Attack ads in Pittsburgh's mayoral race funded by so-called dark money
Pittsburgh's race for mayor has taken a dark turn with one side accusing the other of making sweetheart deals or taking MAGA money along with accusations of racist tactics.
It's all being fueled by so-called "dark money" — unlimited amounts of cash spent by political action committees on TV attack ads and mailers.
"We're a month out and it's already this nasty, so past experience tells us it will only get worse," said political consultant Mike Butler.
PACs are funding these ads with hundreds of thousands of dollars in so-called independent expenditures. There's no limit on what they can spend as long as they don't communicate or coordinate with a candidate's campaign.
"And people don't know who's behind these PACs," said KDKA-TV's Andy Sheehan.
"And that's very unfortunate for our voters to not have a full sense of who is making the messages and who's behind those messages," Butler said.
On the O'Connor side, the mailers and coming TV ads are being funded by a PAC called Common Sense Action. Campaign filings show local trade unions and old line Democrats like Pennsylvania state Sen. Wayne Fontana have contributed $264,000 to the PAC.
On the Gainey side, the anti-O'Connor ads are the product of Pennsylvania Working Families Party — a PAC based in Philadelphia. It's part of a national organization dedicated to the election of progressive candidates. Its most recent filing showed $64,000 on hand, but its total expenditures and contributors won't be learned until another filing at the end of the month.
"Needs reform?" Sheehan asked.
"I think so," Butler said.
Butler says dark money funds attack ads and the messages will likely get nastier and nastier — emotions stoked by faceless PACs with unlimited cash to spend.
"I don't think anyone could be happy with where we are now," Butler said.
Before this is all over, close to $2 million will have been spent on this race, with more than a half million dollars in the form of independent expenditures — a lot of money for a race in Pittsburgh with voters only in the tens of thousands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Tucker Carlson Blasts Former Fox News Colleague Sean Hannity: 'Warmongers'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Right-wing commentator Tucker Carlson blasted his former Fox News colleague Sean Hannity on Friday, calling Hannity and other MAGA hawks "warmongers" for cheering Israel's missile strikes against the Iranian regime. The Context Israel launched a series of strikes against Iran early Friday, local time, which decimated the regime's military chain of command, hit critical nuclear facilities and took out top Iranian nuclear scientists. After the strikes, Iran pulled out of scheduled nuclear talks with the U.S. and retaliated against Israel with a wave of rocket attacks that struck Tel Aviv, Israel's commercial center and also home to the country's central military base. Israel and Iran have been engaged in an increasingly destructive array of tit-for-tat strikes against one another since Hamas—backed by the Iran-led Axis of Resistance—carried out its attack against Israel on October 7, 2023. But the strikes commenced by Israel early Friday marked the most serious escalation yet between Jerusalem and Tehran. What To Know When Israel struck Iran, it capped a long-running foreign policy battle being waged in President Donald Trump's inner circle. Carlson, a staunch isolationist, was among the voices urging against escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, which were at a tipping point before Israel's strikes against the regime early Friday. He also supported Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, as he spearheaded the nuclear discussions with Iran. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP On the other side of the coin were Hannity and conservative media host Mark Levin, who, among others, were deeply skeptical that Iran would agree to end its nuclear program and expressed support for Israel taking military action. On Friday, Carlson tore into Hannity, Levin, conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch and conservative megadonors Isaac Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. "The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it — between warmongers and peacemakers," Carlson wrote on X, formerly Twitter. He added: "Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran. On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now." Newsweek reached out to Fox News for comment via email on Friday. Hannity and Levin took a victory lap on Fox News shortly after Israel carried out its first strike against Iran early Friday, with Hannity rattling off a list of Iran's provocations and nuclear threats and Levin saying that "the Iranians are about to get their asses kicked and it's been coming since Jimmy Carter." "They think this is Joe Biden's administration, that they would get away, get nuclear weapons and then the world would sit there, wouldn't know what to do about it," he said, adding that Israel "is not going to sit there and take it." Hours after the strikes, Carlson put out what he called his potential "final newsletter before all-out war" and accused Trump of being "complicit." "While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's events. Washington knew these attacks would happen," Carlson wrote. "They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." "Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night's events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran," Carlson added. "Steve Witkoff was scheduled to participate in the next round of talks on Sunday, but whether that will still happen is up in the air." Israel's strikes against Iran came after months of Trump urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Tehran, saying that it would torpedo America's already tenuous negotiations with the Iranian regime. What People Are Saying On Friday, after Israel's strikes, Trump again pushed Iran to come back to the table, writing on Truth Social: "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!" After Iran initiated its retaliatory rocket attacks against Israel, a U.S. defense official told Newsweek: "Yes, the U.S. is assisting in shooting down missiles targeting Israel." What Happens Next Israel and Iran have been bombing each other since the first wave of strikes early Friday, with Israel saying it plans to "escalate" in response to Iran's retaliatory attack. Iran, meanwhile, has warned that it will target the military bases of any countries that assist Israel.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oregon road workers urge passage of transportation bill, others warn of financial burden
Aerial view of the Interstate 5 bridge connecting Portland and Vancouver. (Oregon Department of Transportation/Flickr) Rural and urban transportation workers pleaded with the Oregon Legislature's Joint Transportation Committee to pass a massive funding package that Democrats say would solve the Oregon Department of Transportation's budget shortfalls and stabilize the state's deteriorating road infrastructure. In a three-hour hearing on House Bill 2025 Thursday evening — the last of four hearings for the much anticipated transportation package published Monday — workers shared stories about responding to floods, wildfires, fatal accidents and suicide attempts without adequate staff and resources. 'We are operating on a skeleton crew at best,' Bend-based transportation worker Justin Iverson told the committee. 'We have been dwindling down over the last 10 years, to the point that we can barely maintain the roads now.' During the wintertime, when ice and snow pile up on roads, Iverson said just four to five people cover a 300-mile area in Central Oregon. 'We are the first, and oftentimes the only, people to respond during the wintertime,' he told lawmakers. 'The public relies on us to be there. We need to be there for them, so we ask that you fund this so that we can continue serving our communities.' A vote on House Bill 2025 has not yet been scheduled. House Bill 2025 would increase ODOT revenue by creating dozens of new fees and taxes, including a 15-cent raise to the state gas tax over the next three years and almost tripling registration fees for passenger vehicles. State officials estimate they need to raise $1.8 billion each year to pay for transportation services across the state. About $205 million of that is needed just to keep road maintenance funding at its current level. The transportation department said it will run out of money needed for state highway maintenance after mid-2025. Without an increase in funding for this work, ODOT would have to lay off up to 1,000 workers, the Oregonian reported. Revenue from the bill would also fund infrastructure projects such as the Interstate 5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project in Portland's Albina neighborhood, upgrading the Abernethy Bridge and widening Interstate 205 in the Portland metro, improving the Newberg-Dundee bypass in Yamhill County, and upgrading a Salem bridge off Center Street and State Highway 22 to make it strong enough to endure earthquakes. Oregonians from around the state, as well as city and county officials — including the mayors of Bend, Portland, Beaverton and rural Oakridge and Toledo — also spoke in favor of the bill. However, Republican lawmakers and some Oregonians who testified against the bill said low- and middle-income drivers would bear the brunt of new taxes and transportation fee spikes. Some drove hundreds of miles to give testimony Thursday, or tuned in virtually, to oppose the bill. They cited existing financial strain from inflation, high housing costs and rising utility bills. Amy Reiner, a resident from Clackamas County, spoke in opposition to the bill, saying she believes the new taxes and fees would financially strain Oregon families — particularly low- and middle-income ones. 'People are already leaving Oregon,' she said. 'We shouldn't be creating policies that make Oregon harder to live in. We should be focused on making it affordable and inclusive.' Greg Remensperger, the executive vice president of the Oregon Auto Dealers Association, opposed the transfer tax portion of the bill, or a tax on used and new sold cars. He said it would burden car purchasers already dealing with a car loan at a time when those loan delinquencies are at a record high. 'Let's be honest, a 2% transfer tax really needs to be termed what it is,' he told the committee. 'It's a sales tax. Oregon residents have fought down sales taxes on multiple occasions, and they will object to this too.' Several Republicans, including state House Minority Leader Christine Drazan, R-Canby, and state Rep. Shelly Boshart Davis, R-Albany, have criticized the bill, saying it was crafted by Democrats behind closed doors and rushed, without having a financial analysis prepared showing how much revenue it would raise. Bill sponsor state Sen. Chris Gorsek, D-Troutdale, said during an informational hearing on Monday that he thinks the bill would generate at least $1 billion in revenue. 'The public is being asked to testify without knowing what the bill will actually cost them,' Drazan said on Thursday. 'That is unacceptable.' Republicans on Monday introduced an alternative transportation package, House Bill 3982, which avoids taxes and instead redirects funding from climate initiatives, public transit and passenger rail services, bicycle programs and payroll tax allocations. The bill does not yet have a scheduled hearing in either chamber of the Legislature. A gas tax increase from $0.40 to $0.55 per gallon, starting with a 10-cent increase in January 2026 and additional 5-cent increase in 2028. Diesel would also be taxed at the same rate as regular gasoline. Vehicle registration fees would rise from $43 to $113 for passenger vehicles; $44 to $110 for mopeds and motorcycles; $63 to $129 for low-speed vehicles; and $63 to $129 for medium-speed electric vehicles. Title fees would increase from $77 to $182 for new titles, and from $27 to $44 for salvage titles. A new transfer tax on cars 10,000 pounds or less, and sold for more than $10,000, would be taxed at 2% if new, or 1% if used. Increased payroll tax for transit from 0.1% to 0.18% starting in 2026, then increased to 0.25% in 2028 and 0.3% in 2030. Increased privilege tax and commensurate use tax from 0.5% to 1% percent of the sales price of a vehicle. A privilege tax is a tax for the privilege of selling vehicles in Oregon, and the use tax applies to vehicles purchased from dealers outside of Oregon that are required to be registered and titled in Oregon. A new $340 yearly fee for electric vehicle drivers to participate in the Road Usage Charge Program. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Beshear activates Emergency Operations Center ahead of ‘No Kings' protests
LEXINGTON, Ky. (FOX 56) — Gov. Andy Beshear has opened the state's Emergency Operations Center ahead of 'No Kings' protests on Saturday. Seeing protests ramp up across the country, Beshear said they will be monitoring situations as information comes in and coordinating resources for any area that might need it. Lexington 'No Kings' rally to remain peaceful amid anti-ICE protests in LA While recognizing people have the right to protest, he is encouraging folks to stay peaceful. 'If you're going out to protest on Saturday, that is your right. Again, make sure it stays peaceful, and I would recommend everyone wrap it up before dark. We've seen in the past how other groups can come in, especially at night. In turn, what was a peaceful protest aimed at change turns into something that looks very different,' Beshear said. Kentucky Kroger closes aisle after possible rodent infestation Beshear activates Emergency Operations Center ahead of 'No Kings' protests Lexington 'No Kings' rally to remain peaceful amid anti-ICE protests in LA Beshear said those engaging in violent acts, such as setting things on fire and looting, should be prosecuted. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
