We've hit rock bottom
The new leader of the Conservative group on Shropshire Council has said support for the party has "hit rock bottom" in the county.
Dan Thomas, 33, has taken the reins of a Tory group that lost 30 seats at this month's election - and with it, control of the council.
Both the Liberal Democrats, who will form the next administration, and Reform UK took seats from the Conservative group on 1 May.
The party is now the third largest group on the council having held just seven seats.
Shropshire's Conservative influence has been in freefall in recent years, with the party losing support in almost every vote since the last set of Shropshire Council elections in May 2021.
The party unexpectedly lost the North Shropshire parliamentary seat to Lib Dem Helen Morgan in the 2021 by-election; four councillors in the 2023 set of Telford and Wrekin Council elections; and two further MPs, in Shrewsbury and Telford, in last year's general election.
The nail in the coffin was losing control of Shropshire Council, in a large, rural county, which the Tories had led since it became a unitary authority in 2009.
"In our worst nightmares we didn't think we'd be down this low, to just seven [councillors]," said Dan Thomas, a father-of-two from Much Wenlock, who was elected in 2021 along with 42 other Conservatives.
"It's a real shame because there were so many respected, hardworking Conservative councillors who lost their seats.
"I can't see it getting any worse," he added.
Despite his party's dire performance in this month's local elections, Dan Thomas did incredibly well in Much Wenlock, receiving more than 50% of the vote.
The new town mayor for 2025-26 said he was "relieved" to have kept his seat but described the loss of experienced politicians, from all parties, as "ugly".
He blamed national politics and a lack of central government funding for the decline of Conservative support since 2021.
"When things aren't going well it's the parties in power that pay the price and we saw that with the general election last year," Thomas said.
"For us, [introducing a] garden waste charge didn't help, but that's something we had to do because that's £4m of revenue, which has made a massive difference to the council's finances.
"We weren't good enough at explaining that to the electorate.
"We were ultimately, and the Liberal Democrat group will be the same, asking people to pay more tax but essentially get less."
Thomas has replaced Lezley Picton, who led Shropshire Council from 2021, as leader of the Conservative group. She announced earlier this year that she would not be standing for re-election.
"We can certainly come back," said Thomas, who lives in Much Wenlock with his US wife Sara and two children, Eric and Penelope, aged three and 18 months.
"We need to define what we are and win the battle on the economy.
"Whether it's in Westminster or in Shropshire, we must be responsible in opposition to show that we're the grown ups."
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Reform UK new group leader 'up for the challenge'
Council looks for way out of relief road scheme
Lib Dems win control of Shropshire Council
Shropshire Council's new councillors
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage accused of ‘fantasy promises' with expensive policy pledges
Nigel Farage has been accused of leaving a multibillion-pound black hole at the heart of his party's spending plans after unveiling a series of expensive policy pledges to be paid for by cutting nonexistent items of government spending. The Reform UK leader laid out a series of economic promises at a speech on Tuesday designed to take advantage of disquiet among Labour voters at the government's policies on taxes and benefits. But while Farage promised up to £80bn worth of new spending – including scrapping the two-child benefit cap and increasing winter fuel payments – he did not explain exactly how they could be paid for. Helen Miller, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: 'The risk is that we hear much more about sizeable giveaways on tax and benefits while getting nothing like the same amount of specificity about the big cuts to spending on public services that would be needed for the plan to be implementable.' One of Farage's main revenue-raising policies is to scrap the government's commitment to reaching net zero by 2050, which he said would save £45bn a year, citing calculations by the Institute for Government (IfG). But Jill Rutter, a senior fellow at the IfG, said the Reform leader had used a figure that included both public sector and private sector investment. 'The bulk of spending on energy infrastructure is going to come from the private sector – but closing private sector projects won't generate money for the government,' she said. Labour accused Reform of making 'fantasy promises', while the Liberal Democrats called his speech 'Trussonomics on steroids'. The Climate Change Committee says net zero will require investment of £26bn a year, more than two-thirds of which will be provided by the private sector. That will be offset, however, by about £22bn a year of savings the policy will enable. Tim Montgomerie, a political commentator and Reform supporter, told the BBC: 'I wouldn't say the numbers do add up yet, I readily concede that.' He said it was too far away from the election to demand the party deliver a fully costed policy platform. Farage himself admitted his sums might not add up, but insisted they gave 'an idea of direction, policy, of priorities, of what we think is important, of what we think it is going to cost'. The Reform leader set out his latest policy pledges during a speech in central London at which he made three main policy announcements: ending the two-child benefit cap, reversing the cuts to winter fuel payments and increasing tax breaks for married couples. He refused, however, to guarantee keeping the pensions triple lock, which ensures the state pension rises by the highest of inflation, earnings growth or 2.5% a year. The IFS calculated that when added to a separate promise to increase the threshold at which people start paying income taxes to £20,000, the policies could cost between £50bn and £80bn a year. Related: Watch Labour's flip-flopping on winter fuel and benefits, and you'll see who's really considered important | Frances Ryan Farage said his policies were in part about fairness, but also designed to encourage families to have more children, a social policy frequently espoused on the right. 'We believe lifting the two-child cap is the best thing to do, not because we support a benefits culture but because we believe for lower-paid workers this actually makes having children just a little bit easier for them,' he said. He also promised more generous tax breaks for married people should he win the next election, saying he would raise the amount of tax-free allowance that someone can transfer to their spouse from £1,260 to £5,000. He added that he wanted more stringent controls on abortion as well. 'I think it's ludicrous, absolutely ludicrous, that we can allow abortion up to 24 weeks, and yet, if a child is born prematurely at 22 weeks, your local hospital will move heaven and earth and probably succeed in that child surviving and going on and living a normal life,' he said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves gambles on ‘renewing Britain' to win trust of voters and see off Reform
Rachel Reeves has gambled billions of pounds of infrastructure spending on 'renewing Britain' before the next election but faces a challenge to convince voters Labour can deliver change amid deep cuts to everyday spending. The chancellor admitted that 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the change they voted for when Labour was swept to power with a huge majority last year. With many Labour MPs already feeling unsettled about the electoral threat of Reform UK, she has already launched a charm offensive to convince them that her spending review on Wednesday was not a return to austerity. Economists warned that mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel payments for pensioners and Labour MPs' backlash against disability benefit cuts, meant Reeves could be forced to raise taxes or look for more savings in the autumn. There could be other tax increases ahead, with the Treasury's calculations being based on assumptions that local authorities will put up council tax by the maximum 4.99% a year for three years to fund services, including adult social care. Writing in the Guardian, Keir Starmer said departmental budgets, which will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, showed the government had 'entered a new stage' in its efforts to transform the country. 'It is an investment in Britain's renewal, so working people have more money in their pocket, more pride in their community and more hope for their children's future,' he wrote. The NHS and defence were the big winners of the spending review, with 90% of the increase in the day-to-day budget over the next three years going to health and 80% of the boost in capital spending going to defence, according to the Resolution Foundation. However, it means other Whitehall departments, including the Home Office, Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, and the departments of culture, transport and environment, all face real terms cuts to their everyday budgets, as does the Foreign Office, mainly as a result of aid cuts. Ministers have been chastened by polls which suggest that Labour's decision to increase spending overall at the autumn budget has not yet filtered through to voters, after a bumpy first year in power, contentious decisions over welfare cuts and a rise in national insurance for employers. A growing clamour for change has been reflected in a surge in support for Reform UK. In her statement to MPs, Reeves reminded them that Nigel Farage, the party's leader, had described Liz Truss's disastrous mini budget as 'the best Conservative budget since the 1980s'. She said Reform was 'itching to do the same thing all over again' and had already racked up £80bn in unfunded spending commitments since the last election. 'They are simply not serious,' she said. In response to a threat from the right, the chancellor made a high-stakes promise to cut spending on asylum hotels by the end of the parliament, which she said would save £1bn. There was also £280m more a year for the new Border Security Command. But the Home Office will receive a budget cut that will extend beyond the asylum savings, causing alarm from police officers and the London mayor, Sadiq Khan. The government set out its version of Elon Musk's 'Doge' efficiency pledges, suggesting they would make cuts of £14bn through operational improvements, digital transformation, cutting consultants and implementing AI. Despite free school meals being expanded to at least 500,000 more pupils, lifting 100,000 out of poverty, school budgets will be squeezed. Teachers will get a 4% pay rise next year via additional funding of £615m but schools will have to fund about a quarter of it themselves. The spending review marked the culmination of months of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet colleagues. Negotiations with the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, went down to the wire. In recent days, ministers announced £15bn for transport outside London, £14.2bn to build a new nuclear power station and an increase that will almost double government spending on affordable housing to nearly £40bn over the next 10 years. After months of speculation over the government's commitment to net zero, Reeves confirmed ministers would not cut Labour's landmark £13.2bn fund to fix draughty homes. Reeves drew a comparison with the 2.9% cut in the austerity years under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition – a retort to her critics who have accused her of a return to austerity. 'Austerity was a destructive choice for the fabric of our society, and it was a destructive choice for our economy, too, choking off investment and demand,' she said. 'Creating a lost decade for growth, wages and living standards – that is their legacy. My choices are different. My choices are Labour choices.' Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, hailed the 'genuinely big sums' the chancellor had set aside for infrastructure projects, but warned that some departments' day-to-day spending plans look tight. 'The funding increases for health and defence are substantial. The corollary, of course, is a less generous settlement elsewhere,' he said. Reeves changed her fiscal rules in last autumn's budget to pave the way for a £113bn uplift in investment spending, and Wednesday's statement set out details of where this funding will be allocated – much of it aimed outside London and the south-east. Beneficiaries include green energy, social housing and transport. The Treasury hopes such projects will create jobs (including in deprived areas), help to make the UK's sluggish economy more productive, and kickstart growth. As well as changing Treasury rules to support investment in England's regions, the spending review provides £52bn for Scotland, £20bn for Northern Ireland and £23bn for Wales. 'We are renewing Britain. But I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it,' Reeves said. 'My task as chancellor and the purpose of this spending review is to change that. To ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs, and on their high streets.' As the chancellor insisted she would stick to her fiscal rules – including meeting day-to-day spending through tax receipts – experts warned that any economic shock could push her plans off course. Andrew Goodwin, chief economist at consultancy Oxford Economics, said: 'Considering the government's recent U-turn on winter fuel payments could be a precursor to higher government spending in other areas, it looks increasingly likely that substantial tax increases will be needed.' Ruth Curtice, director of the Resolution Foundation, said: 'After a summer of spending, the budget this autumn will be far more challenging. The economic outlook is looking weaker – not stronger – since the spring, and that will require more tax rises or welfare cuts for the chancellor to meet her fiscal rules.' The shadow chancellor, Mel Stride, called it a 'spend-now, tax-later review', adding that Reeves 'knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes and a cruel summer of speculation awaits'.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Julian Harris: Labour Reverts to Type
A few months ago during a news meeting here at Bloomberg, I wondered out loud whether Keir Starmer saw himself as the head of a centrist government that just happened to have a Labour party attached to it. Was the prime minister effectively daring Labour backbenchers and activists to challenge him, knowing they wouldn't do so for fear of ushering Nigel Farage into power? Would the parliamentary term play out as a five-year game of chicken?
