&w=3840&q=100)
Islamic State-backed rebels kill nearly 52 people in eastern Congo, says UN
The UN mission, known as MONUSCO, said in a statement that the attacks by the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) took place in several localities of Beni and Lubero territories, in the North Kivu province.
The violence was accompanied by abductions, looting, the burning of homes, vehicles, and motorcycles, as well as the destruction of property belonging to populations already facing dire humanitarian conditions, the statement read, adding that the death toll is likely to rise.
Eastern Congo has suffered deadly attacks in recent years by armed groups, including the ADF and Rwanda-backed rebels. The ADF, which has ties to the Islamic State, operates along the border with Uganda and often targets civilians.
The group killed nearly 40 people in the Ituri province last month, when it stormed a Catholic church during a vigil and opened fire on worshipers, including many women and children.
The ADF was formed by disparate small groups in Uganda in the late 1990s following alleged discontent with President Yoweri Museveni.
In 2002, following military assaults by Ugandan forces, the group moved its activities to neighboring Congo and has since been responsible for the killings of thousands of civilians. In 2019, it pledged allegiance to the Islamic State.
The Congolese army has long struggled to contain the group, especially while also confronting renewed conflict involving the M23 rebel movement backed by neighboring Rwanda.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Uganda has not agreed to take deportees from US, senior official says
KAMPALA -A senior Ugandan official denied on Wednesday a U.S. media report that the country had agreed to take in people deported from the United States, saying it lacked the facilities to accommodate them. Uganda has not agreed to take deportees from US, senior official says Citing internal U.S. government documents, CBS News reported on Tuesday that Washington had reached deportation deals with Uganda and Honduras as part of its drive to step up expulsions of migrants to countries where they do not have citizenship. "To the best of my knowledge we have not reached such an agreement," Okello Oryem, state minister for foreign affairs, told Reuters by text message. "We do not have the facilities and infrastructure to accommodate such illegal immigrants in Uganda." Honduras's government did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comments on the report. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to increase removals to third countries, including by sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini. The CBS report said the agreements with Uganda and Honduras were based on a provision of U.S. immigration law that allows people seeking asylum to be rerouted to third countries if the U.S. government determines those nations can fairly hear their claims. Uganda, a U.S. ally in East Africa, also hosts nearly two million refugees and asylum-seekers, who mostly come from countries in the region such as Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan and Sudan. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Majority of Americans back UN recognition of Palestinian statehood, finds survey
Nearly 6 out of 10 Americans believe that every country in the United Nations should recognise Palestine as a nation, a new survey has found. The Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 58 per cent of American adults believe that every country in the UN should recognise Palestine, while 33 per cent of respondents disagreed, and another 9 per cent didn't answer when asked. The Reuters/Ipsos poll also showed that 59 per cent of Americans believe that Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive. The tally of those disagreeing with this statement stood at 33 per cent. The findings are similar to a poll conducted in February 2024 where 53 per cent of respondents agreed that Israel's response had been excessive, and 42 per cent disagreed. The six-day poll, which closed on Monday, was taken within weeks of three countries — Canada, Britain and France — announcing their intention to recognise the State of Palestine in the coming months. The State of Palestine is recognised as a sovereign nation by 147 countries, representing 75 per cent of the UN's 193 members. Several countries, including the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands in Europe and the US, Canada, and Mexico in North America have not recognised the State of Palestine. While Japan, South Korea and Singapore are among the Asian countries that have not recognised the State of Palestine, Israel is the only country in the Middle East to do so. The ongoing war in Gaza, which has turned into a humanitarian catastrophe, has made the calls for the recognition of Palestine louder in many of these countries. The United Nations human rights office said on Tuesday that Israel was not letting enough supplies into the Gaza Strip to avert widespread starvation. Israel has denied responsibility for the hunger in Gaza, accusing Hamas of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies. A larger majority of the Reuters/Ipsos poll respondents (65 per cent), said the US should take action in Gaza to help people facing starvation, with 28 per cent disagreeing. The war in Gaza began as a response to the Hamas terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which killed around 1,200 people. The militant organisation took hostage 251 people, of which around 50 are still being held in Gaza. In response to the terror attack, Israel launched a massive military operation in Gaza, which has since killed more than 62,000 Palestinians, and plunged the Palestinian areas into an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, and displaced most of its population.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Rethinking monetary defenses: Why policymakers must reframe de-dollarization strategies
H.E. Prof. Sir Manuel Freire-Garabal y Núñez is a lawyer and journalist. He is a professor, contributor and advisor at different universities, particularly at the IVY League. He serves in diplomacy as advisor to United Nations higher officials and as a member of the diplomatic staff of several governments. He has received high honours from Russian Federation, United States or Peru. LESS ... MORE Global finance is entering a transitional phase. The US dollar remains pre-eminent, yet governments are quietly building buffers against its risks. Economist Otaviano Canuto has described this as 'slow and bounded de-dollarization'—a phrase that captures not only the limits of the trend but also the opportunities it creates for smart policymaking. The challenge now is not to predict the dollar's demise, but to reframe existing policies so that they adapt to this cautious diversification. Beyond symbolism: Policy adaptation Much of the discussion around de-dollarization has been dominated by political rhetoric. But Canuto's insight is clear: local-currency arrangements and regional payment systems are not about toppling the dollar, they are about risk management. Governments must treat them as tools of resilience, not as ideological projects. That reframing matters. Instead of seeing initiatives like the Brazil–China settlement mechanism or BRICS payment platforms as threats to global stability, policymakers should recognize them as insurance policies against shocks. A coherent policy approach requires aligning these experiments with broader financial safety nets. India's opportunity to lead India illustrates the policy crossroads. With foreign reserves above $650 billion, it already possesses one of the world's strongest first-line defenses. At the same time, the Reserve Bank of India has promoted rupee-denominated settlements with partners such as Russia, Sri Lanka, and Mauritius. These moves reflect the logic Canuto highlights: pragmatic steps to diversify, not disrupt. The policy implication is twofold: Deepen liquidity in rupee instruments, so that settlement agreements can expand beyond symbolic volumes. Tie rupee internationalization to regional safety nets, ensuring that bilateral arrangements complement, rather than fragment, existing monetary defenses. By anchoring its strategy in this way, India could become a model for other emerging economies navigating the same balance. Rebuilding the three pillars Canuto's framework for external financial defense provides a roadmap for policy reform: Reserves remain necessary but costly. Policymakers must debate not only how much to accumulate but how to deploy them strategically—through sovereign wealth vehicles, diversification into non-traditional assets, and conditional swap access. Swap lines and regional arrangements should be reframed as policy infrastructure, not ad-hoc crisis tools. India's role in the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement could be scaled up as part of this shift. The IMF must be strengthened, not sidelined. For India and other G20 economies, advocating a larger quota share and modernized lending instruments is not charity—it is self-interest in ensuring that the multilateral backstop keeps pace with global liabilities. Toward a reframed policy architecture The central lesson is that de-dollarization is not an alternative to the existing system but a layering of complementary protections. Policymakers who continue to frame it as a contest of supremacy will miss the real point: the task is to build resilience in a world of uncertainty. Reframing existing policies along the lines Canuto outlines means: Treating local-currency initiatives as hedges, not revolutions. Embedding swap arrangements in long-term architecture. Pushing for a stronger IMF to serve as the connective tissue between regional and global defenses. Conclusion The future of global finance will not be determined by grand announcements but by how governments adapt their policies today. Canuto's expertise reminds us that the real danger is not dollar dominance, but policy inertia. For India and other emerging economies, reframing their monetary strategies now—before the next crisis—may determine whether de-dollarization becomes a source of stability or a pathway to fragmentation. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
