The Irish Times view on US/China trade talks: another fragile truce
This week's
agreement between the United States and China
to suspend some export controls has restored last month's truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies. But substantial tariffs remain in place on both sides and the deal, the full details of which have yet to be made public, does not appear to address the fundamental issues in the US-China trade relationship.
Washington and Beijing agreed in Geneva last month to wind back most of the tit-for-tat tariffs that had reached 145 per cent for Chinese goods going to the US and 125 per cent on American exports to China. But their framework for negotiations fell apart after the US accused China of backsliding on a promise to issue export licences for rare earth minerals and powerful magnets associated with them.
China has a near monopoly on these products, which are used in the production of everything from electric vehicle engines to fighter jets and drones. Unable to source the magnets elsewhere, some car manufacturers in the US had to halt production in factories and the effective export ban threatened manufacturing in other sectors.
Washington retaliated by restricting the sale of jet engines and ethane, which China needs for the production of plastic. And secretary of state Marco Rubio threatened to revoke the visas of Chinese students at American universities.
READ MORE
This week's deal saw Beijing agree to start issuing export licences to US companies for rare earth minerals and magnets immediately and Washington agreed to drop its retaliatory measures. But China insisted on limiting the export licences to six months, so that it can choke off the supply later if the trade talks go badly.
The stand-off has highlighted how supply chains can be weaponised in trade disputes, often with a more immediate and painful impact than the imposition of tariffs. The US has for years limited exports of advanced semiconductor technology to China and persuaded its allies in Europe and Japan to follow suit.
As the world's leading exporter of steel, ships, machinery, textiles and many other goods, China has more of this kind of leverage at its disposal than any other country. And its chokehold on the rare earth minerals and magnets at the centre of the dispute with the US allows it to use export licences as a negotiating chip with other countries too.
This strengthens Beijing's hand as it seeks to persuade other trading partners to resist pressure from the Trump administration to restrict trade with China as part of their own tariff deals with the US.
Trump has said that he would decide within two weeks on the level of tariffs each country would face, a promise of more uncertainty, market turbulence and lost opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Israel's attack on Iran: a reckless act
Israel's unprecedented aerial assault on Iran has brought the Middle East once again to the brink of conflagration. The scale and precision of the attack – striking uranium enrichment facilities and missile factories, and eliminating key figures in Iran's military command – mark this as one of the most consequential military actions in the region in years. What happens next may determine not just the future of Israeli-Iranian relations, but the stability of the wider Middle East. That Israel acted without the support or participation of its closest ally, the United States, is telling. Despite appeals from Donald Trump not to proceed, Binyamin Netanyahu pressed ahead. The White House, clearly forewarned, evacuated personnel from vulnerable positions across the region but distanced itself from the operation. Secretary of state Marco Rubio's declaration that the US was not involved in the strikes and that its priority is 'protecting American forces in the region' is as much a disclaimer as it is a warning – to both allies and adversaries – that America's patience and appetite for regional war is limited. Tehran's response remains uncertain, though its options are narrow. Iran has already endured a series of strategic setbacks in Lebanon, Syria, Gaza and Yemen. Its attempted missile barrage on Israel last year was decisively neutralised by Israel's Iron Dome, with US and UK assistance. But while its military may be bruised, Iran's capacity for asymmetric retaliation through proxies or cyber warfare cannot be discounted. However it is Netanyahu's willingness to escalate that should concern the international community most. Not for the first time, his recklessness heightens the risk of a regional war in a landscape already riddled with conflict. Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon remain fragile, while the Gulf states watch anxiously from the sidelines. READ MORE It is worth remembering how we got here. In 2018, it was Netanyahu who successfully urged Trump to walk away from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the international agreement that curtailed Iran's nuclear ambitions in exchange for economic relief. That deal, for all its imperfections, created space for diplomacy and reduced the danger of nuclear proliferation. Its collapse re-ignited the Iranian nuclear programme which Israel regards as an existential threat, setting the stage for this crisis. Israel's air strikes have put an end, for the foreseeable future, to the Trump administration's attempts to negotiate a new nuclear deal with Iran, one which would probably have borne a more than passing resemblance to the JCPOA. That may well have been Netanyahu's intention. But if the result of his latest gamble is the outbreak of a new war, that will only lead to yet more bloodshed and misery in the region and make the world a more dangerous place
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the US last week after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, pleaded not guilty on Friday to criminal charges of taking part in a conspiracy to smuggle migrants into the United States . Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyer, William Allensworth, entered the not guilty plea on his behalf at a hearing in Nashville, Tennessee, before US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes. At the hearing, Mr Abrego Garcia (29) is also expected to contest a bid by federal prosecutors to have him detained pending trial. US president Donald Trump's administration has portrayed the indictment of Mr Abrego Garcia as vindication of its aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. Before Mr Abrego Garcia's indictment was unsealed on June 5th, officials alleged he was a member of the MS-13 gang and said they would not bring him back. The justice department's decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges is a potential off-ramp for the Trump administration from its escalating confrontation with the judiciary over whether it complied with a court order to facilitate Mr Abrego Garcia's return. READ MORE The Republican president's critics say his swift removal without a hearing showed the administration prioritised increased deportations over due process – the bedrock principle that people in the US, whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. 'You are presumed innocent, and it is the government's burden to prove at trial that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,' Ms Holmes said, addressing Mr Abrego Garcia. The criminal proceeding will provide Mr Abrego Garcia with due process by giving him the right to contest the charges contained in a grand jury indictment returned in secret on May 21st. Still, his lawyers say his return to face criminal charges does not absolve the Trump administration of responsibility for wrongfully deporting him. In the indictment, Mr Abrego Garcia was charged with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations across the country. The indictment alleges that Mr Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025. Mr Abrego Garcia is also accused of transporting firearms and drugs. Jennifer Vasquez Sura, wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, speaks to the media before a hearing for Mr Abrego Garcia in Nashville, Tennessee, on Friday. Photograph: EPA Prosecutors say Mr Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are US citizens, could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he smuggled. That means he could spend the rest of his life in jail if convicted, according to prosecutors. They are urging he be detained, saying the potentially hefty sentence means he may try to flee. They also say detention is warranted because he allegedly murdered a rival gang member's mother in El Salvador and solicited child pornography, though those accusations are not part of his indictment. Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyers have called the charges 'fantastical' and deny he is a flight risk. —Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
RTÉ News
12 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Ireland, Switzerland added to US Treasury monitoring list
No major US trading partner manipulated its currency in 2024, the Treasury Department said in the first semi-annual currency report of President Donald Trump's new administration. But the Treasury Department's "monitoring list" of countries warranting close attention grew to nine with the addition of Ireland and Switzerland. While it did not label China a currency manipulator for now despite "depreciation pressure" facing its currency, the yuan, Treasury issued a stern warning to China, saying it "stands out among our major trading partners in its lack of transparency around its exchange rate policies and practices." "This lack of transparency will not preclude Treasury from designating China if available evidence suggests that it is intervening through formal or informal channels to resist (yuan) appreciation in the future," Treasury said in a statement. The US Treasury said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Vietnam, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland were on its monitoring list for extra foreign exchange scrutiny. Countries that meet two of the criteria - a trade surplus with the US of at least $15 billion, a global account surplus above 3% of GDP and persistent, one-way net foreign exchange purchases - are automatically added to the list. Ireland and Switzerland were added due to their large trade and current account surpluses with the US. The Swiss National Bank denied being a currency manipulator, but said it would continue to act in Switzerland's interests as the strong Swiss franc helped push inflation into negative terrain last month. "The SNB does not engage in any manipulation of the Swiss franc," it said. "It does not seek to prevent adjustments in the balance of trade or to gain unfair competitive advantages for the Swiss economy." Trump in his first term labeled China a manipulator in August 2019, a move made then - as now - amid heightened US-China trade tensions. The Treasury Department dropped the designation in January 2020 as Chinese officials arrived in Washington to sign a trade deal with the U.S. The report was released hours after Trump spoke with China's leader Xi Jinping for the first time since returning to the White House amid an even more tense trade standoff between the world's two largest economies, and more recently a battle over critical minerals. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. The latest report covers the final full year of the administration of Trump's predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who over his four-year term never labelled any trading partner a currency manipulator but raised similar concerns over China's behaviour and lack of transparency. Last year was marked generally by broad-based dollar strengthening, with the greenback gaining 7% in 2024 against a basket of major trading partners' currencies. That dynamic made it less likely that Treasury would find evidence of consistent one-way actions by countries to weaken their currencies for competitive advantage, since most currencies were broadly weakening anyway, Treasury officials said. That could change over the course of this year, with the dollar already down by roughly 9% since Trump returned to the White House and launched a trade war that has global investors rethinking their commitments to US assets. In the current environment, it might be more tempting for countries to step in to try to prevent or reverse the continued strengthening of their currencies, and Treasury officials said they would be watching closely for such behaviour. In the case of China more specifically, Treasury officials said they were looking at broadening their surveillance to include monitoring of the activities of sovereign wealth and state pension funds for any indication these entities were acting on Beijing's behest in the foreign exchange market.
