logo
Judge Mbenenge's conduct at tribunal sends chilling message to women in SA workplaces

Judge Mbenenge's conduct at tribunal sends chilling message to women in SA workplaces

Daily Maverick13-07-2025
Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge weaponised culture to justify and excuse harassment, thereby revealing contempt for women's rights and reinforcing the very systems that silence survivors.
Masimanyane Women's Rights International, the Women's Ikhwelo Network and women's groups nationwide are appalled by the misogynistic and patriarchal statements made by Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge during his sexual harassment tribunal.
We note the lack of accountability for the harm that has been done, not just to the complainant but to women across South Africa. Gender inequality is a key feature of the tribunal and is being perpetuated by the accused and his legal team.
This case is a vivid display of patriarchy, with the power dynamics favouring the judge and dehumanising and humiliating the complainant. We call for an end to the culture of sexual harassment in South Africa's legal system and our society as a whole.
Mbenenge's contemptuous dismissal of the complainant and invocation of 'cultural norms' to justify sexual misconduct are an affront not only to women but to the integrity of the Constitution and the judiciary. His actions violate the core values enshrined in the Constitution, the Judicial Service Commission Act and international commitments such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
Culture can never be a defence for conduct that amounts to gender-based violence and workplace misconduct, as espoused in Convention 190 of the International Labour Organization, to which South Africa is a signatory. Instead of showing accountability, Mbenenge weaponised culture to justify and excuse harassment, thereby revealing contempt for women's rights and reinforcing the very systems that silence survivors.
This is one of the key drivers of gender-based violence in South Africa. Invoking culture to excuse misconduct reinforces harmful gender norms and misuses heritage to shield perpetrators from accountability.
The judge's conduct has led to secondary victimisation of the complainant, where institutions and processes re-traumatise survivors rather than protect them, with their ordeal played out publicly on international platforms, including YouTube — which has garnered almost 3,000 views per day — as well as to millions of viewers on television.
Relentless trauma
This subjects the complainant to continued, relentless trauma and humiliation. This is part of a documented and persistent culture of sexual harassment and gender-based misconduct festering within the legal profession and our society. The fact that it emanates from the highest level of the judiciary in the Eastern Cape makes it so much more heinous.
We have noted with concern that precedents set by past judicial scandals, such as the Nkola Motata matter and numerous complaints reported to the Legal Practice Council, expose a sector deeply resistant to accountability.
In the matter of Gaga v Anglo Platinum Limited, the Supreme Court of Appeal placed the following premium on how a manager or person in authority in the workplace should conduct themselves:
'The rule against sexual harassment targets, amongst other things, reprehensible expressions of misplaced authority by superiors towards their subordinates. The fact that the subordinate may be present as ambivalent, or even momentarily flattered by the attention, is no excuse; particularly where at some stage in an ongoing situation she signals her discomfort. If not initial behaviour, then, at the very least, the persistence therein is unacceptable.'
Arrogance
This case law indicates the responsibility that falls upon a senior manager in workplace situations and is critical to the review of this tribunal. This rot cannot continue. The arrogance displayed by the Judge President and his visible disdain for the complainant's rights constitute secondary victimisation and send a chilling message to women working within the legal system and nationally, that the very institutions meant to protect justice will become perpetrators of their abuse.
South Africa is failing to address the pervasive levels of gender-based violence driven by gender inequality in our society. Women have had enough.
To the legal community — judges, magistrates, attorneys, advocates, legal scholars, regulators — we issue this call to action: Demand fairness and justice in the disciplinary proceedings of the tribunal on the alleged sexual harassment currently under way. Silence equals complicity. Establish independent, transparent mechanisms to investigate sexual harassment claims in all sectors of the legal system and broader society. The judiciary cannot police itself. Overhaul codes of conduct to explicitly sanction and criminalise misogynistic speech and conduct by legal practitioners.
Words have power — and consequences. Create safe reporting structures that protect complainants from retaliation and career sabotage. Survivors deserve justice without fear. Masimanyane Women's Rights International and the Women's Ikhwelo Network, supported by the women's movement nationally, stand in unwavering solidarity with all women who have endured sexual harassment and gender-based violence across all sectors.
We refuse to allow patriarchal attitudes to remain entrenched in spaces where justice is expected to prevail. We urge every legal professional who claims to serve justice to act immediately. Root out this culture of impunity or stand exposed as enablers of misogyny and abuse. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation
ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation

The Citizen

time15 hours ago

  • The Citizen

ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation

The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the appointments of five commissioners to the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) are invalid, citing Parliament's failure to ensure adequate public participation in the selection process. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by the non-profit organisation Corruption Watch. The respondents in the matter included the speaker of the National Assembly, the president, the Information Regulator, and the five CGE commissioners. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank unlawfully interfered in Absa chair appointment, says court Media Monitoring Africa was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Corruption Watch contested the appointments of CGE commissioners chairperson Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Subrayan Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia Leigh-Ann Van Der Merwe, all of whom took office in March 2023. These appointments, for terms of up to five years, were made by the president upon recommendation by Parliament. CGE commissioners' appointment process challenged The nomination process was led by Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities. It began in June 2022 and closed nearly a month later. A shortlist of four candidates was compiled in late August, while public comment was invited between 2 and 16 September. Submissions were to be made via an online form linked through Parliament's website. The link led to a spreadsheet listing candidates' names and qualifications, but their full CVs were not published. READ MORE: Initiation schools: Commission wants answers on why recommendations haven't been carried out Despite Corruption Watch requesting an extension of the public comment period to 30 days, the removal of the character limit on submissions, and the release of CVs, the National Assembly proceeded with its recommendations to the president following candidate interviews. The appointments were announced on 25 February 2023, and the commissioners assumed office on 1 March. Corruption Watch then brought its application before the ConCourt under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution, which grants the court exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the National Assembly has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation. The organisation argued that Parliament's process was flawed due to the limited public access to information about candidates, a 2 000-character restriction on submissions, and the short 14-day window for public comment. (4/4) CCT 333/23 Corruption Watch (RF) NPC v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others August 1, 2025 The speaker defended the process, stating it was reasonable and consistent with past procedures. It was argued that the 14-day period was sufficient, that public comments were properly considered, and that CVs could not be published without candidates' consent in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). However, the Information Regulator clarified in an affidavit that such consent is not required when the information is needed for the performance of public duties. ConCourt judgment In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the ConCourt sided with Corruption Watch and found that the public participation process was insufficient. 'In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly therefore did not comply with the obligations imposed by section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and is therefore invalid,' the summary of the 1 August judgement reads. The declaration of invalidity has been suspended for 12 months from the date of the order, giving Parliament time to conduct a constitutionally compliant appointment process and allowing the president to make appointments. Reactions The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. 'The commission remains committed to its legislative mandate and will continue to discharge its responsibilities while Parliament undertakes its processes. 'The commission will not make further public pronouncements or respond to media enquiries on this matter,' the statement reads. In addition, Corruption Watch welcomed the outcome. 'South African citizens have a right to participate fully in these processes, particularly where such institutions are at the forefront of ensuring justice and enforcement of human rights in the country. 'The opportunity for people to have their say in the appointment of representatives to Chapter 9 institutions like the CGE, is an important example of that process,' the organisation said in a statement. The CGE operates under section 187 of the Constitution, with a mandate to promote and protect gender equality. In March last year, six other commissioners – Seeham Samaai, Mulalo Grace Nemathaheni, Mfundo Nomvungu, Yanga Malotana, Kamohelo Rodney Teele, and Marion Lynn Stevens – were recommended by Parliament and subsequently approved by the president. NOW READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour

Cyril Ramaphosa replaces Senzo Mchunu with new Minister of Police
Cyril Ramaphosa replaces Senzo Mchunu with new Minister of Police

The South African

time18 hours ago

  • The South African

Cyril Ramaphosa replaces Senzo Mchunu with new Minister of Police

Professor Firoz Cachalia has been sworn in as the new Minister of Police during ceremony held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on Friday. 'In terms of the powers vested in me by Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996, I have decided to appoint the following person as Minister for the portfolio indicated in the signed President's Act. The said Minister-Designate, who is about to become Minister, is Professor Firoz Cachalia… (sic),' said President Cyril Ramaphosa during the ceremony. The swearing in follows President Ramaphosa's announcement last month that he had placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on a leave of absence with immediate effect. The affirmation was administered by Acting Judge President, Aubrey Ledwaba, following Cachalia's appointment by President Cyril Ramaphosa. The President further announced the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry, led by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, into allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Mkhwanazi had raised concerns about an alleged criminal syndicate that has infiltrated law enforcement and intelligence structures. He also accused Mchunu of colluding with criminal elements to disband the Political Killings Task Team based in KwaZulu-Natal. Director-General in The Presidency, Phindile Baleni, who spoke at the swearing-in, congratulated the newly appointed Minister. 'Minister, we congratulate you on your appointment and wish you much success in your duties and endeavours to make South Africa and the world a better place for all,' Baleni said. Addressing members of the media after the ceremony, President Cyril Ramaphosa acknowledged the concerns regarding the seeming duplication in the police ministry. 'I know there is a technicality about seeming to have two Ministers in the same portfolio, and that is a matter I do believe is going to be resolved within a short space of time. 'I directed the commission [of inquiry] to complete its work as quickly as possible, so whatever confusion there might be is going to be of a short duration. I expect a report from the commission within three months and if they have to ask for an extension, we will give consideration to that. 'I do want this matter to be resolved as quickly as possible but at the same time, we have had to provide leadership to the police service. We can't leave a vacuum. Whilst all of this is happening, Minister Mchunu is on leave while this matter is being resolved, and he is preparing himself, as I hear, to appear before the commission,' the President said. Speaking to the media about his new role, Cachalia said he had not yet had an opportunity to meet with the President but had been informed that the first Cabinet meeting would take place on Wednesday, and he assumed the President would engage with him in due course. Cachalia assured the public that he is fully aware of the responsibility that comes with the role and is committed to prioritising their safety and security. 'I don't think there are any specific fears going into this portfolio. I understand the moment the country is in and the weight of the responsibility that I have, together with the others in government. I want to assure the public that their safety and security is uppermost in my mind. That's what I am going to focus on, and I hope that I will be able to take the country forward,' he said. Responding to a question on whether he supports the work of the Political Killings Task Team, Cachalia said he would comment after meeting with National Commissioner Fannie Masemola on Thursday next week. 'I don't think it will be appropriate for me to comment on that without having the benefit of a discussion with him,' he said. Cachalia also touched on his dual role as chairperson of the National Anti-Corruption Council, whose term ends at the end of the month. 'I do think that my appointment as a Minister of this portfolio, while I am still the chairperson of the National Anti-Corruption Council – the term of which expires at the end of this month… I am now in a better position than I was as chairperson to take the recommendations of the Council forward, and I will certainly be doing so.' Cachalia said he would ask the National Commissioner, during their upcoming meeting, to arrange a session between the Anti-Corruption Council and the police management team to discuss the Council's recommendations, adding that it is his intention to work closely with the Minister of Justice, as the recommendations impact both their portfolios. 'We will together be in a much better position going forward to take those recommendations forward. The recommendations that the Council has made are the ones I am committed to fully implementing,' Cachalia said. On when he will travel to KwaZulu-Natal to meet with General Mkhwanazi, Cachalia said the visit will depend on his discussion with the National Commissioner. 'As the national Minister, I have to visit all the provinces – in what sequence and with what priorities in mind, that still has to be determined. So, I will answer that question in the coming days,' he said. Minister Cachalia vowed to work hard and remain focused on his responsibilities despite the challenges surrounding his appointment. 'I will work hard. I am not distracted by the noise, and I am not driven by political ambition. I have been given a task. I am going to tackle the task without fear or favour, subject of course to the President's guidance and direction as a member of the Cabinet,' the Minister said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Major court battle looming over City of Cape Town rates
Major court battle looming over City of Cape Town rates

The South African

time20 hours ago

  • The South African

Major court battle looming over City of Cape Town rates

The City of Cape Town is heading into a potential legal battle over its recently implemented 'city cleaning levy,' with civil rights organisation AfriForum preparing to challenge the charge in court. This legal challenge follows the North Gauteng High Court's recent decision to overturn a similar levy imposed by the City of Tshwane, declaring it 'invalid and unlawful.' AfriForum successfully argued that Tshwane's R194-per-month fee amounted to illegal double taxation, violating both constitutional and municipal regulations. Now, AfriForum is setting its sights on Cape Town's version of the charge, which came into effect on 1 July. The group has instructed its legal team to initiate proceedings, calling the levy a 'fundraising ploy' that mirrors Tshwane's flawed approach. Unlike Tshwane's flat-rate levy, Cape Town's cleaning fee is calculated progressively based on property values and applies to all property owners. The City insists the charge forms part of its 'pro-poor budget,' which includes R40 billion in infrastructure investment over the next three years. Officials maintain the levy is a necessary tool to fund core services and improve urban cleanliness. However, critics argue the fee lacks a proper legislative basis and serves more as a revenue-generation mechanism than a targeted service fee. The South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) and the Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) have both expressed strong opposition. 'This is not just about Cape Town,' said a CTCRA spokesperson. 'If this levy is allowed to stand, it sets a dangerous precedent for municipalities across the country to impose similar charges without transparent legal justification.' In Tshwane's case, the court found the city had violated Section 229(1) of the Constitution and Section 74(1) of the Municipal Systems Act, which limit how municipalities can raise revenue. AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel argues that Cape Town's cleaning levy falls into the same constitutional trap. 'The City is using the levy as a disguised tax to plug budget gaps caused by mismanagement,' Kriel said. 'We believe the courts will agree.' SAPOA has already filed for a judicial review of the levy, while the CTCRA is applying to join the proceedings as amicus curiae (friend of the court). If the court rules in their favour, the City could be ordered to refund residents – mirroring Tshwane's outcome. While Cape Town argues the fee is vital for maintaining essential services, opponents view it as a test case for municipal accountability and financial transparency. The outcome could reshape how South African cities structure service charges and tax residents. As legal filings proceed, Cape Town residents and property owners remain in limbo, uncertain whether the cleaning levy will be upheld – or scrapped, with refunds to follow. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store