Jersey and Guernsey leaders discuss AI at British-Irish summit
Leaders from Guernsey and Jersey have attended a summit with Irish, UK and other Crown dependency politicians to discuss artificial intelligence (AI).Jersey Chief Minister Lyndon Farnham and Guernsey's Policy and Resources President Lyndon Trott were among the guests at the 43rd British-Irish Council (BIC), which was held in Newcastle, Northern Ireland.They were joined by other leading politicians, including the first ministers of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin and representatives from Westminster.The theme of the meeting involved potential benefits and challenges of using AI in public administration, the States of Guernsey said.
'A vital forum'
The BIC was set up as part of the Good Friday Agreement to promote relationships between the UK, Ireland and Crown dependencies.Farnham said the summit allowed him and Jersey's External Relations Minister Ian Gorst to have "useful conversations" with other leading politicians which could benefit the island.He added: "The British-Irish Council remains a vital forum that brings together member administrations to discuss, and address, our many joint challenges and opportunities."Trott said it was the last BIC summit he would attend before he retired from politics at the end of this month following the election in Guernsey."It has been one of the great honours of my public life to represent Guernsey at the British-Irish Council table over the years during my times as chief minister," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Easy 30-second trick could stop you being conned out of £1,000s – but you'll need to call your family today
A DEVASTATING scam that can cost you thousands of pounds in seconds can easily be blocked – it just takes 30 seconds. The only catch is that you'll want to get ready for it in advance. One of the most common text-based scams out there right now is called the "Hi Mum" con. It's also known as the "friend in need" scam, and attempts to trick unsuspecting parents into handing over cash quickly. A crook will pose as your child and convince you to send cash in an emergency – but it's a total con. Thankfully, there's a very easy way to scupper it and keep your cash safe. WHAT IS THE SCAM? City of London Police's Action Fraud issued a major warning about the scam back in 2022, revealing that it had already cost users £1.5 million. "Criminals will typically claim to be a family member and will usually begin the conversation with 'Hello Mum' or 'Hello Dad'," Action Fraud explained. "They will say that they are texting from a new mobile number as their phone was lost or damaged and will go on to ask for money to purchase a new phone, or claim that they need money urgently to pay a bill. "The criminal will supply their bank details for payment, with some coming back on multiple occasions until the victim realises they've been scammed." Since then, the scam has only grown in popularity. In 2023, McAfee issued an alert warning of a "new threat" were crooks were using AI to carry out more convincing versions of the scam. Deepfakes more 'sophisticated' and dangerous than ever as AI expert warns of six upgrades that let them trick your eyes This even involved using AI voice-cloning tech to make the con work over phone calls. "With inexpensive and easy-to-use AI voice-cloning tools, fraudsters are delivering bespoke messages through calls or voicemails and fraudulently asking for help in the form of financial assistance," McAfee warned. "In the past, those wishing to create these assets needed to have both the time and technical ability to replicate voices. "But applications and tools that produce near instantaneous, highly believable results are now just a few clicks away." 3 The scam can turn up on chat apps like WhatsApp or iMessage, via email, or even over the phone using an AI-cloned voice. And it can be highly convincing: Brits have already lost millions to the con, with thousands sometimes being taken in a single attack. 'If you receive a message like this from a friend or family member, don't send any money until you've had a chance to call them and confirm their identity," said Detective Chief Inspector Craig Mullish. "Taking a moment to stop and think before parting with your money or information could keep you safe." ACTION FRAUD – THE OFFICIAL ADVICE Action Fraud advises that the public follow the advice of the Take Five to Stop Fraud campaign to keep themselves safe from fraud. Stop: Taking a moment to stop and think before parting with your money or information could keep you safe. Challenge: Could it be fake? It's okay to reject, refuse or ignore any requests. Only criminals will try to rush or panic you. Protect: If you think you've been a victim of fraud, contact your bank immediately and report it to Action Fraud online at or by calling 0300 123 2040. How to report You can report suspicious text messages you have received but not acted upon, by forwarding the original message to 7726, which spells SPAM on your keypad. You can report suspicious emails you have received but not acted upon, by forwarding the original message to report@ If you have provided personal or financial details as a result of a suspicious message, or lost money because of a scam, you should report it to Action Fraud at or by calling 0300 123 2040 HOW TO STAY SAFE – THE QUICK TRICK Of course, if a crook is using voice cloning or has taken over the family member's phone, checking with them through another method might not work. So that's where the clever trick comes in. You'll want to call your son or daughter (or mum or dad) today and set up a safe word or phrase. It can be anything really – like a fruit, a place, or a date – but not something obvious like your birthday or hometown. 3 Then whenever one of you ask's the other for money, you'll demand the safe word to verify the identity. Scammers will have no one of knowing this, as long as you haven't written it down somewhere on your devices. And it's an instant way to prevent the scam from going any further. It only takes half a minute to set up, and could save you from being conned out of thousands of pounds. So give your family members a call today and make sure you have safe words set up.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in red after NICs rise
Rachel Reeves has been accused of shortchanging the UK's devolved nations after leaving the Welsh, Scottish and northern Irish governments with multimillion-pound funding gaps. The chancellor said the Treasury would fully cover the 1.2% rise in national insurance contributions for employers on salaries above £5,000, which came in on 6 April. However, Reeves has calculated the amount of money needed by using the Barnett formula, which ensures funding increases proportional to England in terms of population. Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast – which all operate larger public sectors than England – now say they have been left in the red. The Celtic nations' finance officials have argued the move violates the UK's statement of funding policy, which states each constituent government is not allowed to act in a way that creates adverse financial implications for the others. The Welsh cabinet secretary for finance, Mark Drakeford, announced last week that the Welsh government would use £36m annually, taken from its reserves, to plug half the gap, but a further £36m would have to be funded by public sector employers, including health boards, all 22 local councils, Natural Resources Wales and Cardiff airport. The funding shortage amounts to cuts across the board of about 14%. Drakeford said: 'We have made our position very clear with the Treasury that using the Barnett formula in this instance is a breach of the rules. If this was a one-off, we may have been able to use more of our reserves to cover the shortfall, but as it is, this will unfairly impact Wales year after year.' The bill for Scotland's public services amounts to an estimated £700m, and about £200m in northern Ireland. The Treasury has agreed an additional £339m for Edinburgh and £146m for Belfast. Scotland's budget is already under significant pressure from the rising cost of devolved welfare benefits, public sector pay settlements, and new policy commitments – including the mitigation of the two-child limit. Holyrood's finance secretary, Shona Robison, has called repeatedly for the tax increase to be fully funded by the UK government. She said: 'We have been calling for the UK government to abandon its employer national insurance rise, which risks damaging the economy by making it harder for businesses to take on or keep staff. 'Failing that, we have asked that they fully fund this tax increase to ensure Scotland's NHS, councils and other public services don't lose out on vital revenue. 'As such, it is deeply disappointing that the funding falls so far short of the more than £700m bill we estimate public services face. It feels like Scotland is now being punished for having decided to employ more people in the public sector and to invest in key public services.' The UK government has defended the use of the Barnett formula in calculating public sector national insurance contributions. A spokesperson said the changes were 'in line with agreed funding arrangements and longstanding precedent'. However, the row has reignited a longstanding debate over whether the Barnett formula – in use since 1978 – is fit for purpose, and whether it should be reformed or scrapped in favour of a universal needs-based approach. It also adds to growing friction between the Welsh Labour and UK Labour administrations. Wales has consistently voted Labour for 100 years, and Welsh Labour has controlled the Senedd since its inception in 1999. However, with a year to go before the next Welsh elections, recent polling has suggested the party will trail in third place behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK, with just 18% of votes, putting the first minister and Welsh Labour leader, Eluned Morgan, under pressure to differentiate her wing of the party from its Westminster counterpart. Rory Carroll contributed reporting
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
‘It is a better programmer than me': The harsh reality of being laid off because of AI
The often-talked threat of artificial intelligence on jobs suddenly became very real and shocking to Jane, who asked to use a pseudonym for privacy reasons, when her human resources role became automated and she was laid off in January. She'd spent two years at her company managing benefits and was on track for a promotion. She'd noticed her boss building out AI infrastructure, but didn't think her position, which paid roughly $70,000 a year, would be affected. 'I thought that because I had put in so much time and been so good on the higher-level stuff, he would invest in me,' the 45-year-old Bay Area resident told The Independent about her former employer. 'Then, as soon as he had a way to automate it away, he did that. He just let go of me.' Making matters worse, current economic conditions made job hunting hard. In February, an AI system conducted one of her phone interviews. 'It was kind of like having an interview with an automated voicemail,' she said, adding that the 'robot' asked her questions about herself and responded with generic answers, leaving her unhopeful the technology would help her get to the next round. After several months unemployed, Jane obtained a government position in April, before starting a new gig in sales just a few weeks ago. 'What's happening is there's a huge white collar slowdown,' said Jane. 'I think jobs are going away.' Workers across the country are grappling with the same issue, as tech CEOs sound the alarm on a potential job market bloodbath in the coming years. In an Axios interview last month, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, a leading artificial intelligence company, predicted AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs and increase unemployment to 10 to 20 percent within the next five years. The general public is 'unaware that this is about to happen,' he told the outlet. 'It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it.' Perhaps no other sector has been hit harder than tech. Internet forums are flooded with workers relaying they've either been laid off or wondering when they might be. Software engineer Shawn K (his full last name is K) shared his experience on Substack of getting laid off as AI took over the company, in a now-viral post titled: The Great Displacement Is Already Well Underway. In March 2024, K, 42, was a full-stack engineer at His superiors encouraged employees to use ChatGPT and team productivity skyrocketed. A month later, he was laid off. He'd been in the industry for 21 years and was making $150,000. 'We had been reorienting the company towards AI, adding on AI features all throughout the software and trying to capitalize on AI to our customers, and then shortly after that kind of restructuring and strategizing...I got laid off,' he told The Independent. With two mortgages to cover, he started using Door Dash to do deliveries around his home in Central New York, just to make ends meet. After more than a year and nearly 800 applications, he finally landed a contract position earlier this month. 'I've tried a lot of stuff, like everything I can think of, I've lowered my standards over this past year of all the things I'm applying for and all the things I'm willing to consider,' he said. 'At some point, it gets to a situation where you need cash immediately to literally eat and pay your bills.' K believes AI will make some tech jobs obsolete — but the worker still has a place. 'AI is a better programmer than me, and that doesn't mean that I think that I have no value to offer anymore,' he said. 'I just think that means I can now do 100 times as much as what I was doing before, and solve harder problems that I wouldn't have even attempted before.' Now that his article has received so much attention, he wants people to take notice of the changes coming to the industry. 'I'm really convinced that anybody whose job is done on a computer all day is over. It's just a matter of time,' said K. Brian Ream, a 46-year-old high school and university tutor in Michigan, ran a medical transition business until AI caused demand to dry up. The business, which only generated a few thousand dollars a year, provided English translations for Portuguese medical journals. He started the business in 2014 after spending time in Brazil and learning the language but hasn't had an order in over a year. He knows most of his prior customers are now using Chat GPT and worries about the implications. 'When you're translating medical journal articles, this could have effects that are unintended,' said Ream, noting that some of his former clients could be translating articles with false medical information. Still, he acknowledges the technology could be useful and wants other educators to incorporate it into lessons. 'I wish that teachers were more connected to the tool and were able to teach students what it's capable of and what it's not capable of, so they don't try to use it for things that it can't do,' Ream said. 'The reality is, students are using this to write whole essays, and they're not learning how to do it themselves, so they don't know that the tool isn't capable of it.' As more employers require workers to use AI, he wants the next generation to be prepared — even if it destroyed his own business. 'You cannot stop this from happening,' Ream said.
