UK working on plans to air drop aid into Gaza, PM tells Macron and Merz
In a readout of the call, Number 10 said the leaders had agreed 'it would be vital to ensure robust plans are in place to turn an urgently-needed ceasefire into lasting peace'.
'The Prime Minister set out how the UK will also be taking forward plans to work with partners such as Jordan to air drop aid and evacuate children requiring medical assistance,' a Downing Street spokesperson said.
However, the head of the UN's Palestinian refugee agency warned airdrops were 'a distraction and screensmoke' that would fail to reverse deepening starvation in Gaza, and could in some cases harm civilians.
UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini said on Saturday: 'A man-made hunger can only be addressed by political will. Lift the siege, open the gates and guarantee safe movements and dignified access to people in need.'
Israel said on Friday it will allow airdrops of aid by foreign countries into Gaza to alleviate suffering in the Palestinian territory, where there is widespread devastation.
The readout made no mention of the issue of Palestinian statehood, which the Prime Minister has faced calls to immediately recognise after French President Mr Macron confirmed his country would do so in September.
However, Downing Street said the leaders had committed to 'work closely together on a plan' to 'pave the way to a long-term solution and security in the region'.
Once the proposals have been 'worked up', they will seek to advance them with other key partners, including in the region, the readout said.
Some 221 MPs from Labour, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP and independents have signed a letter pressuring the Government to follow suit at a UN meeting next week.
Donald Trump suggested Mr Macron's announcement, which saw him commit to formally recognising Palestinian sovereignty at the UN General Assembly in September, 'doesn't matter' as he left the US for a visit to Scotland.
US President Donald Trump said a French announcement on Palestinian statehood 'doesn't matter' (Robert Perry/PA)
Sarah Champion, the senior Labour MP who organised the letter by parliamentarians, said recognition 'would send a powerful symbolic message that we support the rights of the Palestinian people'.
Other senior Commons figures who signed the letter include Labour select committee chairs Liam Byrne, Dame Emily Thornberry and Ruth Cadbury.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey, as well as Tory former minister Kit Malthouse, and Sir Edward Leigh – Parliament's longest-serving MP – also signed it.
The majority of those who have signed, 131, are Labour MPs.
The Government has so far said its immediate focus is on getting aid into the territory and insisted that recognising sovereignty must be done as part of a peace process.
Charities operating in Gaza have said Israel's blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing people there towards starvation, warning that they are seeing their own workers and Palestinians 'waste away'.
But Mr Lazzarini said airdrops can be dangerous as they can fall on civilians, and that being able to drive aid through is more effective and safer.
'Airdrops will not reverse the deepening starvation. They are expensive, inefficient and can even kill starving civilians,' he said. 'It is a distraction and screensmoke.'
The Prime Minister will meet the US president during his trip to Scotland, where he arrived on Friday evening.
US-led peace talks in Qatar were cut short on Thursday, with Washington's special envoy Steve Witkoff accusing Hamas of a 'lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'.
The deal under discussion is expected to include a 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.
Aid supplies would be ramped up and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting truce.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy's opposite number Dame Priti Patel said she had 'repeatedly pressed' him on 'what specific and deliverable solutions he is trying to advance on aid'.
'The British Government needs to be leveraging its influence and the UK's considerable aid expertise to bring about practical solutions that alleviate the dire and deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza,' she said.
'The priority must be to get as much aid in as possible, delivered safely and exclusively to innocent civilians.
'Diplomacy is about finding solutions, not just issuing condemnations.'
Meanwhile, Israel's ambassador to the UK said recognising Palestinian statehood would 'reward' hostage-taking and killing by Hamas.
'Recognising a Palestinian state in a post-October 7 reality would be nothing less than a reward for terrorism,' she wrote in the Telegraph.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
US energy exporters face likely letdown in any US-India trade deal
LITTLETON, Colorado, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The fresh 25% tariffs slapped on Indian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump this week are being viewed by many as a negotiating tactic designed to force India to buy more U.S. energy products and other goods going forward. But even though India's fast-growing economy is the fifth largest globally, India's energy importers may have far less room to maneuver than they might appear. Tight corporate operating margins, cost-sensitive consumer markets, binding long-term import contracts and slowing economic growth all limit India's ability to spend big on U.S. oil, LNG, coal and refined products over the near term. At the same time, India's location at the base of Asia means it is far closer to other major energy product exporters than it is to the United States, which would trigger sharply higher shipping costs if it were to switch to U.S.-origin products. No doubt some Indian corporations will be cajoled into pledging major U.S. purchases and investments during upcoming trade negotiations, which may boost sentiment in Washington, D.C. But U.S. exporters of oil, gas, coal and fuels that are hoping for massive, viable and binding purchase commitments by Indian buyers are likely to be left disappointed. It's not just its import needs that India has to worry about. The United States is by far India's largest export market, and has accounted for nearly 20% of all Indian exports in recent years, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data. In 2024, the value of India's exports to the United States was just over $80 billion, while its imports from the U.S. totalled just under $45 billion. As the U.S. is more than twice as large as India's next largest export market - the United Arab Emirates - it will be nearly impossible for the country to replace lost U.S. consumers with other buyers. That means that trade negotiators will remain committed to healing trade ties with Washington as quickly as possible, and will be looking at every possible means of reducing the trade imbalance. The rapid rise in India's purchases of Russian crude oil since mid-2022 has been a sore point for the U.S. and Europe, and has been a focal point during the recent trade talks. Average monthly crude oil flows from Russia to India jumped from around 3.2 million barrels a month between 2018 and 2021 to 50 million barrels a month since mid-2022, data from Kpler shows. That more than 15-fold surge in Russian oil purchases by India provided Moscow with critical import earnings while it grappled with the fallout from its war in Ukraine, and seriously undermined international efforts to cut funding to Moscow. However, while India's refusal to join Western-led sanctions drew ire from the international community, its willingness to step up imports of Russian oil ensured that its refiners and fuel consumers were shielded from any rise in global oil prices. Indeed, the opposite has occurred as Indian importers were able to extract steep discounts from Russian oil sellers who were desperate to secure sales wherever they could. Those cheap imported Russian barrels in turn allowed major Indian refiners such as Reliance ( opens new tab to expand supplies and fuel the country's economic growth since 2020. Indian authorities have stated that providing energy security for its 1.4 billion population has been the main driver of its oil import programme, and that the new tariffs are unfair given that the country is only acting in its own self-interest. What's more, any aggressive pivot away from cheap Russian oil to pricier U.S. crude would drastically change the economic outlook for Indian oil refiners and consumers, and likely result in a surge in fuel prices that would cause economic harm. Since 2022, the official prices of the main grade of Russian oil imported by India have averaged around $70 a barrel, which is around $10 cheaper than the price of the main U.S. crude for export over that same period, data from LSEG shows. As Indian importers likely secured their Russian oil supplies at even lower prices, the real discount compared to U.S. prices is likely larger. That in turn means that there is almost no prospect of Indian refiners being able to profitably switch to U.S. crude any time soon, even if pressured to do so. U.S. trade negotiators have touted U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a means of reducing trade gaps, as a single LNG cargo can cost several million dollars. However, Indian energy product importers have arguably even less scope to switch out current suppliers for the U.S. here. The primary limiting factor is that Indian gas importers are already locked into long-term purchase deals with suppliers such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, and face stiff penalties for breaking contracts. And even if Indian buyers were prepared to tear up those deals in favor of buying from the U.S. instead, they would face a surge in shipping costs that could make overall cargo costs uneconomical. The journey time for an LNG tanker from the U.S. to India is around 30 days, which is six times longer than the trip from Qatar. U.S. coal exporters will likely face similar difficulties in dislodging Indonesia from India's coal import pipeline. The Indonesia to India shipping time is around 11 days, compared to around 27 days for the trip from the U.S. East coast. Such a yawning gap in journey times and shipping costs means that India's trade negotiators may not be able to rely on its energy consumers to close the trade gap, and will need to look elsewhere to secure a trade deal with the U.S. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in
Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:51.000Z Title: Dozens more countries face higher taxes on exports to US as new Trump tariffs come into effect Content: Dozens of countries face higher taxes on their exports to the US now that Donald Trump's latest wave of country-specific tariffs has come into force. The sweeping 'reciprocal' levies announced by the White House a week ago – just before a previous 1 August deadline was due to elapse – were in place as of a minute past midnight Washington time on Thursday. Key details of Trump's latest tariffs include: The rates range from 41% on Syria, 40% on Laos and Myanmar and 39% on Switzerland to 10% for the UK. The levies will be on top of the usual tariffs applying to US-bound goods. Brazil's 'reciprocal' rate is 10%, for example, but its total levy is 50% after Trump added a 40% levy over the prosecution of ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. India's 25% tariff rate could rise to a total of 50% after Trump imposed an additional charge for buying oil from Russia. The European Union is the only US trading partner where its baseline rate – set at 15% after a framework deal – will include previous tariffs. It means, for example, cheeses that are normally hit with import duties of 14.9% will be taxed at 15% and not 29.9%. Trump first unveiled the raft of country-specific rates on 2 April, which he called 'liberation day', claiming the world had long been ripping off the US. On Wednesday, meanwhile, Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff on computer chips – likely raising the cost of electronics and household goods – but that US-produced chips would be exempt. Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:14.000Z Title: Introduction: Bank of England interest rate decision today Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. With the UK economy looking weak, but inflation rumbling away, and a trade war raging, these are tricky times to be a central banker. And at noon today, the Bank of England will reveal whether its policymakers have decided to lower borrowing costs, or leave them unchanged – and, significantly, whether they all agreed on the decision! The City is widely expecting a quarter-point cut in interest rates, to bring Bank rate down from 4.25% to 4%. Some of the nine members of the BoE's monetary policy committee may push for a deeper cut, fearing that rising unemployment and weakening economic activity is flashing the alarm. On the other side of the table, though, hawkish MPC members may point to inflation - which rose to 3.6% in June - as a reason to leave rates on hold. Guillermo Felices, global investment strategist at PGIM Fixed Income, says a 25 basis point (quarter-point) cut is 'almost a done deal', adding: We expect a further 50bps of rate cuts over the 3 following meetings, as the Monetary Policy Committee begins to put more weight on the weak labour market. There are MPC members that already see a greater urgency to cut rates, as indicated by the 6-3 vote split to hold at the last meeting. The Bank also has to weigh up the impact of Donald Trump's trade war. The UK's trade deal with the US means the direct impact from tariffs is relatively limited, but there is the global situation to consider too. Earlier this morning, the latest wave of country-specific tariffs came into force, a week after Trump announced them. Switzerland failed to reach a last-minute deal to lower its rate from 39%. Swiss president Karin Keller-Sutter reportedly left Washington empty-handed last night, following a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 7am BST: Halifax house price index for July Noon BST: Bank of England interest rate decision 12.30pm BST: Bank of England press conference 1.30pm BST: US weekly jobless report
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
The EU could win the trade war with the US
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The U.S.-EU trade deal has been heavily criticised as a capitulation by the bloc. But if you dive into the agreement details, the European Union is likely not only to suffer less than the U.S. but may even see its economy benefit from the new global tariff regime. The EU on July 28 came to an agreement with the U.S. that set base levies on EU goods at 15%, below the 30% rate U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened, through still much higher than tariffs were before the trade war began. Many analysts and journalists alike are adamant that the trade deal the EU struck was a big win for the U.S. and a major loss for the EU. Even French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou seems to think so. The main thrust of the argument is that the EU should have been strong enough to inflict measurable pain on the U.S. but instead made lots of promises without getting much in return. Plus, some European leaders are concerned that their exporters will suffer from lower U.S. demand in the short term. Allow me to disagree and state that, as it stands today, the EU is winning the trade war. First, let us compare the EU trade deal with the agreement that one of Europe's major competitors, Japan, struck with the U.S. just five days earlier. Both countries were hit with a baseline tariff rate of 15%, and both made much-derided promises to boost investment in the U.S. While Europe's total pledge is larger in nominal terms, it only represents around 7% of the EU's GDP compared to over 13% for Japan. The numbers clearly suggest the EU got a better deal than Japan, even without accounting for the fact that Japanese businesses depend more on exports to the U.S. than their EU counterparts. Moreover, neither the EU's promised $600 billion investments in the U.S. nor the purchase of $750 billion in energy commodities is arguably a real concession. Over the last three years, EU businesses have invested some $605 billion in the U.S., so investing another $600 billion in the next three years would likely have happened regardless. And as Reuters Open Interest columnist Clyde Russell explained, it is delusional to think the U.S. can deliver $750 billion in energy commodities to the EU in the next three years. On top of this, modelled projections of the impact of the tariffs on the U.S. and other countries suggest that, based on the announced tariff levels, the U.S. will suffer more than the EU both in terms of GDP and inflation. Over the next 12 months, my model – which is a global trade model that considers the dynamic relationships between trade, growth, inflation, and foreign exchange rates – forecasts a 1 percentage point (pp) increase in U.S. inflation and a 0.4 pp decline in GDP growth. The Yale Budget model, opens new tab anticipates a similar hit to GDP, but it anticipates a larger 1.8 pp boost to inflation. Meanwhile, my model indicates that in the next 12 months, the impact on EU inflation and growth should both be in the order of 0.2 pp to 0.3 pp. In short, the EU appears set to suffer less from the new tariff regime than the U.S. in the next year. And in the medium term, the EU could very well be a net winner from this new trade environment, as new supply chains are established in response to the higher global tariff environment. In fact, my model indicates that, based on the tariffs currently announced, the EU's GDP could actually increase by around 0.1 pp compared to a no-tariff scenario. Why? Because China and several other economies like India, Brazil and possibly Switzerland face much higher tariffs than the EU, which could allow EU exporters to gain market share from these international competitors. After all, U.S. businesses and consumers who cannot replace imported goods with domestically produced ones will seek to find the cheapest possible imported good. And while Chinese imports tend to be cheaper than those from Europe, they will now come with much higher tariffs, eroding China's price advantage. Some recent economic data releases suggest these model forecasts could be onto something. Consider new manufacturing orders in recent PMI surveys. In the U.S. they crashed in April after rising in the first quarter due to businesses front-running tariffs, and they continue to hover well below the crucial 50-point mark denoting expansion and contraction. Meanwhile, in the EU, this indicator has accelerated and remains well above the levels seen in the U.S. Where does that leave us? Sentiment in the EU following the trade deal appears to have become too negative, while investors simultaneously appear too complacent about America's economic prospects. This sounds like where we were at the beginning of the year, right before Europe started outperforming. (The views expressed here are those of Joachim Klement, an investment strategist at Panmure Liberum, the UK's largest independent investment bank). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
