
Ex-CEO shocked at Rs 13 lakh a year in school fees in India. IITian responds: My fees was...
Think raising a child is expensive? Try doing it in a metro city, with dreams of giving them the 'best' education. A LinkedIn post by Mumbai-based ex-founder Ankur Jhaveri is striking a chord across social media for laying bare what many young Indians are quietly grappling with: education fees of children. In his post, Jhaveri confessed he never truly understood the actual cost of raising kids until he spoke to his cousin, a teacher at an international school. What followed was a no-frills, back-of-the-envelope calculation. However, many did not agree with his calculations and some even called out parents' 'fear of missing out(FOMO)' which needs to be urgently addressed.
According to Jhaveri, tuition fees at a typical international school range between ₹7–9 lakh a year. That's just the beginning. Add another ₹2–4 lakh for uniforms, books, private tuitions, and other academic expenses. The yearly education bill already touches ₹12 lakh—and we haven't even factored in the birthday parties, clothes, coaching classes, and extra-curriculars, which bring the total to around ₹13 lakh per year.
So, how much do you need to earn to afford this? Jhaveri breaks it down: if you're spending roughly 30% of your income on your child, your net income should be at least ₹44 lakh annually. Factor in taxes (say, a blended 20%), and your gross salary should ideally be around ₹55 lakh to sustain this lifestyle, for one child.
"And if you want a second kid?" Jhaveri jokes, 'Picture abhi baaki hai mere dost,' reminding readers that doubling those numbers might well push it into luxury territory.
Netizens do not seem to agree with him
The post quickly went viral, Some pushed back, arguing that ICSE or state board schools charge far less. But Jhaveri clarified that most urban parents—especially the LinkedIn demographic—aspire to the best for their kids, and legacy ICSE institutions are both tough to get into and, increasingly, not as 'affordable' as assumed.
Several users weighed in on Ankur Jhaveri's viral LinkedIn post, offering alternative perspectives and challenging the assumptions around the
cost of raising children
in India. One user shared that they are raising two children enrolled in an ICSE school, with total annual costs—including books, uniforms, and transport—coming in under Rs 2 lakh. Even after adding hobby classes like piano, Carnatic vocals, and cricket, their total yearly spend remains well under Rs 3 lakh. In their view, anything beyond this figure is more about lifestyle choices than necessity.
Girish Chandankar, an IIT-Bombay graduate, pointed out the distinction between genuinely good schools and what he referred to as 'branded' schools. He shared that his own school charged less than Rs 15,000 annually and, even now, hasn't crossed the Rs 1 lakh mark. For him, the key lies in making informed choices rather than simply gravitating toward expensive institutions.
Others echoed the sentiment, noting that not all quality schools charge exorbitant fees. Many reputable ICSE, CBSE, and even IGCSE schools offer excellent education within a range of Rs 1–2 lakh per year. This significantly changes the equation laid out in the original post.
One user went further, identifying a deeper issue: the fear of missing out (FOMO). They argued that the pressure to choose high-fee schools is often driven by competitive parenting and social comparison, rather than a child's actual needs. If parents are paying Rs 7–9 lakh in tuition and still feel the need for additional tuitions from early grades—long before competitive exams even begin—it raises concerns about both the school's effectiveness and the mounting pressure placed on the child. In the end, they suggested, it's FOMO that's distorting not just financial decisions, but the very essence of parenting itself.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Google and Latin America's largest airline LATAM are fighting a court battle over a YouTube video
Alphabet's Google has reportedly launched a legal battle against Chile-based LATAM Airlines in a U.S. federal court in San Jose, California, seeking to block Brazilian courts from forcing the removal of a YouTube video in the United States. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The video, which alleges that a LATAM employee sexually abused a child, has sparked a heated dispute over jurisdictional reach, Reuters reported. Google's lawsuit argues that LATAM is attempting to bypass U.S. constitutional protections for free speech by leveraging Brazilian courts to demand the video's global removal. "LATAM is trying to sidestep U.S. law," the filing stated, accusing the airline of overreaching its authority. LATAM Airlines did not immediately respond to Reuters' inquiries regarding Google's claims. Jose Castaneda, a Google spokesperson, emphasized the company's stance, stating, "Google has consistently upheld the principle that a country's courts can govern content within its borders but should not dictate what is accessible in other nations." What is the Google vs LATAM case about At the heart of the current dispute is a 2018 YouTube video uploaded by Raymond Moreira, a Florida resident and U.S. citizen. The video features his 6-year-old son describing alleged sexual abuse by a LATAM employee during a trip as an unaccompanied minor. In 2020, Moreira sued LATAM in Florida over the incident, reaching a confidential settlement. LATAM responded by filing a lawsuit in Brazil in 2018, seeking to compel Google, YouTube's parent company, to remove the video. Brazil's highest court is set to decide next week whether it can mandate a worldwide takedown. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Google's Thursday filing in California asks the court to affirm that LATAM cannot enforce such a removal in the U.S. What Google vs LATAM case shows The case mirrors a February lawsuit in Florida, where Trump Media and Rumble, two right-wing social media platforms, challenged a Brazilian judge's order to delete U.S.-based accounts linked to a supporter of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. A federal judge in that case ruled that the platforms were not required to comply with the Brazilian directive in the U.S. This case highlights ongoing tensions over global content regulation. In a similar 2018 case, Canada's Supreme Court ordered Google to remove certain search results worldwide, but a California judge blocked its enforcement in the U.S. in 2017, underscoring the challenges of reconciling national laws with global digital platforms.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Hyphenating US-Pak: Doing business with gunmen
Howdy, phenomenal pardners! Michael Kurilla (left) & Asif Munir, Florida, 2023 The Trump regime's reported invitation to Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to attend the 250th US Army Day celebrations in Washington tomorrow has stirred various vectors of speculation. Chief among them: Potential reset in US-Pakistan relations. Pakistan's prospective utility within an emergent Trump doctrine that views bilateral ties primarily through an economic lens. Revival of a counterterrorism partnership between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington. Implications of such a warming of US-Pakistan ties on US-India relations. In New Delhi, this apparent shift in Washington's posture has come as a surprise. What is even more startling is the timing - coming on the heels of India's retaliation against Pakistan for its involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attacks on civilians. A significant part of Trump's appeal among Indians, both in India and the diaspora, stemmed from his tough stance on terrorism. During Trump 1.0, he publicly called out Pakistan's duplicity in his very first tweet of 2018, accusing it of 'lies and deceit' while receiving billions in US aid. He subsequently cut $300 mn in aid to Pakistan, a move that built on the Obama administration's earlier decision to withhold one-third of all military assistance to the country. During Trump 2.0, consistent with his recalibrated approach toward various global actors, the US president has markedly diverged from his earlier stance, Pakistan being no exception. In February, the Trump regime departed from its broader aid-cutting policy to authorise $397 mn in security assistance to Pakistan. This was specifically aimed at supporting a US-backed programme for maintenance and technical support of Pakistan's F-16 fighter the assistance explicitly stated that it was not to be used for operations against India, reopening of funding channels to Pakistan signalled a broader trend of policy reversal. In March, Trump publicly thanked Pakistan for its assistance in the arrest of Mohammad Sharifullah, a suspect linked to multiple terrorist attacks, including the 2021 Abbey Gate bombing in recently, Trump's consistent attempts to place Pakistan on equal footing with India, particularly following the India-Pak military escalation in May, appear driven by strategic reinforcing this shift, US Centcom chief Michael Kurilla referred to Pakistan as a 'phenomenal partner' in counterterrorism efforts. Similarly, Paul Kapur, Trump's incoming assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs, affirmed that the US would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to US interests while seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment'. Together, these moves reflect a deliberate and coordinated strategy for renewed strategic engagement with apparent rapprochement between the US and Pakistan may be driven largely by Trump's personal inclinations, and a possible desire to secure future economic deals. For Pakistan, warming ties with Washington represent a strategic gain, however temporary. Any signs of improving relations between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington stand in sharp political contrast to the stance of former PM Imran Khan and his supporters in Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).Khan had accused the US of orchestrating the fall of his government, and maintained that he would never have agreed to American demands for military bases in his country. If PTI continues to remain a significant political force, any future US requests for enhanced military presence - even under the guise of counterterrorism - are likely to face resistance. Conversely, if Trump intensifies efforts to strike an economic deal with Pakistan, the resulting political reverberations within the country could become even more tough posture during his first term - marked by launching a trade war with China, pursuing a 'maximum pressure' strategy against Iran culminating in the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, and publicly calling out countries like Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism - is now giving way to a policy of modus vivendi, driven by an outsized prioritisation of US interests, particularly economic US-China economic deal reportedly 'finalised' on June 11 underscores this clear shift in US diplomacy - one that increasingly sidelines concerns of Washington's allies, partners and friends. While this approach may serve immediate US interests, especially in economic terms, it risks prompting a strategic recalibration by other nations in how they engage with the the shadow of recent military escalation between India and Pakistan, Pakistan's detente with the US may present an opportunity for Trump. But the strain this reset places on India-US relations could prove detrimental to both countries in the long run. The divergence between New Delhi and Washington is now most pronounced on the issue of Pakistan and, more broadly, on India has strongly reaffirmed its zero-tolerance stance against terrorism following the Pahalgam attack, the Trump regime appears increasingly willing to engage Pakistan as a counterterrorism partner. In doing so, Trump seems to be prioritising unilateral US interests over shared strategic concerns that have long underpinned the India-US partnership. Unlike his first term, when Trump's South Asia policy broadly aligned with the US-India strategic convergence, his bilateral bets in his second gig risk further destabilising an already fragile region. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Is Zomato under siege? Quick commerce may be the next telecom Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Coal on one hand and green on the other; this company balances both Stock Radar: Bandhan Bank stocks break out from 1-month consolidation; what should traders do? Check target & stop loss Combination of strong brand & higher margins equals long-term investment: 5 stocks with an upside potential of up to 23% Two Trades for Today: A PSU energy major for 7.5% rise, a large-cap refinery stock for close to 6% upmove These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Samsung Galaxy S24 price drops by Rs 36,600
Samsung Galaxy S24 price drops by Rs 36,600 By Ankita Garg The Samsung Galaxy S24 is available on Amazon with a massive discount offer, that too without any terms or conditions. Amazon is not even running any sale and is directly offering a big discount on it. The Samsung Galaxy S24 is currently listed on Amazon at a discounted price of Rs 43,397. (Marble Gray colour model) To recall, the Samsung Galaxy S24 was launched in India at a starting price of Rs 79,999. This means that consumers are getting a flat discount of Rs 36,602 without any terms or conditions. At the moment, there is no bank offer available, but the deal is already quite attractive for those who have been planning to buy this at a lower price. It is worth noting that the mentioned offer is for the 128GB storage model. Other storage models have also received discounts on Amazon. The Galaxy S24 comes in four colour variants: Amber Yellow, Cobalt Violet, Marble Grey, and Onyx Black. Since this is a flagship, you can expect powerful performance out of the box, be it gaming or general tasks. The Galaxy S24 has a 6.4-inch display, which is great for binge watching and quite bright outdoors. The colours are rich and the panel has minimal bezels around it. For your reference, the Galaxy S24 is powered by Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC and a 4,000mAh battery.