Amherst community face ICE arrests despite sanctuary status
AMHERST, Mass. (WWLP) – Two individuals were taken into custody by ICE this week in two separate incidents.
Visa interview pause impacts international students in Massachusetts
On Wednesday, two individuals were taken into custody by federal agents, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in separate incidents between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. The Town of Amherst states that this is not the first time ICE has taken community members into custody.
The town or police department did not participate in either of these incidents and has not participated in any federal immigration enforcement actions that have previously occurred. The incidents were operated independently by ICE with no prior notification.
The town states that they are a sanctuary community and shall not cooperate with ICE. Section 3.9 of the Town of Amherst General Bylaws states, 'To the extent permissible by law, a Town department, or officer or employee of a Town department shall not perform the functions of an immigration officer, whether pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1357(g) or any other law, regulation, or policy, whether formal or informal.'
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Glitchy, Error-Prone Tool Could Get You Deported—Even If You're a U.S. Citizen
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, despite his U.S. citizenship and Social Security card, was arrested on April 16 on an unfounded suspicion of him being an 'unauthorized alien.' Immigration and Customs Enforcement kept him in county jail for 30 hours 'based on biometric confirmation of his identity'—an obvious mistake of facial recognition technology. Another U.S. citizen, Jensy Machado, was held at gunpoint and handcuffed by ICE agents. He was another victim of mistaken identity after someone else gave his home address on a deportation order. This is the reality of immigration policing in 2025: Arrest first, verify later. That risk only grows as ICE shreds due process safeguards, citizens and noncitizens alike face growing threats from mistaken identity, and immigration policing agencies increasingly embrace error-prone technology, especially facial recognition. Last month, it was revealed that Customs and Border Protection requested pitches from tech firms to expand their use of an especially error-prone facial recognition technology—the same kind of technology used wrongly to arrest and jail Lopez-Gomez. ICE already has nearly $9 million in contracts with Clearview AI, a facial recognition company with white nationalist ties that was at one point the private facial recognition system most used by federal agencies. When reckless policing is combined with powerful and inaccurate dragnet tools, the result will inevitably be more stories like Lopez-Gomez's and Machado's. Studies have shown that facial recognition technology is disproportionately likely to misidentify people of color, especially Black women. And with the recent rapid increase of ICE activity, facial recognition risks more and more people arbitrarily being caught in ICE's dragnet without rights to due process to prove their legal standing. Even for American citizens who have 'nothing to hide,' simply looking like the wrong person can get you jailed or even deported. While facial recognition's mistakes are dangerous, its potential for abuse when working as intended is even scarier. For example, facial recognition lets Donald Trump use ICE as a more powerful weapon for retribution. The president himself admits he's using immigration enforcement to target people for their political opinions and that he seeks to deport people regardless of citizenship. In the context of a presidential administration that is uncommonly willing to ignore legal procedures and judicial orders, a perfectly accurate facial recognition system could be the most dangerous possibility of all: Federal agents could use facial recognition on photos and footage of protests to identify each of the president's perceived enemies, and they could be arrested and even deported without due process rights. And the more facial recognition technology expands across our daily lives, the more dangerous it becomes. By working with local law enforcement and private companies, including by sharing facial recognition technology, ICE is growing their ability to round people up—beyond what they already can do. This deputization of surveillance infrastructure comes in many forms: Local police departments integrate facial recognition into their body cameras, landlords use facial recognition instead of a key to admit or deny tenants, and stadiums use facial recognition for security. Even New York public schools used facial recognition on their security camera footage until a recent moratorium. Across the country, other states and municipalities have imposed regulations on facial recognition in general, including Boston, San Francisco, Portland, and Vermont. Bans on the technology in schools specifically have been passed in Florida and await the governor's signature in Colorado. Any facial recognition, no matter its intended use, is at inherent risk of being handed over to ICE for indiscriminate or politically retaliatory deportations. At state and local levels, however, there is a way to fight back. For example, there is a package of 'Ban the Scan' bills in the New York State Legislature and New York City Council to curb the use of facial recognition: by police (S5609/A1045), by landlords (A6363 and Intro. 425), by public accommodations (A6211 and Intro. 217), and to make permanent the ban on its use in schools (S3827/A6720). And while New York, the most surveilled city in the country, has the opportunity to lead the way, legislative protections against the risks of facial recognition must proliferate nationwide to fully protect our communities. The only way to completely prevent Trump—or any future authoritarian—from allowing this tech to do his and ICE's bidding is to prevent the use of facial recognition in the first place. Because of the immense power of facial recognition to target political enemies and indiscriminately deport any of us, and because the system's racially biased inaccuracy is already causing wrongful arrests, banning facial recognition is an essential step toward preventing authoritarian overreach. The New York State Legislature can and should pass the Ban the Scan package of facial recognition bills, and the rest of the country should follow suit in protecting communities from this force multiplier for tyranny.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Springfield man to be sentenced in Chicopee murder case
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – A man from Springfield is set to be sentenced to prison on Friday. Springfield man arrested after six-hour standoff on Byers Street Kaysone Walters was found guilty in the killing of 25-year-old Brianne Boiselle back in August of 2021. On August 11th, Boisselle was found on Baldwin Street in Springfield with several stab wounds and died from her injuries. An investigation led Springfield Police to apply for an arrest warrant for Walters, who was believed to be the suspect in the alleged murder and armed carjacking. Springfield police along with the U.S. Marshals Service, State Police and the Hampden County Sheriff's Department later learned that Walters left the state and was in Lakeland, Florida. On October 7th, the U.S. Marshals Florida Task Force went to Lakeland and spotted Walters attempting to run away. He was caught and arrested by the officers. Walter was charged with Fugitive from Justice Warrant and was brought back to Massachusetts to face murder charges. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Massachusetts high school student granted bail by immigration court
An immigration court judge has granted bail to Milford, Massachusetts 11th grader Marcelo Gomes Da Silva. The judge issued a $2,000 bond, which Da Silva can post. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested him on Saturday, May 31, a day before his girlfriend graduated from Milford High School. The detention hearing occurred on Thursday, June 5, in Chelmsford, Massachusetts. Da Silva, 18, was taken away by ICE agents when he was stopped May 31 on his way to volleyball practice. Federal officials said they targeted Sa Silva's father, Joao Paulo Gomes-Pereira, who they claim is an undocumented immigrant from Brazil. ICE said they didn't intend to arrest the 18-year-old Da Silva, but when agents realized it was him, not his father, who was driving the car, they had to detain him because he was living in the U.S. without legal status. While Gomes da Silva joined the hearing remotely via video, about a half dozen of his family and friends attended in person to support him. Dozens of friends from school and sympathetic protesters rallied outside. But Gomes da Silva's parents and siblings were not present, on his lawyer's advice to avoid the risk of being detained themselves. She later told reporters that she told his parents 'being there when he gets home is the most important thing.' DHS did not claim he was a 'danger to the public' but did say he 'is a flight risk.' To rebut that claim by demonstrating Gomes da Silva's strong ties to the community, his lawyer Robin Nice noted that he attends church twice a week and was eager to know if his volleyball team was the state tournament semifinals. (The team had lost.) Nice responded, "hopefully today,' when asked by reporters June 5 when Da Silva will be released. She expects he'll have an ankle monitor, per the current Department of Homeland Security's standard operating procedures. He is being held at Plymouth County Correctional Facility. "This kid has been sleeping on the cement floor for the past five days ‒ he's brushed his teeth twice," Nice said during a press conference held immediately after the hearing. 'It's offensive to call arresting an 18-year-old kid with no criminal record a 'collateral arrest.'" She added that her client looked forward to enjoying chicken nuggets and Snickers candy bars once he's released. A master planning hearing has been set for 9 a.m. on June 26, but Nice said that's merely a placeholder. She said Da Silva will get on the regular calendar, but nothing will happen for months ‒ or even a year ‒ because immigration courts are so backed up. "Two steps forward, but one step back," Nice said during the press conference. A separate rally to support Gomes da Silva that was supposed to occur later that afternoon in Milford Town Park was canceled. Quinn Deans, a 14-year-old 8th grader who was one of the handful to show up. He said police present told him the cancellation was due to threats of violence against the event by immigration opponents. This story was updated to add new information. This article originally appeared on The Milford Daily News: Immigration court grants bail to Marcelo Gomes Da Silva of Milford, MA