Welsh Government urged to invest in apprenticeships
The call comes in response to chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement of £1.2 billion in annual funding for training and apprenticeships for over a million young people in England.
The National Training Federation for Wales (NTFW) wants a similar commitment from the Welsh Government, which is set to receive £23 billion from the UK Government.
Data from Medr, the regulator and funder of tertiary education and research in Wales, indicates that 1,880 fewer learners started apprenticeships in Wales between last August and January.
The NTFW has consistently raised concerns about the potential impact of not replacing European funding for apprenticeships post-Brexit.
Some sectors have been hit harder than others, with construction seeing a 26 per cent decline and health and social care experiencing a 10.5 per cent reduction in apprenticeship starts.
Despite funding cuts, Wales has one of the UK's most successful apprenticeship programmes, with a completion rate of 74 per cent, outperforming England (61 per cent) and Northern Ireland (62 per cent).
According to the Centre for Economics and Business Research, doubling investment in apprenticeships over the next Senedd term could generate an additional £3.4 billion in lifetime earnings for people in Wales over the next 30 years.
The NTFW's call for more investment follows a meeting with Jack Sargent, the Wales minister for culture, skills, and social partnership.
Lisa Mytton, NTFW's strategic director, said: "The Welsh Government could achieve crucial economic, health, and education priorities by investing more in apprenticeships and replacing lost European funding.
'Greater investment will create pathways for people of all backgrounds, whether starting their careers or reskilling for new opportunities, to thrive in industries essential to Wales' long-term prosperity."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
You're wasting your breath Mr Swinney: who needs another conversation?
Independence activists are right to be worried. There's no economic plan. The White Paper is long forgotten, the Growth Commission dumped, and nothing credible has taken their place. Meanwhile, they rage at Brexit for damaging 17% of Scottish trade, while pushing for separation from the UK, which accounts for over 60%. The hypocrisy would be comic if the consequences weren't so serious. And then there was the toxic alliance with the Scottish Greens, a partnership that's alienated voters and dragged the Government into the mire of money-losing projects and culture wars. No wonder turnout among independence supporters is collapsing. People have switched off. The truth is, the movement is exhausted. The SNP has run out of ideas, out of talent, and – soon – out of time. Even its most loyal backers are beginning to see it. Scotland doesn't need another 'conversation'. It needs a government focused on real priorities, not constitutional daydreams. Voters are waking up to that and not bothering to vote and those who do are switching to Reform and Labour. It's time for Mr Swinney to find his slippers and put his feet up before he is unceremoniously shown the door. Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. Pretence from the First Minister Presenting you and your party as an attractive proposition after 18 years of questionable performance in power is no easy feat. What you most need is some standout out successes that stick in the public consciousness ('Bid to oust Swinney just self-indulgent rubbish, says ex-MP', The Herald, June 18). Yet for the SNP's own core supporters as well as undecided voters and those committed to countering nationalist rhetoric, what stands out most about the SNP's time in power are largely the negatives. Missing the targets they set for themselves in healthcare, education and the environment. Wasting huge amounts of public funds on mismanaged forays into running businesses. Failing to make meaningful progress in critical areas of concern from drug deaths to the attainment gap in education. Read more letters As for independence, John Swinney chose to return to it at the Scotland 2050 conference as his preferred go-to solution for all that is wrong in Scotland. Otherwise, he would be left with having to try to defend the indefensible, namely the SNP's numerous mistakes and missteps in over 18 years of trying to run Scotland. In his two keynote speeches over the last couple of days John Swinney has effectively asked the people of Scotland to join him in pretending that the SNP is not the main problem, but rather that he and his government are going to start doing things so much better in the future and that in any case most problems would be eased if only we would turn our backs on our fellow UK citizens. The difficulties encountered in leaving the EU have provided an abject lesson of how problematic it can be to achieve the many claims of those promoting walking away from a union. Leaving the much deeper and longer-standing interdependence within the UK holds greater risks and challenges. John Swinney hopes we do not think too much about all of that and instead join him in his comforting pretence. Keith Howell, West Linton. • After the 2024 General Election, in which the SNP lost heavily, Stephen Flynn said: 'It's a time for reflection, it's a time to listen'. John Swinney said 'the party failed to convince people". But lo and behold, less than a year after this defeat they are now saying 'independence is within reach' and 'we want to be a nation state in our own right'. They obviously haven't reflected very much or listened if they are now churning out the same old mantra on independence again. Jim Robertson, Glasgow. Decolonise Scotland How is Scotland's return to being a sovereign nation to be achieved and its preferences tested? In April Kathleen Nutt stated that a border poll for Ireland would be triggered by opinion polling, quoting a Northern Ireland minister. We know that in Scotland no matter how many seats Scottish pro-independence parties win, that senior (English) politicians have repeatedly proclaimed a referendum would not be granted by them while in office. Why wouldn't polling in Scotland mandate an independence referendum just as it does in that other part of the UK, and would the judiciary agree that Scotland being prohibited amounted to discrimination? Scotland is already at 54% in favour of independence and rising, just as the UK appears to be heading for a period of political chaos and instability. I personally now think a new referendum would not be helpful to anyone, given the constitutionally partisan nature of the vast majority of the media which operates in Scotland: it would engender long-lasting angst and outrage over perceptions about bias and fairness. Perhaps, like many other components of the Empire, Scotland could simply morph into independence if it wanted to, with a reasonable proportion of our citizens in favour. We can also look at the recent argument from distinguished historians in England which claims no union ever took place; 'Scotland' was extinguished and a Greater England was formed (or Scotland was added to the English Empire). So we need to decolonise Scotland. GR Weir, Ochiltree. What planet is CalMac on? Once again I do not know whether I should write to the Editor or the Diary, as you report today that an engineer is being flown in from Norway to fix the ailing MV Caledonian Isles' troublesome gearboxes ("Caledonian Isles return delayed as specialist flies in from Norway", heraldscotland, June 18). He will wonder what planet he has arrived on or perhaps think he has ventured into a working museum. He will return to Norway with lots of stories about overcrowding on CalMac ferries, and that's just the crew. It will be something like the spacemen in Cadbury's Smash advert from the 1970s. "And they take their ferries... and they run them until they rust away... hahahaha... and they fill them with more crew than passengers... hahahahaha... and they build them too big for their harbours... hahahahaha... and they paint windows on them... hahahahaha... and then launch them with wooden funnels... hahahahaha... and they take eight years to build... hahahaha... and they cost £250 million each... hahahahahaha... and they are building electric ferries that can't be charged... hahahaha..." Peter Wright, West Kilbride. The MV Caledonian Isles (Image: Newsquest) How to stop the boats You report that French Police Nationale, apparently tooled up in riot gear, fired tear gas at migrants waiting on sand dunes for small boats to appear ("Tear gas deployed against migrants", The Herald, June 18 ). This is both unpleasant and pointless as these police then simply stand around watching the migrants as they wade waist-deep into the shallows to wait there for a small boat to appear to take them across the Channel. Keir Starmer has said it is the 'duty" of his government to stop the small boats, but these half-hearted procedures by the French will never achieve that. Nor will faffing about trying and failing to 'smash the gangs" through ineffective international cooperation. What the PM is faced with is essentially a matter of supply (the gangs) and demand (the migrants). The solution is to remove the demand and the supply will go also. All Keir Starmer needs to do is to take resolute action here in the UK by legislating that anyone breaking our law by arriving here illegally would be disqualified automatically from staying here. They would be detained securely until deported, presumably back to France. That would send a clear message that attempting to cross the Channel in the small boats would be pointless, removing both demand and supply. Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Scotsman
39 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Labour government reveals talks with SNP ministers over 'trans-inclusive' conversion therapy ban
Ministers at Holyrood and Westminster have held talks over plans to ban conversion therapy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The UK government has held talks with SNP ministers over a 'trans-inclusive' ban on conversion therapy with Labour vowing to press ahead with completely abolishing the practice. The Scottish Government shelved its plans for legislation to outlaw conversion therapy despite previously committing to do so. Instead, First Minister John Swinney said SNP ministers will work alongside Westminster and implement a proposed law for England and Wales in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Trans rights protesters in Edinburgh (Picture: Jeff) The UK government has pledged to bring forward legislation to end conversion practices by the end of the parliament in 2029. Labour ministers are yet to publish a draft Bill on banning conversion practices. Campaigners have called for a full ban to be dropped, claiming that young people could be put at risk of pursuing a medical pathway that will damage their bodies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Calls to drop a full ban have ramped up following the Supreme Court ruling that defined a woman in the Equality Act as referring to a biological woman, despite the ruling explicitly stating the decision was not 'a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another'. Trans people can legally change gender with a gender recognition certificate. Labour Equalities Minister, Nia Griffith, told MPs that 'conversion practices have no place in today's society', adding that the UK government was 'committed to bringing forward trans-inclusive legislation to ban these outdated and abusive acts'. Scottish Liberal Democrat MP Christine Jardine warned her party has 'been concerned' about the lack of draft legislation, but stressed she was 'relieved to hear' the UK government remains committed to a full ban on conversion therapy. Christine Jardine MP She added: 'Given the amount of fear and anxiety that there is among the trans community in this country, can she reassure the House that when the Bill comes forward, it will be UK-wide to overcome the Scottish Government's withdrawal of their proposals?' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dame Nia said that the UK government is 'in talks with officials in the Scottish Parliament' for the legislation to apply across the UK. She added: 'I also assure her that we will be bringing this legislation forward very soon, and that there will be a proper opportunity for that pre-legislative scrutiny, which I know she will want to take part in.' A memorandum of understanding, signed by groups including NHS Scotland and the Royal College of GPs in 2017, agreed that 'the practice of conversion therapy, whether in relation to sexual orientation or gender identity, is unethical and potentially harmful'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dame Nia said: 'Our draft legislation on conversion practices will be trans-inclusive. It is crucial that trans people are safe, included, and protected from harm and discrimination. 'The previous government repeatedly broke their promises to deliver on the issue of conversion practices and allowed the debate to become ever more toxic and divided.' Kaukab Stewart | PA Speaking in Holyrood last month, SNP Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart pointed to an 'intention to work with the United Kingdom government to fully explore legislation that would cover England, Wales and Scotland'.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Assisted dying: All you need to know ahead of the next crunch parliamentary vote
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the Bill and what is happening. – What is in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill? The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has since been amended by a committee (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. – When would assisted dying be available if the Bill became law? Kim Leadbeater is the MP behind the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who is the parliamentarian behind the Bill and put forward the extended timeframe, has insisted it is 'a backstop' rather than a target, as she pledged to 'hold the Government's feet to the fire' on implementing legislation should the Bill pass. The extended implementation period was one of a number of changes made since the Bill was first introduced to the Commons back in October. – What other changes have there been? The High Court safeguard was scrapped during the committee process (Alamy/PA) The High Court safeguard has been dropped and replaced by expert panels – a change much-criticised by opponents who said it weakened the Bill, but something Ms Leadbeater has argued strengthens it. At the end of a weeks-long committee process earlier this year to amend the Bill, Ms Leadbeater said rather than removing judges from the process, 'we are adding the expertise and experience of psychiatrists and social workers to provide extra protections in the areas of assessing mental capacity and detecting coercion while retaining judicial oversight'. Changes were also made to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and to set up a disability advisory board to advise on legal implementation and impact on disabled people. Amendments added earlier this month during report stage in the Commons will also see assisted dying adverts banned if the Bill becomes law, and a prohibition on medics being able to speak with under-18s about assisted dying. – Do we know much more about the potential impact of such a service coming in? A Government impact assessment, published earlier this month, estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. – Do healthcare staff have to take part in assisted dying? Doctors will not have to take part in assisted dying (Lynne Cameron/PA) It was already the case that doctors would not have to take part, but MPs have since voted to insert a new clause into the Bill extending that to anyone. The wording means 'no person', including social care workers and pharmacists, is obliged to take part in assisted dying and can now opt out. Amendments to the Bill were debated on care homes and hospices also being able to opt out but these were not voted on. Ms Leadbeater has previously said there is nothing in the Bill to say they have to, nor is there anything to say they do not have to, adding on the Parliament Matters podcast that this is 'the best position to be in' and that nobody should be 'dictating to hospices what they do and don't do around assisted dying'. – What will happen on Friday? MPs will debate the Bill in the House of Commons (Malcolm Croft/PA) The Bill is back for third reading, which is the first time MPs will vote on the overall piece of legislation since the yes vote in November. It is expected some outstanding amendments might be voted on first thing on Friday before debate on the Bill as a whole begins. MPs voted 330 to 275, majority 55, to approve the Bill at second reading in November. The relatively narrow majority means every vote will count on Friday, to secure the Bill's passage to the House of Lords for further debate and voting. An an example, the Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained. A vote would be expected to take place mid-afternoon. – What about assisted dying in the rest of the UK and Crown Dependencies? The Isle of Man's parliament took its final vote in favour of assisted dying in March (Alamy/PA) The Isle of Man looks likely to become the first part of the British Isles to legalise assisted dying, after its proposed legislation passed through a final vote of the parliament's upper chamber in March. In what was hailed a 'landmark moment', members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) in May voted in favour of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, backing its general principles. It will now go forward for further scrutiny and amendments but will only become law if MSPs approve it in a final vote, which should take place later this year. Any move to legalise assisted dying in Northern Ireland would have to be passed by politicians in the devolved Assembly at Stormont. Jersey's parliament is expected to debate a draft law for an assisted dying service on the island for terminally ill people later this year. With a likely 18-month implementation period if a law is approved, the earliest it could come into effect would be summer 2027.
