Chile Poll Shows Evelyn Matthei and Jose Antonio Kast Tied in Race for Presidency
Chile ultra conservative candidate Jose Antonio Kast tied center-right contender Evelyn Matthei atop a new presidential poll, marking the latest twist in the race to lead one of Latin America's richest economies.
Kast was backed by 17% of respondents, up from 14% the week prior and 13% at the start of May, according to a Cadem survey published late on Sunday. Matthei also garnered 17%, though her backing was down from 20% in the poll published on May 11 and 22% at the beginning of the month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Western guests including Elon Musk's father to speak at pro-Putin oligarch's Moscow forum
A pro-Putin Russian oligarch is hosting a two-day conference in Moscow on Monday, featuring a lineup of western speakers, including Elon Musk's father, Errol, the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and the British politician George Galloway. The conference, titled Future Forum 2050, is organised by Konstantin Malofeev – an influential ultra-nationalist tycoon close to the Kremlin and under western sanctions – and appears to mark Moscow's latest effort to court western figures. Other foreign guests include the American economist Jeffrey Sachs and the Briton Matthew Groves, a former East Surrey councillor the organisers mistakenly describe as a 'Conservative group deputy leader'. The conference will also feature several prominent Russian officials, including Sergei Lavrov, Russia's longtime foreign minister, and Sergei Mironov, a veteran hawkish politician who adopted a two-year-old child seized by Moscow from a Ukrainian children's home. According to the organisers, the event will cover topics such as 'foreign policy and national priorities', 'culture and traditional values' and a panel titled 'Maga in Russia'. Once seen as fringe figures, Malofeev and the ultranationalist Russian ideologue Alexander Dugin, who is co-organising the conference, have gained increasing influence in Moscow since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and its subsequent aggressive nationalist turn. The pair have also worked to cultivate ties with influencers abroad who could help shape opinion in Donald Trump's America. It was not immediately clear whether the western speakers would travel to Russia or appear via video. However, before of the conference, Errol Musk was photographed in Moscow, where he downplayed the dispute between his son Elon, the world's richest man, and Trump during an interview with Russian media. 'You know they have been under a lot of stress for five months, you know, give them a break,' Musk Sr told the Russian state-run Izvestia newspaper. 'They are very tired and stressed so you can expect something like this. 'Trump will prevail – he's the president, he was elected as the president. So, you know, Elon made a mistake, I think. But he is tired, he is stressed.' Errol Musk also suggested the row 'was just a small thing' and would 'be over tomorrow'. The 79-year-old has previously voiced admiration for Vladimir Putin, claiming in an interview this year that his entire family was 'a little bit in awe' of him. Elon Musk has become one of the most vocal critics of US support for Ukraine, and is reported to have held secret talks with Putin during the continuing war.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt
BOGOTA, Colombia — Miguel Uribe, a conservative Colombian presidential hopeful, was in critical condition on Monday after being shot in the head from close range during a rally at the weekend. In a statement, doctors said the 39-year-old senator had 'barely' responded to medical interventions, that included brain surgery, following the assassination attempt that has had a chilling effect on the South American nation.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What salary sacrifice changes could mean for your pension
The government has insisted recent reports indicating that it is considering changes to salary sacrifice pension schemes are "purely speculative". It comes off the back of research published by HMRC in May that suggested the government was exploring reducing the tax and national insurance advantages by changing pension contribution schemes for workers. While the research was commissioned by the Conservative government in 2023, the timing of its publication raised eyebrows because of it's proximity to Rachel Reeves's spending review on 11 June. The spending review is when Reeves will lay out all government departments' budgets for the coming years. It could also be a strong indication as to whether the government will need to announce any increase to taxes later this year in the autumn statement. Experts have told Yahoo News why the prospect of targeting salary sacrifice schemes would be so appealing for the government - and who would most likely miss out. A salary sacrifice scheme is a formal agreement between an employee and employer in which the employee agrees to reduce their gross salary in exchange for a non-cash benefit - like a bicycle through the Cycle to Work scheme - provided by the employer. In turn, as the employee pays for this through their salary, they not only pay less income tax, but their employer pays lower national insurance (NI) on the person's remaining take home-pay. As national insurance is one of the main revenue streams for the government, this means that when an employee enrols in a scheme, the Treasury misses out on the extra tax. When you use salary sacrifice for your pension, you agree to take a lower salary, and your employer pays the 'sacrificed' amount directly into your pension. Like with any other salary sacrifice, because your official salary is lower, both you and your employer pay less in NI, and you pay less income tax on your earnings. Salary sacrifice schemes are very popular, with 70% of UK pension schemes using them as the default method for contributions. If the salary sacrifice scheme was limited or cut for pensions, the government could remove or limit these tax and NI savings. For example, you and your employer might have to pay NI on the amount you sacrifice, or there could be a cap on how much salary can be sacrificed before the benefits are lost. "Salary sacrifice along with income tax relief makes it very attractive to save into a pension," Stuart Price, Partner and Actuary at Quantum Advisory told Yahoo News. "For a lower rate tax payer £1 invested only costs them 72p, and for a high rate tax payer £1 invested only costs them 58p. "If the provision of salary sacrifice is removed and hence national insurance relief is no longer provided these numbers increase to 80p for a lower rate tax payer and 60p for a higher rate tax payer," he added. By removing or scaling back the tax and National Insurance (NI) exemptions that benefit employees and employers benefit from through salary sacrifice, the government could boost its revenue. 'Salary sacrifice along with the annual allowance often appear top of the list of options when the government needs to save money," Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown told Yahoo News. The move would therefore be an attractive prospect for HMRC because it would generate "significant income". "I would expect that they would be in favour of the removal of salary sacrifice on pensions," John Mullaly, a group risk and healthcare consultant from actuary Cartwright Employment Awards, told Yahoo News. This may be even more significant as the government is just days away from its spending review, the process the government uses to set all departments' budgets for future years. 'The government may be tempted to turn its eye to salary sacrifice... particularly given the amount it costs in lost national insurance revenue," Martin Willis, a partner at independent consultancy Barnett Waddingham explained to Yahoo News. While the government might benefit, employees earning the least would be the hardest hit. "High earners may be insulated from any potential shift; the real impact would be on lower and moderate earners - particularly those using salary sacrifice to top up pension contributions," Waddingham said. The move could also be an additional blow for businesses after the government's hike on national insurance rates for employers in the last Budget. "Removing it now could disproportionately affect basic rate taxpayers and employers who've only just faced a rise in national insurance costs," Willis added. Morrissey echoes this. "At a time when employers are battling higher wage and NI bills, salary sacrifice might be seen as one way of reducing these costs – making changes will add an extra burden to struggling employers.' While both employees and employers benefit from salary sacrifice arrangements, Mullaly said employers "do not pocket all of the savings." "Quite often they use it to fund additional benefits to be used to attract and retain employees," he added. Additionally, if salary sacrifices adversely affect pension pots, savers could be discouraged from putting away enough into their pension — which is unwelcome news when the figure for a comfortable retirement continues to rise. According to the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA), to live a comfortable retirement in the UK, the estimated annual retirement income needed in 2025 is around £43,100 a year. "There does seem to be a trend of focusing on increasing tax revenue at the expense of all other considerations, rather than focusing on the underlying social reasons for having things like a pension," Price said. "The result of all of this is less money will be saved by employees towards their pension. Not a great thing when as a nation we are nowhere near saving enough for our retirement." Added to this, the change in uptake could affect how and where pension funds invest their money. "Many of the largest pension funds invest in our high streets, shopping centres and other real estate," Mullaly explained. "With many high streets already under threat, any reduction in investment is only going to make the situation in this area worse." While salary sacrifice reduction may be a highly attractive prospect for the government, it is clear that it would be far from popular. The Society of Pension Professionals has already warned the government against salary sacrifice changes, writing in a statement that it would affect earners "very selectively". Added to this, there would be some serious logistical hurdles to tackle to implement it. Firstly, Willis said implementing these reforms after the new financial year has started "would likely be far from straightforward". "Currently, salary sacrifice reward structures are set by employers, so implementing changes could be very messy, especially when it comes to capturing salary decisions for new hires or changes mid-year," he told Yahoo News. "Today salary sacrifice is largely used to support improved pension saving, and is limited since the system was already tightened in 2017." A government spokesperson said: 'These claims are totally speculative. HMRC regularly commissions independent research on all aspects of the tax system, and this research was commissioned under the previous government. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible which is why, at last autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT."
