logo
State Dept. human rights reports scale back criticism of El Salvador, but fault U.K., Germany

State Dept. human rights reports scale back criticism of El Salvador, but fault U.K., Germany

CBS News3 days ago
The State Department on Tuesday released a long-awaited series of reports on worldwide human rights practices that reveal scaled-back criticism of select countries including El Salvador and harsher assessments of traditional U.S. allies, including the United Kingdom and Germany.
The release follows a period of revisions that administration officials said were meant to "streamline" the reports, which cover events in about 200 countries in 2024 and had been largely completed by the end of the Biden administration. A note included with the reports said they had been "adjusted" to be "aligned to the administration's executive orders."
The 2024 reports omit references to LGBTQ discrimination issues and significantly pare back treatments of issues including gender-based violence and government corruption. They no longer include sections dedicated to systemic racial or ethnic discrimination or violence, or to child abuse or child sexual exploitation, among other deletions.
Mandated by Congress, the reports have been produced annually by the State Department for decades and are used by U.S. policymakers, human rights workers, foreign governments and judicial bodies worldwide as a resource to inform potential arms sales and court proceedings, and they also function as a U.S.-led check on government corruption and abuses.
Rights groups and former State Department officials decried the revisions as an "erasure" of the plight of marginalized communities and what they said was a politically motivated move that undermined the prior value of the reports.
"I think the signals are quite loud and quite clear of who they value and who they don't," said Desirée Cormier Smith, former special representative for racial equity and justice, now with the Alliance for Diplomacy and Justice.
In the case of El Salvador, which ended presidential term limits in early August and has an agreement with the Trump administration to accept and detain undocumented immigrants from the U.S., the report notes "There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" and that the government had taken "credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses."
The 2023 report made note of El Salvador's overcrowded prisons and reports of "arbitrary killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention," and more.
This year's report for Hungary notes "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses" though last year's included extensive mention of "serious government corruption" and restrictions on media freedom.
Meanwhile the 2024 report for the United Kingdom notes the "human rights situation worsened," citing "credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism." A similar assessment was offered for Germany and France, countries administration officials including Vice President JD Vance have publicly accused of censorship and the suppression of free speech.
Asked by a reporter how the Trump administration squares its stricter monitoring of free expression via social media accounts of U.S. visa applicants with its criticism of European countries restricting hate speech, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a press briefing Tuesday that "restrictive laws against dis-favored voices, often on political or religious grounds — no matter how disagreeable someone's speech may be — to criminalize it, or silencing it by force only serves as a catalyst for further hatred, suppression, and polarization."
The 2024 report for Israel, the West Bank and Gaza does not include a death toll for Israelis or Palestinians since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, a figure that was included in 2023.
The report acknowledged a Committee to Protect Journalists figure of 82 Palestinian journalists having been killed in the conflict last year, but also included a line saying that "[i]n some cases, the IDF claimed the journalists killed were embedded with Hamas terrorists."
The report did acknowledge troubling human rights records in several countries with which it has struck agreements to deport third national nationals, such as Libya. It noted credible reports of "arbitrary or unlawful killings; disappearances; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; arbitrary arrest and detention" and other abuses.
It also noted of Afghanistan that there was "widespread disregard for the rule of law and official impunity for those responsible for human rights abuses." The U.S. terminated temporary protected status for Afghans last month, leaving more than 12,000 vulnerable to deportation.
Reports for Russia, China, North Korea and Iran noted this year, as they did in previous years, "significant" human rights issues and included criticism of inaction by their respective governments to identify or punish those who had committed abuses.
"The 2024 human rights report has been restructured in a way that removes redundancies, increases report readability and is more responsive to the legislative mandates that underpin the report," a senior State Department official said in a briefing last week. "U.S. policy on promoting respect for human rights around the globe, or in any particular country, has not changed."James LaPorta
contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These Florida cities are defying a ban on rainbow-colored Pride crosswalks
These Florida cities are defying a ban on rainbow-colored Pride crosswalks

Axios

time19 minutes ago

  • Axios

These Florida cities are defying a ban on rainbow-colored Pride crosswalks

Some South Florida cities are resisting new state and federal guidance that prohibits rainbow-colored intersections. Why it matters: While other Florida cities acted quickly to remove their Pride-themed crosswalks and avoid violating the state's June 30 mandate, Key West and Delray Beach appear to be the first to push back against the DeSantis administration. Any response from the state could influence how other cities with Pride-themed street art, like Miami Beach and Fort Lauderdale, decide to move forward. The latest: Key West voted Aug. 6 to explore all legal avenues to preserve its popular rainbow crosswalks at the intersection of Duval and Petronia streets, which the city says is one of the island's "most iconic and visited locations." The city also voted to designate the crosswalks as a cultural landmark and the surrounding area as the "Historic Gayborhood of Key West," honoring the city's LGBTQ community. In Delray Beach, the City Commission decided Tuesday to defy a previous order from the city manager and keep its painted Pride intersection — for now at least, the South Florida Sun Sentinel reported. After city manager Terrence Moore announced in July that the city "must adhere to state guidelines," commissioners this week said it would be premature to remove the crosswalk without receiving a direct order from the state. Zoom in: Neither Miami Beach nor Fort Lauderdale have reacted to the mandate, and the cities' Pride street markings are still in place. Miami Beach Commissioner Alex Fernandez tells Axios the city hasn't received any communication from the state, so there's "no action for the City Commission to take at this time." Fernandez and other local leaders have slammed the state's argument that painted crosswalks are a traffic hazard. What they're saying: Fernandez tells Axios that the city's Pride crosswalk on Ocean Drive and 12th Street met all safety standards when it was approved in 2018 and remains a safe intersection. "From my perspective, if major work were ever done there in the future, that would be the time to review and consider any new regulation, just as we would with any other change to the traffic manual," Fernandez said. "In the meantime, I believe this is a non-issue, a distraction, a solution in search of a problem." Threat level: The mandate — which echoed guidance from the Trump administration on removing political messages from roadways — says noncompliant governments may lose state transportation funding. Zoom out: Some cities, like St. Petersburg, have been contacted by Florida's Department of Transportation requesting a list of all painted crosswalks and other traffic infrastructure. But St. Pete Mayor Kenneth Welch announced this week the city wouldn't take any action until it receives guidance from the state on whether certain public art can be exempted from the mandate.

Feds say migrants at ICE facility in Manhattan can't have toothbrushes because they can be ‘improvised as weapons'
Feds say migrants at ICE facility in Manhattan can't have toothbrushes because they can be ‘improvised as weapons'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Feds say migrants at ICE facility in Manhattan can't have toothbrushes because they can be ‘improvised as weapons'

After a federal judge commanded Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to improve conditions inside a crowded detention space in New York City, government lawyers pushed back on orders to make sure immigrants detained there have access to toothbrushes. Giving detainees a toothbrush could be a 'potential safety concern,' officials told a judge Thursday. In court filings attached to a lawsuit against the facility, detainees reported spending as much as three weeks inside without a chance to bathe or brush their teeth. But 'providing toothbrushes, rather than teeth-cleaning wipes, presents a potential safety concern for other aliens in custody as well as ICE personnel because toothbrushes can be readily improvised as weapons,' according to a letter to the judge from Manhattan U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton. District Judge Lewis Kaplan said Thursday he will continue to allow ICE to ban toothbrushes from the facility, for now, while a legal challenge continues. While jails are notorious for hand-made knives carved from toothbrush handles, it's unclear how serious a threat they actually pose inside the facility at 26 Federal Plaza. They're easily available at many jails across the country — people jailed inside Metropolitan Detention Center in nearby Brooklyn can buy them for less than a dollar. Immigrants in detention centers across the country are also 'routinely' provided with toothbrushes, and 'ICE's own policies provide for them,' according to attorneys for detainees in the Manhattan facility. The agency's national detention standards state that 'each detainee shall receive, at a minimum … one tube of toothpaste' and 'one toothbrush.' 'There is no basis to deny individuals detained at 26 Federal Plaza basic hygiene products that are customarily made available at other immigration detention facilities across the country,' attorneys wrote. Immigrants' rights groups, lawyers and lawmakers have warned for weeks about deteriorating conditions inside the building, which also houses immigration courts. The 'hold room' is not intended to hold people for longer than 12 hours, according to ICE's internal guidance. In May and June, when arrests at courthouses began to skyrocket, immigrants were being held inside the room for 29 hours on average, according to a review from New York City news outlet The City. Within those two months, 81 people were detained there for four days or more at a time. Detentions peaked on June 5, when 186 people were held there overnight, The City found. Detainees are fed inedible 'slop' and were forced to sleep in cells surrounded by the 'horrific stench' of sweat, urine and feces in rooms with open toilets, according to the lawsuit. Thousands of people across the country have faced arrest after showing up for court-ordered ICE check-ins and immigration court hearings as part of Donald Trump administration's mass deportation agenda. Unlike federal district court judges, immigration court judges operate under the direction of the attorney general's office. The Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review has issued guidance to judges to grant motions from government lawyers to immediately dismiss immigrants' cases, making them easy targets for arrest and removal. Half of all immigration court arrests nationwide were in New York City between May and June, The City found. On Thursday, New York District Judge Dale Ho ripped into the Trump administration's 'arbitrary' practice of arresting immigrants as they leave their immigration court hearings, creating what he calls a 'game of detention roulette' that violates due process. Hazmat teams were deployed to the building Thursday evening after envelopes containing a mysterious white powder were allegedly discovered, according to city officials and federal law enforcement agencies. ICE personnel reportedly found envelopes containing 'an unknown white powder' on the 9th floor, according to the FBI. Five envelopes were allegedly found in the mail room of ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations headquarters.

Federal judge rules some USDA grant terminations were illegal
Federal judge rules some USDA grant terminations were illegal

E&E News

timean hour ago

  • E&E News

Federal judge rules some USDA grant terminations were illegal

A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Department of Agriculture illegally terminated several grants earlier this year, including one that was part of a signature Biden administration climate program. Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, ordered the department to restart payments for five grants it canceled for agricultural and forestry nonprofits and blocked a sixth grant cancellation from proceeding. The decision could boost nonprofits and states across the country who are fighting the Trump administration's funding cuts, which have impacted the bottom lines for food banks, local governments and a variety of farmers. While Howell's ruling only applies to the specific nonprofits that sued over USDA's terminations, their success may prompt more organizations to challenge the administration in court. Advertisement 'The Court's granting of the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is the only appropriate response to DOGE and USDA's illegal and destructive grant cancellation,' David Muraskin, managing director for litigation at FarmSTAND and attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'As a result of today's ruling, the plaintiffs in this case will be able to support a habitable climate, fair food system, and healthy nation for all again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store