Labour's Islamophobia law could hand Reform 100-seat majority
The Deputy Prime Minister has appointed a panel to draw up a new definition to be applied across the public sector, despite fears it will prevent politicians speaking up about Asian grooming gangs.
Now a survey of 2,000 people has found that Labour polls significantly worse among voters who are told about the Islamophobia plan.
Before voters were told about the proposal, Reform polled 29 per cent, Labour 23 per cent, Conservatives 17 per cent, and the Liberal Democrats 14 per cent.
But when the people polled were asked how they would vote if Labour brought in a definition of Islamophobia, Reform rose by one point to 30 per cent and Labour fell three points to 20 per cent.
If replicated at a general election, that would be the difference between a Reform majority of 20 without the Islamophobia definition, and 106 if it were brought in.
Bringing in the definition would cause a loss of one million votes to Labour, and a fall in its seats in the Commons from 155 to 103.
The poll was carried out by J L Partners, whose founder, James Johnson, said: 'This polling shows that if Labour introduces a new definition of Islamophobia, it would be like setting off a tinderbox under what remains of their working-class vote.
'With Reform nipping at Labour's heels in hundreds of seats, that is not something they can afford.'
Critics have warned that some proposed definitions of Islamophobia would make it impossible for people to raise concerns about Asian grooming gangs.
And the Tories have accused Ms Rayner of appointing a committee with 'extreme' views to come up with the official definition.
The working group – chaired by Dominic Grieve, a former Tory cabinet minister – is meeting in secret and members of the public will not be able to offer their views.
Mr Grieve has praised a 2019 report which called the discussion of 'grooming gangs' an example of 'anti-Muslim racism'.
Claire Coutinho, the shadow equalities minister, has said a 'culture of secrecy around matters relating to race and religion' was a key factor enabling 'gangs of men to groom, rape, and torture young girls with impunity'.
Last month, Baroness Casey's report on grooming gangs found that hundreds of girls had suffered unimaginable sexual abuse in part because some in authority had not tackled the issue because they feared appearing racist.
Ministers insist the definition of Islamophobia will be written in such a way as not to stifle free speech.
The J L Partners poll of 2,035 British adults was conducted between July 16 and 18.
It found that 37 per cent of respondents felt that protections against hate speech have gone too far – while 28 per cent believed they have not gone far enough, and 19 per cent said they were at about the right level.
Some 30 per cent said protections against Islamophobia had gone too far, compared to 28 per cent who thought they had not gone far enough.
When asked to compare the issue of Islamophobia to other issues facing the Government, 54 per cent said it was relatively unimportant, with 30 per cent saying it is relatively important.
When Labour voters were asked, 45 per cent said it was relatively unimportant.
Across all voters, just 37 per cent said a definition of Islamophobia was necessary in Britain today, and 45 per cent said it was unnecessary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Tories are on the brink of annihilation in Wales – and it holds a lesson for Westminster politicians
By any measure, Kemi Badenoch's leadership of the Conservative party is not in a good place. In the last few months alone, she has been told 'her days are numbered', that she is in 'Liz Truss territory' and that she is 'hitting a new record low'. This is not a hostile audience. These criticisms come from the Telegraph, the Spectator and the Daily Express, outlets that have traditionally turned a blind eye to the most egregious Conservative leadership failings, like a blinkered parent who refuses to accept the repeated reports from teachers that their child is a bully. It's clear that what Badenoch is doing is not working. She needs to change course, not just for her own sake, but for the continued existence of her party as a political entity. In case this isn't obvious to her already (just 10% of people in the UK see her as a PM in waiting), there is a really handy example of what will happen to the Conservative party if it keeps being a Reform tribute act – the Welsh Conservative party. If you haven't paid any attention to the Welsh Conservative party, don't blame yourself, because hardly anyone in Wales has either. I have had the privilege of reporting on the Welsh Tories for a decade and they are the embodiment of all the challenges and failings of the current UK party. And when I say 'privilege', I mean it. Journalistically, it has been like shooting fish in a barrel, such is the level of incompetence exhibited by the Welsh Conservatives. But a gain for the humble hack is a loss for the people of Wales. Since devolution, Wales has been desperate for a sensible centre-right alternative that could genuinely challenge Welsh Labour, whose record is more patchy than Boris Johnson's account of Partygate. Instead, the people of Cymru have been condemned to a Welsh Conservative party that has preferred to dabble in Nigel Farage cosplay rather than genuine opposition. A party that could soon be all but wiped out in Wales. So what lessons can Badenoch learn from the situation her colleagues find themselves in across Offa's Dyke? Well, the first concerns demographics. The Welsh Conservative party is literally dying out. According to a study by Cardiff University's Wales Governance Centre, in 2024 fewer than 10% of people aged under 65 in Wales voted for the Conservatives. In fact, 10% of the party's 2019 voters had passed away by the time of the 2024 election (the figure for Labour was 3%). If this trend continues, 40% of Tory voters in Cymru will have died by the next election. But surely these voters are being replaced? Well, no. If you want to see how hard the Welsh Conservatives are finding it to recruit younger people, then look no further than a fringe meeting that was held at their party conference in May. I remember looking through the programme and seeing that an event by the Welsh Young Conservatives was discussing how to attract more young people. They defined 'young' as under 45. That same conference underlined another problem: that the Conservatives scream incompetence right now. For one thing, Badenoch herself began her speech by saying how 'wonderful' it was 'to meet so many MSPs'. In Wales we have MSs (Senedd members); not MSPs (members of the Scottish parliament). The auto captions all over the hall also wrote 'whales' rather than 'Wales' throughout all of the speeches. And the lack of compassion and hope from the current Conservative party was hilariously encapsulated in the subtitles to the speech of Darren Millar, the Welsh Tory leader in the Senedd, which translated 'We are pro-roads, not just cycle paths' into 'We are pro-roads, not just psychopaths'. It also doesn't help that the Conservatives can't agree about who their Welsh leader is. In the constitution of the Conservative party, Badenoch is technically the leader of the Welsh Conservatives. However, Mims Davies (an MP in Sussex) is the leader of the Welsh Conservatives in Westminster, and Millar is the leader of the Welsh Conservatives in the Senedd. But if we accept that, for all intents and purposes, Millar is the leader in Wales (given he is the only one actually in Wales), we can see how his failure of leadership (and the failures of his predecessors) offer Badenoch a stark warning. The lesson here is that trying to mirror Reform is a losing play. Millar has continued the strategy put in place by his predecessor, Andrew RT Davies, and tried to be more Farage than Farage himself in rhetoric. Davies was investigated by the Welsh parliament's standards commissioner after he told GB News: 'Welsh Labour are dishing out £1,600 to anyone who wants to rock up and claim they are crossing the Channel illegally.' To be clear, the figure he was referring to was the Welsh government's basic income pilot, which will give £1,600 a month to care leavers and included about a dozen migrant children who came to the UK alone with no family. The Welsh Tories also show what happens when you fail to put forward any credible plans for actually governing the country. Regarding the biggest challenge facing Wales, which is the NHS, the Welsh Conservatives issued a statement saying they would 'properly fund the health service'. When asked where the money would come from, they listed a string of 'Labour vanity projects' which they would cut. Unfortunately, some of these ended in 2003. In the Senedd right now, the Welsh Conservatives are the official opposition. They constitute 15 of the 60 members (25%). Polling suggests that in the Welsh election next year they will receive between 10% and 13% of the vote. The electoral system in Wales means that any party that dips under 12% could be totally wiped out. An MRP poll in May suggested that they could have as few as three seats (and this is after the Senedd will have expanded to 96 members). These projections could be Badenoch's Welsh canary in the coalmine. I suspect she will simply say the canary wasn't determined enough, and keep on tunnelling. Will Hayward is a Guardian columnist. He publishes a regular newsletter on Welsh politics and is the author of Independent Nation: Should Wales Leave the UK?
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK needs new regulations to fix broken water industry, review says
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain should overhaul its water regulatory system to create a single, powerful body, and replace current regulator Ofwat, to better protect consumers and the environment, an official report said on Monday. The Labour government ordered a review of the privatised water industry in England and Wales after record sewage spills in rivers and lakes sparked widespread anger. The sector's biggest company, Thames Water, is battling to avoid collapse under its debt pile, and has said it is likely to face 1.4 billion pounds in pollution fines and penalties over the next five years. Former Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe, who led the review, said the current, separate financial and environmental regulation of the sector had failed, and financial regulator Ofwat should be replaced. The review considered the creation of a new regulatory system where water companies can raise enough money through bills to rebuild their assets, investors can get long-term, steady returns, and the impact on the environment can start to improve. "Fully joined-up regulation is essential for the system to meet the demands of the future and ensure that private water companies act in the public as well as the private interest," the report said. Britain's water infrastructure needs more than 100 billion pounds ($134.18 billion) of investment in the next five years to cope with population growth and climate change, with consumers set to face bill rises of an average 36% over the period. Investors were waiting for the report for signs of how the government could reset the regulation for Thames Water, which has been fighting for survival for the last 18 months, if it is to avoid being temporarily nationalised. Environment Minister Steve Reed, who on Sunday promised to halve sewage pollution by 2030, is due to announce "root and branch" reform of the sector's regulation in a speech later on Monday, his office said. Under Cunliffe's recommendations, the new single regulator would set "minimum capital" requirements for investors and it would also be able to block changes in water ownership if they were not deemed to be in the long-term interests of the company. In order to attract investment, the report said the government should offer the regulator direction to support stability and predictability - a reference to expected returns, and potential handling of fines for sewage leaks. The review also recommended the creation of nine new regional system planning bodies responsible for developing water investment plans and directing funding, with the power to streamline existing planning processes. ($1 = 0.7460 pounds)
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with
The shock value of the Lionesses' decision against taking the knee was that they still laboured, five years on, under a misapprehension it was some vital instrument in the fight against racism. Watching them stage this ritual before their games in Switzerland has brought echoes of that overwrought summer of 2020, when the Black Lives Matter movement unleashed such chaos that genuine action took a back seat to superficial slogans and designer hashtags. Kneeling felt tokenistic even then, a tick-box exercise for football to show how much it cared, an easy PR win while avoiding any commitment to deeper change. In 2025, it has become so perfunctory that the England women's team are forced to admit it serves no useful purpose. 'Is the message as strong as it used to be?' asked Lucy Bronze. 'Is the message really hitting hard?' To those questions, Alex Greenwood provided some form of answer. 'There's maybe a feeling,' she said, 'that it has lost its power.' The reality that these players dared not acknowledge was that it had never had any power in the first place. This was not some 21st-century equivalent of the Black Power salute, when Tommie Smith and John Carlos stood atop a podium at the Mexico City Olympics and raised black-gloved fists to the sky at grave personal cost to themselves. This was an empty, performative piece of gesture politics. The wonder, truly, is that it has gone on so long. Even when Gareth Southgate's England included it in their pre-match repertoire in 2021, many fans loudly booed in protest, rejecting both the symbolism of a fad that had originated in the United States and the blurring of political agitation with the escapism of sport. The pro-knee brigade's argument, of course, was that this crusade had less to do with politics than an assertion of universal human rights. But this seemed naive at best when you examined the other principles of BLM leaders who portrayed themselves as 'trained Marxists': defunding the police, for example, or dismantling the nuclear family. Perhaps the most compelling case against kneeling was made by black players who hated it. Wilfried Zaha described it as 'degrading', explaining that his parents had taught him to be proud to be black, that they had urged him to stand tall. 'I think the meaning behind the whole thing is becoming something that we just do now,' he said. 'That's not enough. I'm not going to take the knee.' It was four-and-a-half years ago that he delivered this impassioned statement, so it seems peculiar that the Lionesses are only now reaching the same conclusion. The original rationale was that taking the knee would assume unstoppable force purely through repetition. And yet the reverse has taken place, with the spectacle so denuded of impact that the Premier League has long since chosen to reserve it only for a few carefully-chosen fixtures. For an institution so wedded to the idea that it compelled players in 2020 to replace the names on their shirts with the words 'Black Lives Matter', it is a means of saving face. Now we find ourselves at the logical end point, where the practice is phased out altogether. You might expect this to happen if its stated objectives had been fulfilled, but the bitter truth is that it has done nothing to eradicate the scourge of racism. Just as Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka and Jadon Sancho received unspeakable bigotry after missing penalties in England's European Championship final defeat to Italy, so Jess Carter has spoken of 'vile' and 'abhorrent' comments directed towards her online during the latest tournament. For all that she deserves sympathy over her ordeal, it is revealing that she and her team-mates are abandoning their anti-racism campaign on the pitch at the precise moment that they confront evidence of racism off it. There could scarcely be a more damning illustration of the gesture's hollowness. In sport as in society, we are past the point of being impressed by those who drape themselves in the cloak of righteousness. In 2020, amid the collision of pandemic and culture wars, conspicuous projection of virtue was all the rage, with Jake Humphrey adorning his fleece in the TV studio with one pin badge for the NHS and another for BLM. But in 2025, it is a turn-off, with the sight of footballers dropping to their knees for a couple of seconds inducing nothing more than ennui, a sense that they are acting out of obligation rather than any sincere concern for the cause of anti-racism itself. So, never mind Greenwood's notion that it has 'lost its power' now. Ultimately, you cannot lose what you never had.
