
Record-breaking growth in renewable energy in US threatened by Trump
The US had record-breaking growth in renewable-energy capacity last year, new research shows, but the future of the sector is uncertain amid threats from Donald Trump's administration.
The country brought online 48.2 gigawatts of capacity from utility-scale solar, wind and battery storage in 2024, according to a report from the research organization Cleanview; the report is based on an analysis of federal data. That surge in capacity – enough to power some 3.6m homes – was 47% larger than the increase the US saw in the previous year.
This unprecedented growth is attributable in part to the falling cost of renewables, said Michael Thomas, the founder of Cleanview and author of the report. An even bigger factor, he said, was Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and its historic incentives for green technologies.
'The IRA changed the landscape,' he said.
The report comes as renewable power is being targeted by Trump, who has pledged to halt federal support for clean power as part of his pro-fossil fuel agenda. If he follows through on these promises, they could have devastating effects for the sector and the economy, experts say.
'The clean-energy sector is rapidly growing globally, and halting investments can also undermine America's competitive edge within the renewable energy market,' Nathan Schluter, an energy expert at the consumer advocacy organization Home Energy Club, said in an email.
Still, though the president could hamper the growth of clean power, all hope for the sector may not be lost under his administration, Thomas said. 'We don't know what the future looks like right now. No one does,' he said.
Even as US fossil fuel production soared to record levels last year, the vast majority of the new energy capacity the nation brought online was carbon-free.
Renewables accounted for a combined 93% of all new capacity last year, with nuclear power adding another 2%. It's a sign we're in the 'era of zero-emissions energy', said Thomas.
But not all renewable fuel sources are growing at the same rate. The solar-power and battery industries – often paired, with batteries storing power from the sun – saw record success in 2024.
Growth in wind power, by contrast, has stagnated, with the US adding less wind capacity each year than before the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act. In 2024, the country brought only 5.1 gigawatts of the power source online, accounting for just 9% of all new energy deployed nationwide last year.
In 2024, solar power saw the fastest growth in red southern states. These regions are conducive to solar-power production and tend to have regulations that make it easier to build new projects, said Thomas.
One-quarter of new capacity – 8.9 gigawatts – was built in Texas. In second place was Florida, another Republican stronghold, which brought the second-most capacity online at 3 gigawatts, beating out California in new capacity for the first time.
The solar industry also grew in other Republican states like Arkansas, Missouri and Louisiana.
The US also added a record amount of new battery-storage capacity to its energy system, with California leading the pack and Texas not far behind.
New markets for the industry also emerged in the states of Arizona and Nevada. Both saw multiple battery megaprojects – which have a capacity of 100 megawatts or more – come online.
The wind industry, however, is facing a wide array of challenges. Interest rates, for instance, have risen, as have the costs of steel and other materials. Supply chains have also been disrupted since the Covid-19 pandemic. And since wind farms are taller and more noticeable than solar farms, they often attract more opposition from local communities, who are sometimes fed misinformation from the fossil fuel industry.
Because wind power is usually deployed in sparsely populated areas, it also requires transmission lines to send power to cities. The US lacks such infrastructure, and it requires lengthy, arduous permitting processes to build.
That's a problem for the climate, said Thomas, because wind makes up a crucial piece of the clean-energy puzzle. It is most productive and inexpensive at nighttime, when power from the sun is not available.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'Wind specifically is absolutely essential,' he said.
The clean-energy sector is facing challenges under Trump, who has cracked down on renewables with a spate of executive orders, agency directives and spending freezes while threatening to wage even more attacks. But growth will not stop completely, experts say.
Despite Trump's assaults, some challenges for the wind industry are beginning to subside, with supply-chain clogs starting to ease and more officials beginning to take the problem of transmission seriously. Also, renewable projects that have already gone through the permitting process, including major wind farms in New England, are likely to come online as planned.
The future for not-yet-approved renewable-energy projects is highly uncertain, but growth may continue, said Thomas. Solar capacity doubled during Trump's first term in office but it is unclear whether that kind of progress will be possible this time around.
'There's a scenario where he talks a big game but does little to follow through on those threats,' said Thomas. 'But there is a bad-news scenario which would be very, very bad for the industries.'
'In this scenario, the [Department of Energy] does all they can to hamper renewable energy,' he said. 'And they gut the IRA outright; they gut incentives for manufacturing clean-energy components and simultaneously keep tariffs in place to block imports. It would be a nightmare.'
In the face of this uncertainty, officials are putting pressure on the Trump administration to preserve federal support for renewables. Last month, eight Republicans gave testimony calling on the federal government not to slash IRA tax credits, which have disproportionately benefitted red states.
This week, 132 mayors and local officials from 38 states – 22 of which voted for Trump in 2024 – sent a letter to Congress demanding they preserve all renewable-energy tax credits available to state and local governments.
'We urge you to prioritize the economic and energy future of our communities by preserving all clean-energy tax credits available to state and local governments through elective pay,' the officials wrote.
Mayor Kate Gallego of Phoenix, Arizona, which has more solar energy per capita than any other large municipality, signed the letter. She said clean energy helps to 'bring good-paying jobs to our community, lower residents' electric bills, and secure our grid'.
'I hope that Congress recognizes the critical need for continued advancements in clean-energy and protects the tools both public and private sector entities use to unlock these opportunities,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump and China's Xi have 'very good' phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping have held a "very good" phone call amid their ongoing trade war, during which they agreed to more tariff talks. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a 12 May agreement between the two countries to reduce their tariff rates while talks took place. The call was first reported by Chinese state media and confirmed by the Chinese foreign ministry. According to Chinese state media, Mr Trump initiated the call with the Chinese president. In a post on his Truth Social site the US president said: "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal." He said the call lasted around an hour and a half and "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries". There "should no longer be any questions" on rare earth products, he said. "The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine, or Iran," Mr Trump added. He said the two nations had agreed to more tariff talks, and both leaders invited each other to visit their respective countries. According to Chinese state media, Mr Xi "pointed out that it is especially important to correct the course of the big ship of China-US relations, which requires us to keep the rudder and set the direction, especially to remove all kinds of interference and even sabotage". Mr Xi "emphasised that the US should handle the Taiwan issue carefully to avoid the two countries being dragged "into a dangerous situation of conflict and confrontation". According to the readout of the call, Mr Trump "expressed great respect for President Xi Jinping and the importance of the US-China relationship". It came a day after Mr Trump declared it was difficult to reach a deal with his Chinese counterpart. "I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with!!!," Mr Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. The US president has cut his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks, while China reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%. The trade war has produced sharp swings in global markets and threatens to damage trade between the two nations. Mr Trump's treasury secretary Scott Bessent had suggested only a conversation between the two leaders could resolve their differences in order for talks to begin in earnest. Mr Trump and Mr Xi last spoke in January, three days before his inauguration, where they discussed trade, as well as Mr Trump's demand for China to do more to stop the drug fentanyl from entering the US.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as Labour peer accuses 'out of control' Ukrainian president Zelensky of 'scuppering' Russia peace deal with drone strikes on Kremlin airfields
A Labour peer triggered outrage today by suggesting Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky was 'out of control' and jeopardising efforts to end the war with Russia by approving a major drone strike. Octogenarian Lord Dale Campbell-Savours stunned the House of Lords by suggesting Mr Zelensky had been 'allowed to run amok' with his country's celebrated weekend attack on Russian airfields. The former MP suggested the embattled war leader had 'scuppered' the chances of reaching a truce in the deadly conflict being sought by US president Trump. Ukraine's Security Service claim the attack, dubbed operation Spider Web, destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers. At the same time, Russia has continued to carry out strikes across Ukraine, including the targeting of residential areas. Lord Campbell-Savours, whose son is a Labour MP, was swiftly rebuked in the Lords by figures on all sides, including foreign minister Baroness Chapman of Darlington. Former defence chief Lord Stirrup, who led the Armed Forces from 2006 to 2010, icily said: 'Has the minister noticed any reticence or reluctance on the part of President Putin to killing Ukrainian civilians while so-called peace talks continue? 'And has she identified any actions at all on the part of the American administration to try and compel President Putin down that path of reticence?' US President Donald Trump said this week Mr Putin had told him 'very strongly' in a phone call that he would respond to Ukraine's daring drone attack on Russian air bases. Mr Zelensky, who has accepted a US ceasefire proposal and offered to meet Mr Putin in an attempt to break the stalemate in negotiations, wants more international sanctions on Russia to force it to accept a settlement. But Mr Putin has shown no willingness to meet Mr Zelensky and has indicated no readiness to compromise. US-led diplomatic efforts to end the long-running war have so far failed to make any significant progress. Raising the issue in Parliament, Lord Campbell-Savours said: 'Whilst recognising the sheer bravado of those who executed operation Spider Web, we have to accept that action has undermined Trump's wider initiative, jeopardised his offer on the provision of security guarantees, and hardened Russia's attitude on conflict resolution. 'How can we ever secure a settlement and avoid substantial defence costs being imposed on European taxpayers, if Zelensky is allowed to run amok with unilateral actions, therefore scuppering any prospect of an early settlement. 'Why can't we, with our long experience in diplomacy, think out of the box and engage with Trump's people in discussions with Russia over measures to end this war. 'We can't rely on Zelensky. He's out of control.' However, the peer's controversial view was rejected outright by Baroness Chapman, who said she 'profoundly' disagreed and repeated the UK Government's staunch support for Kyiv. She pointed out it was Russia's leader Vladimir Putin who could end the war, which he had triggered by his full-scale invasion in 2022. She added: 'President Trump wants to see peace. We want to see peace. President Zelensky has agreed to a ceasefire. 'The person who could achieve that ceasefire, who could bring peace to Ukraine, who could see the children return to their homes, is President Putin.' Her Tory counterpart Lord Callanan said: 'I completely agree with the minister's sentiments. 'I think Lord Campbell-Savours is absolutely wrong, and all of us who are strong supporters of Ukraine were greatly encouraged by the recent audacious attack on the Russian airfields, in which nobody was killed by the way, it was just equipment that was damaged. 'But to secure Ukrainian sovereignty in the longer term, it is vital that Ukraine possesses armed forces which have a strong strategic and tactical advantage in the region. 'So could the minister please update the House on the steps that the Government is taking to support the Ukrainian military, to ensure that it has troops which are well trained, well equipped in the longer term to our high standards to help deter further Russian aggression?' Lady Chapman pointed out the UK had committed £3 billion a year for as long as Ukraine needed it and also signed a '100-year' pact, which formalised economic and military support provided by Britain. She also highlighted UK efforts to establish a peacekeeping mission that would enforce a possible future ceasefire in Ukraine, a so-called coalition of the willing.


Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump thought Zelensky's Russian air base strikes were ‘badass'
Donald Trump was so impressed by Ukraine's audacious drone raids on Russian warplanes that he described them as 'badass' to aides. Mr Trump has kept unusually quiet about the Sunday attack on airfields deep inside Russia as he tries to keep both sides talking to each other. But a report published on Thursday revealed he thought the strikes were 'strong' even as he worried that it would make peace efforts more complicated. 'He thought it was badass,' a source told Axios. An adviser said: 'From an international perspective, you've got a chihuahua inflicting some real damage on a much bigger dog.' Kyiv's weekend strikes on airfields destroyed and damaged nuclear-capable aircraft and infuriated Moscow. 'Operation Spider's Web' was reportedly 18 months in the planning. But it leaves Mr Trump with a dilemma. Throughout his dealings with Moscow and Kyiv he has openly worried that the conflict could lead to a Third World War, and influential voices in his Maga coalition, such as Steve Bannon, have publicly warned Ukraine's strikes were 'escalatory' and likely to trigger a brutal Russian response. A third source told Axios: 'We want this war to end. We want it to de-escalate. So if Putin goes crazy in response, yeah, the president has concerns.' Mr Trump has shied from adding extra sanctions or heaping more pressure on Russia to force it to compromise. He spoke to Mr Putin by phone on Wednesday. He posted on social media afterwards: 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' The Russian president has repeatedly rejected calls for a 30-day ceasefire, insisting that it would simply allow Ukraine to rearm and reorganise. The result is an impasse for Mr Trump, who came to power promising to end the conflict on day one of his presidency. On Thursday, Moscow said it would decide 'how and when' to respond. When Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, was asked what Russia's response would be, he said: 'As and when our military deems it appropriate.' The issue is reaching a crucial round of diplomacy. Mr Trump hosts Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, at the White House on Thursday. Germany is the second biggest backer of Ukraine after the US. Then he flies to Canada for a G7 summit followed by a Nato meeting in the Netherlands before the end of the month.