
Bereaved urge ‘truth' as Covid inquiry shifts focus to care homes
Grieving relatives will give evidence this week as the module looking at the adult social care sector begins.
The first week of what is to be a five-week module will also hear from former health secretary Matt Hancock.
Mr Hancock, who resigned from government in 2021 after admitting breaking social distancing guidance by having an affair with a colleague, has given evidence to the inquiry multiple times.
He will return on Wednesday for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector.
In 2023 he admitted the so-called protective ring he said had been put around care homes early in the pandemic was not an unbroken one, and he understood the strength of feeling people have on the issue.
At a Downing Street press conference on May 15 2020, Mr Hancock said: 'Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes.'
Bereaved families have previously called this phrase a 'sickening lie' and a 'joke'.
When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed.
However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested before admission, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April.
This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid-19 symptoms being able to spread the virus.
The Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice (CBFFJ) campaign group said people want answers about decisions made 'at the highest levels of government'.
From Monday, module six of the inquiry will look at the effect the pandemic had on both the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector across the UK.
Among the issues to be examined will be decisions made by the UK Government and devolved administrations on moving people from hospitals into adult care and residential homes in the early stages of the pandemic.
The module will also consider how the pandemic was managed in care and residential homes, including infection prevention and control measures, testing for the virus, the availability and adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE), and the restrictions on access to such locations by healthcare professionals and loved ones.
Charlie Williams' 85-year-old father, Vernute, died at a care home in April 2020.
Mr Williams, a member of CBFFJ, said: 'We have been waiting years for this moment. What happened in care homes during the pandemic was not a tragic accident, it was the result of decisions made at the highest levels of government.
'Covid-positive patients were knowingly discharged from hospitals into care homes. There was no testing, no PPE, and no plan to protect the most vulnerable.
'Those in care were left to die. Bereaved families deserve to know who made those decisions and why.'
The CBFFJ group has written to inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett, to express their concern at some 'key decision-makers' not expected to be called in this module, including former prime minister Boris Johnson.
Mr Williams said not calling Mr Johnson and other senior figures was 'shocking', adding: 'They were at the centre of government when these choices were made, and the inquiry's decision to exclude them is baffling and deeply damaging to any sense of justice.'
He said: 'This is the moment for those responsible to finally tell the truth. We want answers. We want accountability. We want justice.'
Members of bereaved groups from across the UK will give evidence on Tuesday, while representatives of the National Care Forum and Royal College of Nursing will give evidence on Thursday.
Public hearings for the care sector module are expected to run until the end of July.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Supermarkets being told to cut shoppers' calories in obesity crackdown is not 'nanny statism', says Streeting
The health secretary has told Sky News the government's plans to tackle obesity by introducing a health food standard for supermarkets are a "world-first approach" and not "nanny statism". As part of an initiative aimed at taking some pressure off the NHS, food retailers and manufacturers will "make the healthy choice the easy choice" for customers in the UK, which has the third-highest adult obesity levels in Europe. Supermarkets will be required to report sales data and those that fail to hit targets could face financial penalties, suggested Nesta, the innovation agency which initially developed the policy. Speaking on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, Wes Streeting said: "Instead of traditional nanny statism, where we regulate more heavily on price or marketing on what's sold, we're taking a world-first approach, which is working with supermarkets using data they already collect about the nutritional value of their shopping baskets and shopping trolleys, the average shop. "We're going to work with them to reduce the amount of unhealthy food in trolleys and baskets by setting targets on the healthy value of your shopping trolleys and baskets." He said if obese people cut their calorie intake "by about 216 calories a day - the equivalent of a bottle of fizzy coke, we'd halve obesity". "We've got one in five kids leaving primary school with obesity, it's costing the NHS £11bn a year, and obesity has doubled since the 1990s," he added. He also said: "If we reduce calorie intake in this country by just 50 calories a day, that would lift 340,000 children out of obesity." Mr Streeting said supermarkets will decide through the combination of where they put their products, how they do price promotions, and what products they choose to put on the shelves. "They will work with us to make sure that we nudge people in the right direction, without any of us even noticing," he added. 2:40 Businesses will be free to choose how to implement the new healthy food standard, which aims to make their customers' average shopping healthier. Measures could include reformulating products and tweaking recipes, changing shop layouts, offering discounts on healthy foods, or changing loyalty schemes to promote healthier options. Obesity is one of the root causes of diabetes, heart disease and cancer. The new scheme, announced on Sunday by the Department for Health and Social Care, is part of the forthcoming 10-Year Health Plan, through which the government is seeking to shift from sickness to prevention to alleviate the burden on the NHS. 1:22 An 'important step' Michelle Mitchell, Cancer Research UK's chief executive, said: "Businesses can play a major role in supporting people to make healthy choices, and this important step could help to reduce rising obesity rates. "Being overweight or obese is the second biggest cause of cancer in the UK, and is linked with 13 different types of the disease. "The UK government must introduce further bold preventative policies in both the upcoming 10-year Health Plan and National Cancer Plan, so that more lives can be saved from cancer." Some of the UK's biggest supermarkets appear to have reacted positively to plans for a new standard of healthy food, with Ken Murphy, Tesco Group CEO, saying: "All food businesses have a critical part to play in providing good quality, affordable and healthy food. "At Tesco, we have measured and published our own healthier food sales for a number of years now - we believe it is key to more evidence-led policy and better-targeted health interventions. "That's why we have called for mandatory reporting for all supermarkets and major food businesses and why we welcome the government's announcement on this. "We look forward to working with them on the detail of the Healthy Food Standard and its implementation by all relevant food businesses." Simon Roberts, chief executive of Sainsbury's, said: "We're passionate about making good food joyful, accessible and affordable for everyone and have been championing the need for mandatory health reporting, across the food industry for many years. "Today's announcement from government is an important and positive step forward in helping the nation to eat well. "We need a level playing field across the entirety of our food sector for these actions to have a real and lasting impact."


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The suspended doctor selling workers sick notes on demand
A suspended doctor is selling sick notes online to customers who want to go on holiday, take months off work for alleged Covid infection or care for an ill dog, The Telegraph can reveal. Asif Munaf, who was suspended from the medical register over anti-Semitic social media posts, runs Dr Sick Ltd, a company that offers same-day sick notes for as little as £29. Without any face-to-face or phone consultation, Telegraph reporters were able to obtain medical certificates granting five months off work for Covid, six weeks for anxiety over a sick pet, and four weeks of home working to enable them to go on holiday abroad. All three notes were issued within hours of the requests being made. A dossier of evidence has been shared with the General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates doctors, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the healthcare watchdog. The revelations are likely to reignite concern over Britain's growing sick note culture. Workers took 148.9 million sick days last year, an 11 per cent rise on a decade ago. The surge prompted a crackdown by former prime minister Rishi Sunak, who proposed stripping GPs of the power to sign people off work amid fears the system is fuelling a productivity crisis. On Saturday, Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, condemned the 'rogue' Dr Sick Ltd as 'a symptom of a deeper sickness in our welfare system', and criticised Labour for scrapping the Tories' planned fit note reforms. The former Conservative health minister said: 'Sick notes to care for your dog or sunbathe in Malta signed off within hours, no ID, no checks, no link to the NHS. This rogue website is a symptom of a deeper sickness in our welfare system. 'We need an end to the system where it is easier to get a sick note than a job. Labour scrapped our reforms to the fit note system, and now we are living with the consequences. 'Too often, decisions are made without evidence, without scrutiny, and without consequence. Sick notes have become a pathway to permanent dependency, trapping the very people who need real help in a system that's quietly given up on them.' Figures disclosed by the Department for Work and Pensions reveal that, as of November last year, almost 5.8 million people in England and Wales are claiming out-of-work benefits. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to water down plans to cut personal independence payments – financial support for disabled people – following an unprecedented rebellion from his own MPs. Mr Munaf, 37, a serial entrepreneur who has appeared on Dragon's Den and The Apprentice, was dropped from the BBC spin-off The Apprentice: You're Fired last February after describing Zionism as a 'godless satanic cult' and Zionists as 'odiously ogre-like' in posts on X. He was temporarily suspended by the GMC that same month. After a hearing in August 2024, the interim suspension was lifted and replaced with practice restrictions. Mr Munaf has continued to share anti-Semitic content online, including Holocaust denial and claims that 9/11 was 'a Jewish job'. Last November, the GMC again imposed an interim suspension pending investigation. Posing as a supermarket worker with Covid, a Telegraph reporter was issued a sick note within four hours of completing Dr Sick Ltd's online form, without being asked for proof of a positive test. Although the request was for two weeks off, the certificate granted five months. This appeared to contradict Dr Sick Ltd's own policy stating that any leave longer than six weeks requires GP approval. For the second note, the reporter claimed to be a nursery teacher anxious about a dying pet. 'I need to be home with my dog, especially as these are likely to be his last weeks,' they wrote. A certificate was issued within two hours granting six weeks' leave for 'significant distress following recent personal events'. The dog was not mentioned. The final request, made under the reporter's real name, sought an 'adjustment to work duties' to allow remote working while they took a Mediterranean holiday. 'To be honest, I need this adjustment because I want to join my friends on holiday in Malta next month, but please don't put that on the certificate,' they wrote. 'I am confident I can perform my job working remotely for that week, and from home the other weeks. The office work and daily commute on the hot and sweaty tube has made me stressed and I will feel much better with some fresh air, a change of scenery, and more time at home.' That request was approved within an hour. 'Having reviewed the medical history and current symptoms,' the certificate stated, 'I have deemed them unfit for work in their current capacity. 'This is due to significant stress and heat exhaustion with difficulty focusing from the recent hot weather which is impacting their ability to perform their duties. Accordingly, we have advised them to rest and recover by working from home to avoid the heat and humidity on the London Underground.' At no point was the reporter asked for ID, GP details or medical evidence. The only requirement was to write a sentence of more than 20 words describing their symptoms and requested dates of absence. All three certificates, branded with the Dr Sick logo, bore the name, GMC number and apparent signature of a GMC-registered doctor employed by a locum agency used by NHS trusts. When contacted by The Telegraph, the agency said their employee had denied working for Dr Sick Ltd or signing the documents. Mr Munaf did not respond when asked if this was true. The entrepreneur did say that he had no role in issuing the certificates himself, saying: 'I don't issue the medical notes – I run the business.' He claimed: 'Dr Sick Ltd is an ICO-registered, UK-based digital service with a team of five fully GMC-registered UK doctors who issue fit notes in accordance with HIPAA-aligned guidelines'. It is understood the ICO, the data watchdog, has no record of Dr Sick Ltd's registration. HIPAA is a US healthcare privacy law; it does not apply in the UK. Because he has been temporarily suspended by the GMC, Mr Munaf is prohibited by law from practising medicine or presenting himself as a medical doctor. The Medical Act 1983 states that a doctor subject to such an interim suspension order, 'shall be treated as not being registered in the register' and that anyone who 'wilfully and falsely pretends' to be a registered medical practitioner may be committing a criminal offence. This could include an individual using the 'Dr' title to imply they are registered and fit to practise medicine. Until he was contacted by The Telegraph, the Dr Sick website advertised 40-minute 'online medical consultations' with Mr Munaf for £150. A now-deleted webpage offered virtual appointments under the banner of 'expert medical advice' from 'fully registered doctors'. The booking app featured a 'Dr Asif Munaf' logo with a stethoscope. In small print, he described himself as a 'former doctor'. He also continues to style himself as 'Dr Asif Munaf' wearing hospital scrubs, a stethoscope, and listing his medical qualifications in promotional material across his online health ventures. Mr Munaf said: 'Dr Sick doesn't offer 'medical consultations' – we offer medical certification from registered doctors. This is not a GP surgery, nor is it pretending to be. No stethoscopes, no pretending to be House MD here. As for my own consultations, these are heath and lifestle [sic] focused.' Trustpilot reviews for Dr Sick are mixed. Some praised the fast service and said employers accepted their notes. Others complained the certificates looked unprofessional. 'The letter literally says 'from dr sick' on it. Who wants to send that to their boss,' wrote one reviewer. Another said: 'It may come from genuine doctors, but it could not look more fake if they tried.' One user warned the service was open to abuse. 'I feel this is out of order whereby you are providing sick notes to people who simply fill out a questionnaire. We could all go off sick by simply paying a small fee,' she wrote. Dr Sick Ltd is not alone in offering same-day sick notes to paying customers. One rival firm, charging as little as £29.49, claims its notes are 'widely accepted by small and large employers alike' and boasts over 10,000 UK customers. Mr Munaf also runs AM Wellness Ltd, an 'integrative health' clinic launched in 2022, offering medical consultations, full-body MRI scans for £1,688 to detect cancer, intra-venous (IV) nutrient infusions, weight loss injections, blood tests and genetic screening. He told The Telegraph he does not 'administer anything medical' at the clinic. A GMC-registered GP joined as co-director last month. Despite offering a wide range of 'treatment and diagnostic services', AM Wellness Ltd is not registered with the CQC. Mr Munaf said this was 'because we legally don't need to be'. 'The CQC themselves confirmed our business model doesn't fall within their regulatory scope,' he added. A CQC spokesman referred The Telegraph to the list of 'regulated activities' defined in regulations made under the Health and Social Care Act 2008. These include doctor consultations, diagnostics such as MRI and blood tests, genetic screening and treatments using IVs and weight loss drugs. 'While we would not be able to make a speculative decision about particular providers, any provider wishing to carry out regulated activities is required to register with CQC to do so, this should be done before carrying out regulated activities,' the spokesman said. They added that anyone with concerns should contact the CQC, which 'can and has' prosecuted unregistered providers.

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Can you mix hay fever tablets with medication and alcohol?
Peter Thnoia, superintendent pharmacist at NHS-registered online pharmacy PillTime, is urging the public to double-check medication ingredients. He warns people taking sleeping tablets or tranquillisers, such as diazepam or zopiclone, face a "heightened risk of developing breathing difficulties" when these drugs are mixed with certain allergy treatments. While the NHS advises that it's generally okay to take hay fever tablets with other medications, it's always crucial to check for potential interactions and side effects. It's also wise to consult with a pharmacist or GP before taking hay fever tablets alongside other medications. Mr Thnoia, from PillTime, said: 'Hay fever is hitting the country hard, but taking these sedating-style tablets is a no-go if you're already taking medication to help you get to sleep. 'Not only will they both combine to sedate you, but it can impact breathing, and make you short of breath. 'It can also lead to dizziness and in extreme cases people could even fall unconscious.' The concern centres around first-generation antihistamines – the older type of hay fever medication commonly sold under brand names such as Piriton and Benadryl. These drugs are known for causing drowsiness, which can become dangerous when combined with other sedatives. Non-drowsy antihistamines, such as loratadine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine, are widely available and generally safe to take alongside sleep aids or tranquillisers. Mr Thnoia continued: 'These are becoming increasingly common on shelves and are less likely to cross the blood-brain barrier, so shouldn't cause the same sedative effects.' Even SSRIs, the most commonly prescribed class of antidepressants - such as sertraline - may carry similar risks, particularly when combined with older-generation antihistamines. One of the most commonly mixed substances with antihistamines that isn't a medicine at all – but can have the same dangerous effect when combined – is alcohol. Recommended reading: What is thunder fever and how does it affect your hay fever? 5 drinks that could help hay fever symptoms amid pollen bomb The hay fever hack all sufferers should know to avoid a season of the sniffles And it's easy to forget while having a good time in the sun that you've had both in the same day. Mr Thnoia added: 'Alcohol significantly amplifies the sedative effect of first-generation hay fever tablets, which can result in severe impairment and lead to unconsciousness or serious accidents. 'Even non-drowsy antihistamines can occasionally react with alcohol, depending on individual sensitivity, so it's best to avoid alcohol altogether if you're thinking of allergy medication.'