Dubai govt gifting free ChatGPT Plus to everyone? Is it real, what is the truth, and where is the catch
Yes, it is real. If you live in Dubai or any place else in the UAE, you'll soon get free access to ChatGPT Plus — the premium version of OpenAI's popular chatbot. This move makes the UAE the first country in the world to offer ChatGPT Plus — which usually costs $20 (roughly Rs 1,700) a month — to its entire population at no cost. The plan is part of a major agreement between OpenAI and the UAE government, under a programme called OpenAI for Countries. This programme is not just about free AI tools — the bigger goal is to help countries build local AI infrastructure while staying in line with US regulations and global partnerships.advertisementSo, what's the truth behind this? The deal is a big one. As part of the partnership, OpenAI and several global tech companies — including Oracle, Nvidia, Cisco, SoftBank and G42 — are coming together to build a massive AI computing centre in Abu Dhabi. It's called Stargate UAE, and the first phase of the project — around 200 megawatts — is expected to be ready by next year. In total, the facility is planned to reach one gigawatt of computing power, which is huge. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, says the idea is to spread the benefits of AI — like improved healthcare, cleaner energy, and better education — to more people around the world.Now, what about the catch? Honestly, there doesn't seem to be one — at least, not for the public. If you live in the UAE, you'll be able to use ChatGPT Plus for free, whether it's for writing, coding, studying, or simply getting answers to everyday questions. This version includes OpenAI's most advanced tools and models. For the general public, it's a win. But the real investment is happening behind the scenes.advertisement
According to a report by The New York Times, the partnership includes a huge financial commitment: for every dollar spent by the UAE on local AI development, the same amount will be invested in US-based AI infrastructure. That figure could reach up to $20 billion in total. So, while people in the UAE get free access to advanced AI, the broader plan is to grow OpenAI's influence and ensure US-aligned AI systems become the global standard.And while the UAE appears to be leading the charge, this could just be the beginning. OpenAI says its Chief Strategy Officer, Jason Kwon, will be visiting other Asia Pacific nations to explore similar deals. If things go well, more countries may get access to ChatGPT and localised AI tools, customised to their languages, cultures and regulations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Breakout, volume surge make CDSL a buy, says Shivangi Sarda of Motilal Oswal
'Gradual recovery in volume growth, along with increased retail participation can be seen which is supporting the ongoing growth trajectory of exchange platforms such as CDSL. Traders can buy for a target of Rs 1585 in the next 2-3 weeks,' Shivangi Sarda, Analyst, Derivatives and Technical Research, Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd, said. Show more 07:08 01:38 04:40 03:48 02:17 06:32 01:25 02:35 04:55 06:21 04:31 01:40 06:04 05:39 07:05 02:22 05:26 01:45 02:41 02:40 01:29 05:00 03:14 04:45 06:38 01:11 04:28 06:32 02:23 01:51 04:40 02:05 05:11 01:54 01:23 05:12 02:10 06:05 06:41 03:03
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The pause on tariffs, and now a stay: where does this leave Trump's disruptive trade agenda
Hours after US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on goods imported into America from almost every nation was ruled illegal by the US Court of International Trade, an appeals court – the Federal Circuit Court in Washington, DC that has jurisdiction over the trade court – on Thursday temporarily halted the decision, reinstating the levies for now. Its order said that it would grant the Trump administration's request for an immediate administrative stay, and gave the plaintiffs — a group of 12 states and five US-based companies — until June 5 to respond to the administration. Judicial Process As the Trump administration's appeal works its way through the American courts, what is clear is that this case will probably end up at the US Supreme Court at some point in the near future. The three judge panel at the US Court of International Trade, which included one Trump appointee, had ruled unanimously that the statute the White House used, known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or IEEPA – does not grant the American President the authority to impose tariffs with a really wide scope as were levied through Trump's reciprocal tariffs on practically all major trading partners of the US. They said in the ruling that the emergency economic powers legislation (IEEPA) does not give 'unbounded tariff authority' to the President, and that the statute can only be used for unusual and extraordinary threats. Trade deficit, they said, does not really fit that definition. At the same time, there are sector specific tariffs that the Trump administration slapped on steel, aluminum, cars and car parts etc, under a different statute known as Section 232, which could be used in the near future for things such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals too. Those were all imposed citing national security reasons, and were distinct from the tariffs under IEEPA. Those can all stay in place for the moment, and there is a chance that the Trump administration would now use provisions such as Section 232 to impose such sector-specific tariffs on countries, especially if the Federal Circuit court were to also rule against the IEEPA levies. What needs to be kept in mind is that apart from this case at the International Trade Court filed by the dozen other states and some small businesses, there is another high-profile case in California from the Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom arguing that Trump's trade tariffs were illegal. This, according to legal experts, is the case to watch out for. Ensuing Uncertainty In the meantime, what is unclear is whether business should ultimately plan for relief if the trade court's ruling stands, or whether the tariffs might stick. That raises the real question about whether the so-called reciprocal tariffs due in July will ever come into effect, whether the 10 per cent universal tariff can stay, whether the US Congress will come to the president's rescue, and what the final judgement of the Supreme Court will be. This course will decide whether nations need to negotiate for deals with the US. And during the appeals process, the Trump administration could seek alternate routes to deploy additional tariffs, according to experts. This could add to the uncertainties. The earlier ruling halting the imposition of the levies serves to undermine ongoing attempts by the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to negotiate trade deals with other countries, including India. The UK is looking somewhat imprudent in having already rushed into a trade deal with the US, which retains the 10 per cent base rate that was part of Trump's original plan. This is despite the US have a trade surplus with the UK. Others such as Japan and the European Union were already holding back, after seeing the Trump administration beat a retreat amid an upheaval in the US government borrowing rates. The legal uncertainty is a further reason for countries to wait and watch. With negotiators from the US set to arrive in New Delhi for trade talks on June 5-6, officials in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said they are 'studying the implications' of the US Court of International Trade's Wednesday ruling. Trump had on April 2 announced a steep 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on India, despite New Delhi agreeing to commence negotiations with Washington on a trade deal. The tariffs were paused till July 8, and the Indian government is keen to sign an interim trade deal before that. The legal developments, though, could warrant a recalibration now. Legal experts are of the view that the Trump administration could have a weak case, especially when it comes to the question of law on IEEPA. Constitutionally, in America, trade policy is the domain of the US Congress and the chairs of the Trade committees of the House and Senate (branches of the Ways and Means Committee) are typically very powerful positions. President Trump bypassed all of that by proclaiming a variety of national emergencies. While he has some scope to act in actual emergencies, under powers ceded by the US COngress to the White House over the decades, these two specific cases contend that the sweeping use of these powers to announce permanent tariff changes was illegal and unconstitutional. That could hold water. The Court of International Trade ruling appears rather robust from that perspective, and also emboldens California's similar case. For now, it would be prudent to expect other negotiators around the world to put their feet up and wait, while the White House tries to prove the legality of the very basis of its global trade onslaught. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bullish on private banks; 3 stocks to bet on: Rajat Sharma
Rajat Sharma , Founder & CEO, Sana Securities , says he favours private banking, highlighting HDFC Bank , Axis Bank , and Federal Bank . These banks benefit from non-interest income. Sharma is also optimistic about the IT sector, noting attractive valuations for companies like Infosys and TCS . Increased spending in the US will benefit Indian IT firms. He believes these tech giants will remain core portfolio components. Which themes are looking good to you right now? What are you bullish on? Rajat Sharma: Yes, in terms of themes, clearly with it is almost a given that next week there will be a rate cut in the MPC's meeting, so banking of course is one sector that I have been bullish on for a very long time because private banking in particular has already anyways been trading fairly cheap compared to a lot of the other pockets of the market. And with RBI's meeting next week with where inflation is, it is a given that there would be a 25 bps rate cut, so that would be an additional benefit which the banking sector will get. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. But the major reason why I am bullish on banking, in particular private banking, is because the Union Budget that we had this year which increased the tax slabs and made income up to Rs 12 lakh tax-free, the benefit of that you will start seeing from the FY26 which is the financial year which has just started. So, while a lot of people are talking about consumption spending going up and discretionary spending going up, a clear beneficiary, the first beneficiary and the biggest beneficiary of this new tax policy would be banking because that is where money will come in the first place. If you talk about things that are working for the bank, the tax policies, the new tax structure is really favourable, repo rate will be revised to 5.75% so more money in the hands of the banks and over the last two-three years also tax policies have been changed in such a way that a lot of the advantage is given to mutual funds where people were taking their money from banks, particularly debt mutual funds which got indexation benefit and 20% tax post that – has been taken away. Gradually, a lot of policies have started favouring banking and I like private banking. The top picks I have in that sector would be clearly HDFC Bank and Axis Bank which also by the way get a lot of their revenue from non-interest income, another area of banking which I am really positive on, HDFC and Axis both get about 18% to 19% of their total income from fee-based income distribution of third-party products, mutual funds, the AMC business, and the other bank I am bullish on is Federal Bank. Live Events You Might Also Like: CA Rudramurthy BV on crucial Nifty levels to watch; 2 stocks to buy So, these three banks and clearly a week before the MPC meeting banking is definitely one sector which I am really bullish on and bullish on for the next three, four, five years kind of perspective. India still remains an underbanked country. What is your view on the IT sector? Do you continue to be optimistic on that one? And also, how do you see Indian IT companies navigating the whole AI transition play? Rajat Sharma: If you look at the history of the Indian IT sector , it always trails the US IT. Whatever happens there both in terms of development and adoption to new technology whether it was digital around a decade back or it is AI now and also in terms of earnings and valuations, so while US tech companies have run up a lot in the last one year or so, Indian tech has been struggling mainly because there was a negative sentiment around Indian IT companies, still relying on cloud and digital and basically the legacy business of programming and not really adopting to the AI revolution. In fact, because of AI, there were a lot of job cuts which we saw at Infosys and stuff. So, my view is that they got affected because there was a curtailed spending in the US on fears of a recession in US markets on account of Trump's tariffs policies or whatever. Now US and European companies have started spending more, a trend which we have started seeing and given where Indian IT companies are, the large IT companies, Infosys and TCS and Coforge and Mphasis a lot of these companies will benefit from increased spending in the US. I was looking at Infosys, the dividend yield is almost close to 2.75%. For tech companies to be trading at 22-24 kind of price to earnings multiple is a very attractive level to buy. These companies are not going anywhere. They are, were, and will always be part of the core portfolio in India. They will be part of Nifty for all times to come, as would a lot of these large tech companies. So, this is one sector which from a valuation perspective is really attractive and things should turn around for them given that the whole tariff business is behind us and there is no fear of a recession in the US as much as there was some time back. You Might Also Like: Narendra Solanki on where he is overweight and where underweight in current market
