Bluetongue restrictions 'disatrous' for Powys faming says MS
Farmers on the English border in Powys are facing a huge shock in proposed disease restrictions that have been described as 'disastrous'.
Plans to ban the movement of sheep and cattle from England into Wales unless they have been tested for Bluetongue have been branded as 'baffling' and 'impractical'.
The change will come into place on July 1 and will restrict the movement of sheep and cattle across the border unless they have a test which can cost anywhere between £40 to £70 per animal, even if they have been vaccinated.
This comes as England is moved into being a restricted zone as the disease which is spread by infected midges, continues to be found in different locations in England.
Montgomeryshire MS, Russell George warned of a looming economic crisis and would cause millions of pounds in losses to the rural economy and severely disrupt vital cross-border livestock trade.
'The policy will have huge implications for cross-border trade and will ripple through the entire supply chain," said Mr George..
'Farmers are anxious and worried about their livelihoods. They're concerned about not being able to source stock, including breeding stock."
Fellow Powys MS James Evans said farmers now face 'sky high testing fees, red tape, and chaos'.
'No common sense has been applied whatsoever,' said Mr Evans. 'What it does show is a real disconnect and a real lack of understanding from the government of how livestock movements and livestock sales will actually work.
'The impact on cross border trade is also going to be significant, having a two-tiered system when buying livestock in terms of prices and hitting our breeding sales across the country.'
Help support trusted local news
Sign up for a digital subscription now: www.countytimes.co.uk/subscribe
As a digital subscriber you will get
Unlimited access to the County Times website
Advert-light access
Reader rewards
Full access to our app
Former leader of the Welsh Conservatives, Andrew RT Davies said the move 'puts the livestock industry here in Wales on the altar of stupidity' adding that 'this makes no sense whatsoever".
Meanwhile, calls have been made in Powys County Council to put pressure on the Welsh Government to change course.
Reform Cllr Geoff Morgan and independent Cllr Ed Jones have submitted a motion to call on the council to write to the Welsh Government Minister for Rural Affairs Huw Irranca-Davies 'urging an urgent review of the current Bluetongue movement restrictions".
This would request that the Minister give 'a formal update on any plans to facilitate testing, vaccine rollout, and compensation for affected livestock holders in Powys'.
'Farmers across Powys, especially those with land on both sides of the border, are being severely impacted by arbitrary rules that prevent them from moving livestock between fields on the same farm — while livestock can still legally travel the length of England from Cornwall to Cumbria,' said Cllr Morgan.
'Many of Powys County Council's own Farms Estate tenants are among those affected, so this is a matter directly linked to council business.'
Mr Irranca Davies told the Senedd that he had come to the decision after "meeting with senior representatives of the livestock and veterinary sectors on June 5."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
The Senedd passes a ban on plastic wet wipes
From December 18, 2026, it will be an offence in Wales to supply – or offer to supply – wet wipes containing plastic after the Senedd unanimously agreed regulations. Huw Irranca-Davies, deputy first minister of Wales, said: 'There should be no place for wet wipes amongst the pebbles and the sand and the seaweed on our beautiful Welsh coastline. Mr Irranca-Davies, whose responsibilities include the environment, said a survey found 22 per cent of people admitted to having flushed wet wipes into the sewerage system. He warned a large volume of wet wipes – which often contain harmful plastic – enter the natural environment due to inappropriate disposal. He stressed an exemption will be in place if they are designed or manufactured for care and treatment because some people rely on medical-grade wet wipes that contain plastic. He explained that the regulations, which were passed by Senedd members on June 17, add plastic wet wipes to a 2023 law prohibiting a list of single-use plastic products. Mr Irranca-Davies said: 'This pollution, as we all know, is visible, its impact is tangible, and it's long-lasting. Taking decisive action will encourage manufacturers, retailers and consumers of the need to continue our shift towards reusable and non-plastic products.' He told Senedd members the ban will not extend to business-to-business supply, only covering supply to consumers as with other single-use plastics. 'Wet wipes for specific industrial use, where plastic-free alternatives are unsuitable or do not exist, are not included,' he said. 'But we will encourage these sectors to innovate.' The UK-turned-Welsh minister told the Senedd banning single use products is part of an ongoing drive to reduce the damage caused by microplastic pollution. The Conservatives' Janet Finch-Saunders said: 'It's not often that I say this but thank you very, very much… for bringing forward your statement today and indeed this ban.' Mr Irranca-Davies said the 18-month transition period will allow manufacturers time to adapt their business as he welcomed the cross-party support for the ban.
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Welfare reform marks moment of compassion, says Kendall amid backbench anger
Liz Kendall's words come amid a backlash from some Labour MPs who have criticised the 'awful' cuts to welfare – which the Government hopes can save up to £5 billion a year. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation – known as the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. Food bank network Trussell said: 'The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. 'The reality of this Bill is still record cuts in support for disabled people, and the biggest cuts to social security since 2015.' Contrary to Ms Kendall's words, learning disability charity Mencap accused the Government of having 'confirmed the choice to turn its back on thousands of disabled people and by pushing ahead with these welfare reforms, they are causing a huge amount of anxiety'. Ms Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question asked as to what the next date for debate will be, Labour backbencher and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell could be heard to say 'Never'. A date has not yet been confirmed. I'll vote against these awful welfare reforms. A Labour government should lift people out of poverty, not put people into it. If you agree, then please write to your MP and tell them that. — Brian Leishman (@BrianLeishmanMP) June 17, 2025 Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation think tank said the longer period of protection for those affected by Pip cuts is 'a sensible tweak that should ease the blow for those who are no longer eligible for support'. But she criticised extra funding for employment support not coming fully into effect until 2029 at the earliest, saying: 'While ministers have softened the stick of welfare cuts, they have not strengthened the carrot of greater employment support.' Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told Good Morning Britain, saying 'those that need to be protected should be protected'. 'If you need help in support to get into work, the Government should be providing that support and help to get into work,' he said. 'If you do have conditions, disabilities that mean it is impossible for you to work, then you need to be properly protected and supported.' Ms Kendall said her 'door was always open' to colleagues but that the Government is 'firm in our convictions' over the changes. 'I'm a reasonable person who wants to talk to my colleagues,' she told BBC Radio 4's PM programme, adding that she will 'always listen' but that 'we are firm in our convictions of the case for reform and confident in the plans that we have put forward'. The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. (PA Graphics) The figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year. The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall leaves Downing Street after a Cabinet meeting (Stefan Rousseau/PA) An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction, confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Welsh Government urged to invest in apprenticeships
The call comes in response to chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement of £1.2 billion in annual funding for training and apprenticeships for over a million young people in England. The National Training Federation for Wales (NTFW) wants a similar commitment from the Welsh Government, which is set to receive £23 billion from the UK Government. Data from Medr, the regulator and funder of tertiary education and research in Wales, indicates that 1,880 fewer learners started apprenticeships in Wales between last August and January. The NTFW has consistently raised concerns about the potential impact of not replacing European funding for apprenticeships post-Brexit. Some sectors have been hit harder than others, with construction seeing a 26 per cent decline and health and social care experiencing a 10.5 per cent reduction in apprenticeship starts. Despite funding cuts, Wales has one of the UK's most successful apprenticeship programmes, with a completion rate of 74 per cent, outperforming England (61 per cent) and Northern Ireland (62 per cent). According to the Centre for Economics and Business Research, doubling investment in apprenticeships over the next Senedd term could generate an additional £3.4 billion in lifetime earnings for people in Wales over the next 30 years. The NTFW's call for more investment follows a meeting with Jack Sargent, the Wales minister for culture, skills, and social partnership. Lisa Mytton, NTFW's strategic director, said: "The Welsh Government could achieve crucial economic, health, and education priorities by investing more in apprenticeships and replacing lost European funding. 'Greater investment will create pathways for people of all backgrounds, whether starting their careers or reskilling for new opportunities, to thrive in industries essential to Wales' long-term prosperity."
