logo
The fallout from Erin Patterson's mushroom murder convictions is far from over

The fallout from Erin Patterson's mushroom murder convictions is far from over

The skies were clear and the sun was out on Monday afternoon in the regional Victorian town of Morwell.
For a week, those involved with the trial and many more watching around the world had been on edge, waiting, as the jury in Erin Patterson's triple-murder trial deliberated.
Suddenly, the news rippled across the court precinct: the jury would return its verdict at 2:15pm.
A trial that had been played out to audiences across the globe had reached a crescendo.
Adrenaline coursing, those at court craned heads and listened intently as the jury's foreperson delivered the crucial verdicts: guilty on all four counts.
In a matter of minutes, a tension built over weeks of legal arguments and disputed versions of what happened the day Patterson hosted her in-laws for lunch was resolved.
The jury had given the community its answer: the 50-year-old mother of two was a murderer, who had spent weeks planning how to conceal a deadly toxin in a meal served to her trusting in-laws.
She had murdered her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, who had checked in on her and prayed for her good health in the weeks before the meal.
She had murdered her father-in-law Don Patterson, depriving him of the opportunity to spend more time with his grandson sharing their passion for flying.
She had murdered Heather Wilkinson, who had offered love and support after the birth of Simon and Erin's daughter.
And she had attempted to murder Ian Wilkinson, the spiritual leader of her family's church community.
Immediately after the verdicts, the courtyard outside the courtroom was abuzz.
A thick media scrum hovered at the courtroom doors, swarming around those linked to the case as they left the building.
The responses from key parties was minimal: there was no comment from her barrister Colin Mandy SC, and police spoke only briefly to acknowledge the work of detectives and the families who had endured two years of investigations and legal proceedings.
"We will continue to support [the families] in every way possible following this decision," a Victoria Police spokesperson said.
So far, the Wilkinson and Patterson families have made no comment.
The stratospheric interest in the case has been unprecedented in recent history, according to the Victorian Supreme Court.
More than 250 journalists and outlets were on the court's media management list for the trial, including more than a dozen media outlets across the UK, US and New Zealand.
There were slips along the way for media covering the trial too.
Perhaps the most high-profile was carried out by Australia radio hosts Kyle Sandilands and Jackie "O" Henderson, whose on-air banter during the trial attracted the ire of Justice Christopher Beale.
In the June 16 radio segment, the pair discussed the case in highly prejudicial terms, including Sandilands, who issued a call to "lock that bitch up"'.
That afternoon, while the jury was out of the room, Justice Beale told the court he had read a transcript of the segment.
"I encourage all commentators to engage their brains before they open their mouths, as they may otherwise land themselves and their organisations in hot water," he said.
Justice Beale referred the matter to the Office of Public Prosecutions for possible contempt of court charges. The office is yet to reveal whether it will lay charges against the pair.
The verdict also marks the end of an extraordinary journey for the 12 jurors who sat through the lengthy trial to deliver the verdict.
They were among 15,000 people identified in the Latrobe Valley district in February to help cover five Supreme and County court sittings between late April and August 1.
That list was further whittled down through availability to 112 people who presented for potential empanelment in the case on April 29.
Justice Christopher Beale gave them the opportunity to read through a list of 137 names, including witnesses, places and lawyers involved in the case.
"As potential jurors, you have to consider whether you can bring an impartial, open mind to the consideration of the evidence that will be led in this case and can decide the case solely on that evidence," he said.
"If you can't do that, or if you think you may struggle to do that, if you have doubts about your capacity to do that, you must ask to be excused."
A further 27 people were excused and a panel of 15 people was drawn from the remaining 85.
They ranged in age from their 20s to their 70s.
Finally, 12 of them formed the panel that deliberated and reached a verdict on Monday, to thanks from Justice Beale.
"The way you've conducted yourself throughout this trial has caught my attention and you've remained in good spirits even though the trial went much longer than you were led to believe and even though this was a major intrusion in all your lives," the judge said.
As they return to normal life, the jurors are given access to free and confidential counselling.
While the ripples of the verdict continue to be felt, back in Morwell things quickly turned back to normal.
On Tuesday afternoon, the courtyard outside the courtrooms was empty — cold wind whipping leaves across a space that just 24 hours earlier had been a frenzy of activity.
Workers emptying the bin in the middle of the courtyard saw the detritus left behind, including a pile of coffee cups.
In the coming weeks, Patterson's sentencing process will begin — and the possibility of an appeal against her convictions still hangs in the air.
But as news of the verdicts settles, the unfailing dignity and sense of humanity that drove her victims remains in focus in their home town of Korumburra.
After an inspection of the evidence, the jury found those honourable values exemplified in life by Don, Gail and Heather were utterly absent in their killer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Western Sydney Airport official who sought $200k kickback narrowly avoids jail time
Western Sydney Airport official who sought $200k kickback narrowly avoids jail time

ABC News

time8 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Western Sydney Airport official who sought $200k kickback narrowly avoids jail time

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has claimed its first scalp with the sentencing of a corrupt Western Sydney Airport official who asked for a $200,000 kickback. Sajish Erasery pleaded guilty to soliciting a corrupt commission after he attempted to invite a bribe from a company vying for a $5 million contract to provide automated parking systems at the soon-to-be completed airport. The anti-corruption watchdog found the former executive procurement manager had initially proposed he could "get the deal over the line" if he received $250,000, which equated to 5 per cent of the contract's value. The NACC said in a statement Erasery later reduced this figure to $200,000 and suggested a scheme to repay the business by inflating invoices. The Australian Federal Police arrested the man in March 2024 after his former employer referred the matter to the commission. He has been sentenced to two years' jail, which will be served in the community and require him to complete 500 hours of community service. The airport is due to be complete in 2026. Erasery is the first person to be sentenced following an investigation initiated by the NACC. Since the watchdog's inception, there have been convictions in nine other cases which were inherited from the former Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity in July 2023. The latest of those cases involved Anne McCann, a former Department of Home Affairs immigration officer, who abused power in public office by approving a visa application for her brother-in-law. Both matters were prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

‘Taking the mick': Tradie furious at bank's refund after losing $17,000 to scammers
‘Taking the mick': Tradie furious at bank's refund after losing $17,000 to scammers

News.com.au

time17 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Taking the mick': Tradie furious at bank's refund after losing $17,000 to scammers

A tradie who lost $17,000 in an elaborate spoofing scam has been left feeling mocked after receiving a letter from his bank. Bradley Turner runs a micro cementing company called Pure Deco, and he is still reeling from falling victim to a scam in June of this year. The 33-year-old lost almost $17,000 after transferring money because a scammer hacked into an established text chain he had with ANZ, making him believe he needed to move his money to avoid his account being drained. The tradie has maintained that the bank needs to reimburse the money because the hacker was able to infiltrate the text chain he had with the bank. Mr Turner claimed that ANZ initially closed the case without offering to return any of the funds but, after he complained, agreed to re-open the case. He has now been left furious once more after receiving a letter from ANZ, which has seen, revealing the low amount the bank was able to recover. '$1.86 has been recovered as a result of the process and we've credited this amount to the relevant accounts,' the letter read. The letter did not explain how ANZ came to $1.86 figure, or why the bank could recover this amount but not the almost $17,000 that was lost. has reached out to ANZ for comment. The letter also claimed that, while Mr Turner is a 'valued customer', the bank would not be reimbursing him further. 'There are no other steps ANZ is able to take to try and recover these funds. While you're a valued customer we will not be making a payment to you for the remainder of your loss in these circumstances.' Mr Turner told that hearing he was getting less than $2 dollars back after waiting for months for a final response was devastating. 'I felt horrendous, like they're taking the mick,' he said. 'I've been waiting for that money, and then they tell me, I can get $1.86? It is like they're throwing it in my face.' Mr Turner said it is 'annoying' and he is frustrated that the bank is claiming it is a telecom issue, because he feels it is the bank's responsibility to ensure their texting streams cannot be hacked into. The tradie maintains that he never would have fallen for the scam if it weren't for the fact that the messages appeared in an established text chain he had with ANZ. '(The scammers) are putting you in a position where you believe it is ANZ,' he said. Scammers are becoming more sophisticated and can now use state-of-the-art technology to 'spoof' numbers and get into established texting threads. Mr Turner ended up in this mess because he received a text that appeared to be from ANZ, which he believed to be legitimate because it appeared in an already-established message chain. The message alerted him that his voice ID had been updated and that if he didn't request this change, he should contact the number provided immediately. The 33-year-old panicked because he hadn't updated any verifications with the bank and it was for his business account. The tradie insisted he never would have rung the number if he had just received a text message from a random number, but because it appeared to be from ANZ on his phone and was alongside other official messages, he fell for it. Mr Turner called the number and was instructed by the scammers, whom he believed were ANZ staff, to transfer lump sums into a new secure account because he was being hacked. Mr Turner transferred two separate payments, one totalling $16,941 and another payment of around $7000, to a new bank account. After his panic subsided and he hung up from the phone call, it occurred to him that it may have been an elaborate scam. He contacted ANZ only an hour and a half after making the transfers, but it was already mostly too late. ANZ was able to stop the $7000 transfer, but the almost $17,000 sum was already with another bank. When originally covered Mr Turner's scam horror, ANZ said in a statement that the bank always tries to recover funds. 'However, the ability to recover funds depends on a number of factors including how quickly it is reported to us, whether they are transferred to another financial institution, and the speed in which funds are then on-transferred by scammers,' the bank said. 'In many instances, cyber criminals on-transfer funds within minutes, or use them to purchase cryptocurrency.' ANZ said it works with telecommunications companies on measures that stop scammers from adopting the 'ANZ' label in text messages. This includes 'reporting instances where ANZ has been impersonated for telcos to block and prevent these attempts'. 'ANZ has several measures in place to help detect and protect our customers from fraud and scams and we are continually reviewing and adjusting our capabilities as new fraud and scams emerge and criminals change how they operate,' the bank said. 'A genuine ANZ call, email or text will never ask you to share sensitive details such as passwords and pins, click a link to log into your account, grant remote access to your device, transfer money to another account to keep it safe or join an online chat with an ANZ member.' Mr Turner isn't alone in his experience. In February, reported an eerily similar story about another Aussie tradie who lost $58,000 in a spoofing scam. Furkan Colak, from Melbourne, was in the process of trying to buy a house while also saving up for his dad's knee surgery when he received a text message that looked to be from ANZ but was actually from a scammer. Mr Colak previously told that the whole experience left him 'shaking' and it has been tough to get over losing so much money. 'It comes to the point where you're almost over it and then you think what you could have done with the money,' he said

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store