The 20 best new restaurants in the D.C. area
By Tom Sietsema
May 7, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. EDT
8 minutes ago
1 min
Every year around this time, I get to answer one of my favorite questions: 'What's new?'
Let me share the bounty, which includes imports from New York, tasting menus from top chefs, some welcome bargains plus several places with original ideas that you won't find anywhere else in the country — unless I'm missing a menu that includes pheasant under glass or a setting that marries church and steak.
This has not been an easy year in Washington. Federal layoffs and labor issues have taken their toll on restaurants, and diners seem more hesitant than before to pay ever-higher prices to eat away from home. Even the big cheeses worry about the fate of downtown. That means that as much as we all want to follow what's fresh, being a regular at your favorite restaurant, old or new, might be more important than ever.
Restaurants are an investment of time and money. Diverse as they are, these 20 newcomers brim with rewards.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
LIST
MAP
Filter
D.C.
Maryland
Virginia
Vegetarian-friendly
Entrees under $25
Showing all 20 restaurants
La' Shukran
417 Morse St. NE, alley entrance, D.C.
Middle Eastern
Dōgon by Kwame Onwuachi
1330 Maryland Ave. SW, D.C.
Afro-Caribbean
Osteria Mozza
3276 M St. NW, D.C.
Italian
The Occidental
1475 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, D.C.
American
Wye Oak Tavern
211 E. Church St., Frederick, Md.
American
Alara
1303 Wisconsin Ave. NW, D.C.
Mediterranean
Butterworth's
319 Pennsylvania Ave. SE, D.C.
French
Cordelia Fishbar
550 Morse St. NE, D.C.
Seafood
The Duchess
1002 W. 36th St., Baltimore
Guamanian
Elena James All Day
8551 Connecticut Ave., Chevy Chase, Md.
American
Elmina
2208 14th St. NW, D.C.
Ghanaian
Elyse
10822 Fairfax Blvd., Fairfax, Va.
American
Evelyn Rose
111 Church St. NW, Vienna, Va.
American
Kayu
1250 H St. NE, D.C.
Filipino
Minetta Tavern
1287 Fourth St. NE, D.C.
American
La Plaza Bar & Tapas
3917 14th St. NW, D.C.
Spanish
Raw Omakase
1326 14th St. NW, third floor, D.C.
Japanese
Rosedale
4465 Connecticut Ave. NW, D.C.
American
San Pancho
7056 Carroll Ave., Takoma Park, Md.
Mexican
Tapori
600 H Street NE, Suite E, D.C.
Indian and Nepalese
Use Ctrl + scroll to zoom the map
Use two fingers to move the map
© OpenMapTiles © OpenStreetMap contributors
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want an acai bowl? Want to play pickleball? Try these new NJ businesses
The Record, the Daily Record and the New Jersey Herald want to keep you up to date on all the newest shops, restaurants and service providers moving into your towns. Below is a roundup of businesses that recently opened or are coming soon. Are you opening a business in North Jersey? Get the word out to your neighbors as soon as possible. Send us your information and photos and we will try to add them to our next new-business roundup. We're also interested in reporting business closings. Have a tip? Contact Business Reporter Daniel Munoz at munozd@ or 201-270-9870. Early learning center serving children up to 6 years old, offering programs such as literacy, STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics), social-emotional development and foreign languages. WHERE: 1176 Route 10, Randolph WHEN: Opening was May 3. Hours are 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. FOR MORE INFORMATION: call 862-418-5453, email randolph@ or visit Health-focused café offering such superfoods as açaí bowls, smoothies, salads, wraps and grain bowls. Offering dine-in and contactless delivery. According to the Mayo Clinic, a superfood is a "food or group of foods that contain exceptional nutritional properties," but as the clinic notes, their reported health benefits have fallen under scientific scrutiny. WHERE: 50 Main St., Hackensack WHEN: Opening was May 9. Hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Sunday. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call 201-244-7771, email vitalityhackensack@ or visit Indoor facility with eight pickleball courts and four golf simulators. Offering private court rentals, open play and professional lessons, as well as yearly and monthly memberships with a variety of benefits. WHERE: 153 River Road, Montville WHEN: Opening was May 9. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Call 973-265-0466, email hello@ or visit Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on New NJ businesses for acai bowls, play pickleball and more
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: South Africa's visit to the US shows how diplomacy has changed
Diplomacy is an art that has often most effectively been practiced behind closed doors. But the 47th president of the United States of America, Donald Trump, has changed that. Diplomacy is now practiced in the full glare of the world's TV cameras and media, leaving very little room to wriggle — but an ocean of opportunity for disaster. The net effect has been a total recalibration of the practice of diplomacy, with May 21 being a perfect case in point when South African President Cyril Ramaphosa led his entourage to the White House. The fact that the meeting even took place was a triumph of old-school diplomacy given the unprecedented depths that the historic relationship between the two nations has plunged, especially since the advent of the 47th administration in January this year. There was massive trepidation back home in South Africa about just how this meeting would evolve, especially after the public dressing down that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was forced to endure in February. This time, the tactics were the same: The White House presented unvarnished beliefs about the situation in South Africa, which Trump has held very firmly, this time via a video pastiche. Ramaphosa's party was astutely selected, blending key political leaders, including organized labor, with officials, business leaders and golf champions, who were neither politicians nor administrators. It was an example once again of how much has changed in the last six months — and even beyond — in Africa and in the world. South Africa has moved from declaring itself neutral in the war in Ukraine to actively protecting Russia from censure to inviting Zelenskyy to a state visit in April. The U.S. has moved from actively, and sometimes unquestioningly, backing Kyiv and sanctioning Moscow to actively engaging with President Vladimir Putin rather than isolating him. Both countries' approaches seem poles apart and inherently contradictory — and yet they share very similar motivations and characteristics. Washington and Pretoria want the war to end, both are working hard to do just that and both are using nontraditional, sometimes disruptive, methods. The Black Sea Grain Initiative was the first seed in a bid to reap a harvest of peace. It was sown by an initiative under South Africa's leadership to get Ukraine and Russia — or their proxies — to a table. The first hoped-for outcome was to prevent Africans from starving after they were cut off from the breadbasket of Eastern Europe and the fertilizers produced there to grow their own crops. But the bigger prize was to forge swords into ploughshares because the geopolitical tensions of an increasingly volatile and multipolar world were playing out in African countries as they became substitute battlegrounds in the war for global influence. Private individuals, business leaders and philanthropists helped to bring the different parties together by leveraging their networks and stepping in where normal diplomatic channels had failed. The Black Sea Grain Initiative led to a previously unthinkable invitation: Pretoria offered to host Zelenskyy. Previously, Pretoria had earned Washington's ire for refusing to back a United Nations General Assembly resolution censuring Russia. The intervention of unorthodox players happened in Washington, too, as Ramaphosa sat in the Oval Office with Trump. It was no surprise that some at the meeting were golfers themselves, stepping in where diplomats and political leaders could not, to help drive through Pretoria's message. South Africa came to the U.S. to recalibrate a relationship that has been increasingly under threat for months; a growing ideological gulf in the majority party of its unity government has been a contributor. Coming to America forced a timely reappraisal of South Africa's issues, and in the process, the South African delegation did much to disabuse the U.S. administration of some of its most firmly held views. South Africa does have serious societal issues to contend with, including high levels of violent crime — and no one shied away from this problem, but white South Africans are not disproportionately affected by it. To properly address the issue is not a matter of being a supplicant who begs for international aid, but rather of building the economy, creating jobs and instilling hope in new generations of South Africans. To achieve that, the U.S. must be an active trade partner with South Africa — continuing with the current trade agreements and even boosting investment in the country, to everyone's benefit. There is no doubt that the recent meeting between U.S. and South African officials was an inflection point in Washington-Pretoria relations. Taking a cue from Trump, it was akin to sinking a 3-foot putt in the full glare of the cameras, which isn't an easy thing to do — and yet, I think the South Africans, together, might just have done it. _____ Ivor Ichikowitz is a South African-born global industrialist and African philanthropist. He chairs the Ichikowitz Family Foundation, which played a leading role in facilitating the talks that led to the Black Sea Grain Initiative. _____
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nebraskans have a couple of questions
Nebraska's congressional delegation is shown in Washington. From left: U.S. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen, U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb., U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb. Feb. 5, 2025. (Courtesy of Nebraska Governor's Office) Welcome to another 'What If?' press conference, questions for Nebraska's congressional delegation in Washington. Since our last session, the White House has tried to shutter the U.S. Department of Education, our tariff 'policy' resembles a yo-yo, the inaptly-named 'big, beautiful bill' has uglied up the nation's balance sheet, and curious Americans have taken to looking up both 'emoluments' and 'original sin.' Let's start with the aforementioned BBB. The House kept vampire hours to pass it by a single vote, after which the yays, apparently in a fit of sleep-deprived hubris, congratulated themselves before the bill went to the Senate. We have a couple questions: Your own accounting firm, the Congressional Budget Office, determined the BBB gives 60% of its tax breaks to the top fifth of the income bracket, yet cuts food assistance and health care to millions of poorer Americans. How does this benefit the country and what problem does it solve? The five of you belong to a political party that has historically railed against deficits. The CBO projects the BBB will add $3.8 trillion to the nation's deficit over the next decade. Please explain what the economic advantage is here, given the dismal history of such cuts: See Reagan 1981, G.W. Bush 2001 and 2003 and Trump 2017 for details. We'll move on. During a recent congressional hearing the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security couldn't come up with the meaning of habeas corpus when she was asked to define it. This comes on the heels of recent interviews in which high-ranking administration officials, including the president, couldn't guarantee that federal detainees would be given due process. Hmm? Assuming you still support habeas corpus and due process, when and how should Congress intervene when the administration ignores these most basic of principles in a country in which the rule of law is paramount? This next question is actually a matter of math. According to the Partnership for Public Service, using numbers from the federal Office of Personnel Management, 'in absolute numbers, the federal workforce is slightly smaller than it was 50 years ago, even as the U.S. population has increased by nearly two-thirds during that time period.' Even though the courts have tied up or reversed much of the Department of Government Efficiency's work, how do you square those numbers with DOGE's scorched-earth policy, especially since the American public has been provided scant evidence of findings of waste, fraud, and abuse, the triplex premise on which DOGE hangs its hat? Time to talk tariffs. To date, even a casual observer would conclude that the president's on again, off again tariff proclamations have roiled markets and created uncertainty with little resulting economic benefit. As you know, Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives only Congress the power to levy tariffs. Even though previously enacted laws allow Congress to let the president set tariffs in certain situations, could you explain and defend the 'qualifying' situation in which we find ourselves and detail how Congress sitting on the sidelines at this juncture in the levying of tariffs benefits Americans? The president has pulled $2.5 billion from Harvard University, threatened its tax-exempt status, tried to block enrollment of foreign students and pretty much wants a say in whom it should hire and what it should teach. All this to curb what he says is Harvard's anti-semitism, a charge which, while acknowledged in part by the school, remains without specifics. (Nevermind that the president hosted a cryptocurrency dinner during which a number of coins carried virulently anti-semitic names.) Some have argued that Harvard is simply the poster child for the administration's 'war on higher education,' in the guise of eliminating DEI, CRT, essentially any voice contrary to its liking. First, should the government be telling colleges and universities what to teach, who should teach it and who is allowed to learn? Please respond to the following quote as it relates to social studies and history curricula. 'History is not there for you to like or dislike. It is there for you to learn from. And if it offends you, even better, because you are less likely to repeat it. History is not yours to change or destroy. It belongs to all of us.' Could you explain what problem is solved by closing the Department of Education, which, as you know, sets no curriculum? Finally, does it ever occur to you that some in Washington have no idea what they are doing or worse, know what they are doing, know it's bad for America and do it anyway? Asking for some friends. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
