Claudine Bouchard named new CEO of Hydro-Quebec
Bouchard, who started working at Hydro-Quebec more than 25 years ago in the call centre, replaces Michael Sabia, who is stepping down from the role to lead Prime Minister Mark Carney's Privy Council Office in Ottawa. Sabia had only been the Quebec Crown corporation's head boss since 2023.
A Hydro-Quebec veteran, Bouchard has been the executive vice-president and Chief Operating and Infrastructure Officer since 2023 and oversees the Société d'énergie de la Baie James, a subsidiary that offers services in generation and transmission plant engineering, project management and construction.
She takes on her new role as CEO on July 5 after the board of directors recommended her as Sabia's successor.
In a press release, the provincial government described her as a 'visionary and strategic leader' who helped steer the modernization of the power utility for several years. Economy Minister Christine Frechette welcomed the news, highlighting how she helped spearhead a plan that led to a reduction of power outages by 50 per cent last year.
Je suis très fière d'annoncer la nomination de Mme Claudine Bouchard à titre de présidente-directrice générale d'@hydroquebec.
Mme Bouchard a débuté son parcours chez Hydro-Québec il y a 25 ans. Arrivée comme guide au départ, elle a contribué au fil des ans à de nombreux projets… — Christine Fréchette (@CFrechette) July 2, 2025
Citing new wind power projects throughout Quebec and the 'historic' energy agreement with Newfoundland and Labrador, Premier François Legault said Hydro-Quebec needs 'strong leadership that is capable of delivering results.'
'Claudine Bouchard knows the Crown corporation very well. She has demonstrated that she knows how to get things done, bring teams together and lead concrete transformations. I am convinced that she has everything it takes to lead Hydro-Québec in this new phase of its development,' Legault said in a statement.
Bouchard also said she was 'honoured' to be appointed.
'It is a great privilege to lead this company, which has had such a profound impact on Quebec's history and will play a key role in its development in the coming decades,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
This advisor has seen attitudes toward sales and planning change in her 48 years in the industry
In the Behind the Advice series, Globe Advisor asks advisors about their relationship with money from a young age, lessons learned over the years and how their experiences influence the advice they give to clients. We've also launched a Behind the Advice podcast – find all the episodes here. Audrey Chiang, an advisor and president with Audrey Chiang Insurance Services Inc. at Sun Life Financial Investment Services (Canada) Inc. in Toronto, talks about growing up in Hong Kong before moving to Canada to study, losing money in the dot-com meltdown, and changes she's seen in her 48 years as an advisor: Describe your upbringing. I was born in the 1950s in Hong Kong, the youngest of seven children. My father was a businessman; he passed away many years ago. My mother, who is still alive – she just turned 104 – was a housewife. My parents were very careful in running the household expenses. My mother gave us a new wardrobe once a year, only during the Chinese New Year. They taught us not to spend money unnecessarily and encouraged us to study hard and get a good education if we wanted to become successful one day. Two of my older siblings came to Canada for university. I was lucky that my parents also allowed me to study abroad. I came to Canada when I was a teenager. I finished my high school education in Saskatchewan and studied economics at McMaster University in Hamilton. Describe your first money lesson. When I moved to Canada, my parents gave me $3,000 as spending money, which was a lot in the early 1970s. (They covered my school and housing costs.) It was the first time I had been given such a large amount of money. I spent very little of it. I worked during the summer as a chambermaid at a hotel, earning $2.75 an hour. I saved as much of that money as I could. Once I went to university, I applied for student loans and worked part-time to support my living expenses. I was very careful not to spend money unnecessarily, which is something I continue to do today. I save money first before I spend. I only buy what I can afford. What did you want to be when you grew up, and how did you get into financial services? Growing up, I wanted to become a banker. I was inspired by my father, who was a successful businessman. My parents were also into buying stocks and real estate in Hong Kong. After getting my university degree, I applied for jobs in the banking and insurance sectors. I picked the insurance business because the recruiter told me that I could be my own boss and earn a higher income helping clients with their health and wealth protection needs. What decision around money and investing made the greatest impact on your life? I am always looking for growth opportunities. My husband and I have moved our family four times in the past 40 years, switching from smaller to larger homes and taking advantage of no tax on the sale of principal residences. We also invest in stocks and mutual funds. It's also something we teach our three children to do. What is the biggest money mistake you've made, and what did you learn from it? My husband and I didn't have experience in the stock market and lost money in the dot-com bubble in 2001. After that, we learned not to invest heavily in a single sector. Diversification is the most effective strategy for investing. Also, be disciplined. Don't chase high returns. Don't be greedy. What do you worry about when it comes to money, both personally and in the industry? I worry about losing my own money and that of my clients. I will evaluate the risk before investing and always put my clients' needs at the centre, including their goals, needs, lifestyle considerations and potential risks. How long have you been an advisor, and what have been some of the major changes you've seen in your career to date? I just celebrated my 48th anniversary of being an advisor. When I started in my 20s, it was more about selling products than financial planning. Today, people have more assets and wealth, and therefore require more comprehensive planning strategies. Technology has also changed a lot. There's a lot of great software that helps us with planning strategies. There's also AI software that helps advisors streamline our work, which means we can spend more time helping clients directly. What advice do you have for someone who wants to enter your business? It's a lucrative business being an insurance and investment advisor. You have to enjoy what you're doing in the business. You have to prepare to work long hours. You need to continue your education to give valuable advice to the clients. It's not about making a sale. You need to be honest and provide continuous service to the clients. This interview has been edited and condensed.
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
If You Buy Amazon Stock With $50,000 Today, Will You Be a Millionaire in a Decade?
Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) stock returned 910% during the last decade, growing at a pace that would have turned $50,000 into more than $500,000. Wall Street remains overwhelmingly bullish on the company. Among 71 analysts, 97% have a buy rating on the stock, and the median 12-month target price of $240 per share implies 9% upside from its current share price of $220. Can Amazon stock turn $50,000 into $1 million in the next 10 years? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Amazon is a major player in three growing markets Amazon has a strong position in three large industries -- e-commerce, digital advertising, and cloud computing. The company is also leaning on artificial intelligence (AI) across all three business units to accelerate revenue growth and widen profit margins, as detailed below: E-commerce: Amazon runs the largest e-commerce marketplace in the world, in terms of revenue, and the most popular, in terms of traffic. Even more impressive, the company is still gaining share. Amazon has built more than 1,000 generative AI applications to make its retail business more efficient, including tools to improve inventory placement, demand forecasting, and developer productivity. It's also using generative AI to let human workers engage warehouse robots in natural language. Digital advertising: Amazon has as a distinct advantage in advertising not only because it draws so many shoppers to its marketplace, but also because it has troves of consumer data to target advertising. That advantage has helped it become the third-largest ad tech company in the world. Amazon has added AI tools that help brands plan and optimize ad campaigns, as well as generative AI tools that let brands create images and videos. Cloud computing: Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the largest public cloud platform in terms of infrastructure and platform spending. That means the company is already well-positioned to monetize demand for AI infrastructure, but AWS has further cemented its status as a go-to cloud services provider by designing custom chips for AI training and inference. The company says those chips deliver better price performance than leading graphics processing units (GPUs). Through 2030, retail e-commerce sales are forecast to increase at 11% annually, ad tech spending is projected to increase at 14% annually, and cloud computing sales are expected to increase at 20.4% annually, according to Grand View Research. That means Amazon can achieve double-digit annual revenue growth through the end of the decade if it merely maintains its market share in those industries. Amazon stock is unlikely to turn $50,000 into $1 million in the next decade Amazon would have to increase 20 times in value (i.e., a 1,900% return) to turn $50,000 into $1 million. That is theoretically possible over a decade, but such performance is exceedingly rare. Only five companies in the S&P 500 achieved 20-fold returns during the last 10 years, as listed below: I doubt Amazon shares will advance 1,900% over the next decade. It's already a $2.3 trillion company, and multiplying its current market capitalization by 20 would bring its valuation to $46 trillion. That's nearly what the entire S&P 500 is worth today. It seems unlikely Amazon alone will be worth that much in 10 years. However, the stock is still a smart long-term investment. Why Amazon stock is a buy at its current price Some Wall Street analysts have lowered their forward earnings forecasts based on the idea that tariffs will hurt sales or margins. The consensus currently says Amazon's adjusted earnings will increase at 10% annually through 2026. That makes the current valuation of 36 times earnings look expensive, but I think Wall Street is too pessimistic. Amazon beat the consensus by an average of 22% over the last six quarters, and I think the company will continue to top expectations due to its strength in three growing markets and its capacity for innovation in adjacent areas. For instance, Amazon is reportedly preparing to test humanoid robots for package delivery, and its autonomous driving subsidiary Zoox is set to launch robotaxis in at least one U.S. city this year. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $697,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $939,655!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,045% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to178%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Amazon, Axon Enterprise, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Axon Enterprise, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Fair Isaac. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
New supply management law won't save the system from Trump, experts say
OTTAWA – A new law meant to protect supply management might not be enough to shield the system in trade talks with a Trump administration bent on eliminating it, trade experts say. 'It's certainly more difficult to strike a deal with the United States now with the passage of this bill that basically forces Canada to negotiate with one hand tied behind its back,' said William Pellerin, a trade lawyer and partner at the firm McMillan LLP. 'Now that we've removed the digital service tax, dairy and supply management is probably the number 1 trade irritant that we have with the United States. That remains very much unresolved.' When Trump briefly paused trade talks with Canada on June 27 over the digital services tax — shortly before Ottawa capitulated by dropping the tax — he zeroed in on Canada's system of supply management. In a social media post, Trump called Canada a 'very difficult country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products.' Canada can charge about 250 per cent tariffs on U.S. dairy imports over a set quota established by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement. The International Dairy Foods Association, which represents the U.S. dairy industry, said in March the U.S. has never come close to reaching those quotas, though the association also said that's because of other barriers Canada has erected. When Bill C-202 passed through Parliament last month, Bloc Québécois MPs hailed it as a clear win protecting Quebec farmers from American trade demands. The Bloc's bill, which received royal assent on June 26, prevents the foreign affairs minister from making commitments in trade negotiations to either increase the tariff rate quota or reduce tariffs for imports over a set threshold. On its face, that rule would prevent Canadian trade negotiators from offering to drop the import barriers that shield dairy and egg producers in Canada from price shocks. But while the law appears to rule out using supply management as a bargaining chip in trade talks with the U.S., it doesn't completely constrain the government. Pellerin said that if Prime Minister Mark Carney is seeking a way around C-202, he might start by looking into conducting the trade talks personally, instead of leaving them to Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand. Carney dismissed the need for the new law during the recent election but vowed to keep supply management off the table in negotiations with the U.S. Pellerin said the government could also address the trade irritant by expanding the number of players who can access dairy quotas beyond 'processors.' '(C-202) doesn't expressly talk about changing or modifying who would be able to access the quota,' he said. Expanding access to quota, he said, would likely 'lead to companies like grocery stores being able to import U.S. cheeses, and that would probably please the United States to a significant degree.' Carleton University associate professor Philippe Lagassé, an expert on Parliament and the Crown, said the new law doesn't extend past something called the 'royal prerogative' — the ability of the executive branch of government to carry out certain actions in, for example, the conduct of foreign affairs. That suggests the government isn't constrained by the law, he said. 'I have doubts that the royal prerogative has been displaced by the law. There is no specific language binding the Crown and it would appear to run contrary to the wider intent of the (law that it modifies),' he said by email. 'That said, if the government believes that the law is binding, then it effectively is. As defenders of the bill insisted, it gives the government leverage in negotiation by giving the impression that Parliament has bound it on this issue.' He said a trade treaty requires enabling legislation, so a new bill could remove the supply management constraints. 'The bill adds an extra step and some constraints, but doesn't prevent supply management from eventually being removed or weakened,' he said. Trade lawyer Mark Warner, principal at MAAW Law, said Canada could simply dispense with the law through Parliament if it decides it needs to make concessions to, for example, preserve the auto industry. 'The argument for me that the government of Canada sits down with another country, particularly the United States, and says we can't negotiate that because Parliament has passed a bill — I have to tell you, I've never met an American trade official or lawyer who would take that seriously,' Warner said. 'My sense of this is it would just go through Parliament, unless you think other opposition parties would bring down the government over it.' While supply management has long been a target for U.S. trade negotiators, the idea of killing it has been a non-starter in Canadian politics for at least as long. Warner said any attempt to do away with it would be swiftly met with litigation, Charter challenges and provinces stepping up to fill a federal void. 'The real cost of that sort of thing is political, so if you try to take it away, people are screaming and they're blocking the highways and they are calling you names and the Bloc is blocking anything through Parliament — you pay a cost that way,' he said. But a compromise on supply management might not be that far-fetched. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'The system itself won't be dismantled. I don't think that's anywhere near happening in the coming years and even decades,' said Pellerin. 'But I think that there are changes that could be made, particularly through the trade agreements, including by way of kind of further quotas. Further reduction in the tariffs for outside quota amounts and also in terms of who can actually bring in product.' The United States trade representative raised specific concerns about supply management in the spring, citing quota rules established under the CUSMA trade pact that are not being applied as the U.S. expected and ongoing frustration with the pricing of certain types of milk products. Former Canadian diplomat Louise Blais said that if Canada were to 'respect the spirit' of CUSMA as the Americans understand it, the problem might actually solve itself. 'We jump to the conclusion that it's dismantlement or nothing else, but in fact there's a middle ground,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 3, 2025.
