Mass Immigration Raid in Los Angeles: DHS, MS-13, Mayor's Anger और प्रदर्शन की पूरी कहानी
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Despite 60-day grace for H-1B visa holders, laid off workers get deportation notices; here's why
H-1B visa holders in the US, who have been laid off from their jobs, are getting deportation notices, despite a 60-day grace period being in place. The matter was reported by NAFSA -- an association of international educators. A Notice to Appear (NTA) begins the deportation process before an immigration judge. Image for representation(Unsplash) NAFSA stated that US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) was sending "Notices to Appear" to some H-1B holders whose employers were withdrawing the petitions after an 'employment separation'. The non-profit professional organization for professionals in all areas of international education said it was cognizant of the reports that such notices were being sent by the USCIS. A Notice to Appear (NTA) begins the deportation process before an immigration judge. DHS rules about deportation and grace period explained H-1B visa rules state that when the holder's employment ends – voluntarily or involuntarily – they and their dependents can stay in the US up to 60 days or till the I-94 expires, whichever comes earlier. Also Read | Green card rules change for married couples: See the new immigration guidelines This period is meant to help the individual seek new employment, change their visa status, or make plans to leave. NAFSA cited 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2) to make its case, which states 'An alien admitted or otherwise provided status in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 or TN classification and his or her dependents shall not be considered to have failed to maintain nonimmigrant status solely on the basis of a cessation of the employment on which the alien's classification was based, for up to 60 consecutive days or until the end of the authorized validity period, whichever is shorter, once during each authorized validity period.' However, 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2), apart from providing the 60-day grace period, also states that the 'DHS may eliminate or shorten this 60-day period as a matter of discretion.' NAFSA also noted that issuing NTAs solely on the basis of employers withdrawing the petitions is not in the scope of USCIS's February 28, 2025, issuance policy memo. The moves comes amid the Donald Trump government's crackdown on immigration.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
What's really behind the Trump administration's push to dismiss Harvard's international student lawsuit?
Trump administration moves to dismiss Harvard's international student lawsuit in US The Trump administration Friday filed a motion to dismiss Harvard University's lawsuit challenging efforts to prevent the institution from hosting international students. The case arose after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a May 22 letter revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification, a requirement for enrolling foreign students, and was followed by an executive proclamation barring certain foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard. The administration argues that the revocation of Harvard's SEVP certification is now "moot" following a recent filing stating the DHS will not enforce the May 22 letter. At the same time, it maintains the presidential proclamation barring international students from attending Harvard is constitutional. Harvard contends the proclamation violates the university's First Amendment rights and represents retaliation for protected speech, according to the Harvard Crimson. Legal background of the lawsuit Harvard initially brought the lawsuit in response to the DHS's May 22 decision to revoke the university's SEVP certification, but amended its complaint after President Donald Trump issued the June 4 executive proclamation. This proclamation barred foreign students from entering the US if their courses were fully online due to Covid-19 restrictions. The Trump administration's lawyers contend the president has the authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to restrict entry to the US on national security grounds. They argue that allowing Harvard's foreign students to attend courses could "pose a serious risk to the nation." However, Harvard challenges this interpretation, asserting that the law does not grant the president such sweeping powers to ban students on nonimmigrant visas. The university also argues the revocation letter and proclamation are unlawful and lack proper constitutional justification, as reported by the Harvard Crimson. Judge's response and ongoing injunctions US District Judge Allison D. Burroughs has so far shown reluctance to accept the government's arguments. She granted Harvard two preliminary injunctions that prevent the May 22 SEVP revocation and the June 4 proclamation from taking effect during the lawsuit. In her June 23 decision, she wrote that the proclamation lacked "legitimate grounding" and was unlikely to survive constitutional challenges. The Trump administration has appealed the injunction on the proclamation, with the First Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled to hear the case in late August. Meanwhile, the DHS's formal notice of intent to withdraw Harvard's SEVP certification remains active. This notice, issued on May 28, gave Harvard 30 days to demonstrate compliance with federal regulations necessary to maintain certification. Current status and university response As of late June, Harvard responded to the DHS notice but has not publicly disclosed the details of its compliance efforts. According to the Harvard Crimson, a university spokesperson stated that the government's motion "has no impact" on Harvard's ability to enrol international students and called the May 22 revocation letter "unlawful." The government's lawyers noted Harvard had not challenged the DHS's ongoing withdrawal process and would have to amend its complaint to do so if it wished to contest any future decision. Several federal agencies, including the State Department and Department of Justice, are also named in Harvard's suit. The case remains a significant legal battle over the rights of international students in the US and the extent of presidential authority over immigration and education policy. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
US considers fixed-term student visas: What the policy change means for international students
DHS proposal to limit US student visas raises concerns for foreign learners The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has proposed a new policy to impose fixed-term limits on international students and exchange visitors, signalling a significant change in the management of academic visas. This proposal has recently cleared the White House review process and is expected to be released for public comment shortly. Currently, international students holding F-1 visas and exchange visitors on J-1 visas can remain in the US for the 'duration of status,' allowing them to stay as long as they are enrolled in academic programmes or internships. The new proposal would instead restrict their stay to a predetermined number of years, after which they would be required to apply for extensions even if their academic or exchange programmes are incomplete. Impact on international students, especially from India This potential policy shift could affect a large number of foreign students, particularly those from India. In 2024, Indian students represented the largest group of international students in the US, with over 420,000 enrolled across various educational institutions. The introduction of fixed-term limits could lead to uncertainties for these students, many of whom pursue multi-year courses and research programmes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Effective Are Non-Surgical Treatments for Aging Skin? (Explore Benefits) AskLayers Learn More Undo The DHS sent the draft rule to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs on June 27, with the review concluding recently. This clearance is a procedural step before the proposal is made available for public feedback and possible revisions. Policy background and previous versions The proposed rule marks a return to a similar policy first introduced in 2020 during the Trump administration. That earlier plan sought to cap the duration of student and exchange visitor visas to two or four years, depending on the course of study or the applicant's nationality. At the time, academic institutions strongly criticised the policy, arguing it would create disruption and uncertainty for students and educational programmes. Following criticism, the Biden administration withdrew the 2020 rule. However, the reintroduction of a comparable framework suggests renewed interest within the DHS in applying time-bound controls over nonimmigrant academic visas. Summary of key differences in visa duration Visa Type Current rule Proposed fixed-term limit F-1 Student Duration of status Fixed number of years (TBD) J-1 Exchange Duration of status Fixed number of years (TBD) Details on the exact number of years for these limits have not yet been disclosed. Next steps and public consultation Once the DHS publishes the draft rule, a period of public comment will follow, allowing stakeholders such as universities, student groups, and diplomatic missions to submit feedback. The final rule will be developed after considering these responses. This development comes amid ongoing debates around immigration policies and their impact on the US higher education sector, which relies heavily on international students for diversity, academic contributions, and financial support. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
