No contempt for Trump officials over Venezuela deportations, appeals court rules
Venezuelan migrants arrive after being deported from U.S., at Simon Bolivar International Airport, in Maiquetia, Venezuela June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/File Photo
WASHINGTON - A U.S. appeals court overturned on Friday a lower court's ruling finding probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in contempt of court over their handling of the deportations of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants under a centuries-old wartime law.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found in April that officials could face criminal contempt charges for willfully disregarding his March 15 order barring the deportations to El Salvador of alleged Venezuelan gang members under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without the chance to challenge their removals.
The Trump administration appealed. On Friday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals sided with the government by a 2-1 vote.
"The District Court's order raises troubling questions about judicial control over core executive functions like the conduct of foreign policy and the prosecution of criminal offenses," Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas wrote in an opinion. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Nagasaki mayor warns of nuclear war as city marks 80 years since A-bomb
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox NAGASAKI - Thousands bowed their heads in prayer in Nagasaki on Aug 9 to mark the 80th anniversary of the city's atomic bombing , as the mayor warned that current global conflicts could push the world again into nuclear war. The western Japanese city was levelled on Aug 9, 1945, when the United States dropped a 10,000-pound (4,535kg) plutonium-239 bomb, nicknamed 'Fat Man', instantly killing some 27,000 of the city's estimated 200,000 people. By the end of 1945, the death toll from acute radiation exposure had reached about 70,000. Nagasaki's destruction came three days after a US uranium-235 bomb destroyed Hiroshima. Japan surrendered on Aug 15, ending World War II. After a moment of silence at 11.02am, marking the time of the blast, Mayor Shiro Suzuki called on leaders to return to the principles of the UN Charter and show a concrete path toward abolishing nuclear weapons, warning that delay was 'no longer permissible'. 'This is a crisis of human survival that is closing in on each and every one of us,' Mr Suzuki told the crowd, estimated by Japanese media at 2,700. He quoted the testimony of a survivor to illustrate the reality of a nuclear attack: 'Around me were people whose eyeballs had popped out ... Bodies were strewn about like stones.' 'Is it not this 'global citizen' perspective that will serve as the driving force behind stitching back together our fragmented world?' Mr Suzuki asked, calling for a solution based on mutual understanding and solidarity. The US military is believed to have chosen Nagasaki as a target due to its significance as a major industrial and port city. The city's geographical features, including its hilly terrain, were also thought to concentrate the blast. Representatives from 95 countries and territories, including nuclear superpower the United States, and Israel - which neither confirms nor denies having nuclear weapons - attended the annual ceremony at the Nagasaki Peace Memorial Park for the milestone year. Russia, which possesses the world's largest nuclear stockpile, was also represented. Daiji Kawanaka, a 14-year-old tourist from Osaka, echoed the mayor's sentiments. 'I truly believe a tragedy like this must never be repeated,' he told Reuters, saying the anniversary prompts conversations about peace even among his young peers. 'We can only pledge to take the initiative ourselves in making a step toward peace.' Japan's leading organisation of A-bomb survivors, Nihon Hidankyo, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 for campaigning for a world without nuclear weapons. Survivors, known as 'hibakusha', continue to suffer the effects from radiation and social discrimination. With their numbers falling below 100,000 for the first time in 2025 , their stories fuel ongoing efforts to advocate for a nuclear-free world. Japan, the only country to have suffered nuclear attacks, has stated its commitment to nuclear disarmament but is not a signatory or observer of the UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons. REUTERS
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
University of California reviews US government's $1.2b UCLA settlement offer, World News
The University of California said on Friday (Aug 8) it was reviewing a $1 billion (S$1.2 billion) settlement offer by President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze $584 million in federal funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests, while some faculty groups have sued saying the cuts have chilled free speech. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. "The University of California just received a document from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it," University of California President James Milliken said in a statement, adding the institution offered to have talks earlier this week with the government. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Last month, the government settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. The $1 billion settlement offer for UCLA marks an unusually high amount. The White House had no immediate comment. Experts have raised concerns about the government's federal funding threats to universities, saying they amount to an assault on free speech and academic freedom. The government has also attempted to deport some international students, over which civil rights groups have raised due process concerns. [[nid:721061]] Rights advocates note a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to the conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Mexico seeks compensation from Adidas in cultural appropriation row
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Marina Nunez Bespalova speaks on Aug 8 to condemn Adidas and US designer Willy Chavarria over Adidas' Oaxaca Slip-On sandals. MEXICO CITY - Mexico's government said on Aug 8 that it was seeking compensation from Adidas, which is accused of cultural appropriation for bringing out sandals resembling traditional design from the southern state of Oaxaca. The Oaxaca Slip-On sandals were created by US fashion designer Willy Chavarria, who has Mexican heritage, but drew pushback from officials in Oaxaca, who say he did not receive authorisation from the indigenous community behind the original design. The government said that Adidas had agreed to meet with Oaxaca authorities, who argue that the sandal is modelled on the traditional 'huarache' (sandal) of the village of Villa de Hidalgo Yalalag. 'It's collective intellectual property. There must be compensation. The heritage law must be complied with,' President Claudia Sheinbaum said during her regular morning press conference. The controversy is the latest instance of Mexican officials denouncing major brands or designers using unauthorised indigenous art or designs from the region, with previous complaints raised about fast fashion juggernaut Shein, Spain's Zara and high-end label Carolina Herrera. AFP
