logo
Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial is coming to a close. Here's what you need to know

Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial is coming to a close. Here's what you need to know

CBC2 days ago

WARNING: This article may affect those who have experienced​ ​​​sexual violence or know someone affected by it.
Jurors will soon weigh the case against former movie studio boss Harvey Weinstein, who is standing trial for a second time in New York on sexual assault charges.
The trial, which began in a Manhattan criminal court on April 23, moved on to closing arguments Tuesday without testimony from Weinstein.
Deliberations by the jury — made up of seven women and five men, with five people serving as alternates — could begin Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday.
Weinstein, 73, is accused of raping an actress and assaulting two women in what prosecutors have called a pattern in which the disgraced movie producer used his power and influence to lure in victims and then keep them silent.
The Miramax studio co-founder has pleaded not guilty and has denied ever having non-consensual sex with anyone. Weinstein, suffering from a litany of health problems, was present throughout the trial in a wheelchair.
Weinstein returned to court five years after he was convicted of rape and sexual assault by a New York jury, for a new trial covering many of the very same allegations — plus one that hasn't been tried before.
That trial and a whirlwind of other allegations against Weinstein from women in the film and television industry, including some prominent movie stars, propelled the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct.
The retrial is happening because New York's top court last year threw out Weinstein's 2020 conviction. The high court found that the previous trial judge allowed prejudicial testimony about allegations separate from the charges.
Here's what you need to know about Weinstein's retrial as the case nears a close.
WATCH | How the prosecution took a gamble in 2020 Weinstein trial and what went wrong:
Why Harvey Weinstein's rape conviction was overturned | About That
1 year ago
Duration 8:49
Weinstein not testifying
Weinstein opted not to testify at his New York retrial, his lawyer Arthur Aidala said Sunday night. It was a fraught decision for the 73-year-old, who didn't testify at previous trials in New York and California and was convicted in both.
He denies the allegations, and Aidala has said that Weinstein was carefully weighing whether to take the stand this time.
Speaking outside court on Thursday, Aidala said that Weinstein thought a lot of holes had been poked in the accusers' accounts, but that he also was pondering whether jurors would feel they needed to hear from him.
In the U.S., defendants in criminal cases aren't obligated to testify, and many decide not to, for various reasons. Among them: the prospect of being questioned by prosecutors.
Who are the accusers?
He's charged in New York with raping Jessica Mann in 2013 and forcing oral sex on Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola, separately, in 2006.
Mann was an actor and hairstylist, Haley a production assistant and producer, and Sokola a model who aspired to an acting career.
It was the first time prosecutors publicly identified Sokola and detailed her account of what unfolded between her and the Oscar-winning movie producer in the early 2000s. She has also accused him in a civil lawsuit of groping her against her will four years earlier, when she was 16.
Like the two other accusers in the case, Sokola alleges a complex series of encounters and reactions — being sexually assaulted, yet staying in touch; wary of Weinstein but wanting to remain on good terms with a Hollywood power broker who dangled the possibility of an acting career.
The Associated Press does not generally identify people alleging sexual assault unless they consent to be named, as Haley, Mann and Sokola have done.
What are the accusations?
All three women testified for days at the retrial, giving emotional and graphic accounts of what they say they endured.
They said Weinstein suggested he'd help them achieve their show-business dreams, but then manoeuvred them into private settings and preyed on them.
Haley, a former TV production assistant, was the first to testify and recalled the alleged events of July 2006.
She said she accepted an invitation to visit Weinstein's Manhattan apartment one early evening because she felt it would have been odd to decline; she was due to fly on his company's dime to Los Angeles the next day to see a premiere of the film Clerks II, which Weinstein's company co-produced.
After she and Weinstein briefly chatted on his living room sofa, he lunged to kiss her, she testified. She said she leapt up and rejected him, but he grabbed her and forcibly backed her into a bedroom.
Then, Haley said, he pinned her down on a bed and performed oral sex on her, ignoring her pleas that she didn't want it.
Sokola, an aspiring actor at the time, told jurors Weinstein put his hand inside her underwear and made her touch his genitals at a Manhattan apartment in 2002.
Mann, a 39-year-old cosmetologist and hairstylist, was the last of three accusers to testify in the case and the one with arguably the most complicated history with Weinstein.
She said she met Weinstein at a party in late 2012 or early 2013, when she was 27 and had recently moved to Los Angeles to try to launch an acting career.
She said he took an interest in her ambitions, and they had a few followup meetings that alternated between professional talk and boundary-pushing.
In March 2013, she said she travelled to New York with a friend. After the pals made plans for breakfast with Weinstein, he showed up early and got a room at Mann's hotel, over her protests, she said.
Weeping and wiping her eyes on the witness stand, she said she went upstairs with Weinstein to try to avoid a public argument and told him, "I don't want to do this," but he shoved the door shut as she tried to leave.
After Weinstein demanded she undress and grabbed her arms, she said she "just gave up." Mann said he then had sex with her — after, she believes, injecting himself with an erection-promoting drug that she later found in the bathroom trash.
Mann told no one about the alleged rape. She said that she doubted she'd be believed and feared reprisals from the well-connected Weinstein.
Weinstein's lawyers have argued that anything that happened between him and his accusers was consensual.
Will Weinstein go free if he's acquitted at this trial?
Weinstein had been serving a 23-year sentence in a prison in upstate Rome, N.Y., when his first conviction was overturned. But even if he's acquitted in this trial, he's not a free man.
Last year, he rejected an extradition request from California, where he was found guilty of rape, forced oral copulation and another sexual misconduct count involving a woman known as Jane Doe 1, after a two-month trial held in Los Angeles in late 2022.
He was sentenced early the following year to 16 years in prison, which was to begin after the New York sentence was served.
Weinstein's conviction in California is subject to review, but in the wake of the overturning of the New York verdict, legal experts said that the two states had rules that differed regarding testimony about prior acts and behaviour.
WATCH | Weinstein sentenced for rape, sexual assault of accuser known as 'Jane Doe 1':
Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 16 years for rape and sexual assault
2 years ago
Duration 3:04
An L.A. judge has sentenced Harvey Weinstein to 16 years in prison following his conviction for the rape and sexual assault of the accuser known as 'Jane Doe 1.' The former movie producer will serve the sentence after his current 23-year sentence in New York.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman dragged into wooded area at High Park and sexually assaulted: police
Woman dragged into wooded area at High Park and sexually assaulted: police

CTV News

time38 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Woman dragged into wooded area at High Park and sexually assaulted: police

A photo of the sign at the entrance to Toronto's High Park. Toronto police have issued a public safety alert after a woman was dragged into a wooded area in High Park and sexually assaulted on Wednesday night. Police were called to the east side of the park near Howard Park Avenue and Parkside Drive at around 10:40 p.m. They say that a female was walking on a paved pathway in the park when she was approached from behind by an unknown male suspect who dragged her into a wooded area and sexually assaulted her before fleeing. The victim was able to get away from the suspect and seek help from a passerby who called the police, investigators say. She sustained non-life-threatening injuries in the attack, police said. A media officer later told CP24 that the victim is an 'adult female.' The suspect is described as a Black male with a dark complexion, who is about five-foot-ten and 30 to 40 years old with a slim, athletic build. He was last seen wearing a T-shirt and dark-coloured pants. This investigation is ongoing and anyone with further information is asked to contact Toronto police or Crime Stoppers anonymously.

Tesla shares down as Trump fires back at ally Musk
Tesla shares down as Trump fires back at ally Musk

Globe and Mail

time38 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Tesla shares down as Trump fires back at ally Musk

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla (TSLA-Q) and self-proclaimed 'First Buddy' of President Donald Trump, has stepped up criticism of the president's massive tax legislation in recent days. Investors are starting to notice. Tesla shares dropped more than 5 per cent on Thursday on a day otherwise devoid of news for the electric vehicle maker, leading traders to speculate that Mr. Musk's increasingly pointed rhetoric suggests strain in the relationship that has benefited his sprawling empire of businesses. Mr. Trump said on Thursday that Mr. Musk was upset because the bill took the EV mandate away. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' the president said. 'He said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally. That'll be next. But I'm very disappointed.' Mr. Trump's comments extended a decline in Tesla shares. The world's richest man, a key figure in the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) cost-cutting initiative for several months, has blasted the bill, not long after he said he would spend less time in the White House and more time with his companies. On his social media platform X, Mr. Musk has called on Congress members to kill the legislation, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk,' Musk, the largest Republican donor in the 2024 election cycle, said on X on Tuesday. Mr. Musk's leadership of DOGE and his alignment with the Trump administration have put off some Tesla buyers. Sales of his EVs have slumped in Europe, China and key U.S. markets like California, even as overall electric vehicle purchases continue to grow. Mr. Musk has slowly started to separate himself from the White House in recent weeks, stung in part by the wave of protests against Tesla. 'Elon's politics continue to harm the stock. First he aligned himself with Trump which upset many potential Democratic buyers. Now he has turned on the Trump administration,' said Tesla shareholder Dennis Dick, chief strategist at Stock Trader Network. Mr. Musk's other businesses, SpaceX and Starlink, dominate their respective markets, but have also come under scrutiny due to Mr. Musk's relationship with Mr. Trump. Those two businesses often serve as the default choice for commercial launches and satellite internet deployment, and foreign governments have also increasingly looked to Starlink, with regulatory approvals smoothed by Mr. Musk's ties. Tesla shares are down 12 per cent since May 27, roughly coinciding with his decision to pull back from Washington activities. The stock has been on a roller-coaster ever since his endorsement of Mr. Trump in mid-July 2024 in his re-election bid, gaining 169 per cent from that point through mid-December. That was followed by a 54-per-cent selloff through early April as a 'Tesla Takedown' protest movement intensified. The House of Representatives version of the budget bill proposes largely ending the popular US$7,500 electric vehicle subsidy by the end of 2025. Tesla and other automakers have relied on incentives for years to drum up demand, but Mr. Trump promised during the transition to end the subsidy. Tesla could face a US$1.2-billion hit to its full-year profit, along with an additional US$2-billion setback to regulatory credit sales due to separate Senate legislation targeting California's EV sales mandates, according to J.P. Morgan analysts. 'The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies,' said Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management. Mr. Musk's public attacks have upset potential Republican Tesla buyers as well, Dennis Dick added. One White House official on Wednesday called the Tesla CEO's moves 'infuriating.' The billionaire joined Senate Republican deficit hawks this week in arguing that the House bill does not go far enough in reducing spending. Overall, Tesla shares are down 22 per cent this year, including Thursday's losses. But the company is still the most valuable automaker worldwide by a long shot - carrying a market value of US$1-trillion, far surpassing Toyota Motor's market value of about US$290-billion. Tesla trades at 140.21 times profit estimates, a steep premium to other Big Tech stocks like Nvidia. Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Sheds Light on Dangers of Broadside Collisions in New Legal Insight
Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Sheds Light on Dangers of Broadside Collisions in New Legal Insight

Globe and Mail

time41 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Sheds Light on Dangers of Broadside Collisions in New Legal Insight

In a recent article titled 'What is a Broadside Collision?', the legal team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. ( offers a clear breakdown of one of the most dangerous types of crashes that can occur on Western Pennsylvania roads. The firm's publication highlights how broadside collisions, commonly known as T-bone accidents, present a severe threat to drivers and passengers alike. The article also emphasizes the legal options available to those injured in such incidents, reinforcing the importance of consulting with a Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney. Broadside collisions happen when the front of one vehicle crashes into the side of another, often at intersections. These collisions are particularly hazardous due to the limited structural protection on the sides of vehicles. As explained by the Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C., the injuries resulting from these crashes are frequently severe and may include brain trauma, spinal damage, and broken bones. 'Broadside collisions are particularly dangerous due to the way the force of impact affects the occupants of the vehicle,' the article states. The firm's analysis of how broadside collisions occur reflects common real-world scenarios: one driver fails to yield, ignores a red light, or makes an improper left turn, placing other vehicles directly in harm's way. These situations, which are all too familiar to a Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney, often lead to confusion about liability. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. discusses how intersections, side roads, parking lots, and merging areas are frequent sites for these crashes. Contributing factors such as distracted driving, speeding, impairment, and fatigue further compound the risk. According to the article, Pennsylvania's modified comparative negligence laws mean that establishing fault can be a determining factor in how much compensation an injured party may receive. A driver who is more than 51% at fault cannot recover damages. This legal structure underscores the necessity for detailed accident investigations, especially when liability is disputed. A Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney is positioned to help gather evidence like traffic camera footage, police reports, and witness statements to support a strong claim. The article also offers a practical look into the insurance claim process following a broadside collision. Pennsylvania's no-fault system requires drivers to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP), which covers immediate medical costs regardless of fault. However, the right to pursue compensation for pain and suffering depends on whether the injured party selected Full Tort or Limited Tort insurance coverage. While Full Tort permits unrestricted legal claims, Limited Tort restricts non-economic damages unless the injury meets certain criteria. The attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. clarify that many injuries stemming from broadside collisions—such as broken bones or brain injuries—often qualify as serious under Pennsylvania's legal definition. Exceptions to Limited Tort, such as accidents involving drunk drivers or injured pedestrians, may also allow additional compensation avenues, regardless of the initial coverage selection. Beyond legal definitions, the article outlines a series of steps for individuals to take following a broadside collision: checking for injuries, calling the police, exchanging information, documenting the scene, seeking medical attention, and notifying insurance providers. Timely medical evaluations are critical, even if injuries are not immediately obvious. Delayed symptoms from concussions or internal trauma are common in these types of crashes. Legal support becomes even more crucial as injured individuals begin to navigate post-collision recovery and potential disputes with insurers. The article emphasizes how legal representation can help challenge blame-shifting tactics from insurance companies and ensure rightful compensation is pursued. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. concludes the article with a clear message: victims of broadside collisions should not face their recovery and legal challenges alone. The firm's experience with car accident cases across Western Pennsylvania allows them to handle the legal process while injured individuals focus on healing. Their advocacy aims to secure compensation that reflects the true extent of physical, emotional, and financial harm caused by serious collisions. Those who have suffered injuries in a broadside crash can find value in the practical, legally-grounded information shared in this article. Early consultation with a trusted legal advisor offers the best opportunity to protect one's rights and move forward with confidence after a traumatic event. About Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.: Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. is a Pennsylvania law firm committed to advocating for individuals harmed in vehicle collisions and other injury-related incidents. The firm handles cases involving car accidents, workplace injuries, medical harm, and more. With a legacy of legal support across Western Pennsylvania, the team provides representation built on diligence, clarity, and a focus on justice. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: lmkelly@ Website:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store