Madras HC refuses to entertain PIL seeking action against former judges for alleged interference in judicial process
CHENNAI: Madras high court on Wednesday refused to entertain a PIL seeking action against seven former judges of the HC, led by Justice B Chandru, for allegedly interfering with the judicial process by addressing a letter to Justice G R Swaminathan, urging him to refrain from initiating contempt action against advocate S Vanchinathan.
Madurai-based lawyer Vanchinathan lodged a complaint with the Chief Justice of India (CJI), making allegations of 'caste-based bias' against Justice Swaminathan.
Refusing to concur with the submissions of advocate G S Mani, representing the petitioner 'journalist' Varaaki, that the letter issued by the seven retired judges amounts to interference with the administration of justice, the first bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan asked, "Do you feel that such judges are influenced by such issues?"
You Can Also Check:
Chennai AQI
|
Weather in Chennai
|
Bank Holidays in Chennai
|
Public Holidays in Chennai
|
Gold Rates Today in Chennai
|
Silver Rates Today in Chennai
"This plea is nothing but publicity-seeking litigation.
The issue will be dealt with on the administrative side of the court. We do not want people like you to poke your nose into such matters," the bench said.
The issue pertains to a complaint lodged by Madurai-based advocate S Vanchinathan, alleging 'caste-based bias' against Justice
Swaminathan
to the CJI.
On the presumption that the bench headed by Justice Swaminathan was likely to initiate contempt of court action against Vanchinathan, seven former judges of the court, led by Justice B Chandru, addressed a communication to Justice Swaminathan to refrain from initiating any such action, as it is for the CJI to take a call on the complaint.
Alleging that the appeal made by the seven retired judges to Justice Swaminathan amounts to interference in judicial proceedings, Varaaki moved the present plea in the form of a PIL seeking action against the former judges.
He wanted the court to forbid the retired judges from issuing public letters, appeals, or statements intended to influence pending judicial proceedings, particularly in matters involving allegations against sitting judges of the HC.
Advocate Mani contended that the communication made by the retired judges damaged the dignity and integrity of the judiciary, particularly Justice Swaminathan.
The former judges might have stopped after issuing the communication to Justice Swaminathan, but the same was widely circulated on social media. Even the contents of the complaint against the judge were shared by Vanchinathan on social media, he alleged.
If such practices are entertained, how will the sitting judges of the court pass orders in sensitive matters, the petitioner said.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
SC To Hear Plea For Intervention To Save Kerala Nurse Nimisha Priya
The Supreme Court will on Thursday hear a petition seeking urgent intervention in the case of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, who has been sentenced to death in Yemen. The matter will be taken up by a bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta. Nimisha Priya, a native of Kerala, was convicted by a Yemeni court for the murder of a Yemeni national in 2017. While her execution has been temporarily deferred, activists and humanitarian organisations have been pressing for diplomatic and legal efforts to secure her release or commute her sentence. The Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council, an advocacy group formed to campaign for her release, had approached the Central Government seeking permission for a delegation to travel to Yemen. The aim was to initiate negotiations with the victim's family in accordance with Yemeni law, which allows for a pardon in return for payment of "blood money". However, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had earlier rejected the council's request, citing severe security risks in Yemen, where armed conflict and political instability continue to pose a threat to foreign nationals. The ministry had informed the petitioners that it could not grant travel clearance to the war-torn country under the current circumstances. In the hearing, the Centre is expected to apprise the Apex Court of the current legal and diplomatic status of the case. The court will also consider the petitioner's contention that, without direct engagement in Yemen, securing Nimisha Priya's release would be nearly impossible. The Action Council's plea has urged the court to direct the government to make every possible diplomatic effort, including facilitating authorised representatives to negotiate with the victim's family. They argue that time is running out as her death sentence, though stayed for now, could be enforced if a resolution is not reached soon. The case has drawn significant attention from human rights groups, the Indian diaspora, and Kerala's political leadership, who have repeatedly appealed for urgent action. The Supreme Court's proceedings on this matter are expected to set the tone for the next phase of legal and diplomatic engagement.
NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Donald Trump Signs Order Easing Space Regulations In A Boost To Elon Musk's SpaceX
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday easing regulations for the private space industry, including eliminating some environmental reviews, in a move likely to please his erstwhile advisor Elon Musk. The executive order, which said it aimed to "substantially" increase the number of space launches in the United States, was described by an environmental group as "reckless." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has talked up several space missions including sending humans to the Moon and Mars. The Moon and Mars missions are planned to get a ride on the massive Starship rocket of Musk's private firm SpaceX. However, Starship has had a series of setbacks, with its latest routine test ending in a fiery explosion in June. SpaceX dominates the global launch market, with its various-sized rockets blasting off more than 130 times last year -- and that number looks set to rise after Trump's executive order. "It is the policy of the United States to enhance American greatness in space by enabling a competitive launch marketplace and substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence" by 2030, the order read. The change could well benefit Musk, who has long advocated for deregulation of the space industry. The world's richest man was previously a close advisor to Trump before the pair had a dramatic, public falling out in July. The executive order also called on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy -- who was at the signing and is currently NASA's administrator -- "to eliminate or expedite the Department of Transportation's environmental reviews" for launches. SpaceX has been repeatedly criticized over the environmental impact at the sites where Starship, the largest and most powerful rocket in history, blasts off. The US-based nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity said Trump's new executive order "paves the way for the massive destruction of protected plants and animals." "This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas," the center's Jared Margolis said in a statement. Musk's dreams of colonizing Mars rely on the success of Starship, and SpaceX has been betting that its "fail fast, learn fast" ethos will eventually pay off. The Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in annual Starship rocket launches from five to 25 in early May, stating that the increased frequency would not adversely affect the environment. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Belekeri scam: ED raids houses of Congress MLA Sail, two businessmen
KARWAR/HOSAPETE: The Enforcement Directorate raided the residences of Congress MLA Satish Sail in Karwar and two Hosapete-based businessmen on Wednesday morning, in connection with the Belekeri illegal iron ore export case. However, the MLA was in Bengaluru for the monsoon session when 20 officers in six cars arrived at his house at Sadashivgad early in the morning. A Special Court for trying cases against elected representatives had sentenced Sail to seven years in prison with a fine of Rs 9 crore. Later, the Karnataka High Court had suspended his sentence. Sources said the raid continued till late Wednesday evening. In Hosapete, the ED officers searched the houses and properties of businessmen Karadapudi Mahesh and Swastik Nagaraj from 5.30 am. Mahesh, who also serves as a city municipal council member, resides in JP Nagar. He owns a free purified drinking water unit near Ballari Circle, where he also runs an office and a steel shop. ED officials were carrying out inspections at all three locations. Nagaraj's residence is located in Rajeev Nagar, with his office and a steel shop near the APMC yard. Searches were under way on these premises as well. More than four teams conducted the raids. Further details are awaited.
