logo
Why is the Trump administration threatening to deport this Iranian man to Australia?

Why is the Trump administration threatening to deport this Iranian man to Australia?

RNZ News15 hours ago
By
Brad Ryan
, ABC
Reza Zavvar has been an active contributor to his local community for years, his loved ones say.
Photo:
Supplied
The US government is threatening to deport an Iranian man to Australia - even though he has no connection to Australia and has lived in the US since 1985.
Reza Zavvar, a 52-year-old recruiter from Maryland, has been targeted for deportation because of a marijuana possession conviction from the 1990s, his lawyer says.
A court order means he cannot be returned to Iran because of the risk of persecution there.
So immigration authorities say they are sending him to either Australia or Romania after arresting him in the street near his home in late June.
"They got him while he was walking his dog in his quiet suburban neighbourhood," his lawyer, Ava Benach, told the ABC.
"And they detained him and sent him to Texas to hold him, and they said: 'We're gonna deport you to Australia or Romania.'
"How they picked those countries is a mystery to me."
His family, friends and locals are fundraising for a legal fight. They say Mr Zavvar had been quietly contributing to his community for years, helping out his elderly neighbours and making sandwiches each week for those in need of food.
He had adopted his dog from a local shelter and recently moved in with his mother to help care for his grandmother.
"After 40 years of living in the US, Reza knows no other home," his sister, Maryam, wrote as part of an online petition.
"He waits in a privately run detention centre, thousands of miles from anything familiar, while bureaucrats decide his future."
Mr Zavvar's case has highlighted a controversial strategy increasingly used by the Trump administration as part of its mass deportation regime - sending migrants to countries they have no connection to, sometimes using historical low-level misdemeanours as justification.
But immigration lawyers said they had not seen Australia listed as a destination before.
"Most of us in the immigration bar have been hearing about cases being sent to Central and South America," said Mahsa Khanbabai, an elected director on the American Immigration Lawyers Association board.
"Normally, what we've been seeing is that the Trump administration is targeting countries where they feel they have some leverage, that they feel they can push around and bully.
"Australia is not a country that we would normally consider to be in such a position."
A DHS Notice of Removal document, dated July 1, says ICE intends to deport Reza Zavvar to Australia.
Photo:
Supplied
The Australian government said it had not been contacted by US authorities about the case.
"There have been no new agreements made with the Trump administration on immigration," a government spokesperson said.
Despite repeated requests for clarification, neither Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) explained why Australia had been selected.
But in a statement, DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: "ICE continues to try and find a country willing to accept this criminal illegal alien."
Mr Zavvar's sister said her brother had "built his life in Maryland, surrounded by his loving family, including his parents, sister, and cousins".
"He was a natural athlete, excelling in football during high school, where he was affectionately known as a 'gentle giant' - competitive on the field but kind and warm-hearted off."
He had a green card, allowing him permanent residence in the US - but his lawyer says his past marijuana-related conviction was later used to jeopardise that status.
In 2004, an airport agent noticed his conviction and started a process that could have led to deportation.
Reza Zavvar was arrested by immigration agents while walking his dog.
Photo:
Supplied
But three years later, a judge issued a "withholding of removal" order, preventing his return to Iran.
DHS says his previous conviction - for attempted possession of a controlled substance - remains a reason to deport him.
"Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US," the department's Ms McLaughlin said.
"Zavvar had almost 20 years to self-deport and leave the United States."
The Trump administration has been pushing other countries to accept deportees who cannot return to their countries of origin: either because those countries will not take them back, or because of protection orders like Mr Zavvar's.
The "withholding of removal" orders theoretically allow the US to deport the migrant to a different country, but that is historically rare.
"We've never really seen people being sent to third countries in my 25 years of practice," Ms Khanbabai said.
"When the UK started doing that a few years ago, I remember thinking, what a horrendous situation, thank God the United States doesn't do that. And now here we are seeing the US carry out these very same inhumane, what I would consider illegal, practices."
The US government recently struck deals with several African countries, which have opened the door to more of these deportations.
Small numbers of migrants - from countries including Vietnam, Cuba and Jamaica - have been sent to South Sudan and Eswatini.
And on Wednesday, local time, Reuters reported that Rwanda had said it would accept up to 250 deportees, "in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation".
The Trump administration says it is delivering on an election promise to crack down on the millions of people in the US who don't have legal rights to live there, and especially those with criminal convictions.
"Under President Trump … if you break the law, you will face the consequences," Ms McLaughlin said. "Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US."
But immigration lawyers and advocates say Mr Zavvar is among what appears to be a growing number of Iranians detained since the US air strikes on Iran in June.
Green card and student visa holders, many of whom have clean records, are among them, Ms Khanbabai said.
The Trump administration says it is delivering on an election promise.
Photo:
AFP
The lawyer, who is Iranian American and has many Iranian clients, said the community felt it was being targeted.
"The Trump administration claimed that they were going to be going after criminals, yet the vast majority of people, including the Iranians, don't have any serious criminal offences or any at all," she said.
"And so we're trying to figure out, is there an uptick of this focus on Iranians … or is this just part of the massive targeting of and scapegoating of immigrants?"
Mr Zavvar's lawyer hopes her client's arrest will prove to be a publicity stunt that doesn't lead to his deportation.
"I honestly think that they wanted to make a show of arresting Iranians in the wake of our bombing of the Iranian nuclear facility," Ms Benach said.
"What people are going to remember is that the administration was arresting Iranians when they were certain that the Iranians were going to retaliate … and then six months from now, they might have to release them under the law, but we'll have moved on to something else."
-
ABC
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW attorney-general approves $2 million compensation payment to Kathleen Folbigg after release from prison
NSW attorney-general approves $2 million compensation payment to Kathleen Folbigg after release from prison

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

NSW attorney-general approves $2 million compensation payment to Kathleen Folbigg after release from prison

By Nakita Jager, ABC Kathleen Folbigg (right) with her lawyer Rhanee Rego in 2023, when her convictions were quashed. Photo: ABC News / Keana Naughton Kathleen Folbigg's solicitor says a $2 million payout from the NSW government is "profoundly unfair and unjust" after spending 20 years in prison. Attorney-General Michael Daley granted a compensation payment to Folbigg, who was exonerated of killing her four children after spending two decades in jail for their deaths. Folbigg was convicted in 2003 of killing her four children between 1989 and 1999. Following a seven-week trial, a jury found Folbigg guilty of the murders of Patrick, Sarah and Laura, and the manslaughter of Caleb. In 2023 Folbigg's convictions were quashed and in 2024 she applied for a compensation payment. The state government said it had agreed to a request from Folbigg to not publicly discuss the details of the compensation decision. "The decision follows thorough and extensive consideration of the materials and issues raised in Ms Folbigg's application and provided by her legal representatives," Daley said. Folbigg's solicitor Rhanee Rego said in a statement her client continues to feel the lasting effects of this ongoing trauma. "Kathleen Folbigg spent two decades in prison, yet for her wrongful imprisonment she has been offered $2 million," the statement read. "When Lindy Chamberlain was exonerated in 1994, she received $1.7 million for three years in prison." Rego said the payment "does not reflect the extent of the pain and suffering Kathleen has endured". "This should be about the system recognising the significance of what it did to her. "An inquiry is needed to understand how the government decided on this figure." Greens MLC Sue Higginson says Folbigg's payment is not enough. Photo: ABC News / Victoria Pengilley NSW Greens MLC Sue Higginson dubbed the compensation amount an insult from Premier Chris Minns, describing the offer as "go away" money. "I'm astounded at the lack of reason, financial accounting, reflection and empathy this offer represents," she said. "Two million dollars barely covers what Kathleen could have earned on a full-time salary over 20 years. "Kathleen has not only lost 20 years of wages, she has lost her four children, her home and her employability. "She has racked up legal costs fighting her wrongful conviction, she has lost her superannuation, and she has been the victim of one of the worst injustices in this state's history - wrongful imprisonment." Rego said the system had failed her client once again. "Kathleen Folbigg's fight should be over. After being failed at her conviction and abused in prison, she is now being treated with contempt by the very system that should be making amends," she said. "This is profoundly unfair and unjust." - ABC

America's punishing new tariffs now operational on more than 90 countries
America's punishing new tariffs now operational on more than 90 countries

NZ Herald

time6 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

America's punishing new tariffs now operational on more than 90 countries

Trump's tariffs have indeed helped generate money — roughly US$152 billion ($255b) in customs collections through July, recent data show — but his policies have not been without consequence. A growing number of businesses have warned recently that they may no longer be able to stomach the rising costs of key foreign components. As a result, prices have started to climb. The latest monthly measure of inflation showed that appliances, clothing and furnishings became more expensive in June. The economy has grown but at an anaemic pace, and some analysts predict little improvement through the remainder of the year. The labour market has experienced its own strains, with hiring sharply slowing in July. Olu Sonola, the head of US economic research at Fitch Ratings, said the economy was just 'starting to see' the effects of the tariffs that Trump announced in the northern spring, adding that with Trump's newest duties now in place, Americans would 'see that magnified' in coming months. The tariffs start at 15%, targeting imports from countries including Bolivia, Ecuador, Iceland, and Nigeria. Others, like Taiwan, have a 20% tax applied to items sold to US buyers. Trump also imposed a much higher 50% tariff on some goods from Brazil. He has cast it as punishment for Brazil's decision to prosecute his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the country's former president, for seeking to stay in power after losing an election. And today, Trump said he would raise tariffs on India to 50% by late August for buying Russian oil. The President has signalled he could impose similar penalties on other countries, as he looks for ways to use trade policy to pressure Russia into halting its war against Ukraine. In general, the duties do not apply to foreign goods that have been loaded onto ships just before the deadline. Those products in transit won't be subject to new taxes so long as they enter the US before early October, perhaps opening the door for importers to amass more inventory before the steepest rates cut into their bottom lines. Many smaller countries' exports have faced 10% tariffs since the President first announced, then suspended, his initial tranche of policies in April. Others have staved off eye-watering rates after brokering deals with the US that set their tariffs generally between 15% and 20%. That includes the 27-member EU, as well as Japan, South Korea and Vietnam. Each of those governments promised to open its market to US goods, and in some cases they pledged to invest billions of dollars in American industries. But the exact terms of those deals remain murky. Separately, Trump imposed a 35% tariff on goods from Canada not covered by the existing US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. The Canadian levies took effect on Friday. Similarly high rates have been suspended for Mexico while the two sides keep talking. And duties on Chinese goods remain at 30% under an agreement brokered between the superpowers this year, though the truce is set to expire on Tuesday. The rates that took effect today are unlikely to be the final chapter in Trump's expanding trade war, which faces a series of legal challenges in federal courts. He still plans to impose additional tariffs on foreign-made medicines, computer chips, and other products. Trump said the forthcoming tariffs on semiconductors, which have not been formally announced, would be set at 100%. The President shared his thinking at a White House event alongside Tim Cook, the chief executive of Apple, which had pledged to invest an additional US$100b in the US. Trump signalled that the taxes may be relaxed on companies seeking to produce more of the critical high-tech chips domestically. Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple Inc., in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, today. Photo / Getty Images The President also dismissed evidence that his policies may be upsetting the US economy, claiming instead that 'costs are way down' and that the country would experience 'unprecedented' growth. He previously insisted that foreigners were bearing the brunt of his tariffs, and he moved last week to fire the top official who oversees the government's jobs report, claiming without evidence that its data had been rigged to harm him politically. The President's new tariffs send the average US effective tariff rate to above 18%, the highest level since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. For American households, those duties may add up to price increases, resulting in an average annual loss of US$2400, the Yale research centre found. And for the broader economy, it could translate to a drop in output, shaving off half a percentage point in growth starting in 2025. Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics, said the tariffs threatened to create an environment that was 'very stagflation-esque', referring to the risk of a stagnant economy with inflationary prices. That, he said, would add to the challenge facing the Federal Reserve at a time when Trump is demanding lower interest rates. 'Growth is slowing,' Zandi said. 'It's happening, and it's going to become much more obvious.' So far, the US economy has sidestepped the most dire predictions of a recession. But many experts say it was always going to be a matter of time before tariffs unleashed real, noticeable effects, especially because many businesses stockpiled imports before the steepest rates took effect. Matthew Martin, a senior economist at Oxford Economics, said businesses had worked their way through those inventories since the President announced, but quickly suspended, his original slate of steep tariffs in April. With tariffs climbing again, Marin continued, so will prices: 'That is something that's going to accelerate over the next couple months'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Tony Romm ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

Trump's tariffs come into effect
Trump's tariffs come into effect

Otago Daily Times

time7 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Trump's tariffs come into effect

President Donald Trump's higher tariff rates of 10% to 50% on dozens of trading partners kicked in today, testing his strategy for shrinking US trade deficits without massive disruptions to global supply chains, higher inflation and stiff retaliation from trading partners. US Customs and Border Protection agency began collecting the higher tariffs at 4pm (NZ time) after weeks of suspense over Trump's final tariff rates and frantic negotiations with major trading partners that sought to lower them. Goods loaded on to US-bound vessels and in transit before the midnight deadline can enter at lower prior tariff rates before October 5, according to a CBP notice to shippers issued this week. Imports from many countries had previously been subject to a baseline 10% import duty after Trump paused higher rates announced in early April. But since then, Trump has frequently modified his tariff plan, slapping some countries with much higher rates, including 50% for goods from Brazil, 39% from Switzerland, 35% from Canada and 25% from India. He announced a separate 25% tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday to be imposed in 21 days over the South Asian country's purchases of Russian oil. Ahead of the deadline, Trump heralded the "billions of dollars" that will flow into the US, largely from countries that he said had taken advantage of the United States. "THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL!" Trump said on Truth Social. Eight major trading partners accounting for about 40% of US trade flows have reached framework deals for trade and investment concessions with Trump, including the European Union, Japan and South Korea, reducing their base tariff rates to 15%. Britain won a 10% rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines secured rate reductions to 19% or 20%. "For those countries, it's less bad news," said William Reinsch, a senior fellow and trade expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "There'll be some supply chain rearrangement. There'll be a new equilibrium. Prices here will go up, but it'll take a while for that to show up in a major way," Reinsch said. Countries with punishingly high duties, such as India and Canada, "will continue to scramble around trying to fix this," he added. Trump's order has specified that any goods determined to have been trans-shipped from a third country to evade higher US tariffs will be subject to an additional 40% import duty, but his administration has released few details on how these goods would be identified or the provision enforced. Trump's July 31 tariff order imposed duties above 10% on 67 trading partners, while the rate was kept at 10% for those not listed. These import taxes are one part of a multilayered tariff strategy that includes national security-based sectoral tariffs on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, autos, steel, aluminum, copper, lumber and other goods. Trump said yesterday the microchip duties could reach 100%. China is on a separate tariff track and will face a potential tariff increase on August 12 unless Trump approves an extension of a prior truce after talks last week in Sweden. He has said he may impose additional tariffs over China's purchases of Russian oil as he seeks to pressure Moscow into ending its war in Ukraine. Financial markets largely shrugged off the new tariffs, with stock markets in Asia at or near record highs while the dollar dipped slightly. REVENUES, PRICE HIKES Trump has touted the vast increase in federal revenues from his import tax collections, which are ultimately paid by companies importing the goods and consumers of end products. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said that US tariff revenues could top $300 billion a year. The move will drive average US tariff rates to around 20%, the highest in a century and up from 2.5% when Trump took office in January, the Atlantic Institute estimates. Commerce Department data released last week showed more evidence that tariffs began driving up US prices in June, including for home furnishings and durable household equipment, recreational goods and motor vehicles. Costs from Trump's tariff war are mounting for a wide swath of companies, including bellwethers Caterpillar, Marriott, Molson Coors and Yum Brands. All told, global companies that have reported earnings so far this quarter are looking at a hit of around $US15 billion ($NZ25.17 billion) to profits in 2025, Reuters' global tariff tracker shows.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store