logo
Opinion - Trump's continues the American tradition of abandoning allies

Opinion - Trump's continues the American tradition of abandoning allies

Yahoo27-02-2025

President Trump's betrayal of Ukraine takes me back to 60 years ago, when I first set foot in Vietnam as a journalist after covering the end of the era of anti-Americanism in Indonesia and the downfall of Sukarno.
In the face of corruption, destructive political rivalries and the failure of U.S.-advised South Vietnamese forces, the Americans were having a deeper impact on the Vietnamese than many realized. It was not that 'we are winning,' as U.S. commanders claimed, but that American influence pervaded every corner of the culture of what we then called South Vietnam to differentiate it from the perceived enemy, North Vietnam.
As I flew in and out of Vietnam on extended visits from Hong Kong and then Tokyo, then spent a couple of years writing a book in the venerable Hotel Majestic overlooking the Saigon River, I came to realize how much the Vietnamese not only counted on their American ally and benefactor but also how they trusted us. Whatever journalists might write on the horrors of the war, the disruption of civilized life and the unlikelihood of a happy ending, millions of South Vietnamese depended on the American forces in their midst.
That's why it came as such an incredible shock when the Americans cut and ran 50 years ago, leaving the South Vietnamese to fend for themselves against the North Vietnamese.
Who would have thought the Americans — big and rich, arrogant and often ignorant as they were — would not come to their rescue as the North Vietnamese poured southward, taking over town after town, base after base, until the fall of the Saigon regime on April 30, 1975? About 3 million people from South Vietnam and neighboring Cambodia and Laos fled over the next two decades — hundreds of thousands on fishing boats. Tens of thousands of them died.
Likewise, as many as 2.8 million Cambodians were killed during more than three years of Khmer Rouge rule after the U.S. stopped showering the Phnom Penh regime with military aid and stopped the air support that had held the Khmer Rouge at bay.
It is easy to rationalize all this suffering by saying the Americans should never have plunged into the war there in the first place. A significant number of Americans were anti-war — many sympathetic with the communist government in Hanoi. And the American bug-out ranks as the most humiliating defeat in American history until now. It set the pattern for debacles in which U.S. forces have withdrawn, fled or yielded to the enemy when politicians willing to compromise with foes at home and abroad tired of waging war.
That's essentially what Trump has been doing in Ukraine: begging his friend, Russia's President Vladimir Putin, for negotiations that would sanctify Russia's gains — and set the stage for the next phase of a struggle in which the Russians would fight to take over all Ukraine, as they did during Tsarist rule and again during the communist era, with Joseph Stalin grabbing Ukraine's rich agricultural products, notably wheat, leaving millions to die.
Ever since the defeat of the old Saigon regime, we've been facing more compromise and more defeat. As the winners of two world wars, having defended the southern 'half' of the Korean peninsula against North Korean and Chinese onslaughts, the U.S. has suffered setbacks in just about every significant conflict in which our presidents have invested arms or lives. Vietnam may rank as our worst total defeat, but we can't say we haven't lost a few since then.
We are still living with the aftermath of George W. Bush's decision to order American forces into Iraq in 2003, overthrowing Saddam Hussein. I arrived in Baghdad in June 2004 on the day Bush transferred 'sovereignty' to a Baghdad regime that could hardly survive without the infusion of more than 100,000 American troops plus air support and arms. Now the regime is left with 2,000 or so U.S. military advisers offering clues on how to survive against its Iran-backed foes and remnants of the Islamic State.
Trump, in a foretaste of what he's doing to Ukraine, abandoned the Kurds in southern Turkey and Syria to the mercies of the Turks during his first presidency. Next, though he loudly denies it, Trump shares responsibility with his much maligned successor, former President Joe Biden, for abandoning the Afghan regime that the U.S. had been defending for a decade. First, Trump pulled about 10,000 American troops out of Afghanistan and then made a deal with the Taliban to withdraw American support. As with his effort at bullying Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky into compliance, so he overlooked the former Afghan government. Trump loves to blame Biden for the fiasco of the final American pullout in August 2021, but Trump had already decided the war was over for the U.S.
It would be nice to rationalize America's decisions, from Vietnam onward, to cut and run as necessary or inevitable, but we see the same scenario playing out in Ukraine. The war, as fought with tens of billions of dollars' worth of American arms and ammunition, is not likely to end well — at least, as far as Trump is concerned — so why not make a deal with Putin? Trump may claim that he's getting Putin to agree to settle for what the Russians have already carved out in the eastern and southeastern Donbas region, as well as Crimea, but we must assume Putin wants the rest of the country too — and will fight to get it on some spurious pretext.
Or was this all a negotiating strategy, to bring Zelensky to the table? Ukraine and the U.S. will be meeting on Friday in D.C. to discuss a 'natural resources deal' as 'part of future security guarantees.' Interesting, but with Russia dead-set against 'peace-keepers' from European members of NATO in Ukraine guaranteeing the peace, we can be none too sure Putin will go for it.
After Ukraine, Trump will face still more challenges, but it's questionable if he will reverse the trend. What if President Xi Jinping finally decides to take on the independent island state of Taiwan, 90 miles from Chinese mainland at the closest point? Or, what if Xi wants to attack the Philippines from bases the Chinese have built in the South China Sea, which China says is all theirs? Trump may make a show of challenging the Chinese in a terrible trade war, but we can be pretty sure that he would not order a strong defense of either Taiwan, which Biden assured we're 'committed' to defend, or the Philippines, with which Biden strengthened our alliance.
For that matter, what about South Korea? Would Trump be likely to wage a second Korean War to protect it again? North Korea's hereditary dictator, Kim Jong Un, grandson of Kim Il Sung, founder of the regime that's now a 'nuclear power,' as Trump has called it, today threatens our side with much worse devastation. Trump has repeated traditional calls for 'Complete, Verifiable, Irreversible Dismantlement' of North Korea's nuclear program, but he's been 'in love' with Kim ever since their first summit in Singapore in June 2018. Let us not forget that he spoke during his first term of withdrawing most of America's 28,500 troops from the South, playing into Kim's strategy for reuniting the Korean peninsula on his own harsh terms.
Kim's new relationship with Putin, to whom he is providing arms and troops, may pave the way for another Trump-Kim summit, if Trump forces a deal with Putin on Ukraine while excluding Ukraine's president from the process. Then look for Trump, after putting on a tough-guy show on slashing China's enormous trade surplus with the U.S., to kowtow before China's president, promising they would do 'everything possible to make the World more peaceful and safe!' Those words, eerily similar to his praise for Putin, don't foretell a stout defense of America's Asian friends against Chinese bullying and worse.
Donald Kirk has been a journalist for more than 60 years, focusing much of his career on conflict in Asia and the Middle East, including as a correspondent for the Washington Star and Chicago Tribune. He is currently a freelance correspondent covering North and South Korea, and is the author of several books about Asian affairs.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who will be Trump's new Silicon Valley bestie?
Who will be Trump's new Silicon Valley bestie?

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Who will be Trump's new Silicon Valley bestie?

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms founder and CEO Zuckerberg was something of a MAGA stan earlier this year. Meta, his company, dropped $1 million on Trump's inauguration, and Zuck even co-hosted a black-tie soirée that night to honor the second-time president. Now, with Meta in the throes of a federal antitrust lawsuit, Zuckerberg may not be on Trump's good side. But the Meta CEO could be playing the long game here: He snapped up a $23 million, 15,000 square-foot DC mega mansion, establishing more of a presence in the capital. Zuck has also been on a bit of a rebrand journey, from a hoodie-wearing founder to a gold chain-wearing CEO with unapologetic swagger. Part of this transformation has included podcast appearances, like an episode with Trump-endorsing Joe Rogan in which Zuck talked about his "masculine energy" and his proclivity for bowhunting. Sam Altman, OpenAI cofounder and CEO Altman has also been circling the throne. First came Stargate: the $100 billion AI infrastructure plan between OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, announced the day after Trump's inauguration. Then, in May, the OpenAI CEO joined Trump on a trip to Saudi Arabia while Altman was working on a massive deal to build one of the world's largest AI data centers in Abu Dhabi. This reportedly rattled Musk enough to tag along at the last minute, according to the Wall Street Journal. OpenAI was ultimately selected for the deal, which Musk allegedly attempted to derail, the Wall Street Journal reported. Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder and executive chairman, Washington Post owner, and Blue Origin founder Back in 2015, Bezos wanted to launch Trump into orbit after the at-the-time presidential candidate fired shots at Bezos on what was Twitter, now X, calling the Washington Post, which Bezos owns, a "tax shelter," Bezos responded that he'd use Blue Origin, a space company Bezos founded, to "#sendDonaldtospace." Times have certainly changed. In January, Bezos said he is "very optimistic" about the administration's space agenda. Behind the scenes, he has reportedly given Trump political advice, allegedly as early as the summer of 2024, according to Axios. There was a brief flare-up in April, though, after Amazon reportedly considered listing Trump's tariffs next to products' prices on the site, according to Punchbowl News. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the plan a "hostile and political action." The idea, which was never implemented, was scrapped, and an Amazon spokesperson insisted it was only ever meant for its low-cost Haul store. If Trump does cancel Musk's SpaceX government contracts as he threatened to do, Bezos' Blue Origin, and rival to SpaceX, could stand to benefit. Blue Origin already has a $3 billion contract with NASA. Jensen Huang, Nvidia cofounder and CEO While Huang was notably missing from Trump's second inauguration in January, he did attend the Middle East trip in May. Nvidia is partnering with Oracle, SoftBank, and G42 on the OpenAI data center plans in the UAE. But Nvidia hasn't gotten off too easy: In April, Trump banned the chip maker from selling its most advanced chips, the H20, to China, a move that Nvidia says cost it $5.5 billion and reportedly prompted the company to modify the chip for China to circumvent US export controls. Sundar Pichai, Google CEO In April, a federal judge ruled that Google holds an illegal monopoly in some advertising technology markets. This is one of two major legal blows to Google in the past year: Back in August 2024, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust law with its online search. If Google has to sell Chrome, Barclays told clients on Monday, Alphabet stock could fall 25%. This flurry of litigation — and potential divestment of the Chrome business — puts Pichai between a rock and a hard place. While the CEO was spotted with the rest of the technorati at Trump's inauguration, it's hard to say how he might cozy up to Trump, and whether friendly relations would do anything to remedy these rulings.

Trump boasts of ‘big win' over AP as court allows WH to ban access after ‘Gulf of America' spat
Trump boasts of ‘big win' over AP as court allows WH to ban access after ‘Gulf of America' spat

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump boasts of ‘big win' over AP as court allows WH to ban access after ‘Gulf of America' spat

President Trump celebrated a 'big win' Friday as a federal appeals court ruled that his administration can ban the Associated Press from entering the Oval Office and other restricted areas amid its ongoing legal spat with the outlet over the Gulf of America. The White House can now restrict the wire service from the Oval Office, Mar-a-Lago and Air Force One, per a split 2-1 ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. 'Big WIN over AP today,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' The court ruled Friday that certain White House spaces aren't open to the public or large press pools – effectively giving officials the power to decide which journalists and outlets get access, CNN reported. The decision comes after a lower court judge blocked the administration from restricting the AP from privileged areas where the press is typically allowed. 'We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options,' a spokesperson for the Associated Press told the outlet. The legal dispute erupted in February when the White House barred the outlet from the Oval Office in response to the agency's refusal to update its style guide to reflect Trump's executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. The AP, which manages the media's go-to style guide 'Associated Press Stylebook,' argued the large ocean basin has been called the Gulf of Mexico for 'more than 400 years' and other international groups have not acknowledged the change. 'VICTORY! As we've said all along, the Associated Press is not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in other sensitive locations,' White House press secretary Karoline Levitt posted to X following the ruling. 'Thousands of other journalists have never been afforded the opportunity to cover the President in these privileged spaces. Moving forward, we will continue to expand access to new media so that more people can cover the most transparent President in American history rather than just the failing legacy media. 'And by the way @AP, it's still the Gulf of America.' Hundreds of reporters have a so-called 'hard pass' which allows access to the White House briefing room and press working area. A second, more limited group of journalists — referred to as the pool — is granted access to more intimate or restricted events with greater opportunity to ask the president face-to-face questions. The pool used to be decided by the White House Correspondents Association, until the Trump administration took it over to hand-pick which journalists they could add to — or remove from — the pool. The AP previously had access to the president's limited events every day alongside fellow wires Reuters and Bloomberg. Now only one wire service is allowed in the pool each day.

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison says current executive overreach is new in country's history
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison says current executive overreach is new in country's history

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison says current executive overreach is new in country's history

Jun. 6---- Although state attorneys general and other agencies are currently prevailing in court rulings against what they argue is executive overreach by the administration, there is still a concern the targeted agencies and departments — created by — may be forever damaged by the administration's attempts to dismantle them. Minnesota Attorney General says he hopes that is not the case, but he does not know. "I don't think anybody really knows," Ellison told the West Central Tribune in an interview Thursday after a presentation he gave in Willmar. "Our country's never been through this. I mean, from (President George) Washington until now, we've never had a president who's decided, 'I'm going to wreck the administrative state. I'm going to persecute the press by suing them. I'm going to persecute law firms. I'm going to ignore the courts.' This is new." Since taking office on Jan. 20 through May 23, Trump signed 157 executive orders, compared to the 220 executive orders he signed during his entire first term in office, according to For further comparison, signed 162 executive orders during his four-year term, signed 277 executive orders in his eight years in office and signed 291 executive orders during his eight years in office. During Ellison's presentation Thursday at the League of Women Voter of the Willmar Area monthly "Hot Topics" event, he explained the constitutional way to accomplish what the Trump administration is trying to accomplish — by going through Congress. "It's true that you can change birthright citizenship if you change the 14th Amendment," Ellison said. Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, to end birthright citizenship for certain people born in the U.S., which is currently being challenged in the courts. "You can even abolish the Department of Education if you introduce a bill in the House and in the Senate, you go through the committee process and then the president signs that bill into law," Ellison continued. "But what you cannot do, and which it is absolutely not conservative to do, is to just get rid of the Department of Education through an edict or proclamation, also known as the executive orders. ... You've got to operate constitutionally." He said he is not aware of another time in American history when the head of state used unconstitutional action to dismantle every American institution, which he and 23 other attorneys general are working hard to prevent through lawsuits. Ellison gave numerous examples of the issues that have been caused by the Trump administration's executive orders, including chaos and confusion. One of the lawsuits brought forth by the attorneys general is against the Trump administration's tariffs. Ellison served in the U.S. House from 2007 to 2019, including 12 years on the Financial Services Committee. "I'm not 100% against tariffs," he said. "I think there are times to use tariffs, but you don't have them on again, off again, 50% today, 100% tomorrow, back down to zero, back up to 50%," Ellison said. "... That is the surest way to ruin the economy." The Trump administration has also been sued over placing conditions on federal funding if local law enforcement agencies do not enforce immigration laws. Ellison explained that local law enforcement has its own jobs to do and the federal government is responsible for enforcing immigration laws. "I will not interfere with (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) if you have a judicial warrant to arrest somebody and put them in removal proceedings," Ellison said. "I demand, as an American, that they have due process rights, but I'm not going to get in the way of it if that's the legal process." Another lawsuit making its way through the courts is regarding the impoundment of federal education funding for K-12 schools that are teaching diversity, equity and inclusion. He pointed out that Secretary of Education Linda E. McMahon was asked if teaching African American history would be a violation and she said that she did not know. "Well, of course, she doesn't know, because it's not defined in law anywhere," he said. "There is no working definition (of diversity, equity and inclusion) that you can apply across the board as to what they say you can't do." The Trump administration attempt to force voters to prove their citizenship before being allowed to cast a ballot will affect millions of eligible voters who may find it difficult to produce their birth certificate or or other needed documentation if they have changed their name. Ellison said he used to be an advocate for a nationwide voting system to ensure uniform voting throughout the country. "I now no longer think that's a good idea, because the saving grace of this moment is to have 50 different voting systems," he said. " ... In a way, this ended up being a strength, because he cannot just go to some federal voting agency and say, 'Do it my way.' It's state by state." The Trump administration is also being sued in relation to transgender rights, with which not everyone in the audience would agree, Ellison noted during his presentation Thursday. When U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi threatened to sue Minnesota over its law allowing transgender youth to play for the sports team with which they identify, Ellison sued first. He said he believes that youth sports is about hanging out with friends, learning sportsmanship and learning not to quit. "I believe sports are good for kids, and kids should get to play. That's where I'm coming from," he said. He is also suing the Trump administration over its threat to pull congressionally-approved federal funding for medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store