shouldn't be writing letters prescribing people's actions to try to contain it.' Difficult solutions McMullen, the Canadian wildfire expert, said battling the fires isn't as simple as many seem to believe. The country and its territories are vast and fires are often in remote areas where the best — and sometimes only — course of action if there are no residents or structures is to let them burn or 'it is going to just create another situation for us to deal with in a year or two or 10 or 20 years from now,' McMullen said. Prescribed burns to clear underbrush and other ignition sources are used in some areas, but aren't practical or possible in some forests and prairies that are burning, experts said. McMullen has advocated for a Canadian forest fire coordination agency to help deploy firefighters and equipment where they're needed. But as for stopping worsening fires, 'I don't think there's much they can do,' said University of Michigan climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck. He noted that hotter temperatures are melting permafrost in northern Canada, which dries out and makes the vast boreal forests far more likely to burn. Instead, the two countries should collaborate on climate change solutions 'because our smoke is their smoke, their smoke is ours,' Overpeck said. 'As long as this trend of warming and drying continues, we're going to get a worsening problem. 'The good news is ... we know what the cause is ... we can stop it from getting worse.' ___ Tammy Webber, The Associated Press The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Charges laid in Hamilton crash that left mother and her 10-year-old child dead
Video A 24-year-old man has been charged in a crash in Hamilton last month that left a mother and her 10-year-old child dead.
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Premier Danielle Smith, Alberta Next panel to get feedback at third town hall
Premier Danielle Smith is set to host another Alberta Next town hall, this one in Edmonton. Mason DePatie reports. Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual EDMONTON — A travelling panel collecting public feedback on Alberta's grievances with Ottawa is set to make its third summer town hall stop tonight. Premier Danielle Smith and 15 other members of her Alberta Next panel are scheduled to be in Edmonton to brainstorm with people about possible future referendum questions. The premier has said one of the reasons for the panel is to address concerns that are inspiring separatist sentiment in the province. Its agenda focuses on six policy ideas, including pulling out of the Canada Pension Plan and creating a provincial police force to replace the RCMP. Earlier events were held last month in Red Deer and Edmonton. At those town halls, some Albertans offered support for the proposals, some protested at the gates and others dismissed the panel as a self-serving political exercise meant to stir up discontent and division. It is set to host events in Fort McMurray and Lloydminster in two weeks. The panel has also faced criticism for presenting online survey questions that left no option to disagree. The government later added options to some survey questions. The changes were made after 32,000 people had already filled out the surveys. The premier's office has said the survey results for the different versions will be separated. Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi has dismissed the panel as a way for Smith to curry favour with extreme elements of her United Conservative Party to keep them from splintering off. He's also said the government is using it to conjure up unreliable data to support things it already wants to do. Alberta public opinion pollster Janet Brown has said the government's effort is not a polling exercise but a public engagement exercise and that changing the survey questions midstream underscores that. She has said the survey will offer a good idea of who participated in the process but it's not a random representative sample that reflects public opinion. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025. Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press
