French Open sexism scheduling row erupts as Ons Jabeur blasts lack of visibility given to women's tennis - as organisers defend men dominating prime-time night slot
The French Open has once again been gripped by a sexist scheduling row as Ons Jabeur hit out at the lack of visibility given to women's tennis at the event.
Last year, every match chosen for the prime-time night session slot was a men's match - and the same again every day this year so far.
Roland Garros tournament director Amelie Mauresmo - ironically a former WTA star herself - remain utterly unapologetic about the lopsided scheduling.
There is limited outcry among the players themselves, mostly because the night session is generally seen as an inconvenient time to compete.
Four-time champion Iga Swiatek likes to play early in the day, so her attitude to the whole thing can be summed up as: I'm alright Jack.
But Jabeur is one of the few to see the bigger picture: that women's tennis has to fight for greater visibility.
You don't have to agree , just read with an open heart❤️ pic.twitter.com/pmJnWhgy6L
— Ons Jabeur (@Ons_Jabeur) May 30, 2025
'I hope whoever is making the decision, I don't think they have daughters, because I don't think they want to treat their daughters like this,' said the Tunisian earlier in the week.
'It's a bit ironic. They don't show women's sport, they don't show women's tennis, and then they say, 'Yeah, but mostly they watch men."
'Of course they watch men more because you show men more. Everything goes together.'
And on Friday she posted a long message on X: 'The women's game has been writing its own legacy loudly, brilliantly, and for far too long without full recognition.'
In her mid-tournament press conference, Mauresmo was repeatedly taken to task over the lopsided scheduling.
To sum up her position: when there is only one match in the night session, we will always go for a men's match because that guarantees the punters a minimum of three sets, rather than two.
Why can't you have two matches, a men's and a women's? Because then the night session would finish too late.
Why can't you start it earlier? Because people wouldn't be able to get there in time after leaving work, so the stands would be empty for the first match.
It is not easy to argue with any of her reasoning, but that does not make the end result any less palatable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chester Zoo sees return of rare bat-eared foxes after 30 years
A zoo has welcomed two rare bat-eared foxes, 30 years on from when the animal was last two African foxes, which are known for their 13cm (five inches) tall ears, are said to be settling in well at Chester Maasai and Malindi will live alongside 12 porcupines in the zoo's new Heart of Africa habitat and will play a part in the zoo's conservation White, Chester Zoo's team manager, said: "It's incredibly exciting to welcome bat-eared foxes back to Chester Zoo after a 30-year hiatus and they're a wonderful addition to our new Heart of Africa habitat." "They're a truly unique and fascinating species with some amazing adaptations," he said their "enormous ears aren't just for show – they act like satellite dishes and help the foxes detect the tiniest of movements coming from insects beneath the ground, allowing them to detect prey with pinpoint accuracy". Zoo conservationists brought the sisters over to Chester from a zoo in Paris, France, with one of the sisters set to be introduced to a male fox as part of efforts to safeguard the little-known foxes were given their name due to their distinctive oversized ears and they are found in the open savannahs and arid grasslands of eastern and southern Africa. In the wild, bat-eared foxes face increasing threats, largely due to habitat loss caused by agriculture, human encroachment and hunting, a zoo spokesperson said. David White said that like many species found in the African savannah, bat-eared foxes were under threat as their habitat became more fragmented as a result of human activity."That's why our teams are on the ground in several national parks across Kenya and Uganda safeguarding some of the continent's rarest species like northern giraffe, giant pangolins, mountain bongo and Eastern black rhino," he said. "By protecting these species and their habitats we're also helping many of Africa's little known species like bat-eared foxes, that share the same habitats, to go on to thrive once again." Read more stories from Cheshire on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC North West on X. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jack Draper's ready to fire more forehand bullets as he channels Rafael Nadal at the French Open - but his next opponent is riding high after a Las Vegas bender
As the new plaque of his footprint on Court Philippe Chatrier demonstrates, Rafael Nadal 's legacy at Roland Garros is eternal. His inspiration can be traced through the next generation - including our very own Jack Draper and his brutal forehand. The similarities in the two men's strokes are impossible to miss. The coiling of musclebound shoulders. The whiplash swing of a left arm, sending the ball fizzing through the air to land, grip on the clay then spit towards the opponent at head height. Draper has until now been hesitant to embrace the comparison. 'It's hard for me to look at my own forehand,' said the 23-year-old, who faces Alexander Bublik today in his first visit to the fourth round of the French Open. 'I can appreciate it's getting better and better but I still watch Rafa and… his forehand's a joke. But I definitely understand the comparison of how it's kicking up and the spin and the speed of it.' Like Nadal, Draper uses the height and spin of his forehand to push opponents back, leaving them vulnerable to the drop shot - a one-two punch which was incredibly effective in his third-round victory over Joao Fonseca. Draper's forehand lacks the curl of Nadal's, meaning it is harder for him to replicate the classic Rafa pattern of swinging the ball away from the right-hander's backhand. That lack of swing is not all downside, though - as Nadal's forehand angled away from the backhand side, it angled into the forehand side, making it easier for opponents to cover that space. Draper can fire a more direct arrow down the line. As a fellow right-hander who plays leftie, Nadal was a touchstone for young Draper. When I visited his first tennis club in Sutton last year, members told stories of young Jack playing in sleeveless tops to look more like Rafa. 'I modelled myself on his game but more so his competitive nature, his doggedness,' said Draper. 'I loved Rafa - the grunt, everything. He massively inspired me to become the player I am and hopefully I can get to his level.' If Draper has internalised Nadal's Stakhanovite work ethic, the same cannot be said of his next opponent, who puts his recent uptick in form down to a three-day bender in Las Vegas. Bublik is one of the great talkers in the game, so let's allow him the floor to explain how he went from a career high to a career low, then recovered. 'After Wimbledon 2024, I got to No 17 in the world,' he began. 'Then I'm like, "OK, I have to practise harder". Work on my diet, stop drinking, stop partying. 'Be a more professional soldier. Right now everybody is like robots, crazy, crazy performance guys. My fall was not linked with lack of attitude and lack of practising. It was the exact opposite. I just burned out. 'Then it was the other way around. I was No 80 in the world. My coach suggested a trip to Vegas in between Indian Wells and Phoenix. 'I said, OK, let's go to Vegas, and it worked.' To clarify, was this a training trip to Vegas? 'No, Vegas Vegas, like The Hangover Vegas,' said Bublik, referencing the 2009 stag-party-gone-wrong comedy film. The 27-year-old went straight from Nevada to Phoenix, Arizona, for a lower-tier Challenger event. He made the final, and then won his next Challenger in Turin. 'I came there to win,' said Bublik. 'I have to take matches more seriously, and I did. It's as simple as that. There was a shift in the mentality because I had no options whatsoever.' On his last-16 opponent, Bublik said: 'Jack, for me, is insane. I saw him here and I said, "Are you getting ready for UFC?" 'Last year the guy is No 40 in the world. This year he is top five. That's a crazy achievement. He doesn't seem to stop. 'What do I have to do to beat him? I don't know. I will just go there, enjoy the time - we all know what I'm capable of doing on court.' The Kazakhstani is capable of almost anything. If his array of tweeners, underarm serves and general zaniness gives the impression of a man messing around, Bublik insists he is just maximising his chances of victory against the 'robots'. 'I'm not a fighting person,' said Bublik. 'To win against the best of the best, I have to find ways to outplay them because they will outwork me, outrun me. 'Against Jack, I'm not capable physically of running for five hours. I would die, literally. I'm worrying about my health over tennis. So I find a way to beat these guys with what I have - and I have a lot, in terms of an arsenal of shots. Sometimes I have to go for what seem like crazy shots, but this is the only option I have.' If Draper needs reminding of how dangerous the world No 62 can be, he could ask Alex de Minaur. The No 9 seed took a two-set lead over Bublik in the second round before being blown away in 90 minutes of lights-out shotmaking. Draper has tuned up nicely for this test, riding out similar purple patches from Mattia Bellucci and Gael Monfils in the first and second rounds. 'I don't need to play my best to win matches because my base level is high,' said Draper. 'If I play point by point at that level, it's tough for guys to beat me. 'Especially if they're up and down, like Monfils or Bublik. They're gonna play some great tennis and they could beat me for sure, but I know it's going to be very tough (for them) because I'm always going to be at that level.' Sentiments of which Rafa would be proud.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
It's time to put renewed emphasis on life skills for our young people
Worse, the same report suggests that the prospect of securing a good job is just as dependent now as it was 20 years ago on who you know, rather than what you know. Perhaps most worrying, the report suggests that in a world where the nature of work is changing very rapidly, young people are being prepared by the education system for a career in traditional professions which might not even exist in the very near future, so significant is going to be the impact of AI. You could dismiss the report, except for the fact that it comes from a source as authoritative as the OECD. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is a Paris-based think tank that is, admittedly, dominated by the world's richest countries, but it is also noted for producing the best comparison statistics on education in the world. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM – poll In fact, the report is so persuasive because what the researchers did was compare current world data with data from 20 years ago, when they first undertook work of this sort, and they would appear to be shocked to find that so little has changed. I am not surprised by this. If anyone had told me when I was at university, in the 1970s, that I would be making most of my income as a social media content creator, I would have been bemused by the suggestion. No-one had heard of the internet, or YouTube, or electronic recording data of the type we now use. Nor did any of the technology we use to consume social media exist back then. I make the point for a good reason. If my own career has changed this radically, and the rate of change in the nature of work is increasing and things are changing more often, what is it that we should now be training young people so that they have skills that may support them for decades, rather than a year or two at most after they leave either school or university? I have had six university appointments over the past 28 years and I appreciate the value of an academic education. But what I also realise is that this type of education, which dominates Highers and university courses, does not suit most people. In fact, in many disciplines, unless you want to be an academic, it is not much use at all. That is most especially true as far too many courses do not encourage much critical thinking at undergraduate level. All that means I am not surprised by what the OECD has found. I know that there might be exceptions to my comments in the case of some applied disciplines, such as medicine or veterinary science, and some engineering courses, but even then, these subjects exist in a real-world context once the person studying them has left university. To ignore this fact when they are training is quite ridiculous. So, what do I suggest we should do? I think the time has come for the unnecessary focus on academic disciplines in education to go. If the tiny minority who want to pursue a career in that area need concentrated training, that is for postgraduate education, above all else. At the level of Highers, in particular, the focus has to be very heavily on life skills. Of course, two or three more specialist subjects should be taken, but as important as these might be, so are essential and transferable life skills to ensure that people have the opportunity to change careers as time develops, as will inevitably happen to almost everyone now. So, what skills do I think are required? Try this list, which are things that matter to me now as an employer (which I am): Effective written communication Effective verbal communication Applied numeracy, including how to construct business-oriented spreadsheets Basic bookkeeping, accounting and budgeting An outline of the tax system Website creation and management The essentials of marketing Time management Basic employment law and contract law There is no job that exists for anyone over the age of 21 that does not require most skills, and most young people arrive in employment missing many of them. If, however, young people arrived with them, it would then be relatively easy for employers to provide more vocational training after the age of 21, using apprenticeship schemes if appropriate. Even those schemes are, however, at present, being hindered by a lack of these basic essentials, even among graduates. My suggestion is that at least 40% of the required undergraduate courses should also be cut on these issues. The result would be degrees that might be useful, and more fun to study, which is an issue that really matters to me when I know that so many students do not get very excited by their undergraduate university courses at present. Scotland could make these changes. Everyone would be a winner.
