Border tensions intensify as Thailand rules out dialogue with Cambodia amid conflict escalation
Caretaker Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai ruled out all negotiations, stating that no dialogue could take place 'until the fighting stops,' reports CNN.
He stressed that while no formal war has been declared, Cambodian forces had fired heavy weapons into Thai territory 'without clear targets,' resulting in civilian deaths.
'We are not in a state of war,' he added, 'but we are not ignoring the reality on the ground.'
Tensions between the two countries have been simmering since May, when a brief clash in the disputed Emerald Triangle border region—where Thailand, Cambodia and Laos meet—left a Cambodian soldier dead. Both sides blamed each other and said their forces had acted in self defence.
Despite pledges by military leaders to de-escalate, border reinforcements have increased and tit-for-tat economic measures have followed.
Cambodia has blocked Thai imports including fresh produce, and halted purchases of electricity and internet services. Thailand has responded with similar restrictions.
Violence spiked this week when a Thai soldier lost his leg in a landmine explosion near the border. In retaliation, Thailand launched airstrikes, with an F-16 fighter jet dropping bombs on what Bangkok said were Cambodian military targets.
Phnom Penh condemned the strikes, accusing Thailand of hitting a road near the historic Preah Vihear temple—calling it 'brutal and illegal military aggression' and a violation of international law.
At least 11 Thai civilians and one soldier have been killed in the crossfire. Cambodia has not released an official death toll, but damage on both sides is mounting.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet called on Cambodian nationals in Thailand to 'maintain their dignity' and return home if they face discrimination.
'Avoid any actions that could affect the Royal Thai Embassy, Thai companies, or citizens in Cambodia,' he said in a Facebook statement.
The crisis has also shaken Thai politics. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended earlier this month following a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, in which she appeared to criticise her own military's actions.
With both sides reinforcing positions and public rhetoric hardening, hopes for a quick resolution appear slim. Thailand maintains that no talks will resume until the border is calm—an increasingly uncertain prospect as the standoff deepens.
UNI ANV SS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
SC questions ED's low conviction rate; CJI Gavai says accused are "sentenced without trial"
New Delhi, Aug 7 (UNI) The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over the low conviction rate in cases investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), observing that the agency often manages to keep accused persons behind bars for extended periods, even without trial or conviction. A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, and Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and Vinod Chandran, made the critical remarks during the hearing of a review petition filed in relation to the Court's earlier order rejecting JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL). "Even if they are not convicted, you (ED) have been successful in sentencing them almost without a trial for years together," CJI Gavai observed, questioning the prolonged incarceration of accused persons despite the absence of convictions. The observation came after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), defended the ED's work by stating that the agency has recovered over ₹20,000 crore and returned it to victims in various cases. "The matters which come to court are only high-profile matters, there are other matters also," Mehta added, attempting to contextualise the agency's performance. In response, CJI Gavai sharply asked, "How much is the conviction rate?" Mehta, while refraining from giving a specific figure, replied, "Conviction is different. Sometimes we wonder how a person was acquitted. Sometimes we have recovered so much money that our machines stop working. We can't give press interviews and YouTube discussions." To this, the CJI firmly noted, 'The Court does not decide matters based on press reports.' The exchange highlights growing judicial scrutiny of the Enforcement Directorate's functioning, especially regarding its extensive use of arrest and detention powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), in the backdrop of low conviction rates. The review petition, relating to the resolution of BPSL's insolvency proceedings, remains pending, and the hearing is currently in progress. UNI SNG RN
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Dates for President Putin's India visit 'almost finalised': NSA Doval in Moscow
Moscow/New Delhi, Aug 7 (UNI) National Security Advisor Ajit Doval said in Moscow today that the dates for the India visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin are 'almost finalised' and that the annual summit meetings between their leadership have been a watershed moment in the bilateral ties. In his comments during a bilateral meeting with Russian Security Council chief Sergei Shoigu in Moscow, NSA Doval said: 'We are very excited and delighted to learn about the visit of His Excellency President of Russia, President Putin, to India. I think that the dates are almost finalised now. 'More important thing is that these summit meetings have always been a watershed for us. They have always given a new direction to our relationship – (in terms of) what is there that we can add in substance and in terms of deliverables to the talks.' Referring to Shoigu's remarks, Doval said: 'You have very rightly mentioned that we have got a very special relationship, long relationship, and we highly value our strategic partnership. 'We have high level engagements, and these engagements have contributed very substantially' to the relationship. NSA Doval said that PM Modi has specifically asked him to convey thanks to the Russian President for the support to India during the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22. 'I want to thank Russia and President Putin, and the PM has specifically asked me to convey his thanks; and I will probably convey it to the President when I meet him, for the support he gave when India was attacked, and we faced a very gruesome terrorist attack, on April 22..' Referring to Shoigu's remarks on the current geopolitical situation, NSA Doval said: 'You said that the world is passing through a tumultuous situation, there is some unpredictability, there are some uncertainties, and in an environment like this our old strategic and privileged partnership has got a very special role. 'Though we know each others' position, we have been exchanging our thoughts and ideas at various levels from time to time,' he said. He also apologised for having missed the 13th International Meeting of High Representatives for Security Issues in Moscow in May, due to suffering from Covid. In his remarks, the Russian security chief said that 'Russia and India are linked by strong, trusting, time-tested bonds of friendship". 'For our country, the comprehensive strengthening of the special privileged strategic partnership with India, based on mutual respect, equal consideration of each other's interests and the desire to advance a unifying agenda, is of paramount importance.' He added that both Russia and India are looking to create 'a new, more just and sustainable world order, ensuring the supremacy of international law and jointly combating modern challenges and threats.' The NSA's Moscow visit comes amid US President Donald Trump's signing of an executive order on Wednesday which imposed an additional 25% tariff on all imports from India, in a bid to pressurise New Delhi to cut its oil trade with Russia. In effect, most Indian exports to the US will be charged a high 50% tariff. India, for its part, has refused to budge, criticising the move and calling the White House' measures 'extremely unfortunate,' while pledging to protect its own national interests. At his meeting with Doval on Thursday, Shoigu said, 'Regular consultations through the Security Council of the two countries help deepen Russian-Indian relations and take them to a new, higher level in the current difficult international situation.' UNI RN
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump Wanted India To Buy More US-Made Arms. It Doesn't Add Up Now
If his behaviour, public statements and social media outbursts are any indication, US President Donald Trump is much more extractive of India in his second term, and relations between the two countries appear to be at their worst. Traditional diplomatic rhetoric and public niceties seem a distant memory with Trump's second coming. Yet, Trump still seems to want to tackle the trade deficit with India. Defence exports to India can be a central component in rectifying that trade deficit - a prospect he is in danger of jeopardising. The Trump administration's second act in the Oval Office may be the beginning of a new chapter of India-US ties. Friend To Foe Traditionally, despite ups and downs, the US has viewed India as a potential partner in Asia. The United States was the second-largest defence supplier to India. Today, that partnership is in the worst state it has ever been in. Earlier this year, Trump claimed that the US was 'paving the way' to provide India with the F-35, and a joint statement released by both countries seemed to indicate that a deal was imminent as well. India is also prioritising modernising its military, and the deal, had it materialised, would have been a large step forward in upgrading India's airpower. However, with each 25% dose of tariffs that the US has administered to India within the last few days, India's unwillingness to purchase a fleet of stealth fighters seems to be increasing. In a response to a question in the Lok Sabha, the minister of state claimed that 'no formal discussions' regarding the purchase of the stealth fighters had been made yet. If these tariffs were not enough to severely impact the strategic relationship, the US administration's concurrent overtures towards Pakistan add a layer of strategic insult to economic injury. Embracing China And Pak Theories on statecraft and power are barely enough to explain some of the messaging President Trump has been engaging in. He seems to prioritise economic gains over everything, including peace and partnerships. He himself and the White House, on separate occasions, have claimed credit for resolving the recent conflict between India and Pakistan - something that the Indian government has outright denied. Pakistan supported these claims, and, not so coincidentally, the recent revision finally set the reciprocal tariff rate with Pakistan at 19%. On the other hand, India now faces 50% tariffs. A new deal for the joint development of Pakistani oil reserves, which was publicly commemorated by both Shehbaz Sharif and Trump, coincides with the imposition of tariffs on India. For India, all this speaks of Pakistan's growing proximity with the United States at a time when Indian leaders have expressed displeasure with Trump's attitude towards India. A Perplexing Attitude While US protectionism is not new, this level of tariff increases is unprecedented. Trump has made remarks on India relying on military equipment from Russia, which, in his opinion, is 'not good'. These seem like efforts to impose costs on India for its reliance on Russia and force it to look towards the United States. However, on the other hand, some of his remarks seem to go beyond merely trying to coerce India into trading with the US. Over the last few days, the POTUS has called Indian trade policies 'strenuous and obnoxious' and has referred to India and Russia as 'dead economies'. While the present Indian administration and Indian opposition leaders find little common ground, actors across the spectrum of Indian politics have made statements that indicate that they feel belittled and insulted by Trump's colourful diplomatic lexicon. The next and potentially final nail in the coffin is the Trump administration's apparent softening towards China, which serves as another sore point for Indo-US ties. On the China front, in late July, the US and China paused the escalation of tariffs for 90 days, a bid to prevent a trade war. Moreover, Trump has taken an uncharacteristically diplomatic tone and said the US would be 'very nice with China'. In June, the US also cemented a deal that restored its access to rare earths, bringing a temporary fix to major supply chain disruptions that were caused by Chinese restrictions. While these measures may be temporary given the volatility of American policies currently, for India, Trump's relatively diplomatic and cautious approach to China can be interpreted as a tacit thaw in tensions between the two countries, something that was previously a shared interest between India and the United States. Unreliable Partner The tariffs, coupled with the US' proximity to Pakistan, create a trust deficit. Supplier reliability is of paramount importance when purchasing long-term assets, say, fighter jets. A partner capable of imposing such stringent economic measures would create uncertainty about the ready supply of spare parts, software upgrades, and maintenance support for platforms with a multi-decade lifespan. This concern goes beyond merely the question of F-35 fighters and casts a shadow over the entire defence trade ecosystem between India and the United States. There is an apparent contradiction between the US's expressed interest in increasing defence exports to India on one hand, and its punitive tariffs and warming relations with China and Pakistan on the other, especially at a time when India's own neighbourly ties are far from normal. Today, the United States is India's third-largest defence supplier after Russia and France, having fallen from second place in the early 2000s. This inconsistency will likely further push India to consider other suppliers when shopping for military hardware. Although other inherent issues for India come with relying on European countries or Israel for defence procurement, given the current volatility of Trump's dealings with India, India may benefit from looking elsewhere.
