Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology
Mr Farage labelled Technology Secretary Mr Kyle's remarks as 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief', and urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed.
We talked to mums about the Online Safety Act 👇 pic.twitter.com/rt6xJPWjVr
— Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (@SciTechgovuk) July 25, 2025
Former Reform chair Zia Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government.
'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws,' Mr Kyle told Sky News.
'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Peter Kyle's comments on @SkyNews are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise.
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 29, 2025
Responding to Mr Kyle on a live stream on Tuesday morning, Mr Farage said: 'Just how low can the Labour Government sink in its desperation?
'Yes, of course they're in trouble. They're well behind us in the opinion polls. But frankly, to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile, it's so below the belt it's almost not true.'
He also reiterated his demand for an apology and added: 'We're not going to get one. I think perhaps the best thing we can do is to sign the petition to repeal the Online Safety Act. That's what I'm going to do today. I think it makes sense. I'm deeply worried about the implications for free speech.'
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Mr Yusuf has said that the laws work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-Government speech'.
After being asked by Mr Farage to apologise on social media, Mr Kyle doubled down on his comments, claiming that wanting to 'overturn' the Act puts somebody 'on the side of predators'.
If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. https://t.co/oVArgFvpcW
— Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025
Mr Yusuf has claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.'
He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.'
Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone.
'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.'
The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Nigel Farage won't take a day off
Parliament is in recess for the next four weeks, a time when Westminster usually goes quiet, but this year there's one man who's determined to keep working. Nigel Farage. Today the Reform UK leader delivered his third weekly conference as part of his campaign on 'Lawless Britain', broadening out (slightly) from the party's usual single-issue politics. Of course, much of the emphasis is still heavily on migration. But do these conferences tell us about the current contradictions in British politics and have Reform peaked too soon? Read: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reform councils ‘save taxpayers £40m' by scrapping net zero
Taxpayers are to save more than £40m after councils led by Reform UK scrapped their net zero policies, the party has claimed. In their first 100 days of power, Reform leaders say they have also cut more than £50m of wasteful costs in other areas. The costs axed by the party include scrapping upgrades of council cars to electric vehicles, and reducing spending on solar panels. Reform also says it has cracked down on overcrowded housing for asylum seekers, and removed Pride flags from display outside town halls. Nigel Farage's party swept to victory in 10 councils in May, taking eight from the Conservatives and two from Labour. He said his councils' achievements showed that Reform was fulfilling its election promises. 'On May 1, we showed that if you vote Reform, you get Reform,' he said. 'In the 100 days since, Reform UK councils across Britain are proving they're the change we promised and already delivering on their manifesto commitments. 'From rolling back the devastating net zero agenda on a local level to cutting wasteful spending, Reform councils are standing up for the priorities of local people, not the whims of bureaucrats or the entrenched elite.' Since last May, Reform has prioritised reductions in spending on net zero. Staffordshire county council has prevented 63 farms owned by the authority from being used for solar, wind or battery farms, meaning they will continue to produce food from farm to fork. Durham county council was the first British council to scrap its 'net zero emergency declaration', instead declaring a care emergency to recognise the escalating crisis in children's social care and special educational needs provision. A Reform cost-cutting unit sent into Kent county council has recommended scrapping plans to modify council-owned property to make it compatible with net zero obligations, saying £32m over four years. It also recommended scrapping the net zero transitioning of the council's vehicles to electric vehicles, saving a further £7.5m by 2030. Leicestershire county council has redirected £2m from its 'net zero carbon reserve' towards real-world flooding protection and drainage work. Meanwhile, West Northamptonshire council removed net zero targets in its area. More widely, Reform said it had saved taxpayers' money in other areas of council spending. Durham plans to make £4.2m in savings by scrapping a variety of capital projects, not upgrading the council's vehicle fleet to electric and cancelling a number of solar-power projects. The council will also scrap a new heat pump at its new county hall. Kent has reduced the level of debt by £16m, saving thousands in interest payments alone. It has also cancelled plans to move staff into a neighbouring building, saving more than £14bn. Derbyshire has made £6,000 a day savings in councillor allowances in the first three weeks and delayed a pay strategy review for two years, saving millions of pounds. Staffordshire stopped the roll-out of electric vehicle charging in areas where there is little to no customer demand, saving the taxpayer £4.5m. In Nottinghamshire, a cap has been placed on allowances to save £112,000 a year; while Lincolnshire has started looking at options to save at least £25m by streamlining and modernising services. And West Northamptonshire council has rolled out a new software licensing agreement with Microsoft, saving £1m over three years. All Reform UK councils have mandated the flying of the Union Flag, St George's Cross and relevant county flags, rather than rainbow flags representing the LGBTQ+ community. In other changes, Durham has demanded the council apply for planning permission when converting properties into homes in multiple occupation to stop unchecked migrants coming in. West Northamptonshire has also cracked down on illegal houses of multiple occupancy, and landlords in designated areas must now apply for a licence or face unlimited fines or civil penalties up to £30,000. The council will conduct physical inspections to ensure properties meet standards.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Glasgow locals have their say on 'pointless' UK Online Safety Act
Compelling all websites and online platforms to introduce strict age verification measures, the act bans underage kids from accessing content deemed age-inappropriate. We went out on the streets from Glasgow to find out what the people truly think about the Online Safety Act. Some locals agreed with the UK Government's aims, with one woman saying: 'I think it's a good idea, I think it will take a long time for the implementation to actually be ideal, it's a bit inconvenient right now, but I think in general it's a good idea.' While the Government claims the act marks a significant step toward creating a safer digital environment, the legislation has been met with sharp criticism from civil liberties groups, tech experts, and members of the public. One man who we spoke to said: 'It's fucking stupid, it's pointless – it's supposed to protect children even though it's fucking not.' He continued on to say: 'The whole thing is to protect children, in less that 24 hours the same children who they've tried to protect managed to bypass it. The use of VPNs (virtual private networks) has spiked since the introduction of the new laws. These allow users to tell websites they are in another country, where the UK act does not apply. There have also been reports of young people using video game characters to trick their way past facial ID checks. Opponents argue that the law could set a dangerous precedent for online surveillance, with potential consequences for freedom of expression and digital privacy. A member of the public said: 'It's just the government overreaching its powers, it's just really not fair.' A petition calling for the act to be repealed has passed half a million signatures, with concerns over the collection and storage of sensitive data, such as ID documents and facial recognition scans. READ MORE: Tech expert 'smeared as paedo' in UK Government meeting on Online Safety Act Critics fear that leaving individual platforms responsible for managing this data may increase the risk of security breaches, identity theft, and misuse of personal information. One Glasgow local told The National: 'I feel weird about giving some websites my identification, you don't know who you can trust.' Despite mounting pressure and public concern, the government has stated that it has no plans to repeal or revise the legislation. Ministers maintain that the act is essential for tackling harmful online content and protecting the most vulnerable members of society.
