logo
Lawsuit filed over Philadelphia's plan to expand bike lane infrastructure on Pine and Spruce streets

Lawsuit filed over Philadelphia's plan to expand bike lane infrastructure on Pine and Spruce streets

CBS Newsa day ago

A legal battle is unfolding in Center City as residents of Pine and Spruce streets push back against the city's latest efforts to bolster bike lane safety.
A newly filed lawsuit seeks to block the Philadelphia Streets Department from installing neighborhood loading zones and future concrete barriers adjacent to protected bike lanes.
The complaint, submitted Monday by attorney George Bochetto on behalf of the advocacy group Friends of Pine and Spruce, argues that the city overstepped its authority.
"The administration by regulation is now trying to overrule City Council and completely reconfigure what happens on those two streets," said Bochetto. "And it's gonna create a disaster."
"It's going to create congestion, there are gonna be emergency vehicles that are not going to be able to get through," Bochetto continued.
The lawsuit claims the Streets Department acted beyond the scope of existing ordinances by implementing new loading zones through regulation, without formal changes to city law.
The defendants named in the suit include the Philadelphia Streets Department and the city's Office of Infrastructure and Transportation Systems.
City officials said the loading zones are essential to support a recently enacted law banning vehicles from stopping in bike lanes, a move driven by safety concerns.
Advocates argue that the new zones are a common-sense solution to reduce conflicts between parked vehicles and cyclists, especially on high-traffic corridors like Pine and Spruce streets.
Tensions around the bike lanes are not new. The roots of the conflict date back to 2009, when protected lanes were first introduced. An agreement under then-Mayor Michael Nutter allowed residents to stop briefly in the bike lanes for loading and unloading.
Enforcement has been an issue and has left cyclists vulnerable, as cars routinely block the lanes. Currently, the bike lanes are protected only by flexible plastic posts.
In July 2024, an alleged drunk driver swerved into the Spruce Street bike lane and killed a pediatric oncologist. The accident galvanized support for stronger bike lane protections and led to the city's no-stopping law.
Still, not all residents are on board. Some said the planned barriers and reconfiguration of the streets could worsen congestion and impede emergency vehicles. Longtime Spruce Street resident Ollie Chernihivski expressed concern over reduced lane access for deliveries and services.
"There's a problem, there's only two lanes here," said Chernihivski. "If we lose one lane, any delivery or anything that happens on the street becomes impossible."
On the other side, advocates like Jacob Russell with Philly Bike Action said the city is simply giving cyclists the same safety infrastructure already afforded to pedestrians.
"We already protect people who walk with concrete curbs. Bicycles should get the same level of protection," Russell said.
The city tells CBS Philadelphia that the lawsuit is currently under review.
The Office of Transportation and Infrastructure Systems announced that the city and the Philadelphia Parking Authority will start the first phase of the Spruce and Pine Bike Lane safety Upgrades project Thursday, and that stage will last at least two weeks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Immigrants at ICE check-ins detained, then held in basement of federal building in Los Angeles, some overnight
Immigrants at ICE check-ins detained, then held in basement of federal building in Los Angeles, some overnight

CBS News

time42 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Immigrants at ICE check-ins detained, then held in basement of federal building in Los Angeles, some overnight

Many undocumented immigrants who went to their Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) check-in appointments at a federal building in Los Angeles this week were taken into custody and brought to the basement and held there, some overnight, according to immigration lawyers and family members. It was unclear how many people were affected, but the attorneys told CBS News hundreds of immigrants were detained – dozens in the basement in rooms that could fit up to 30 at a time. CBS News reached out to the representatives of ICE and the Department of Homeland Security for comment. One attorney, Lizbeth Mateo, said ICE officials slated several of her clients for check-ins at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in downtown L.A. but when they showed up on Tuesday, they were detained and immediately escorted to the basement. Mateo said a couple and their two children, one of whom is a U.S. citizen, spent the night in a room with no beds and limited access to food and water. Mateo said the father had previously been issued a stay of removal, barring him from deportation but he and his family were detained anyway. His wife was released Wednesday evening along with their children since she needed medical attention due to a high-risk pregnancy. He was still being detained early Friday, Mateo said. "This is something I've never seen before," she added. "Under the first Trump administration, I represented clients with very difficult cases, but never anything like this. Under any other circumstance, he would have been released." On Thursday evening, CBS News spoke to people waiting outside the building who claimed they had relatives in the basement who were texting them. "We are telling them that we are waiting for them outside and to remain calm," a woman using the name Maria to protect her identity told CBS News. "We just want to make sure their children, my nieces, have food." Maria said her brother was in the basement along with his wife and their two children – they'd been scheduled for an ICE check-in on Thursday morning. Their asylum requests had previously been denied in court. The family was apparently still being held early Friday. Immigration lawyers said it was also unclear why people were being held in that basement. "They're having to literally house these immigrants in a makeshift detention center, which on its face is illegal," said Juan Proaño, Chief Executive Officer of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). "It is beyond inhumane treatment for any immigrant and in this particular case, you're talking about families." CBS News obtained internal government data showing arrests by ICE during President Trump's second term topped 100,000 this week, as federal agents intensified efforts to detain unauthorized immigrants in courthouses, worksites and communities across the U.S. ICE recorded more than 2,000 arrests on Tuesday and again on Wednesday, a dramatic increase from the daily average of 660 arrests reported by the agency during Mr. Trump's first 100 days back at the White House, the federal statistics show. During former President Joe Biden's last year in office, ICE averaged roughly 300 daily arrests, according to agency data. The latest numbers show ICE is getting closer to meeting the demands of top administration officials like White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, an immigration hardliner who has forcefully pushed the agency to make "a minimum" of 3,000 arrests each day. "The Trump administration, DHS, ICE have gotten way ahead of themselves. They haven't necessarily planned this properly and don't have the capacity required in order to continue with these large-scale deportations," Proaño asserted. contributed to this report.

New Yorkers Can't Remove Mayors for Misconduct. That Could Change Soon.
New Yorkers Can't Remove Mayors for Misconduct. That Could Change Soon.

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

New Yorkers Can't Remove Mayors for Misconduct. That Could Change Soon.

After Mayor Eric Adams of New York City was indicted last year on federal corruption charges, he faced steady calls for his resignation or removal. He did not resign. And Gov. Kathy Hochul, the only person in New York empowered to force a mayor to leave office, declined to begin removal proceedings. Now a group of city officials want to create another legal option to kick a mayor out of office. A Charter Revision Commission, created last year by the City Council, will recommend on Friday that voters be presented with a ballot question to decide whether the Council should be granted the power to begin removal proceedings. Danielle Castaldi-Micca, the panel's executive director, said in an interview that the city had a 'pretty traumatic year' and there was 'frustration among the public about the existing means of removing the mayor.' 'There isn't a means of local control over this,' she said. 'What we're looking at is creating a means of local control, and there is a high bar because there should be a high bar.' She said the process would only be used in 'extraordinary circumstances' when a mayor had been accused of wrongdoing. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

A Professor Was Fired for Her Politics. Is That the Future of Academia?
A Professor Was Fired for Her Politics. Is That the Future of Academia?

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

A Professor Was Fired for Her Politics. Is That the Future of Academia?

In January 2024, Maura Finkelstein finished teaching her first classes of the semester, unaware they would be her last as a professor. This was on a Wednesday at Muhlenberg College, a campus stippled with red doors meant to represent both hospitality and the college's Lutheran roots. As Finkelstein prepared to go home, she noticed a text from someone claiming to be the college's provost, Laura Furge. 'I had just done the online phishing training,' she told me later. 'And I was like, 'I know that if the provost texts me on an unknown number, it's spam.'' She deleted and blocked the message. Then she checked her email. There was a message from the provost there as well. 'So, I unblocked her number and called her,' she said. Furge told Finkelstein that the Department of Education had opened an investigation into Muhlenberg for potential civil rights violations. The college had yet to receive the underlying complaint, but they knew a professor had been named, and campus administrators assumed that professor was Finkelstein. It made sense. For months, students, alumni and strangers had been complaining about Finkelstein. They started a petition the previous fall, demanding that she be fired for 'dangerous pro-Hamas rhetoric' and 'blatant classroom bias against Jewish students.' As evidence, the petition, and its 8,000 signers, had offered up screenshots of Finkelstein's posts: a photo of her, on Oct. 12, in a kaffiyeh, a kaffiyeh-patterned face mask and a tank top that read 'Anti-Zionist Vibes Only,' below which she had written 'Free Gaza, free Palestine, stop the ongoing genocide by the Israeli and American war machines.' In another, on Oct. 26, she wrote, 'ISRAEL DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND ITS OCCUPATION.' Furge didn't have many details to share with Finkelstein. 'She was like, 'I wanted you to know so you didn't hear it from the press first,'' Finkelstein recalled. 'And — this is so me — I was like, 'Laura, I am always trying to help the college have different experiences.'' Furge, Finkelstein said, 'didn't really laugh.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store