logo
The brutal men who built Hitler's war machine

The brutal men who built Hitler's war machine

Telegraph22-05-2025

The title and sub-title of Charles Dick's well-researched and scholarly book, Unknown Enemy: The Hidden Nazi Force that Built the Third Reich, do him, and it, no favours. Yes, Dick has studied, in depth, the Nazi machine – Organisation Todt (OT), named after its founder Fritz Todt – and which Hitler charged with over­seeing the infrastructure of the new Germany.
But OT was not an unknown enemy, and it certainly isn't after much scholarship on it. Dick ­himself published a book on it three years ago, though for an ­academic market, of which this appears to be in effect a 'popular' version, and it is 15 years since Blaine Taylor's Hitler's Engineers: Fritz Todt and Albert Speer – Master Builders of the Third Reich.
As well as books, there are numerous articles in learned ­journals. But then this is a book for the mass market, which is not credited with too much intelligence; early on, we're told that the Red Army answered to 'Soviet ­dictator Josef Stalin'. (We are, at least, spared the formula 'Nazi ­dictator Adolf Hitler '.)
Todt was a highly qualified engineer who had fought in the Great War and joined the Nazi party early on. Hitler had great regard for him, not because he was a sycophant – he was far less of one than many who greased up to the Führer – but because he was exceptionally good at his job. He took a realistic view of what his organisation could do, and never overpromised about the speed at which it would do it. ­Hitler's first great dream in transforming Germany was to improve the roads, so OT built the autobahns. Hitler also regarded them as essential to get his troops to all ­corners of Europe swiftly, in order to discharge his acts of conquest.
When the Second World War came, OT had new priorities: the Atlantic Wall, submarine pens, mines for raw materials, bunkers for command posts and, after the devastating RAF raid on Peenemünde in summer 1943, huge underground factories in which to develop the V-2 and also to build Messerschmitts. This is where Dick lifts up the stone: much of what OT achieved, or tried to achieve, required slave labour. As such, OT played its part in the Final Solution and other war crimes. This book is a depressing reminder that most of the leaders of the organisation, and the chief brutes who worked under them, got away with it.
Todt himself did not live to have judgement passed on him: he was killed in a plane crash just after meeting Hitler at his eastern command post in 1942. There have been conspiracy theories ever since that the plane was sabotaged on Hitler's orders. Todt, who had a remarkable grasp of realism in a movement characterised by blind fanaticism, had been to tell his Führer that the war against the Soviet Union was unwinnable, and the Germans should offer peace terms before the conflict broke the Reich's economy. Dick discounts the theory and is right to do so, given the absence of evidence. He points out that if ­Hitler wanted to be rid of Todt, he had plenty of other means by which to do so.
Todt was succeeded by Hitler's blue-eyed boy, Albert Speer. Speer later served 20 years in Spandau for war crimes but managed to charm some of the judges at Nuremberg into believing he should not be hanged. However, his responsibility for OT, the orders he repeatedly gave for the urgent completion of infrastructure projects, whatever the cost, and the bestial conditions in the labour camps for which he was responsible suggest a rope round his neck was the very least he deserved. He compounded his offence by continuing to lie about what he knew – or didn't know – in the 15 years between his release in 1966 and his death in 1981. Dick highlights some of the discrepancies in the stories he told at various times, and his apparent unawareness that a sustained act of genocide was happening.
Dick presents the story often from the point of view of the enslaved: Jews for whom getting on an OT work detail was a possible escape from the gas chambers, ­Russian prisoners of war, Poles and others from the overrun territories of the East. There were also German criminals, hauled out of jail and put to work on lethal projects such as the railway in north Norway that could help ship iron ore to the Reich. Those from western Europe whom the Nazis considered racially superior – French, Dutch, Danes – had better treatment, but the management and overseer class were almost entirely German, and contained the usual quota of sadists and psychopaths.
Dick does highlight the odd more humane SS officer, but they were rare birds. What he also makes clear was that OT leaders did not merely work their charges to death, they beat them to death, shot them and sometimes even buried them alive if it suited them. They deserve their place in infamy, but the question of how so many of them got away with their hideous crimes shows just how ineffective the restoration of order in post-Nazi Germany really was.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

English court bars jailed Russian tycoon from appealing in Transneft case
English court bars jailed Russian tycoon from appealing in Transneft case

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

English court bars jailed Russian tycoon from appealing in Transneft case

MOSCOW, June 5 (Reuters) - The English Court of Appeal has refused jailed Russian tycoon Ziyavudin Magomedov permission to appeal against a decision that threw out his $14 billion lawsuit against Russian oil pipeline monopoly Transneft and other firms, the company said. Magomedov sued the company and several others at London's High Court, alleging his 2018 arrest on embezzlement charges prompted a Russian state-supported scheme to strip him of his holdings in valuable port operators. In January, Transneft, as well as U.S. private equity firm TPG (TPG.O), opens new tab and other companies, won their bid to block Magomedov's London lawsuit. Transneft said late on Wednesday that the English Court of Appeal denied Magomedov permission to appeal the ruling. "It is clear from the English process that there are massive losses which Mr Magomedov has suffered as a result of wrongdoing against him. He will continue to seek justice and a fair outcome wherever he can," a spokesperson for Magomedov said. Magomedov once controlled an empire ranging from port logistics to oil and gas through his Summa Group conglomerate, which he founded with his brother Magomed. But the brothers were arrested on embezzlement and organised crime charges in one of the most high-profile prosecutions of its kind in years. Magomedov was sentenced to 19 years in jail in 2022. He says the charges against him are unfounded and unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction.

A 'nightmare double war' against Russia and China faces the West within two years as Putin challenges NATO and Beijing eyes Taiwan invasion, military chiefs fear
A 'nightmare double war' against Russia and China faces the West within two years as Putin challenges NATO and Beijing eyes Taiwan invasion, military chiefs fear

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

A 'nightmare double war' against Russia and China faces the West within two years as Putin challenges NATO and Beijing eyes Taiwan invasion, military chiefs fear

British military chiefs fear a 'nightmare scenario' of fighting major wars against Russia and China at the same time, and are preparing for the West's enemies to launch coordinated campaigns. General Sir Patrick Sanders, the former head of the British army, revealed that the Ministry of Defence has drawn up plans for how to respond to wars breaking out simultaneously on two fronts. He said such crisis could erupt within two years, and told The Times' podcast The General and The Journalist how such a scenario could play out. 'We could end up with the axis powers - Russia and China, supported potentially by Iran and North Korea - collaborating to create a war on two fronts,' he said. 'It would start with a large-scale confrontation in the Indo-Pacific, like a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which draws off what remains of US forces in Europe. 'An opportunistic Russia would then move against some part of a NATO territory where they know they can actually win by achieving local dominance, like the Baltics or somewhere in the high north like Svalbard. 'Having quickly seized limited objectives, limited territory, they sit back behind a nuclear umbrella and they dare NATO to act. Now that's incredibly high stakes, but the payoff for Putin would be very, very high.' Sanders, who left his post as chief of the general staff 11 months ago, said his former colleagues were 'really worried' about the prospect and were actively thinking it through and 'wargaming' ways to deal with it. If Russia invaded the territory of a NATO member state and the military alliance failed to act against its aggression, 'it effectively means the end of Nato', Sanders said. He additionally warned that the only way to deter aggression from Britain and NATO's adversaries was to rapidly rearm. His comments come as US defence chief Pete Hegseth today pushed NATO to agree a deal on increasing military spending that could satisfy President Donald Trump. The US leader has demanded that alliance members boost defence budgets to five percent of their GDP at the June 24-25 meeting in the Netherlands. NATO chief Mark Rutte has put forward a compromise agreement for 3.5 percent of GDP on core military spending by 2032, and 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Several diplomats say Rutte looks on track to secure the deal for the summit in The Hague as NATO grapples with the threat from Russia after more than three years of war in Ukraine. But a few allies remain hesitant about committing to such levels of spending, including UK PM Sir Keir Starmer, who refused to promise that Britain will raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2034. However military leaders calling for more defence investment have warned such a rise could be too little too late. China's President Xi Jinping considers 2027 to be the date his military is capable of invading Taiwan, with Hegseth warning this week that the threat posed by Beijing is 'imminent'. Meanwhile Germany's defence chief starkly warned last week that NATO should be prepared for a possible attack by Russia within the next four years. General Carsten Breuer told the BBC that Russia poses a 'very serious threat' to the Western defence bloc, the likes of which he has never seen in his 40-year military career.' Breuer pointed to the massive increase in Vladimir Putin's armoury and ammunitions stock, including a massive output of 1,500 main battle tanks every year as well as the four million rounds of 152mm artillery munition produced in 2024 alone. He said that not all of these additional military equipment was going to Ukraine, which signalled a possible building up of capabilities that could be used against the NATO bloc, adding that Baltic states were at a particularly high risk of being attacked. 'There's an intent and there's a build up of the stocks' for a possible future attack on NATO's Baltic state members. 'This is what the analysts are assessing - in 2029. So we have to be ready by 2029... If you ask me now, is this a guarantee that's not earlier than 2029? I would say no, it's not. So we must be able to fight tonight,' he said. Breuer said that the Suwalki Gap, a region that borders Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Belarus, was particularly vulnerable to Russian military activity. 'The Baltic States are really exposed to the Russians, right? And once you are there, you really feel this... in the talks we are having over there,' he said. Starmer on Monday vowed to make the UK 'battle-ready' while committing to building 12 new nuclear-powered submarines and at least six new munitions factories as part of the government's Strategic Defence Review. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz last week declared that Berlin will finance the production of long-range missiles in Ukraine, shortly after pushing a €500 billion defence and infrastructure spending bill through parliament. He is due to meet President Trump in Washington today as he works to keep the US on board with Western diplomatic and military support for Ukraine. Merz will hope that his pledge to sharply increase Germany's NATO defence spending will please Trump, and that he can find common ground on confronting Russia after the US president voiced growing frustration with Putin following a frosty call between the two leaders yesterday.

UK inflation number for April too high after data blunder
UK inflation number for April too high after data blunder

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

UK inflation number for April too high after data blunder

The UK's statistics agency has said the headline inflation rate for April was too high after it discovered it had been given incorrect road tax data by the Department for Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the pace of general price rises should have been 3.4%, instead of the 3.5% it had comes as the ONS faces a crisis of confidence in its work after concerns about the quality of its concerns make it more difficult for the government and companies to make fully informed decisions about the UK economy. The ONS said it had spotted an error in Vehicle Excise Duty data. It found that the number of vehicles people were paying road tax on in the first year of registration was too high in the data that was statistics agency said it would not be amending April's inflation figure, in line with a policy that it only carries out revisions in exceptional it did say it would be reviewing how it checks the quality of data from outside the agency "in light of this issue".Both the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) and Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation figures were 0.1 of a percentage point too high for the year to April. Last month, the ONS's former head Sir Ian Diamond resigned with immediate effect due to health April, the UK's Office for Statistics Regulation had set out its concerns about the quality of the data provided by the ONS concerns focused on, but were not limited to, widely-recognised problems with the Labour Force Survey which is used to measure the unemployment rate in the the pandemic, statistics agencies around the world have struggled to get good enough response rates to ensure their data is of the quality they would regulator said it would like more assurance that the ONS had sufficient steps in place to regularly review and improve sample design and representativeness, tackling bias, survey methodology, and imputation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store